切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 83 -86. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.02.005

论著

植入式静脉输液港导管异位的安全性探讨
邢雷1, 刘洪1, 石果1, 罗凤1,(), 任国胜1   
  1. 1.400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-28 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 罗凤

Safety on catheter malposition of implantable venous access port

Lei Xing1, Hong Liu1, Guo Shi1, Feng Luo1,(), Guosheng Ren1   

  1. 1.Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016,China
  • Received:2016-11-28 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Feng Luo
引用本文:

邢雷, 刘洪, 石果, 罗凤, 任国胜. 植入式静脉输液港导管异位的安全性探讨[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 83-86.

Lei Xing, Hong Liu, Guo Shi, Feng Luo, Guosheng Ren. Safety on catheter malposition of implantable venous access port[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 83-86.

目的

探讨乳腺癌患者使用植入式静脉输液港(IVAP)发生导管异位的情况及其安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6 月至2016年3 月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院使用IVAP 化疗的360 例乳腺癌患者临床资料。 分析左右颈内静脉置管发生IVAP 导管异位的差异,以及IVAP 导管异位患者发生IVAP 相关性血栓形成的情况。 IVAP 导管异位发生率的比较采用χ2 检验或Fisher 确切概率法。

结果

360 例患者均在超声引导下经颈内静脉穿刺成功置管,其中左侧颈内静脉置管139 例,右侧颈内静脉置管221 例。 术后X 线摄影发现IVAP 导管异位患者5 例,导管位于上腔静脉者355 例。 导管异位部位为同侧颈内静脉2 例,同侧锁骨下静脉2 例,对侧无名静脉1 例。 IVAP 导管异位发生率为1.4%(5/360),其中,左右侧颈内静脉穿刺置管后导管异位发生率分别为2.2% (3/139)和0.9%(2/221),两者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.277,P=0.598)。 5 例IVAP 导管异位患者均出现无症状的IVAP 相关性血栓形成,经IVAP 回抽见血,输液通畅,无一例患者出现因导管异位所致的不适症状,对其进行严密随访,未予特殊治疗,并于化疗结束后顺利取出IVAP,中位置管时间为156 d(135 ~182 d)。

结论

乳腺癌患者化疗期间使用IVAP 化疗是一种安全有效的方法。 IVAP 导管异位发生率低,在密切随访的情况下继续使用IVAP 也是安全的。

Objective

To investigate the incidence of catheter malposition in breast cancer patients with implantable venous access port (IVAP) and explore the safety.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 360 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy via IVAP in Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University from June 2015 to March 2016. The catheter malposition of IVAP in left and right internal jugular vein catheterization was investigated. The IVAP-related thrombosis in those patients with catheter malposition was recorded. χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the rates of catheter malposition of IVAP.

Results

Totally 360 patients had successful catheterization via internal jugular veins under the guidance of ultrasound, including 139 patients via the left internal jugular vein and 221 patients via the right internal jugular vein. However,postoperative chest X-ray revealed in 5 cases and the catheter located in superior vena cava in 355 cases. The catheter malposition was located in ipsilateral internal jugular vein (2 patients), ipsilateral subclavian vein (2 patients) or contralateral innominate vein(1 patient) on the chest radiograph. The incidence of catheter malposition of IVAP was 1.4% (5/360). The incidence of catheter malposition was 2.2% (3/139) for left internal jugular vein and 0.9% (2/221) for right internal jugular vein, indicating a significant difference (χ2 = 0.277, P = 0.598). Five patients had asymptomatic IVAP-related thrombosis. Blood could be pumpbacked via IVAP and the transfusion was fluent.No patients had discomfort caused by catheter malposition. All patients were closely followed up without any special treatment. IVAP was successfully removed after chemotherapy. The median catheterization duration was 156 d (range:135-182 d).

Conclusions

Application of IVAP in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy is safe and effective. The incidence of catheter malposition is low, even in catheter malposition, continuous application of IVAP is safe under close monitoring.

图1 植入式静脉输液港(IVAP)放置示意图 注:a 箭头所示颈内静脉走向;b 箭头所示IVAP 导管;c 箭头所示皮下隧道;d 箭头所示IVAP 底座
图2 5 例IVAP 导管异位乳腺癌患者胸部X 线摄影结果 注:a 图所示,病例1 IVAP 导管末端位于同侧锁骨下静脉;b 图所示,病例2 IVAP 导管末端位于同侧颈内静脉;c 图所示,病例3 IVAP 导管末端位于同侧颈内静脉;d 图所示,病例4 IVAP 导管末端位于对侧无名静脉; e 图所示,病例5 IVAP 导管末端位于同侧锁骨下静脉。 IVAP 为植入式静脉输液港;箭头所示为导管尖端位置;R 表示右侧
图3 IVAP 导管异位于同侧颈内静脉的乳腺癌患者X 线摄影结果 注:在X 线摄影引导下,经IVAP 内推注碘海醇(造影剂)观察输注液体的流向,发现造影剂在血管内流向正常,并未产生明显的湍流IVAP 为植入式静脉输液港;箭头所示为造影剂
[1]
Teichgräber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN, et al. Outcome analysis in 3160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems [J]. Eur Radiol, 2011,21(6):1224-1232.
[2]
毕铁强, 周军, 汪瑞, 等. 完全植入式静脉输液港与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管在乳腺癌患者化疗中的应用效果比较[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2014,8(2):103-108.
[3]
Ma LI, Liu Y, Wang J, et al. Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2996 breast cancer patients[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2016,4(3):456-460.
[4]
孙玉巧, 周涛, 李云涛,等. 完全植入式静脉输液港的临床应用[J]. 中华外科杂志,2014,52(8):608-611.
[5]
Granic M, Zdravkovic D, Krstajic S, et al. Totally implantable central venous catheters of the port-a-cath type: complications due to its use in the treatment of cancer patients [J]. J BUON, 2014, 19 (3):842-846.
[6]
An H, Ryu CG, Jung EJ, et al. Insertion of totally implantable central venous access devices by surgeons[J]. Ann Coloproctol,2015,31(2):63-67.
[7]
Gurkan S, Seber S, Gur O, et al. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications[J]. J BUON,2015,20(1):338-345.
[8]
Keum DY, Kim JB, Chae MC. Safety of a totally implantable central venous port system with percutaneous subclavian vein access [J].Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2013,46(3):202-207.
[9]
Chang HM, Hsieh CB, Hsieh HF, et al. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2006,32(1):90-93.
[10]
Araújo C, Silva JP, Antunes P, et al. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2008,34(2):222-226.
[11]
Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, et al. Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators[J]. Intensive Care Med,2007,33(6):1055-1059.
[12]
Turker G, Kaya FN, Gurbet A, et al. Internal jugular vein cannulation: an ultrasound-guided technique versus a landmark-guided technique[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo),2009,64(10):989-992.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[12] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[13] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[14] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[15] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
阅读次数
全文


摘要