切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 113 -115. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2018.02.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

综述

残余肿瘤负荷评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用
陈锴1, 刘超乾2, 盛湲2,()   
  1. 1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学学员旅
    2. 200433 上海,海军军医大学附属长海医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-09 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 盛湲

Residual cancer burden score for efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Kai Chen1, Chaoqian Liu2, Yuan Sheng2()   

  • Received:2017-01-09 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuan Sheng
引用本文:

陈锴, 刘超乾, 盛湲. 残余肿瘤负荷评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 113-115.

Kai Chen, Chaoqian Liu, Yuan Sheng. Residual cancer burden score for efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 113-115.

术前新辅助化疗能降低乳腺癌的临床分期,增加手术适应证,并提高保留乳房率,为治疗乳腺癌提供新的可能。pCR被认为是评价新辅助化疗预后的主要终点,但该评价方式过于简单,且缺乏对术后治疗的指导意义。目前,连续性残余肿瘤负荷(RCB)评分已逐步推广。研究表明该评分能用于评估新辅助化疗与乳腺癌分子分型的关系。笔者就RCB评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用和发展前景进行综述。

[1]
陈万青,郑荣寿. 中国女性乳腺癌发病死亡和生存状况[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2015,42(13):668-674.
[2]
孙强. 对乳腺癌新辅助化疗指征的探讨[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015,9(5):287-291.
[3]
Viale G. Characterization and clinical impact of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Breast, 2013, 22 Suppl 2(3): S88.
[4]
Simos D, Clemons M, Ginsburg OM, et al. Definition and consequences of locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2014, 8(1): 33-38.
[5]
Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(28): 4414-4422.
[6]
MD Anderson Cancer Center. Residual cancer burden calculator[CP/OL]. Texas: MD Anderson Cancer Center.[20117-01-08].

URL    
[7]
Peintinger F, Sinn B, Hatzis C, et al. Reproducibility of residual cancer burden for prognostic assessment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Mod Pathol, 2015, 28(7): 913-920.
[8]
Romero A, García-Sáenz JA, Fuentes-Ferrer M, et al. Correlation between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients[J].Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(3): 655-661.
[9]
Nahleh Z, Sivasubramaniam D, Dhaliwal S, et al. Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool[J]. Curr Oncol, 2008, 15(6): 271-278.
[10]
Symmans WF, Wei C, Gould R, et al. Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(10): 1049-1060.
[11]
梁璟慧,吴毓东,杨丽萍. 三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗的最新进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4):270-274.
[12]
Pierga JY, Petit T, Delozier T, et al. Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy for primary inflammatory HER2-positive breast cancer (BEVERLY-2): an open-label, single-arm phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(4): 375-84.
[13]
Sharma P, Lópeztarruella S, Garcíasaenz JA, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer: Combined analysis of two cohorts[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23(3): 649-657.
[14]
Peintinger F, Buzdar AU, Kuerer HM, et al. Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008, 19(12): 2020-2025.
[15]
Naidoo K, Parham DM, Pinder SE. An audit of residual cancer burden reproducibility in a UK context[J]. Histopathology, 2017, 70(2), 217-222.
[16]
Pasam R, Sivarama TV, Nagakishore MG. Cytomorphological changes in breast carcinomas, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a study of twenty cases[J]. Int J Res Med Sci, 2015, 3(11): 3326-3330.
[17]
Bossuyt MD, Symmans WF. Standardizing of pathology in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(10): 3153-3161.
[18]
Braeuning MP, Burke ET, Pisano ED. Embolization coils as tumor markers for mammography in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 174(1): 251-252.
[19]
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, et al. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(2): 243-251.
[20]
Tudorica A, Oh KY, Chui SY, et al. Early prediction and evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative DCE-MRI[J]. Transl Oncol, 2016, 9(1): 8-17.
[21]
Lim EA, Gunther JE, Kim HK, et al. Diffuse optical tomography changes correlate with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 162(3): 533-540.
[22]
Lee SM, Bae SK, Kim TH, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of pathologic response (by residual cancer burden criteria) of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2014, 39(10): 882-886.
[23]
Jones RL, Salter J, A'Hern R, et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009, 116(1): 53-68.
[24]
Sheri A, Smith IE, Johnston SR, et al. Residual Proliferative Cancer Burden to predict long-term outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(1): 75-80.
[25]
Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(32): 4273-4278.
[26]
Krysko DV, D'Herde K, Vandenabeele P. Clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells and its immunological consequences[J]. Apoptosis, 2006, 11(10): 1709-1726.
[27]
Exner R, Sachet M, Arnold T, et al. Prognostic value of HMGB1 in early breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Med, 2016, 5(9): 2350-2358.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?