切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 92 -96. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2025.02.005

论著

早期浸润性乳腺癌保留乳房患者的腋窝分期研究
张国锋1,(), 徐向升2, 刘蕾3, 张春1, 孔蕾2, 房立柱4   
  1. 1. 102206 北京大学国际医院乳腺外科
    2. 102206 北京大学国际医院放射治疗科
    3. 102206 北京大学国际医院病理科
    4. 102206 北京大学国际医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-17 出版日期:2025-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张国锋

Axilla staging in breast-conserving patients with early invasive breast cancer

Guofeng Zhang1,(), Xiangsheng Xu2, Lei Liu3, Chun Zhang1, Lei Kong2, Lizhu Fang4   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
    2. Department of Radiooncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
    4. Department of Ultrasound, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2023-11-17 Published:2025-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Guofeng Zhang
引用本文:

张国锋, 徐向升, 刘蕾, 张春, 孔蕾, 房立柱. 早期浸润性乳腺癌保留乳房患者的腋窝分期研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 92-96.

Guofeng Zhang, Xiangsheng Xu, Lei Liu, Chun Zhang, Lei Kong, Lizhu Fang. Axilla staging in breast-conserving patients with early invasive breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 92-96.

目的

探讨早期浸润性乳腺癌(cT1-2N0-1M0)保留乳房(简称保乳)患者的腋窝分期策略。

方法

根据纳入及排除标准,纳入2016年1月至2023年9月北京大学国际医院乳腺外科收治的701例早期浸润性乳腺癌(cT1-2N0-1M0)保乳患者进行回顾性研究。对患者腋窝淋巴结(ALN)进行超声评估,cN1患者优选超声引导细针穿刺活组织检查(FNAB);cN0或cN1且FNAB阴性患者,则接受前哨淋巴结活组织检查(SLNB)。如患者SLN有1~2枚转移,则豁免腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND);如患者SLN≥3枚转移,则需接受ALND。cN1且FNAB阳性患者[cN1(f)],则需接受ALND。

结果

701例患者中,539例(76.9%)cN0患者接受SLNB,162例(23.1%)cN1患者接受超声引导FNAB,其中105例(64.8%)患者FNAB阴性并接受后续SLNB,57例(35.2%)患者FNAB阳性并接受ALND。该57例cN1(f)患者ALND术后病理证实,49例(86.0%)患者ALN仅有1~2枚转移,如果优选SLNB,则可以豁免ALND。644例患者(包含539例cN0和105例cN1且FNAB阴性患者)接受SLNB,结果显示519例(80.6%)患者SLN阴性无需后续ALND;113例(17.5%)患者SLN有1~2枚转移,豁免ALND。超声评估cN0-1患者ALN的敏感度仅为47.3%(86/182),误诊率达14.6%(76/519)。

结论

对于早期浸润性乳腺癌保乳患者,超声检查对腋窝分期不敏感。如cT1-2N0-1M0患者腋窝分期全部优选SLNB,既简化了分期流程,又能进一步提高其中cN1(f)患者保留腋窝淋巴结的比率。

Objective

Toexplorethestrategyofaxillarystaginginbreast-conservingpatientswith early invasive breast cancer (cT1-2N0-1M0).

Methods

A-ccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 701 breast-conserving patients with early invasive breast cancer (cT1-2N0-1M0) in the Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital from January 2016 to September 2023 were included for a retrospective study. Ultrasound examination of axillary lymph node (ALN) was performed in 701 patients.Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was performed in cN1 patients. The cN0 patients or cN1 patients with negative results of FNAB underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were exempted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients with ≥3 positive SLNs underwent ALND. cN1 patients with positive results of FNAB [cN1(f)]underwent ALND.

Results

Among these 701 patients (cT1-2N0-1M0), 539 cN0 patients (76.9%) underwent SLNB and 162 cN1 patients (23.1%) underwent ultrasound-guided FNAB. The 105 (64.8%) patients with negative results of FNAB underwent SLNB, and 57 (35.2%) patients with positive results of FNAB underwent ALND.Among these 57 cN1(f) patients, 49 patients (86.0%) had 1-2 positive ALNs confirmed by postoperative pathology and could not have undergone ALND if SLNB was performed preferentially. Totally 644 patients (539 cN0 patients and 105 cN1 patients with negative findings in FNAB) underwent SLNB. The results of SLNB showed that 519 (80.6%) patients with negative SLN did not require subsequent ALND, and 113 (17.5%)patients with 1-2 positive SLNs were exempted from ALND. The sensitivity of ultrasonography in detecting ALNs of cN0-1 patients was 47.3% (86/182), and the misdiagnosis rate was 14.6% (76/519).

Conclusion

The ultrasonography is not sensitive enough for axillary staging in cT1-2N0-1M0 breast cancer patients. SLNB is suggested to be performed preferentially for axillary staging, which can not only simplify the staging process,but also further improve the ALN-preservation rate in cN1(f) patients.

图1 入组患者腋窝分期策略 注:cN是腋窝淋巴结临床分期;SLNB是前哨淋巴结活组织检查;FNAB是细针穿刺活组织检查;ALND是腋窝淋巴结清扫
表1 701例cT1-2N0-1M0期乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征
表2 162例cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌患者的细针穿刺和超声检查结果
表3 701例cT1-2N0-1M0期乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结超声评估与活组织检查结果
[1]
Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg,2010, 252(3): 426-432.
[2]
Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2011,305(6): 569-575.
[3]
Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA,2017, 318(10): 918-926.
[4]
Caudle AS, Cupp JA, Kuerer HM. Management of axillary disease[J]. Surg Oncol Clin, 2014, 23(3): 473-486.
[5]
Rocha RD, Girardi AR, Pinto RR, de Freitas VA. Axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in preoperative staging of axillary lymph nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer[J]. Radiol Bras, 2015,48(6): 345-352.
[6]
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(5): 331-357.
[7]
Pilewskie M, Jochelson M, Gooch JC, et al. Is preoperative axillary imaging beneficial in identifying clinically node-negative patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection?[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2016,222(2): 138-145.
[8]
中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺学组. 乳腺癌荧光示踪前哨淋巴结活组织检查操作指南[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017,11(4): 193-197.
[9]
Katz A, Smith BL, Golshan M, et al. Nomogram for the prediction of having four or more involved nodes for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(13): 2093-2098.
[10]
中华医学会外科学分会乳腺外科学组. 乳腺癌改良根治术专家共识及手术操作指南 (2018 版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018,38(8): 851-854.
[11]
Giuliano AE, Hawes D, Ballman KV, et al. Association of occult metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow with survival among women with early-stage invasive breast cancer[J]. JAMA,2011, 306(4): 385-393.
[12]
Caudle AS, Kuerer HM, Le-Petross HT, et al. Predicting the extent of nodal disease in early-stage breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014,21(11): 3440-3447.
[13]
Hieken TJ, Trull BC, Boughey JC, et al. Preoperative axillary imaging with percutaneous lymph node biopsy is valuable in the contemporary management of patients with breast cancer[J]. Surgery, 2013,154(4): 831-840.
[14]
Yoo T, Kang BJ, Kim SH, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection is not obligatory in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastasis[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2020, 181(2): 403-409.
[1] 金钰婷, 苑龙, 齐晓伟, 姜军. 乳腺癌非根治性手术临床研究证据[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 65-69.
[2] 李金泽, 彭雅琪, 刘月平, 马力. 乳腺癌HER-2低表达及超低表达临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 70-75.
[3] 肖锦怡, 周金妹, 王涛. 2024年乳腺癌全身系统治疗十大热点[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 76-83.
[4] 柴效科, 周海存, 杨涛, 卫翀羿, 魏赟, 张旭, 隆建萍. HER-2状态与AR/p53/Ki-67表达对三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 84-91.
[5] 李昕宇, 李玉东, 刘强. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活组织检查的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 108-112.
[6] 乔平, 杜华, 师迎旭. 选择性多聚腺苷酸化在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 113-118.
[7] 史福军, 魏巍, 林晓华, 廖玥, 郭志容. 单孔机器人辅助乳腺癌手术一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 125-127.
[8] 王昭雨, 姜军. 乳腺癌外科治疗理论和技术的发展与挑战[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-5.
[9] 张群, 李俊杰. 乳腺癌外科十大热点[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 6-11.
[10] 徐航程, 王佳玉. PI3K/AKT/mTOR 信号通路及其靶向治疗在乳腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 12-19.
[11] 方婉婷, 商家炜, 孟英爽, 闫婷, 明健. 一步核酸扩增在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移检测中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 20-26.
[12] 慕春燕, 杨大伟, 张云东, 崔兆清. E1A结合蛋白P300与乳腺癌发生发展的关系研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 111-115.
[13] 苏明, 唐丹萍, 王萍, 何谦. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方法选择研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 231-234.
[14] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[15] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
阅读次数
全文


摘要