切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 342 -348. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.06.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性现状及影响因素分析
陈霞1, 罗凤2,(), 孔令泉2   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科;611731 成都市妇女儿童中心医院护理部
    2. 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-08 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 罗凤

Medication compliance with goserelin and influencing factors in patients with luminal breast cancer

Xia Chen1, Feng Luo2,(), Lingquan Kong2   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China; Department of Nursing, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610073, China
    2. Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2020-03-08 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Feng Luo
引用本文:

陈霞, 罗凤, 孔令泉. luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 342-348.

Xia Chen, Feng Luo, Lingquan Kong. Medication compliance with goserelin and influencing factors in patients with luminal breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 342-348.

目的

了解luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性情况,分析影响其依从性的相关因素。

方法

根据纳入及排除标准,收集2015年1月至2017年12月重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科使用戈舍瑞林治疗的luminal型乳腺癌女性患者174例进行回顾性分析。中位随访时间16个月(范围:1~54个月),完成随访154例,失访20例,失访率为11.5%(20/174)。采用问卷调查评价其用药依从性,使用χ2检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较不同特征患者依从性的差异;用Logistic回归分析影响患者依从性的相关因素。将患者分为≤40岁(103例)和>40岁(51例)2个亚组,进行亚组分析。

结果

在完成随访的154例患者中,依从性好82例(53.2%,82/154),依从性差72例(46.8%,72/154)。≤40岁组患者中,55.3%(57/103)依从性好,而>40岁组患者中仅49.0%(25/51)依从性好。全部患者中,文化程度、医保类型、不良反应和是否了解疗程时间均与乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性有关(χ2=13.586、13.042、7.880、14.251,P均<0.050);Logistic回归分析结果显示:高中及以下学历、居民医保和不了解戈舍瑞林的疗程时间为影响依从性的危险因素(OR=2.772,95%CI:1.243~6.183,P=0.013;OR=5.188,95%CI:1.383~19.465,P=0.015; OR=3.363,95%CI:1.645~6.878,P=0.001)。亚组分析显示:文化程度、职业、医保类型和是否了解疗程时间是≤40岁患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性的影响因素(χ2=15.992、5.978、7.701、10.376,P均<0.050);不良反应及医保类型是>40岁患者用药依从性的影响因素(χ2=4.763、7.471,P均<0.050)。Logistic回归分析表明:高中及以下文化程度和不了解疗程时间是≤40岁患者用药依从性的危险因素(OR=5.126,95%CI:2.086~12.598,P<0.001; OR=3.631, 95%CI:1.500~8.792,P=0.004);居民医保是>40岁患者用药依从性的危险因素(OR=64.315,95%CI:2.513~1 646.042,P=0.012),不良反应是>40岁患者用药依从性的保护因素OR=0.189,95%CI=0.047~0.759,P=0.019)。

结论

luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性较差,文化程度、医保类型及是否了解疗程时间都可能影响患者的依从性。≤40岁组和>40岁组患者依从性有差异,且影响因素不同,建议对不同年龄患者用药采用不同的干预措施。

Objective

To investigate the medication compliance with goserelin in patients with luminal breast cancer and analyze influencing factors.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 174 female patients with luminal breast cancer treated with goserelin in the Department of Endocrinology and Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2015 to December 2017 were enrolled for a retrospective analysis. The median follow-up time was 16 months (range: 1 to 54 months). Totally 154 patients completed follow-up and 20 were lost to follow-up. The loss to follow-up rate was 11.5%(20/174). A questionnaire survey was conducted to evaluate the compliance. The χ2 test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the drug compliance in patients with different characteristics. Logistic regression was used to analyze related factors affecting the compliance. The patients were divided into two subgroups: ≤40 years (103 cases) and >40 years (51 cases) for subgroup analysis.

Results

Among all 154 patients who completed the follow-up, 82 patients had good compliance (53.2%, 82/154) and 72 patients had poor compliance (46.8%, 72/154). Among patients ≤40 years, 55.3% (57/103) had good compliance, while only 49.0% (25/51) of patients >40 years had good compliance. In all patients, education level, type of medical insurance, adverse reactions and whether to understand the course of treatment were all related to the compliance of breast cancer patients (χ2=13.586, 13.042, 7.880, 14.251, all P<0.050 ); Logistic regression analysis showed that poor education (high school and below), resident medical insurance, and ignorance of goserelin treatment course were risk factors affecting compliance (OR=2.772, 95%CI: 1.243-6.183, P=0.013; OR=5.188, 95%CI: 1.383-19.465, P=0.015; OR=3.363, 95%CI: 1.645-6.878, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that education level, occupation, type of medical insurance and whether to understand the course of treatment were the influencing factors of goserelin compliance in patients≤40 years (χ2=15.992, 5.978, 7.701, 10.376, all P<0.050); adverse reactions and type of medical insurance were the influencing factors of compliance in patients >40 years old (χ2=4.763, 7.471, both P<0.050). Logistic regression analysis showed that poor education (high school and below) and ignorance of treatment course were risk factors for goserelin compliance in patients ≤40 years old (OR=5.126, 95%CI: 2.086-12.598, P<0.001; OR=3.631, 95%CI: 1.500-8.792, P=0.004); Resident medical insurance was a risk factor in patients >40 years (OR=64.315, 95%CI: 2.513-1 646.042, P=0.012), but adverse reaction was a protective factor in patients >40 years (OR=0.189, 95%CI: 0.047-0.759, P=0.019).

Conclusion

Patients with luminal breast cancer have poor medication compliance with goserelin. Education level, medical insurance type and understanding of treatment course may affect the compliance of patients. The compliance and its influencing factors present significant difference between patients ≤40 years and patients>40 years, so and the influencing factors are different. It is recommended that different intervention measures be given to the patients of different ages.

表1 luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性影响因素Logistic回归分析变量赋值表
图1 luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性差的常见原因
表2 luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性的单因素分析[例(%)]
变量 依从性好(n=82) 依从性差(n=72) 检验值 P
年龄        
  ≤40岁 57(69.5) 46(63.9) χ2=0.547 0.459
  >40岁 25(30.5) 26(36.1)
民族        
  汉族 79(96.3) 70(97.2) χ2=0.095 0.758
  少数民族 3(3.7) 2(2.8)
家族史        
  77(93.9) 67(93.1) χ2=0.045 0.831
  5(6.1) 5(6.9)
婚姻状况        
  未婚 11(13.4) 5(6.9) χ2=2.307 0.315
  已婚 67(81.7) 65(90.3)
  离异 4(4.9) 2(2.8)
生育史        
  未育 20(24.4) 10(13.9) χ2=2.695 0.101
  已育 62(75.6) 62(86.1)
文化程度        
  高中及以下 28(34.1) 46(63.9) χ2=13.586 <0.001
  大专及以上 54(65.9) 26(36.1)
经济情况        
  较差 26(31.7) 26(36.1) χ2=0.332 0.564
  良好 56(68.3) 46(63.9)
职业        
  无业 20(24.4) 28(38.9) χ2=3.756 0.053
  在职 62(75.6) 44(61.1)
医保类型        
  职工医保 63(76.8) 40(55.6) χ2=13.042 0.001
  居民医保 6(7.3) 21(29.1)
  其他 13(15.9) 11(15.3)
居住地类型        
  主城 55(67.1) 40(55.6) χ2=2.152 0.142
  郊县 27(32.9) 32(44.4)
既往史        
  65(79.3) 58(80.6) χ2=0.040 0.842
  17(20.7) 14(19.4)
组织学分期        
  1期 1(1.2) 1(1.4) Z=-0.027 0.978
  2期 71(86.6) 62(86.1)
  3期 10(12.2) 9(12.5)
不良反应        
  25(30.5) 38(52.8) χ2=7.880 0.005
  57(69.5) 34(47.2)
用药目的        
  不了解 29(35.4) 31(43.1) χ2=0.953 0.329
  了解 53(64.6) 41(56.9)
疗程时间        
  不了解 32(39.0) 50(69.4) χ2=14.251 0.001
  了解 50(61.0) 22(30.6)
表3 luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性的Logistic回归分析结果
表4 不同年龄组乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性的单因素分析[例(%)]
表5 ≤40岁组患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性Logistic回归分析结果
表6 >40岁组患者用药依从性Logistic回归分析结果
[1]
Chen W, Sun K, Zheng R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2018,30(1): 1-12.
[2]
邵志敏. 中国女性乳腺癌流行现状及趋势分析//中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会,重庆市科学技术协会.第四届中—法乳腺癌高级学术论坛论文集[C].重庆:重庆市科学技术协会,2010:2.
[3]
Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ,et al. Breast cancer in China[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): e279-289.
[4]
徐兵河,邵志敏,胡夕春,等.中国早期乳腺癌卵巢功能抑制临床应用专家共识(2016年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(8): 712-718.
[5]
Kim HA, Ahn SH, Nam SJ, et al. The role of the addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen in young women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer who remain premenopausal or regain menstruation after chemotherapy (ASTRRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and progress[J]. BMC Cancer, 2016,16(1): 319.
[6]
Recchia F, Necozione S, Bratta M, et al. LH-RH analogues in the treatment of young women with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of a phase II study[J]. Int J Oncol,2015,46(3): 1354-1360.
[7]
Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-wood M, et al.Predictive validity of medication adherence measure in an out-patient setting[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2008,10(5): 348-354.
[8]
王旭.绝经后乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗依从性研究[D].河北:河北医科大学,2017.
[9]
陈霞. 中青年乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性及其影响因素的研究[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2020.
[10]
邹誉亚,武晋晓,许秀萍,等.影响糖尿病药物治疗依从性的多因素分析及护理对策[J].护理研究,2014,(16): 1940-1942.
[11]
Font R, Espinas JA, Gil-Gil M,et al. Prescription refill, patient self-report and physician report in assessing adherence to oral endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study in Catalonia, Spain[J]. Br J Cancer, 2012,107(8): 1249-1256.
[12]
Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions[J]. Value Health,2008,11(1): 44-47.
[13]
陈霞,罗凤.乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗依从性现状及对策的研究进展[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2020,14(2): 252-256.
[14]
Kuba S, Maeda S, Matsumoto M, et al. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: a prospective observational study in Japanese women[J]. Clin Breast Cancer,2018,18(2): 150-156.
[15]
Rossi L, Pagani O. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: evolving paradigms in premenopausal women[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2017,18(5): 28.
[16]
Tan X, Marshall VD, Anderson RT,et al. Adjuvant therapy use among appalachian breast cancer survivors [J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(26): e1071.
[17]
Güth U, Myrick ME, Kilic N, et al. Compliance and persistence of endocrine adjuvant breast cancer therapy[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012,131(2): 491-499.
[18]
Wuensch P, Hahne A, Haidinger R,et al. Discontinuation and non-adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: is lack of communication the decisive factor? [J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015, 141(1): 55-60.
[19]
Lee JY, Min YH. Relationships between determinants of adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer[J]. BMC Women’s Health, 2018, 18(1): 48.
[20]
郝永杰.乳腺癌内分泌治疗依从性分析[D].新疆:新疆医科大学,2013.
[21]
杜娟,赵秀莉,张文周.280例乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗用药依从性分析[J].中国药房,2016,27(26): 3718-3720.
[22]
宋涛.绝经前乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗依从性的调查和影响因素分析[D].河北:河北医科大学,2017.
[23]
Ali EE, Cheung KL, Lee CP,et al. Prevalence and determinants of adherence to oral adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer patients in Singapore[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2017, 4(4): 283-289.
[24]
Stanton AL, Petrie KJ, Partridge AH. Contributors to nonadherence and nonpersistence with endocrine therapy in breast cancer survivors recruited from an online research registry [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014, 145(2): 525-534.
[25]
Bright EE, Petrie KJ, Partridge AH, et al. Barriers to and facilitative processes of endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2016,158(2): 243-251.
[26]
Nabieva N, Fehm T, Häberle L, et al. Influence of side-effects on early therapy persistence with letrozole in post-menopausal patients with early breast cancer: results of the prospective EvAluate-TM study [J]. Eur J Cancer,2018,96: 82-90.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要