切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 305 -310. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2026.05.007

论著

横滨报告系统在乳腺肿块空芯针穿刺组织印片快速现场评价中的应用
孙丽, 蔡媛†(), 米会敏, 张亚妮   
  1. 721000 宝鸡,宝鸡市中心医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-27 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 蔡媛

Application of the Yokohama reporting system in rapid on-site evaluation of core-needle biopsy touch imprints for breast masses

Li Sun, Yuan Cai†(), Huimin Mi, Yani Zhang   

  1. Department of Pathology, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji 721000, China
  • Received:2026-05-27 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuan Cai
引用本文:

孙丽, 蔡媛, 米会敏, 张亚妮. 横滨报告系统在乳腺肿块空芯针穿刺组织印片快速现场评价中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 305-310.

Li Sun, Yuan Cai, Huimin Mi, Yani Zhang. Application of the Yokohama reporting system in rapid on-site evaluation of core-needle biopsy touch imprints for breast masses[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 305-310.

目的

探讨横滨报告系统在乳腺肿块空芯针穿刺组织印片快速现场评价(ROSE)中的应用价值,评估基于该报告系统的ROSE分类情况开展患者分流管理的临床意义。

方法

根据纳入、排除标准,纳入2024年1月至2025年12月在宝鸡市中心医院行超声引导下乳腺肿块空芯针穿刺活检的1 475例患者资料进行前瞻性研究。穿刺标本同时制备组织印片行ROSE,采用国际细胞学学会横滨报告系统作为分类标准完成ROSE判读,结果分为良性病变、非典型病变、疑为恶性肿瘤、恶性肿瘤。以组织学诊断为金标准,对比分析基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类结果与组织学诊断的符合情况。采用Kappa一致性检验评估ROSE对乳腺肿块的诊断效能,并根据分类结果指导患者分流。

结果

1 475例标本中,基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类结果:良性病变770例,非典型病变74例,疑为恶性肿瘤43例,恶性肿瘤588例;其与组织学诊断准确度分别为99.5%(766/770)、55.4%(41/74)、93.0%(40/43)、100%(588/588)。基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类对比组织学诊断金标准的敏感度和特异度分别为94.58%(628/664)和99.63%(808/811),准确度为97.36%(1 436/1 475),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为99.52%(628/631)和95.73%(808/844)。乳腺肿块采用基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类结果与组织学诊断一致性较好(κ=0.946,P<0.05)。基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类为良性病变的770例患者均行日间手术,术中冰冻病理结果提示3例为恶性、1例为韧带样纤维瘤病的患者行扩大手术,与ROSE结果相符的766例患者次日出院;ROSE分类为非典型病变、疑为恶性肿瘤、恶性肿瘤均等待次日穿刺组织学病理结果,组织学诊断为良性病变的患者行微创手术,诊断为交界性肿瘤的患者行扩大手术,诊断为恶性肿瘤的患者行新辅助治疗或改良根治术或保留乳房手术。

结论

横滨报告系统可应用于乳腺肿块空芯针穿刺组织印片ROSE中,分类为良性病变、疑为恶性肿瘤及恶性肿瘤者与组织学诊断准确度较高,对评估乳腺肿块性质具有较高的诊断效能,有助于优化乳腺肿块患者的诊疗流程。

Objective

To explore the application value of the Yokohama reporting system in rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of touch imprints from core-needle biopsy (CNB) of breast masses, and to evaluate the clinical significance of patient triage management based on ROSE classification according to this reporting system.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of 1 475 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided CNB for breast masses at the Baoji Central Hospital from January 2024 to December 2025 were enrolled in this prospective study. Touch imprints were simultaneously prepared from biopsy specimens for ROSE. ROSE interpretation was performed with the Yokohama reporting system by the International Academy of Cytology as the classification standard, and the results were divided into benign lesion, atypical lesion, suspicious for malignancy and malignant tumour. Using histological diagnosis as the gold standard, the concordance between ROSE classification results based on the Yokohama reporting system and histological diagnosis was compared and analysed. The Kappa consistency test was adopted to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ROSE for breast masses, and patient triage was guided according to the classification results.

Results

Among the 1 475 specimens, ROSE classifications based on the Yokohama reporting system showed 770 benign lesions, 74 atypical lesions, 43 suspicious malignancies and 588 malignant tumours. The diagnostic accuracy compared with histological diagnosis was 99.5% (766/770), 55.4% (41/74), 93.0% (40/43) and 100% (588/588), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of ROSE classification based on the Yokohama reporting system against the histopathological gold standard were 94.58% (628/664), 99.63% (808/811) and 97.36% (1 436/1 475), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 99.52% (628/631) and 95.73% (808/844). The ROSE classification of breast masses had good consistency with histological diagnosis (κ=0.946, P<0.05). All 770 patients with ROSE classification of benign lesion received day-case surgery. Intraoperative frozen pathology revealed 3 cases of malignancy and 1 case of desmoid fibromatosis, for which extended surgery was subsequently performed. The remaining 766 patients consistent with ROSE results were discharged on the next day. Patients with ROSE results of atypical lesion, suspicious malignancy and malignant tumour waited for the final histological report on the following day. Patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions underwent minimally invasive surgery; patients with borderline tumours received extended surgery; patients with malignant tumours received neoadjuvant therapy, modified radical mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery.

Conclusion

The Yokohama reporting system can be applied to ROSE of touch imprints from CNB of breast masses. The categories of benign lesion, suspicious malignancy and malignant tumour demonstrate high concordance with histological diagnosis. This system exhibits high diagnostic efficacy in evaluating the nature of breast masses and helps optimise the diagnosis and treatment workflow for patients with breast masses.

图1 乳腺肿块患者空芯针穿刺处理流程 注:ROSE为快速现场评价,本研究ROSE环节采用横滨报告系统完成细胞学分类;HE为苏木精-伊红
图2 乳腺肿块患者穿刺标本基于横滨报告系统的ROSE分类及对应术后组织学病理图 A图为ROSE分类良性病变(快速HE ×100);B图为A图对应患者术后组织学病理示纤维腺瘤(HE ×100);C图为ROSE分类非典型病变(快速HE ×400);D图为C图对应患者术后组织学病理示导管内乳头状癌(HE ×100);E图为ROSE分类疑恶性肿瘤(快速HE ×200);F图为E图对应患者术后组织学病理示乳腺黏液癌(HE ×100);G图为ROSE分类恶性肿瘤(快速HE ×40);H图为G图对应患者术后组织学病理示浸润性乳腺癌非特殊类型(HE ×100)
表1 1 475例乳腺肿块基于横滨报告系统ROSE分类结果与组织学诊断结果对照(例)
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会乳腺外科学组. 超声引导乳腺病灶和区域淋巴结穿刺活检专家共识与临床操作意见[J]. 中华外科杂志,2019,57(6):404-407.
[2]
Sanderink WBG,Camps-Herrero J,Athanasiou A,et al. Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions: when to use what biopsy technique[J]. Insights Imaging,2025,16(1):208.
[3]
Field AS,Raymond WA,Rickard M,et al. The international academy of cytology Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytopathology[J]. Acta Cytol,2019,63(4):257-273.
[4]
何蕾蕾,马宁,米会敏,等. HE染色应用于快速现场细胞学评价的方法介绍[J]. 诊断病理学杂志,2022,29(10):975-976.
[5]
赵琳琳,曹淼,王聪,等. 不同醇类固定液快速HE染色在细胞学快速现场评估中的效果研究[J]. 诊断病理学杂志,2024,31(10):980-984.
[6]
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Breast tumours [M]. 5th ed. Lyon:IARC Press,2019.
[7]
杨文涛,步宏. 第5版WHO乳腺肿瘤分类解读[J]. 中华病理学杂志,2020,49(5):400-405.
[8]
邵牧民. “WHO细胞病理学报告系统”与乳腺细胞学的应用[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志,2024,40(11):1130-1134.
[9]
Milluzzo SM,Olivari N,Rossi G,et al. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA)for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique:a single-centre experience[J]. Cytopathology,2023,34(4):318-324.
[10]
Jaleel R,George JT,Thomas A,et al. Comparison of the diagnostic yield of rapid versus non-rapid onsite evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solid pancreatic lesions[J]. Ann Gastroenterol,2024,37(3):371-376.
[11]
Kothari K,Tummidi S,Agnihotri M,et al. This 'rose' has no thorns: diagnostic utility of 'rapid on-site evaluation' (ROSE) in fine needle aspiration cytology[J]. Indian J Surg Oncol, 2019, 10(4): 688-698.
[12]
Graham AJ,Robinson MT,Kahler J,et al. Rapid on-site evaluation(ROSE)of image-guided FNA specimens improves subsequent core biopsy adequacy in clinical trial patients:The impact of preanalytical factors and its correlation with survival[J]. Cancer Cytopathol,2024,132(1):30-40.
[13]
李惠,晋萍,张祥武,等. 现场快速评估技术在术中诊断乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2023,17(1):6-12.
[14]
Nema M,Pachoria R,Khandare M,et al. Touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy:an underused low-cost strategy for same-day breast cancer diagnosis in resource-limited settings[J]. Trop Doct,2026,56(1):83-85.
[15]
中华医学会消化内镜学分会,中国医师协会消化医师分会,国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心,等. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸/活检标本的快速现场细胞学评价专家共识[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2026,43(1):10-19.
[16]
邵牧民,毕嘉欣,王晓玫,等. 乳腺细针穿刺细胞学诊断规范探讨[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志,2023,39(1):1-6.
[17]
米会敏,蔡媛. 快速细胞学评估在乳腺包块诊断中的应用[J]. 临床与病理杂志,2024,44(10):1398-1402.
[18]
于丹,刘建学,蔡媛,等. 快速现场细胞学评估在超声引导下乳腺病灶粗针穿刺活检中的应用[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2025,36(11):776-779.
[19]
Boler AK,Roy S,Singh PP,et al. Effectivity of touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy in evaluation of breast lesions:a study in changing trends of rapid on site evaluation[J]. J Cytol,2024,41(3):162-165.
[20]
Klevesath MB,Godwin RJ,Bannon R,et al. Touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy specimens:a useful method for immediate reporting of symptomatic breast lesions[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2005,31(5):490-494.
[21]
Kooistra B,Wauters C,Strobbe L,et al. Preoperative cytological and histological diagnosis of breast lesions:a critical review[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2010,36(10):934-940.
[22]
Agrawal N, Kothari K, Tummidi S, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytopathology of breast lesions using the international academy of cytology Yokohama system and rapid on-site evaluation: a single-institute experience[J]. Acta Cytol, 2021, 65(6): 463-477.
[23]
Torous VF, Lopez SH, Xu C, et al. Performance of rapid on-site evaluation in breast fine-needle aspiration biopsies: identifying areas of diagnostic challenge[J]. Acta Cytol, 2022, 66(1): 1-13.
[1] 孔祥溢, 白裕涵, 王翔宇, 张文祥, 陈力, 伍娟, 王仲照, 方仪, 王靖. 早期乳腺癌腋窝降阶梯治疗的循证医学证据与临床决策[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 265-271.
[2] 李珂, 张译尹, 杨后圃, 王殊. 乳腺癌保留乳房手术中精准定位与切缘评估技术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 272-278.
[3] 李玲, 金锋, 张殿龙, 白石, 陈波. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结示踪技术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 279-284.
[4] 谢丽, 宋佳睿, 高纪东, 林栋材, 陈晓琦, 黄埔, 孙佳乐, 李源, 谢欣彤, 周红. 内增压供血在乳腺癌术后即刻腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 285-290.
[5] 张薇, 魏敏, 金小丁, 储呈玉, 汤永喆, 王杰, 金贻婷. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人在经腋窝入路保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术联合即刻胸肌前假体乳房重建中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 291-296.
[6] 李贤, Arslan Muhammad, 何琳赟, 朱迪, 朱燕雯, 张普生. 吲哚菁绿荧光导航在腔镜下乳腺癌带蒂大网膜保留乳房整形手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 297-304.
[7] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌整合防筛专业委员会. 乳腺癌遗传咨询专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 197-206.
[8] 谭玉靓, 马飞. 组蛋白乙酰转移酶抑制剂在激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性乳腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 207-212.
[9] 黎立喜, 桑蝶, 段博识, 李巧佴, 郑晓娟, 彭雪楠, 曾成, 祁亚龙, 张晓童, 岳静, 兰波, 王佳玉, 李俏, 马飞. 艾立布林在不同分子分型晚期乳腺癌中的疗效分析:多中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 213-218.
[10] 于世元, 邓嘉诚, 王磊, 孙旭, 李朦, 李响, 张熠, 史若彤, 吕铮. 3种细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性乳腺癌中的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 219-227.
[11] 苏金铭, 田萍, 李青林, 马静, 宋伟伟, 刘博文, 曹晓莹, 薛玲, 王文军. HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者复发转移的影响因素及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 228-235.
[12] 凌洁, 吴世婷, 尹勇, 邓显光, 周瑶, 龚婕, 赵丹, 刘丽芳. 血清标志物在肿块期肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎、乳腺癌及乳腺纤维腺瘤中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 236-244.
[13] 曾成, 高颖, 王佳妮, 马飞. 乳腺癌全程管理中的肿瘤心脏病风险识别与长期随访[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 245-250.
[14] 田晨阳, 官浩, 胡大海, 计鹏, 杨云舒, 刘博, 郑朝. 内窥镜辅助下采用钟摆形背阔肌肌皮瓣修复乳腺癌术后乳房缺损的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 247-252.
[15] 顾芯烨, 宋佳, 王皆, 李亚婕, 汪波, 顾剑峰. MRI征象评估乳腺癌新辅助后手术治疗时机的研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 422-426.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?