切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 264 -268. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2024.05.002

论 著

基于空芯针穿刺活组织检查的乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者治疗策略
张国锋1,(), 屈欣荣1, 李艳1, 张春1, 刘蕾2   
  1. 1.102206 北京大学国际医院乳腺外科
    2.102206 北京大学国际医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-21 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张国锋

Treatment strategy for breast fibroepithelial tumor diagnosed by core-needle biopsy

Guofeng Zhang1,(), Xinrong Qu1, Yan Li1, Chun Zhang1, Lei Liu2   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery,Peking University International Hospital,Beijing 102206,China
    2.Department of Pathology,Peking University International Hospital,Beijing 102206,China
  • Received:2023-10-21 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Guofeng Zhang
引用本文:

张国锋, 屈欣荣, 李艳, 张春, 刘蕾. 基于空芯针穿刺活组织检查的乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者治疗策略[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 264-268.

Guofeng Zhang, Xinrong Qu, Yan Li, Chun Zhang, Lei Liu. Treatment strategy for breast fibroepithelial tumor diagnosed by core-needle biopsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 264-268.

目的

探讨空芯针穿刺活组织检查(CNB)病理诊断为乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤(FT)患者的最佳治疗策略。

方法

回顾性分析2017 年1 月至2023 年5 月北京大学国际医院乳腺外科经CNB 诊断为FT 的783 例患者。 根据临床处理方法分为2 组:657 例患者(83.9%)为手术组,126 例患者(16.1%)为随访组。 比较2 组患者的临床特征和超声检查特征,评估手术组患者术后病理和临床特征的关系,以及随访组患者的自然病程及其影响因素。 年龄的组间比较采用独立样本t 检验,多组比较采用方差分析,并使用LSD-t 检验进行事后两两比较。 病变最长径的两组比较采用Mann-Whitney U 检验,多组比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H 检验,进一步两两比较采用Dunn-Bonferroni 检验。 临床特征、超声检查特征的多组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher 确切概率法,两两比较采用Bonferroni 校正。

结果

手术组与随访组患者的年龄(t=7.106,P<0.001)和乳腺癌家族史(χ2 =4.581,P =0.032)比较,差异有统计学意义。 2 组患者的超声检查特征比较,发现在病变形态不规则(χ2 =12.127,P<0.001)和BI-RADS 分类≥4B(χ2 =35.116,P<0.001)2 个方面差异有统计学意义。 手术组的术后病理显示:559 例(85.1%)为纤维腺瘤,84 例(12.8%)为良性叶状肿瘤(PT),14 例(2.1%)为非良性PT。 病变病理类型与是否可触及肿块(χ2 =9.252,P=0.010)和病变的最长径(超声:H=9.267,P<0.001;病理:H=8.421,P<0.001)具有相关性。 随访组中,83 例(65.9%)患者病变稳定,43 例(34.1%)患者病变最长径增加。 年长患者(≥40 岁)病变更倾向于保持稳定(χ2 =4.948,P=0.026)。 随访期间改行手术的11 例患者,病理诊断均为良性病变。

结论

大部分经CNB 诊断为FT 患者可通过门诊随访免除不必要的手术。 对于直径大于3 cm、有症状、快速增大或BI-RADS 分类≥4B 的患者,手术是合理的选择。

Objective

To explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with fibroepithelial tumor (FT) through core-needle biopsy (CNB).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 783 patients diagnosed with FT via CNB in the Department of Breast Surgery,Peking University International Hospital from January 2017 to May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on clinical management: the surgery group with 657 patients (83.9%) and the follow-up group with 126 patients (16.1%). Clinical and ultrasound characteristics were compared between the two groups, and the relationship between postoperative pathology and clinical features in the surgery group, and the natural progression and influencing factors in the follow-up group, were evaluated. Independent sample t-test was used to compare age between groups, and variance analysis was used for multiple group comparisons with LSD-t tests for post-hoc pairwise comparisons. The maximum lesion diameter was compared between two groups using Mann-Whitney U test, between multiple groups using Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by Dunn-Bonferroni tests for pairwise comparisons. Group comparisons of clinical and ultrasound characteristics were conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, with pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in age (t=7.106,P<0.001) and family history of breast cancer (χ2 =4.581, P=0.032) between the surgery group and follow-up group. In ultrasound characteristics, significant differences were found in the cases with lesion irregularity (χ2 =12.127, P<0.001) and BI-RADS grade ≥4B(χ2 =35.116, P<0.001) between the two groups. Postoperative pathology in the surgery group revealed 559 cases (85.1%) of fibroadenoma, 84 cases (12.8%) of benign phyllodes tumor (PT), and 14 cases (2.1%)of non-benign PT. The pathological type of the lesion was associated with palpable masses (χ2 =9.252,P=0.010) and maximum lesion diameter (ultrasound: H =9.267, P <0.001; pathology: H =8.421,P<0.001). In the follow-up group, 83 patients (65.9%) had stable lesions, while 43 patients (34.1%)showed an increase in maximum lesion diameter. Older patients (≥40 years) were more likely to have stable lesions (χ2 =4.948, P =0.026). All 11 patients who underwent surgery during the follow-up were diagnosed with benign lesions.

Conclusions

Most of the CNB-diagnosed FT patients can avoid unnecessary surgery through outpatient follow-up. Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with lesions which were larger than 3 cm, symptomatic, rapidly growing, or classified as BI-RADS grade ≥4B.

图1 932 例乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者入组流程图 注:FT 为乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤;FA 为纤维腺瘤;PT 为叶状肿瘤
表1 783 例乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者的临床特征[例(%)]
表2 783 例乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者超声检查特征[例(%)]
表3 657 例不同病理类型乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者临床特征比较[例(%)]
表4 126 例随访组乳腺纤维上皮性肿瘤患者病变最长径增长与临床特征的关系
[1]
Mousa-Doust D, Dingee CK, Chen L, et al. Excision of breast fibroepithelial lesions:when is it still necessary? A 10-year review of a regional centre[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2022,194(2):307-314.
[2]
Arnawoot B,Scaranelo A, Fleming R, et al. Cellular fibroepithelial lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy:is there any role of clinicalsonography features helping to differentiate fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumor? [J].J Surg Oncol,2020,122(3):382-387.
[3]
Li JJX,Tse GM.Core needle biopsy diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast:a diagnostic challenge[J].Pathology,2020,52(6):627-634.
[4]
Tan BY,Tan PH.A diagnostic approach to fibroepithelial breast lesions[J].Surg Pathol Clin,2018,11(1):17-42.
[5]
Limberg J,Barker K,Hoda S,et al.Fibroepithelial lesions(FT)of the breast:is routine excision always necessary? [J].World J Surg,2020,44(5):1552-1558.
[6]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:breast cancer(2024.V1) [EB/OL].[2024-03-02].https:/ /jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/22/5/article-p331.xml.
[7]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2024 年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2023, 33(12):1092-1187.
[8]
Marcil G,Wong S, Trabulsi N, et al. Fibroepithelial breast lesions diagnosed by core needle biopsy demonstrate a moderate rate of upstaging to phyllodes tumors[J].Am J Surg,2017,214(2):318-322.
[9]
Mohan SC,Tseng J, Marumoto A, et al. Upstaging of fibroepithelial lesions:a single-institution experience [J].Ann Surg Oncol,2022,29(4):2193-2199.
[10]
Mimoun C,Zeller A,Seror J,et al.A pre-operative score to discriminate fibroepithelial lesions of the breast:phyllode tumor or fibroadenoma?[J].Anticancer Res,2020,40(2):1095-1100.
[11]
Dessauvagie BF,Lee AHS,Meehan K,et al.Interobserver variation in the diagnosis of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast:a multicentre audit by digital pathology[J].J Clin Pathol,2018,71(8):672-679.
[12]
WHO classification of tumours editorial board.Breast tumours[M].5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press,2019:168-176
[13]
Telli ML,Horst KC,Guardino AE,et al.Phyllodes tumors of the breast:natural history,diagnosis,and treatment [J].J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2007,5(3):324-330.
[14]
Sim Y,Lee SE, Kim EK, et al. A radiomics approach for the classification of fibroepithelial lesions on breast ultrasonography [J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2020,46(5):1133-1141.
[15]
Ware AD, Argani P, Cimino-Mathews A. Accuracy and clinical implications of pre-operative breast core needle biopsy diagnoses of fibroepithelial neoplasms and sarcomatoid carcinomas[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2019,178(1):51-56.
[16]
Tse GMK,Lee CS,Kung FYL,et al.Hormonal receptors expression in epithelial cells of mammary phyllodes tumors correlates with pathologic grade of the tumor:a multicenter study of 143 cases[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2002,118(4):522-526.
[17]
Lee A,James J,Whisker L,et al.Which lesions with a radiological or core biopsy diagnosis of fibroadenoma should be excised? [J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2022,104(5):361-366.
[1] 代妮娜, 张文君. 乳腺纤维腺瘤的超声诊断及误诊分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1103-1107.
[2] 王琳琳, 方建强, 李尔清. 超声造影在乳腺叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(01): 29-32.
[3] 叶艳娜, 叶瑞婷, 陈艳玲, 彭雯, 刘乐, 肖文秋, 黄辉, 李明深, 钟慕仪, 叶娴. 基于影像学表现和临床病理特征预测良性与交界性乳腺叶状肿瘤复发的列线图模型[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 229-237.
[4] 张迈, 宋达疆, 张永林, 付玉梅, 徐晓蝶, 谭志华, 刘蜀. 自体组织乳房重建用于修复乳腺叶状肿瘤术后胸壁缺损[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 163-166.
[5] 刘泰源, 李珺, 高济越, 赵海东. 乳腺恶性叶状肿瘤预后因素分析及预后预测模型的构建[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 346-352.
[6] 超声引导微波(射频)消融治疗乳腺纤维腺瘤全国多中心研究协作组. 超声引导微波(射频)消融治疗乳腺纤维腺瘤专家共识[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 321-323.
[7] 李波, 张承圣, 文飞. 腋窝副乳腺纤维腺瘤二例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 191-192.
[8] 张秀祥, 李梦涵, 赵朋, 李晓莉, 战越, 石爱平. 乳腺低度恶性叶状肿瘤伴感染性休克一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 123-125.
[9] 李雄雄, 朱丽喆, 周灿, 任予. 复杂乳腺纤维腺瘤的诊断及治疗[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 61-64.
[10] 黄泽楠, 曾维根, 刘宇, 陈健宁, 胡攀, 刘仁斌. 乳腺叶状肿瘤60例临床病理分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 08(03): 223-227.
[11] 洪泓. 经腋前线单切口腔镜切除乳腺纤维瘤手术分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 09(03): 180-182.
[12] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要