切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2008, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (02) : 18 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2008.02.005

临床研究

术前淋巴显像在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的作用
王磊1, 胡旭东1, 李济宇1, 陈鸣陆1, 杨国仁1, 刘岩松1, 周正波1, 李永清1, 刘雁冰1, 赵桐1, 陈鹏1, 左文述1, 王永胜1,()   
  1. 1.250117 济南,山东省肿瘤医院乳腺疾病中心
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-07 出版日期:2008-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王永胜

Role of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients

Lei WANG1, Xu-dong HU1, Ji-yu LI1, Ming-lu CHEN1, Guo-ren YANG1, Yan-song LIU1, Zheng-bo ZHOU1, Yong-qing LI1, Yan-bing LIU1, Tong ZHAO1, Peng CHEN1, Wen-shu ZUO1, Yong-sheng WANG,1()   

  1. 1.Breast Disease Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan 250117, China
  • Received:2007-09-07 Published:2008-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yong-sheng WANG
引用本文:

王磊, 胡旭东, 李济宇, 陈鸣陆, 杨国仁, 刘岩松, 周正波, 李永清, 刘雁冰, 赵桐, 陈鹏, 左文述, 王永胜. 术前淋巴显像在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的作用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2008, 02(02): 18-21.

Lei WANG, Xu-dong HU, Ji-yu LI, Ming-lu CHEN, Guo-ren YANG, Yan-song LIU, Zheng-bo ZHOU, Yong-qing LI, Yan-bing LIU, Tong ZHAO, Peng CHEN, Wen-shu ZUO, Yong-sheng WANG. Role of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2008, 02(02): 18-21.

目的

探讨术前淋巴显像在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy, SLNB)中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析了716 例联合术前淋巴显像与术中γ 探测仪和蓝染料检测乳腺癌SLNB 的结果。

结果

全组SLNB 成功率98. 2% (703/716),验证组SLNB 的假阴性率16. 0%(15/94)。 淋巴显像共成功地确定出620 例患者(86.6%)的前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN),并在36 例患者(5.0%)中发现了腋窝以外的前哨淋巴结。 淋巴显像确定SLN 的失败率与原发肿瘤的部位、肿瘤的病理类型和注射同位素到显像的时间无显著相关性(均P >0.05)。 注射示踪剂前已进行肿瘤切除活检的患者,其淋巴显像成功率低于未行肿瘤切除活检者; 淋巴结转移患者淋巴显像的成功率低于淋巴结阴性患者。 术中确定SLN 的成功率在术前淋巴显像成功组和失败组之间存在显著的统计学差异(99.5% vs 91.0%,P <0.01)。 术前淋巴显像是否成功确定SLN 与SLNB 的假阴性率无显著相关性(P=0.731)。

结论

乳腺癌SLN 术前淋巴显像可以预测术中SLNB 的成功率,同时术前淋巴显像有助于确定腋窝以外的SLN,但术前淋巴显像并非乳腺癌SLNB 所必需。

Objective

To explore the role of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in breast cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 716 consecutive breast cancer patients who received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy before SLNB in our database.

Results

The success rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was 98.2% (703/716). The false negative rate of SLNB was 16.0% (15/94). Among all the patients, sentinel lymph nodes ( SLN) were well imaged by lymphoscintigraphy in 86.6% patients,and SLNs were found at extra-axilla in 36 patients.The visualization of SLN in lymphoscintigraphy was not associated with histopathologic type,the location and stage of primary tumor and time interval from injection of radiocolliod to surgery. However,the negative lymphoscintigraphy results were associated with excision biopsy before injection of radiocolliod and axillary node metastases.Failure of surgical identification of axillary SLN was associated with the imaging of hot spot by lymphoscintigraphy. There was no significant difference in the false negative rate between patients who had axillary hot spot in lymphoscintigram and those who did not have (P=0.731).

Conclusions

Visualization of SLN in preoperative lymphoscintigraphy predicts the successful SLN identification.Moreover,preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is helpful in identification of extra-axillary sentinel nodes.However,it is not necessary in sentinel lymph nodes biopsy in breast cancer.

表1 淋巴显像所示前哨淋巴结的部位
表2 入组患者的临床病理特征和术前淋巴显像的结果
图1 术前淋巴显像示例 R:右侧;L:左侧;ANT:前视图;A:前;P:后; LL:左侧视图;SLN:前哨淋巴结;INJSPOT:注射部位
表3 术前淋巴显像确定前哨淋巴结与术中联合蓝染料确定前哨淋巴结成功率的关系
表4 术前淋巴显像对前哨淋巴结活检假阴性率的影响
[1]
Hilsenbeck S G, Ravdin P M, de Moor C A, et al. Timedependence of hazard ratios for prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat,1998,52:227 -237.
[2]
Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med,1998,339:941 -946.
[3]
McMasters K M, Giuliano A E, Ross M I, et al. Sentinellymph-node biopsy for breast cancer:not yet the standard of care.N Engl J Med,1998,339:990 -995.
[4]
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer:results in a large series.J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91:368 -373.
[5]
Wang Y, Yu J, Wang L, et al. The study of sentinel node biopsy in clinical node negative breast cancer in China. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2004,88:S89 -S95.
[6]
Thompson J F,Uren R F,Shaw H M,et al. Location of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma: new insights into lymphatic anatomy. J Am Coll Surg,1999,189:195-204.
[7]
McMasters K M, Wong S L, Tuttle T M, et al. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes. Ann Surg,2000,231:724 -731.
[8]
Goyal A, Newcombe R G, Mansel R E, et al. Role of routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer,2005,41:238 -243.
[9]
Rousseau C, Classe J M, Campion L, et al. The impact of nonvisualization of sentinel nodes on lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol,2005,12:533 -538.
[10]
Kawase K , Gayed I W , Hunt K K , et al . Use of lymphoscintigraphy defines lymphatic drainage patterns before sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg,2006,203:64 -72.
[11]
Martin R C 2 nd, Chagpar A, Scoggins C R, et al.Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg, 2005,241:1005 -1012.
[12]
Carcoforo P,Sortini D,Feggi L,et al. Clinical and therapeutic importance of sentinel node biopsy of the internal mammary chain in patients with breast cancer:a single-center study with long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13:1338 -1343.
[13]
Hong J, Chog E, Soni N, et al. Extra-axillary sentinel node biopsy in the management of early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol,2005,31:942 -948.
[14]
Klauber Demore N, Bevilacqua J L, Van Zee K J, et al.Comprehensive review of the management of internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg,2001,193:547 -555.
[15]
Burak W E Jr, Walker M J, Yee L D, et al. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg,1999,177:445 -449.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要