切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 87 -91. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.02.006

论著

乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术后上肢淋巴水肿相关症状研究
王玲1, 汪苗1,(), 周丽华2   
  1. 1.241002 芜湖,皖南医学院护理学院
    2.241002 芜湖,皖南医学院第一附属医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-17 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 汪苗
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目(15YJCZH159)皖南医学院校中青年自然科学基金(WK201613)

Upper extremity lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients

Ling Wang1, Miao Wang1,(), Lihua Zhou2   

  1. 1.Department of Nursing, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002,China
    2.Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, China
  • Received:2016-06-17 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Miao Wang
引用本文:

王玲, 汪苗, 周丽华. 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术后上肢淋巴水肿相关症状研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 87-91.

Ling Wang, Miao Wang, Lihua Zhou. Upper extremity lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 87-91.

目的

探讨乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术后上肢淋巴水肿相关症状,为淋巴水肿的早期诊断和症状管理提供指导。

方法

根据纳入和排除标准,回顾性选取2010年3 月至2015年12 月在皖南医学院第一附属医院甲乳外科就诊的乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术后的343 例患者为研究对象,采用自编的上肢淋巴水肿症状评估表对其进行调查。 采用上肢周径测量法作为淋巴水肿的诊断标准。 根据是否发生淋巴水肿把研究对象分为淋巴水肿组和非淋巴水肿组,采用χ2 检验、t 检验、非参数检验比较2 组患者一般资料、上肢淋巴水肿相关症状的发生率有无差异;采用χ2 检验比较上肢淋巴水肿及其相关症状的发生率在术后不同时间段(≤3 个月、>3 ~6 个月、>6 ~12 个月、>12 ~24 个月、>24 ~36 个月、>36 个月)之间的差异。

结果

343 例乳腺癌患者中,84 例(24.5%)发生上肢淋巴水肿,非淋巴水肿患者259 例(75.5%)。 淋巴水肿组和非淋巴水肿组一般资料的比较中,患者临床分期和腋窝淋巴结清扫的级别差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.208,P=0.027; Z=-4.477,P=0.001)。 术后不同时间段患者淋巴水肿发生率的比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.405,P<0.001),其中>12 ~24 个月(39.0%,23/59)和>24 ~36 个月(38.9%,14/36)患者淋巴水肿发生率显著高于≤3 个月(12.33%,9/73)(χ2 =12.622, P<0.001;χ2=10.216, P=0.001)。 在上肢淋巴水肿相关症状的比较中,上肢的沉重感[59.5%(50/84)比19.3%(50/259)]和肿胀感[56.0%(47/84)比19.3%(50/259)],在2 组间的差异有统计学意义(χ2=49.674、42.000,P 均<0.001)。 上肢沉重感和肿胀感的发生率在术后不同时间段之间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=6.975,P=0.223;χ2=5.202,P=0.392)。

结论

上肢的沉重感和肿胀感作为上肢淋巴水肿相关症状,可为淋巴水肿早期诊断和筛查提供参考。

Objective

To explore the related symptoms of upper extremity lymphedema in breast cancer patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection, and provide references for early diagnosis and management of lymphedema.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we enrolled 343 patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection in Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from March 2010 to December 2015. A self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate the lymphedema related symptoms of breast cancer patients. Lymphedema was defined by circumferential measurement and then all patients were divided into lymphedema group and nonlymphedema group. The general data and the incidence of upper extremity lymphedema between two groups were compared by χ2 test, t test and nonparametric test. The incidences of upper extremity lymphedema in different periods after surgery (≤3 months, >3-6 months, >6-12 months, >12-24 months, >24-36 months, >36 months) were compared using χ2 test.

Results

In 343 patients,84 patients (24.5%) were diagnosed with lymphedema and 259 (75.5%) presented no lymphedema. There were significant differences in clinical stage and axillary lymph node status between lymphedema group and non-lymphedema group (Z=-2.208, P=0.027; Z=-4.477, P=0.001). The incidence of upper extremity lymphedema in different postoperative periods showed a significant difference (χ2 = 21.405, P <0.001). The incidence of upper extremity lymphedema was 39.0% (23/59) in postoperative 12 - 24 months and 38.9% (14/36) in postoperative 24-36 months, significantly higher than 12.3% (9/73)within postoperative 3 months(χ2 =12.622, P<0.001;χ2 = 10.216, P = 0.001). The incidences of heaviness[59.5% (50/84) vs 19.3%(50/259)] and swelling[56.0%(47/84) vs 19.3%(50/259)] in upper extremities showed a significant difference between two groups (χ2=49.674,42.000, both P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidences of heaviness and swelling of upper extremities among different periods after surgery(χ2=6.975,P=0.223;χ2 = 5.202,P = 0.392).

Conclusion

The heaviness and swelling in upper extremities are lymphedema related symptoms, which can provide references for early diagnosis and management of lymphedema.

表1 2 组乳腺癌患者一般资料的比较(例)
表2 343 例乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿在术后各时间段发生率的比较(例)
表3 2 组乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿相关症状比较[例(%)]
表4 84 例乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿相关症状在术后各时间段的发生情况(例)
[1]
黄哲宙,陈万青,吴春晓,等. 中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况——全国32 个肿瘤登记点2003—2007年资料分析报告[J]. 肿瘤,2012,32(6):435-439.
[2]
郑莹,吴春晓,吴凡.中国女性乳腺癌死亡现况和发展趋势[J]. 中华预防医学杂志,2011,45(2):150-154.
[3]
侯显会.乳腺癌手术术式探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2014,8(5):33-34.
[4]
Park JH, Lee WH, Chung HS. Incidence and risk factors of breast cancer lymphoedema[J]. J Clin Nurs,2008,17(11):1450-1459.
[5]
Norman SA, Localio AR, Potashnik SL, et al. Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms[J].J Clin Oncol,2009,27(3):390-397.
[6]
Fu MR, Axelrod D, Cleland CM, et al. Symptom report in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema [J]. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press),2015,7:345-352.
[7]
Armer J, Fu MR. Age differences in post-breast cancer lymphedema signs and symptoms[J]. Cancer Nurs,2005,28(3):200-209.
[8]
王珊珊. 护理干预对控制乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿发生的效果研究[D].北京:北京协和医学院,2013.
[9]
姚秀钰,李峥,胡丽丽,等.攻击行为风险评估工具在精神病患者中的初步应用[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(7):613-614.
[10]
Shah C,Vicini FA. Breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: incidence rates, diagnostic techniques, optimal management and risk reduction strategies[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,81(4):907-914.
[11]
段艳芹,李惠萍.乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿的评估与预防进展[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(11):1048-1050.
[12]
Hayes SC, Johansson K, Stout NL, et al. Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care [J].Cancer,2012,118(8 Suppl):2237-2249.
[13]
廖光冲,吕书勤,陆明.乳腺癌术后并发淋巴回流障碍的预防及治疗现状[J].内蒙古中医药,2010,29(7):77-78.
[14]
郑建伟,蔡淑艳,宋慧敏,等.乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2015,9(6):363-366.
[15]
Petrek JA,Senie RT,Peters M, et al.Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis[J].Cancer,2001,92(6):1368-1377.
[16]
朱倩男,夏添松,凌立君,等.乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿发生机制及预防进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2013,7(6):442-444.
[17]
路潜,LIN Feng,刘宇,等.乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的风险因素、评估与管理[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(5):458-460.
[18]
李喆,葛海燕.乳腺癌根治术后上肢淋巴水肿的研究进展[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2012,6(2):201-207.
[19]
刘飞, 路潜,欧阳倩,等. 乳腺癌患者术后淋巴水肿与其相关症状的关系研究[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):518-522.
[20]
Armer JM, Henggeler MH, Brooks CW, et al. The health deviation of post-breast cancer lymphedema: symptom assessment and impact on self-care agency[J]. Self Care Depend Care Nurs,2008,16(1):14-21.
[21]
Stolldorf DP, Dietrich MS, Ridner SH. Symptom frequency, intensity,and distress in patients with lower limb lymphedema[J]. Lymphat Res Biol,2016,14(2):78-87.
[22]
Armer JM, Radina ME, Porock D, et al. Predicting breast cancerrelated lymphedema using self-reported symptoms[J].Nurs Res,2003,52(6):370-379.
[23]
Ridner SH. Quality of life and a symptom cluster associated with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema[J]. Support Care Cancer,2005,13(11):904-911.
[24]
Hayes S,Di Sipio T,Rye S,et al. Prevence and prognostic significance of secondary lymphedema following breast cancer[J]. Lymphat Res Biol,2011,9(3):135-141.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要