切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 257 -263. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2024.05.001

专家论坛

多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值
葛睿1,(), 陈飞2, 李杰3, 李娟娟4, 陈涵5   
  1. 1.200040 上海,复旦大学附属华东医院普外科
    2.200060 上海,同济大学附属普陀人民医院普外科
    3.510623 广州,广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心甲状腺乳腺疾病诊疗中心
    4.430060 武汉,武汉大学人民医院乳腺甲状腺外科
    5.200052 上海,解放军海军第905医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-24 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 葛睿
  • 基金资助:
    北京科创医学发展基金(KC2023-JX-0082-09)同济大学附属普陀区人民医院课题(2023rmky06)

Application of multi-gene panel testing in adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Rui Ge1,(), Fei Chen2, Jie Li3, Juanjuan Li4, Han Chen5   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
    2.Department of General Surgery, Putuo People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200060, China
    3.Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery,Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
    4.Breast and Thyroid Center,People’s Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
    5.Department of General Surgery,PLA Navy 905 Hospital, Shanghai 200052, China
  • Received:2024-09-24 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Rui Ge
引用本文:

葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.

Rui Ge, Fei Chen, Jie Li, Juanjuan Li, Han Chen. Application of multi-gene panel testing in adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.

多基因检测为早期乳腺癌辅助治疗提供了新的策略和方法。 随着基因组学技术的不断发展和应用,多基因检测在早期乳腺癌的预后评估、疗效预测和治疗决策中发挥着越来越重要的作用。目前,多基因检测已在激素受体阳性、HER-2 阴性乳腺癌的化疗决策、内分泌延长治疗和辅助放射治疗决策中显示出显著价值,同时在三阴性乳腺癌的新辅助治疗中也展现出应用潜力。 在HER-2 阳性乳腺癌中的应用也有一些探索,但仍需进一步确认其临床价值。 本文就目前临床应用的多基因检测工具在早期乳腺癌个体化辅助治疗中的价值进行综述,为临床实践提供参考。

Multi-gene panel testing has provided new strategies and approaches for adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. With continuous development and application of genomic technologies, multi-gene panel testing plays an increasingly important role in prognosis evaluation, efficacy prediction, and treatment decisionmaking in early breast cancer. Currently, multi-gene panel testing has shown a significant value in chemotherapy decision-making, extended endocrine therapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy decision-making for hormonal receptor positive and HER-2 negative (HR+/HER-2-) breast cancer, and potentials in neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative breast cancer. Some explorative studies are conducted in HER-2-positive breast cancer, but its value still needs further confirmation. This article reviewed the application of multi-gene panel testing tools clinically used in individualized adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer, providing a reference for clinical practice.

表1 目前用于乳腺癌患者的多基因检测工具
[1]
Siegel RL,Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(1): 12-49.
[2]
Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, et al. Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(8): 1533-1546.
[3]
Cobain EF, Hayes DF. Indications for prognostic gene expression profiling in early breast cancer [J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2015,16(5):23.
[4]
Huang J, Luo Q, Tan Q, et al. Evaluation of the surgical fat-filling procedure in the treatment of refractory cough after systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy in patients with right lung cancer [J]. J Surg Res,2014,187(2):490-495.
[5]
Ji JH, Ahn SG, Yoo Y, et al. Prediction of a multi-gene assay(Oncotype DX and Mammaprint) recurrence risk group using machine learning in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer-the BRAIN study [J]. Cancers (Basel),2024,16(4):774.
[6]
Andre F, Ismaila N, Henry NL, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline updateintegration of results from TAILORx [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019,37(22): 1956-1964.
[7]
Venetis K, Pescia C, Cursano G, et al. The evolving role of genomic testing in early breast cancer: Implications for diagnosis, prognosis,and therapy [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(11):5717.
[8]
Davey MG, Cleere EF, O'donnell JP, et al. Value of the 21-gene expression assay in predicting locoregional recurrence rates in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network metaanalysis [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2022, 193(3): 535-544.
[9]
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015,373(21): 2005-2014.
[10]
Zeng C, Zhang J. A narrative review of five multigenetic assays in breast cancer [J]. Transl Cancer Res,2022,11(4):897-907.
[11]
中国抗癌协会国际医疗与交流分会, 中国医师协会肿瘤医师分会乳腺癌学组. 激素受体阳性人表皮生长因子受体2 阴性早期乳腺癌术后辅助治疗多基因检测应用专家共识(2023 版) [J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2023, 45(10): 863-870.
[12]
杨红健, 俞星飞, 陈俊青,等. 浙江省早期乳腺癌辅助治疗多基因检测应用专家共识(2020 版) [J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2021,15(5):263-274.
[13]
Lindström LS, Yau C, Czene K, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of the estrogen receptor and the long-term risk of fatal breast cancer [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2018, 110(7): 726-733.
[14]
Hochheiser L, Hornberger J,Turner M,et al. Multi-gene assays:effect on chemotherapy use, toxicity and cost in estrogen receptor-positive early stage breast cancer [J]. J Comp Eff Res,2019,8(5):289-304.
[15]
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(2): 111-121.
[16]
Paik S. Expression of the 21 genes in the recurrence score assay and tamoxifen clinical benefit in the NSABP study B-14 of node-negative,estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [J]. ASCO,2005,69(1):17-21.
[17]
Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(23): 3726-3734.
[18]
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2019, 380(25): 2395-2405.
[19]
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Clinical outcomes in early breast cancer with a high 21-gene recurrence score of 26 to 100 assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy: a secondary analysis of the TAILORx randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2020,6(3): 367-374.
[20]
Woodward WA, Barlow WE, Jagsi R, et al. Association between 21-gene assay recurrence score and locoregional recurrence rates in patients with node-positive breast cancer [J]. JAMA Oncol,2020,6(4):505-511.
[21]
Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, et al. 21-gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 385(25): 2336-2347.
[22]
O'shaughnessy J, Graham CL, Whitworth P, et al. Association of MammaPrint index and 3-year outcome of patients with HR +HER2-early-stage breast cancer treated with chemotherapy with or without anthracycline [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(16-suppl): 511.
[23]
Huang TT, Lei L, Chen CA, et al. A new clinical-genomic model to predict 10-year recurrence risk in primary operable breast cancer patients [J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 4861.
[24]
Casasanta N, Patel R, Raymond S, et al. Correlating predicted adjuvant therapy benefit and risk of Recurrence Between Breast Cancer Index (BCI) and the 21-Gene Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS)[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2024, 24(7): 585-596.
[25]
Sestak I, Buus R, Cuzick J, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6 prognostic signatures for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Oncol,2018, 4(4): 545-553.
[26]
Bartlett JM, Bayani J, Marshall A, et al. Comparing breast cancer multiparameter tests in the OPTIMA prelim trial: no test is more equal than the others [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016, 108(9): djw050.
[27]
Woolpert KM, Ahern TP, Lash TL, et al. Biomarkers predictive of a response to extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2024,203(3): 407-417.
[28]
Bartlett JMS, Sgroi DC, Treuner K, et al. Breast cancer index is a predictive biomarker of treatment benefit and outcome from extended tamoxifen therapy: final analysis of the trans-attom study [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2022, 28(9): 1871-1880.
[29]
Noordhoek I, Treuner K, Putter H, et al. Breast cancer index predicts extended endocrine benefit to individualize selection of patients with HR(+) early-stage breast cancer for 10 years of endocrine therapy [J].Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 27(1): 311-319.
[30]
Filipits M, Dubsky P, Rudas M, et al. Prediction of distant recurrence using EndoPredict among women with ER(+),HER2(-) node-positive and node-negative breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy only[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 25(13): 3865-3872.
[31]
Mamounas EP, Liu Q, Paik S, et al. 21-gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in node-positive/ER-positive breast cancer treated with chemo-endocrine therapy [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2017,109(4):djw259.
[32]
Bilani N, Crowley F, Mohanna M, et al. Does the 21-gene recurrence score have clinical utility in HR+/HER2+breast cancer? [J]. Breast,2022,66:49-53.
[33]
Llombart-Cussac A, Pérez-García J, Brasó-Maristany F, et al.HER2DX genomic assay in HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab: a correlative analysis from the PHERGain phase Ⅱtrial [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 30(18):4123-4130.
[34]
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [J]. Lancet, 2014, 384(9938): 164-172.
[35]
Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2020, 6(5):676-684.
[36]
Lehmann BD, Jovanovi c' B, Chen X, et al. Refinement of triplenegative breast cancer molecular subtypes: implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy selection [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(6): e0157368.
[37]
Asleh K, Lluch A, Goytain A, et al. Triple-negative PAM50 non-basal breast cancer subtype predicts benefit from extended adjuvant capecitabine [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2023, 29(2): 389-400.
[38]
Jimenez MM, Gluz O, Villacampa G, et al. TNBC-DX genomic test in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant taxane-based therapy without immunotherapy [J]. Ann Oncol,2024,35:S312.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 杨柳, 宋振川, 王新乐. 乳腺癌改良根治术联合背阔肌复位的临床疗效评估[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 269-273.
[3] 王睿, 邓俊, 施廷鑫, 张志兆, 王成方, 张毅, 齐晓伟. FAM91A1 可能是乳腺癌患者的独立预后因子[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 274-280.
[4] 季思涵, 唐新宇, 王邦杰, 狄汶洋, 王佳鸣, 查小明, 谢晖, 周文斌, 潘红, 王水. 阿贝西利在激素受体阳性、HER-2 阴性乳腺癌患者中的安全性研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 281-286.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[11] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[12] 中国抗癌协会结直肠肿瘤整合康复专业委员会, 北京癌症防治学会直肠癌新辅助治疗专业委员会. 直肠癌新辅助治疗相关恶心、呕吐副反应的预防、诊断及治疗指南[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 353-361.
[13] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[14] 唐诗, 薛传优, 叶兴, 张鸿举, 戴瑞. 急性病毒性肝炎患者血脂、血糖、蛋白、尿酸变化特点及其与预后的关联[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 396-399.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要