切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 294 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2009.03.006

临床研究

DNA含量测定在乳腺癌预后判断中的意义
张敏1, 宁连胜1, 张瑾1,()   
  1. 1.300060天津,天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺科
  • 收稿日期:2008-01-19 出版日期:2009-06-11
  • 通信作者: 张瑾

Predicting role of DNA content assay in prognosis of breast carcinoma

Min ZHANG, Lian-sheng NING, Jin ZHANG()   

  • Received:2008-01-19 Published:2009-06-11
  • Corresponding author: Jin ZHANG
引用本文:

张敏, 宁连胜, 张瑾. DNA含量测定在乳腺癌预后判断中的意义[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2009, 03(03): 294-300.

Min ZHANG, Lian-sheng NING, Jin ZHANG. Predicting role of DNA content assay in prognosis of breast carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2009, 03(03): 294-300.

目的

应用流式细胞仪(flow cytometry,FCM )回顾性分析预后差的早期乳腺癌及预后好的晚期乳腺癌患者的DNA 含量特点,并探讨FCM 对预后的应用价值,为临床选择治疗方法提供参考。

方法

将手术后常规治疗且10年内出现复发、转移甚至死亡的Ⅰ期乳腺癌11例以及术后10年内健在且淋巴结转移10枚以上的Ⅲ期乳腺癌16例分别作为实验组,再从同期患者中选取术后无病生存的Ⅰ期乳腺癌14例以及预后差且淋巴结转移10枚以上的Ⅲ期乳腺癌14例分别作为对照组,应用FCM 对各组患者进行DNA 含量检测,包括DNA 指数(DNA index,DI)、S期分数(SPF)以及DNA 倍体。分析比较Ⅰ期及Ⅲ期乳腺癌实验组与对照组DNA 含量的特点,并对Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者淋巴结及结外软组织转移水平进行亚组分析。成组设计的计量资料比较采用t检验,多组间的比较采用单因素方差分析,小样本率的比较采用Fisher精确概率法。

结果

(1)Ⅰ期乳腺癌实验组中异倍体出现率为6/11,二倍体出现率为5/11;Ⅰ期对照组异倍体出现率为0,二倍体出现率为14/14,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。(2)分别比较Ⅰ期及Ⅲ期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的DI和SPF,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.050)。(3)Ⅲ期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的DNA 倍体间的差异也无统计学意义(P>0.050)。(4)Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者第三水平淋巴结转移组二倍体含量高于第一、二水平组,第一、二水平组SPF值低于第三水平组,但组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.050)。(5)Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者软组织不同转移水平组间DNA 倍体分布的差异无统计学意义(P>0.050)。

结论

应用FCM 研究早期以及晚期乳腺癌肿瘤的生物学特性,进行DNA 含量测定,对临床判断预后,选择治疗方法有一定的指导意义。

Objective

To retrospectively analyze DNA contents in early b reast cancer with bad prognosis and advanced breast cancer with good prognosis using flow cytometry(FCM)and to assess the value of FCM for prognosis of breast cancers,in order to provide a method for clinic choice of appropriate treatment.

Methods

Patients for this study were randomly selected from those who underwent surgery and conventional treatment in Tianjin Cancer Hospital from January 1990 to December 1992,including 11 patients with clinical stageⅠbreast cancer who had recurrence,metastasis or even death in ten years after surgery and 16 patients with clinical stageⅢbreast cancer whose positive axillary lymph nodes were more than ten and with ten year disease-free survival after surgery;patients as controls were selected respectively in the same period,including 14 patients with clinical stageⅠbreast cancer and with disease-free survival and 14 patients of clinical stageⅢbreast cancer with positive axillary lymph nodes more than ten and with bad prognosis.Then the DNA contents of all samples were tested with FCM,including DNA index(DI),s-phase fraction(SPF)and DNA ploidy.The characteristics of the DNA contents in both groups of clinical stageⅠandⅢbreast cancers were analyzed.The levels of lymphatic and soft tissue metastasis of stageⅢbreast cancer patients in the subgroups were also analyzed.t test was used for the comparison of quantitation data,single element variance analysis was used for multiple group comparison,and Fisher precise probabilistic method was used for small sample comparison .

Results

⑴In the group of 11 clinical stageⅠbreast cancer patients with bad prognosis,the DNA ploidy was aneuploid in 6 cases(6/11),and diploid in 5(5/11);in the control group of 14 clinical stageⅠbreast cancer patients with ten year disease free survival,the DNA ploidy was aneuploid in zero (0/14)and diploid in all(14/14),there was statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.003).⑵There was no statistical difference in DI between the group of stageⅠbreast cancer with bad prognosis and the group of clinical stageⅠbreast cancer with ten year disease free survival,and between the group of stageⅢbreast cancers with good prognosis and the group of stageⅢbreast cancers with bad prognosis(P>0.050).⑶There was no statistical difference in DNA ploidy between the group of stageⅢbreast cancers with bad prognosis and the group of stageⅢbreast cancers with good prognosis.⑷According to the analysis of different metastasis level of lymph nodes in all cases of stageⅢbreast cancers,the diploid was greater in the third level of lymph nodes than in the first and second levels of lymph nodes,while SPF was lower in first and second levels of lymph nodes than in the third level of lymph nodes.But there was no statistical difference between them(P>0.050).⑸According to the analysis of different metastasis level of soft tissue outside lymph nodes in all cases of stageⅢbreast cancers,there was no statistical difference among them(P>0.050).

Conclusion

Using FCM to study the biological characteristics of early and advanced breast cancer and determine the DNA contents has guiding significance in clinical assessment of prognosis and clinical choice of therapy.

表1 I期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的各项临床病理因素的统计学分析结果
表2 Ⅲ期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的各项临床病理因素的统计学分析结果
表3 I期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的DNA 含量
表4 Ⅲ期乳腺癌实验组与对照组的DNA 含量比较
表5 Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结不同转移水平间DNA 含量的分析
表6 Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者淋巴结外软组织不同转移水平患者间DNA 含量的分析
[1]
李树玲.乳腺肿瘤学.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2000:6.
[2]
李祥,李红兵.234例乳腺癌临床分析.肿瘤防治研究.1999,26:146-147.
[3]
刘珊珊,王喜春,黄颖,等.558例乳腺癌临床疗效分析.实用肿瘤学杂志,1997,11:126-127.
[4]
江勃年,曾福华.青年与中老年Ⅰ~Ⅲ乳腺癌预后因素对比分析.医学临床研究,2003,20:189-191.
[5]
Largillier R,Namer M,Ramaioli A,et al.Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in 920 breast cancer patients:focus on T1N0 status.Int J Biol Marker,2003,18:273-279.
[6]
Sundquist M,Thorstenson S,Klintenberg C,et al.Incidence and prognosis in early onset breast cancer.Breast,2002,11:30-35.
[7]
张月琴,李爱筠,蔺素琴,等.综合治疗晚期乳腺癌生存因素探讨.实用医学杂志,2003,19:632-633.
[8]
Sharon H.Giordano.Update on locally advanced breast cancer.Oncologist,2003,8:521-530.
[9]
沈镇宙,张亚伟.Ⅲ期乳腺癌治疗进展.实用肿瘤杂志,1995,10:133-135.
[10]
Dressler L G,Seamer L C,Owens M A,et al.DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens.Cancer,1988,61:420-427.
[11]
Muss H B,Kute T E,Douglas Case L,et al.The relation of flow cytometry to clinical and biologic characteristics in women with node negative primary breast cancer.Cancer,1989,64:1894-1900.
[12]
Winchester D J,Duda R B,August C Z,et al.The importance of DNA flow cytometry in node-negative breast cancer.Arch Surg,1990,125:886-889.
[13]
王娴, 张苏展,袁瑛,等.DNA 合成时相细胞百分率在腋淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的预后意义.实用肿瘤杂志,1998,13:283-285.
[14]
O'Relliy S M,Camplejohn R S,Barnes D M,et al.Node-negative breast cancer:prognostic subgroups defined by tumor size and flow cytometry.J Clin Oncol,1990,18:2040-2046.
[15]
Ottesen G L,Christensen I J,Larsen J K,et al.DNA aneuploidy in early b reast cancer.Br J Cancer,1995,72:832-839.
[16]
吴祥德,耿翠芝,王桂兰,等.乳腺癌细胞DNA 含量分析.中国肿瘤临床,1989,16:69-72.
[17]
顾海峰,张杏梅.乳腺不同类型病变与乳腺癌细胞DNA 含量分析.临床肿瘤学杂志,2000,5:95-96.
[18]
张祥宏.石蜡包埋组织FCM DNA 检测技术方法的进展.中华物理医学与康复杂志,1995,17:182-184.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要