切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 113 -115. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2018.02.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

综述

残余肿瘤负荷评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用
陈锴1, 刘超乾2, 盛湲2,()   
  1. 1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学学员旅
    2. 200433 上海,海军军医大学附属长海医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-09 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 盛湲

Residual cancer burden score for efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Kai Chen1, Chaoqian Liu2, Yuan Sheng2()   

  • Received:2017-01-09 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuan Sheng
引用本文:

陈锴, 刘超乾, 盛湲. 残余肿瘤负荷评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 113-115.

Kai Chen, Chaoqian Liu, Yuan Sheng. Residual cancer burden score for efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 113-115.

术前新辅助化疗能降低乳腺癌的临床分期,增加手术适应证,并提高保留乳房率,为治疗乳腺癌提供新的可能。pCR被认为是评价新辅助化疗预后的主要终点,但该评价方式过于简单,且缺乏对术后治疗的指导意义。目前,连续性残余肿瘤负荷(RCB)评分已逐步推广。研究表明该评分能用于评估新辅助化疗与乳腺癌分子分型的关系。笔者就RCB评分在乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果评价中的应用和发展前景进行综述。

[1]
陈万青,郑荣寿. 中国女性乳腺癌发病死亡和生存状况[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2015,42(13):668-674.
[2]
孙强. 对乳腺癌新辅助化疗指征的探讨[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015,9(5):287-291.
[3]
Viale G. Characterization and clinical impact of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Breast, 2013, 22 Suppl 2(3): S88.
[4]
Simos D, Clemons M, Ginsburg OM, et al. Definition and consequences of locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2014, 8(1): 33-38.
[5]
Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(28): 4414-4422.
[6]
MD Anderson Cancer Center. Residual cancer burden calculator[CP/OL]. Texas: MD Anderson Cancer Center.[20117-01-08].

URL    
[7]
Peintinger F, Sinn B, Hatzis C, et al. Reproducibility of residual cancer burden for prognostic assessment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Mod Pathol, 2015, 28(7): 913-920.
[8]
Romero A, García-Sáenz JA, Fuentes-Ferrer M, et al. Correlation between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients[J].Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(3): 655-661.
[9]
Nahleh Z, Sivasubramaniam D, Dhaliwal S, et al. Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool[J]. Curr Oncol, 2008, 15(6): 271-278.
[10]
Symmans WF, Wei C, Gould R, et al. Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(10): 1049-1060.
[11]
梁璟慧,吴毓东,杨丽萍. 三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗的最新进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4):270-274.
[12]
Pierga JY, Petit T, Delozier T, et al. Neoadjuvant bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy for primary inflammatory HER2-positive breast cancer (BEVERLY-2): an open-label, single-arm phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(4): 375-84.
[13]
Sharma P, Lópeztarruella S, Garcíasaenz JA, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel in triple negative breast cancer: Combined analysis of two cohorts[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23(3): 649-657.
[14]
Peintinger F, Buzdar AU, Kuerer HM, et al. Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008, 19(12): 2020-2025.
[15]
Naidoo K, Parham DM, Pinder SE. An audit of residual cancer burden reproducibility in a UK context[J]. Histopathology, 2017, 70(2), 217-222.
[16]
Pasam R, Sivarama TV, Nagakishore MG. Cytomorphological changes in breast carcinomas, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a study of twenty cases[J]. Int J Res Med Sci, 2015, 3(11): 3326-3330.
[17]
Bossuyt MD, Symmans WF. Standardizing of pathology in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(10): 3153-3161.
[18]
Braeuning MP, Burke ET, Pisano ED. Embolization coils as tumor markers for mammography in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 174(1): 251-252.
[19]
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, et al. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(2): 243-251.
[20]
Tudorica A, Oh KY, Chui SY, et al. Early prediction and evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative DCE-MRI[J]. Transl Oncol, 2016, 9(1): 8-17.
[21]
Lim EA, Gunther JE, Kim HK, et al. Diffuse optical tomography changes correlate with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 162(3): 533-540.
[22]
Lee SM, Bae SK, Kim TH, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of pathologic response (by residual cancer burden criteria) of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2014, 39(10): 882-886.
[23]
Jones RL, Salter J, A'Hern R, et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009, 116(1): 53-68.
[24]
Sheri A, Smith IE, Johnston SR, et al. Residual Proliferative Cancer Burden to predict long-term outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(1): 75-80.
[25]
Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(32): 4273-4278.
[26]
Krysko DV, D'Herde K, Vandenabeele P. Clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells and its immunological consequences[J]. Apoptosis, 2006, 11(10): 1709-1726.
[27]
Exner R, Sachet M, Arnold T, et al. Prognostic value of HMGB1 in early breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Med, 2016, 5(9): 2350-2358.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 刘佳璇, 徐兵河. 中国乳腺癌临床研究年度进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 259-265.
[13] 姚成才, 刘长春, 黄文剑, 陈明. 单孔非溶脂荧光腔镜技术在早期乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结活组织检查中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 266-271.
[14] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[15] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要