切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 336 -342. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.06.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

46例乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤切除术后经皮瓣修复缺损者的预后分析
饶南燕1,(), 杨雅平1, 陈凯1, 李顺荣1, 朱李玲1, 吴畏1, 苏逢锡1, 刘强1   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院乳腺肿瘤整形外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-10 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 饶南燕

Prognostic analysis of 46 patients receiving resection of gaint breast tumor and defect repair by autologous tissue flap

Nanyan Rao1,(), Yaping Yang1, Kai Chen1, Shunrong Li1, Liling Zhu1, Wei Wu1, Fengxi Su1, Qiang Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2018-10-10 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Nanyan Rao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Rao Nanyan, Email:
引用本文:

饶南燕, 杨雅平, 陈凯, 李顺荣, 朱李玲, 吴畏, 苏逢锡, 刘强. 46例乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤切除术后经皮瓣修复缺损者的预后分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 336-342.

Nanyan Rao, Yaping Yang, Kai Chen, Shunrong Li, Liling Zhu, Wei Wu, Fengxi Su, Qiang Liu. Prognostic analysis of 46 patients receiving resection of gaint breast tumor and defect repair by autologous tissue flap[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 336-342.

目的

分析经自体皮瓣修复乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤术后缺损者的预后及相关因素。

方法

回顾性分析2012年4月至2018年5月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院收治的46例乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料。患者接受局部切除术后行自体皮瓣修复缺损。根据不同病理类型、是否伴有远处转移、切缘能否达到阴性以及治疗反应性进行亚组分析,采用Log-rank检验分析不同亚组的疾病无进展生存(PFS)和OS情况;采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析PFS和OS的影响因素。

结果

46例患者中,乳腺间叶恶性肿瘤患者7例,其余39例为乳腺癌患者(luminal B型18例,HER-2阳性乳腺癌11例,三阴性乳腺癌10例)。单因素分析发现:(1)乳腺间叶恶性肿瘤患者中位PFS和OS分别为28.5个月(18.1~38.7个月)和28.5个月(18.1~38.9个月), luminal B型乳腺癌患者中位PFS和OS分别为17.2个月(14.1~20.3个月)和25.1个月(13.7~36.6个月),HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者中位PFS和OS分别为15.6个月(12.9~51.2个月)和35.8个月(19.8~71.8个月),三阴性乳腺癌患者中位PFS和OS分别为8.6个月(4.6~12.5个月)和18.5个月(5.8~43.5个月)。4种恶性肿瘤相比,患者中位PFS和OS的差异均有统计学意义(PFS:χ2=16.645,P=0.001;OS:χ2=8.617,P=0.035)。(2)仅有T4局部病灶者(25例)与T4病灶伴远处转移者(21例)相比,中位PFS和OS的差异均无统计学意义[PFS:17.2个月(7.3~27.0个月)比9.8个月(8.6~11.1个月),χ2= 1.369,P=0.242;OS:28.5个月(14.1~42.9个月)比20.2个月(14.4~25.9个月), χ2=1.779,P=0.182]。(3)皮肤切缘阴性者(35例)中位PFS和OS分别为22.1个月(10.8~33.4个月)和22.2个月(11.3~33.2个月),明显优于皮肤切缘阳性者(11例)的5.1个月(3.0~7.2个月)和10.2个月(5.4~15.0个月)(PFS:χ2=17.794,P<0.001;OS:χ2=6.192,P=0.013)。(4)系统治疗反应好的乳腺癌患者,其中位PFS和OS明显优于治疗反应差的患者[PFS:23.1个月(5.9~40.4个月)比8.7个月(7.8~9.8个月),χ2= 9.868,P=0.001; OS:46.7个月(25.5~68.0个月)比14.3个月(9.9~18.9个月),χ2=8.994,P=0.002]。将以上因素纳入多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析后发现,这些因素都不是影响患者PFS和OS的独立预后因素。

结论

乳房巨大恶性肿瘤患者的预后与肿瘤病理类型、切缘是否阴性、全身系统治疗的反应性等多个因素相关,并非由单一因素所决定。

Objective

To analyze the prognosis and related factors of patients with giant breast tumors, whose chest wall defects was repaired by autologous tissue flaps after tumor resction.

Methods

The clinical data of 46 giant breast tumor patients in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April 2012 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. They all underwent the resection of gaint breast tumor and defect repair by autologous tissue flap. Then the subgroup analysis was performed according to different pathological types, distant metastasis status, therapeutic responses and negative margin. Log-rank test was used to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of different subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the related factors of PFS and OS.

Results

Among the 46 patients, 7 patients had malignant mesenchymal tumors of the breast, and the other 39 patients had breast cancer (18 luminal B, 11 HER-2 positive, and 10 triple negative). Univariate analysis showed that: (1) the median PFS and OS were 28.5 months (18.1-38.7 months) and 28.5 months (18.1-38.9 months) in patients with malignant mesenchymal tumors, 17.2 months (14.1-20.3 months) and 25.1 months (13.7-36.6 months) in luminal B breast cancer, 15.6 months(12.9- 51.2 months)and 35.8 months(19.8-71.8 months)in HER-2 positive breast cancer, 8.6 months (4.6-12.5 months) and 18.5 months (5.8-43.5 months) in triple negative breast cancer. There were significant differences in median PFS and OS among the four types of malignant tumors (PFS: χ2=16.645, P=0.001; OS: χ2=8.617, P=0.035). (2) The patients with T4 lesions alone (n=25) presented no significant differences in median PFS and OS compared with the patients with T4 lesions and distant metastases (n=21) [PFS: 17.2 months (7.3-27.0 months) vs 9.8 months (8.6-11.1 months), χ2=1.369, P=0.242; OS: 28.5 months (14.1-42.9 months) vs 20.2 months (14.4-25.9 months), χ2=1.779, P=0.182]. (3) The median PFS and OS in patients with negative margin (n=35) were 22.1 months (10.8-33.4 months) and 22.2 months (11.3-33.2 months), respectively, significantly better than those in patients with positive margins(n=11)[5.1 months (3.0-7.2 months) and 10.2 months (5.4-15.0 months)] (PFS: χ2=17.794, P< 0.001; OS: χ2=6.192, P=0.013). (4) The median PFS and OS in patients with good response to systemic treatment were significantly higher than those in patients with poor response [PFS: 23.1 months (5.9-40.4 months) vs 8.7 months (7.8-9.8 months), χ2=9.868, P= 0.001; OS: 46.7 months (25.5-68.0 months) to 14.3 months (9.9-18.9 months), χ2=8.994, P=0.002]. The above-mentioned factors were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and the result showed that these factors were not independent prognostic factors affecting the PFS and OS of breast cancer patients.

Conclusion

The prognosis of the patients with giant malignant breast tumors is related to pathological types of tumors, negative margin and the response to systemic treatment, but none is an independent prognostic factor.

图1 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者行皮瓣修复术后效果 a、b图分别所示患者手术前后乳房外观
表1 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者预后影响因素的Cox比例风险回归模型变量赋值表
图2 46例乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤切除术后经皮瓣修复缺损患者的生存曲线
图3 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者肿瘤病理类型与预后的关系
图4 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者肿瘤分期与预后的关系
图5 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤患者皮肤切缘状态与预后的关系
图6 乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤(乳腺癌)患者系统治疗反应性与预后的关系
表2 经皮瓣修复乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤术后缺损患者无进展生存的单因素与多因素分析
表3 经皮瓣修复乳腺巨大恶性肿瘤术后缺损患者总生存的单因素与多因素分析
[1]
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45(2):228-247.
[2]
Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer?[J]. Surgery,2002,132(4):620-627.
[3]
Rashid OM, Nagahashi M, Ramachandran S, et al. Resection of the primary tumor improves survival in metastatic breast cancer by reducing overall tumor burden[J]. Surgery,2013,153(6):771-778.
[4]
Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis[J]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24(18):2743-2749.
[5]
Comen E, Norton L, Massagué J. Clinical implications of cancer self-seeding[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2011,8(6):369-377.
[6]
Danna EA, Sinha P, Gilbert M, et al. Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease[J]. Cancer Res,2004,64(6):2205-2211.
[7]
Soran A, Ozbas S, Kelsey SF, et al. Randomized trial comparing locoregional resection of primary tumor with no surgery in stage Ⅳ breast cancer at the presentation (Protocol MF07-01): a study of Turkish Federation of the National Societies for Breast Diseases[J]. Breast J,2009,15(4):399-403.
[8]
Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, et al. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial [J].Lancet Oncol,2015,16(13):1380-1388.
[9]
朱明,马晓飞,杨燕文,等. 基于单中心的局部巨大乳腺癌手术切除后胸壁重建及巨大创面修复策略[J]. 中国临床医学,2018,25(2):182-187.
[10]
宋达疆,李赞,周晓,等. 局部晚期乳腺癌切除术后巨大复杂创面的整形外科修复[J]. 中华整形外科杂志,2018,34(8):630-635.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 康一坤, 袁芃. 三阴性乳腺癌分子遗传学及临床特征研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 290-293.
[13] 王雪菲, 海琳悦, 李立方, 肖春花. Luminal A型乳腺癌的内分泌治疗与化疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 294-300.
[14] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[15] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要