切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 156 -162. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2026.03.004

论著

线粒体基质导入因子23在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其作用机制
范遥1, 黄玉娥1, 杨森果2, 丁华2, 张黔3, 刘蜀2,3,()   
  1. 1 550004 贵州,贵州医科大学附属医院精准医学研究院
    2 550004 贵州,贵州医科大学附属医院乳腺外科
    3 550004 贵州,贵州医科大学附属医院临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-25 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘蜀
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(62541203); 贵州省科技厅基础研究计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK(2022)一般431); 贵州医科大学国家自然科学基金培育项目(22NFCP50)

Expression of mitochondrial matrix import factor 23 in triple negative breast cancer and its mechanism

Yao Fan1, Yu'e Huang1, Senguo Yang2, Hua Ding2, Qian Zhang3, Shu Liu2,3,()   

  1. 1 Institute of Precision Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
    2 Department of Breast Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
    3 School of Clinical Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
  • Received:2025-12-25 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Shu Liu
引用本文:

范遥, 黄玉娥, 杨森果, 丁华, 张黔, 刘蜀. 线粒体基质导入因子23在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 156-162.

Yao Fan, Yu'e Huang, Senguo Yang, Hua Ding, Qian Zhang, Shu Liu. Expression of mitochondrial matrix import factor 23 in triple negative breast cancer and its mechanism[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 156-162.

目的

探讨线粒体基质导入因子23(MIX23)影响三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的分子机制。

方法

从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库下载乳腺癌患者的 RNA-Seq表达谱数据及其对应的临床信息,共纳入1 097例原发肿瘤组织和114例癌旁正常组织样本用于后续分析。从人类蛋白质图谱(HPA)数据库获取乳腺癌组织中MIX23的免疫组织化学染色图像(肿瘤组织样本11例,癌旁正常组织样本6例)并对蛋白表达水平进行定量分析。下载METABRIC乳腺癌队列(1 980例)的表达谱数据作为独立验证集。基于MIX23在乳腺癌患者中的表达均值,将TCGA数据与METABRIC数据各划分为高、低表达两组(TCGA:高表达480例,低表达534例;METABRIC:高表达969例,低表达1 011例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并通过Log-rank检验评估两组间生存率差异。通过RT-qPCR和Western blot检测TNBC细胞系 MDA-MB-231中MIX23的mRNA和蛋白表达。利用慢病毒载体构建稳定敲低MIX23的MDA-MB-231细胞(sh-MIX23组),将表达非靶向 scramble shRNA 慢病毒载体的细胞作为对照组。通过克隆形成、CCK-8及细胞划痕实验检测细胞增殖及迁移能力。基于TCGA数据进行差异基因分析,筛选下游靶点。

结果

在TCGA队列中,与癌旁正常组织相比,MIX23 mRNA在乳腺癌组织中的表达水平显著升高(7.756±0.605比7.145±0.341,t=16.613,P<0.001)。HPA队列分析显示MIX23在肿瘤组织中的表达高于癌旁正常组织(43.978±4.158比55.211±7.339, t=-2.980, P=0.018)。MIX23在TNBC、HER-2阳性、Luminal A及Luminal B型不同亚型组织中的表达水平分别为8.154±0.743、7.858±0.628、7.613±0.535、7.744±0.477,4组间比较差异具有统计学意义(F=28.260,P<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析结果显示,在TCGA队列中,MIX23的高表达与无病间期缩短显著相关(HR=1.667,95%CI:1.087~2.555,P=0.018)。MIX23敲低后,与对照组相比,细胞克隆形成能力显著降低(184.500±9.576比110.200±6.976,t=12.578,P<0.001),增殖能力在24、48、72 h受到显著抑制(0 h:0.185±0.009比0.182±0.007,t=0.515,P=0.626;24 h:0.399±0.057比0.246±0.004,t=4.333,P=0.006;48 h:0.704±0.058比0.403±0.021,t=9.642,P<0.001;72 h:0.999±0.0416比0.452±0.031,t=21.110,P<0.000 1),24 h后的细胞相对迁移面积显著小于对照组(62.861±12.252比35.971±8.024,t=5.193,P<0.01)。与对照组比较,MIX23可以上调骨诱导因子(OGN)表达(1.195±0.254比1.958±0.223,t=-3.945,P=0.018),Akt、mTOR、EGFR表达明显下调(1.000±0.023比0.054±0.006,t=68.352,P<0.001;1.000±0.052比0.058±0.007,t=31.092,P<0.001;1.000±0.094比0.036±0.004,t=17.785,P<0.001)。

结论

MIX23在乳腺癌组织中呈高表达且与预后不良相关,敲低MIX23可通过上调OGN并抑制下游EGFR/Akt/mTOR通路,进而抑制乳腺癌生长及转移。

Objective

To explore the molecular mechanism by which mitochondrial matrix import factor 23 (MIX23) affects triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

The RNA-Seq expression profile and corresponding clinical data of breast cancer patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, including 1 097 primary tumor tissue samples and 114 adjacent normal tissue samples. Immunohistochemistry staining images of MIX23 in breast cancer tissues were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database for quantitative analysis of protein expression levels. Expression profile data of the METABRIC breast cancer cohort were downloaded as an independent validation set. Based on the mean expression level of MIX23 in breast cancer patients, the TCGA and METABRIC datasets were each stratified into high- and low-expression groups (TCGA: 480 cases in high-expression group, 534 in low-expression group; METABRIC: 969 in high-expression group, 1,011 in low-expression group). Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, and log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in survival rate between the two groups. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to detect the mRNA and protein expression of MIX23 in TNBC cell line. Lentiviral vector was used to construct MDA-MB-231 cells with stable MIX23 knockdown (sh-MIX23 group), with the cells transfected with lentiviral vectors carrying non-targeted scramble shRNA as control group. Cell clone formation assay, CCK-8 assay and cell scratch assay were adopted to detect cell proliferation and migration abilities. Differential gene analysis was performed based on TCGA database to identify downstream target genes.

Results

In the TCGA cohort, the mRNA expression level of MIX23 was significantly higher in breast cancer tissues than in adjacent normal breast tissues (7.756±0.605 vs 7.145±0.341, t=16.613, P<0.001). HPA cohort analysis also showed that MIX23 expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues than in normal tissues (43.978±4.158 vs 55.211±7.339, t=-2.980, P=0.018). The expression levels of MIX23 in TNBC, HER-2 positive, Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes were 8.154±0.743, 7.858±0.628, 7.613±0.535 and 7.744±0.477, respectively, with significant difference (F=28.260, P<0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that in the TCGA cohort, high MIX23 expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free interval (HR=1.667, 95%CI: 1.087–2.555, P=0.018). After MIX23 knockdown, compared with control group, the colony formation ability of cells in the sh-MIX23 group was significantly decreased (184.5±9.576 vs 110.2±6.976, t=12.578, P<0.001), the cell proliferation was markedly inhibited at 24, 48 and 72 h (0 h: 0.185±0.009 vs 0.182±0.007, t=0.515, P=0.626; 24 h: 0.399±0.057 vs 0.246±0.004, t=4.333, P=0.006; 48 h: 0.704±0.058 vs 0.403±0.021, t=9.642, P<0.001; 72 h: 0.999±0.0416 vs 0.452±0.031, t=21.110, P<0.0001). The relative migration area of cells in the sh-MIX23 group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at 24 h after scratching (62.861±12.252 vs 35.971±8.024, t=5.193, P<0.01). Compared with the control group, MIX23 could up-regulate the expression of osteoglycin (1.195±0.254 vs 1.958±0.223, t=-3.945, P=0.018) and inhibit the expression of Akt, mTOR and EGFR (1.000±0.023 vs 0.054±0.006, t=68.352, P<0.0001; 1.000±0.052 vs 0.058±0.007, t=31.092, P<0.0001; 1.000±0.094 vs 0.036±0.004, t=17.785, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

MIX23 is highly expressed in breast cancer and correlated with poor prognosis. Knockdown of MIX23 affects the growth and metastasis of breast cancer by up-regulating osteoglycin and inhibiting the downstream EGFR/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

图1 TCGA数据库中MIX23高、低表达患者无瘤生存曲线 注:HR=1.667,95%CI:1.087~2.555,P=0.018
图2 敲低MIX23的MDA-MB-231细胞克隆形成实验结果(结晶紫染色) A图为sh-NC组;B图为sh-MIX23组
图3 敲低MIX23后的MDA-MB-231细胞划痕愈合实验结果(×10) A、C图分别为sh-NC组0、24 h对比图;B、D图为sh-MIX23组0、24 h对比图
图4 MIX23敲低后MDA-MB-231细胞中OGN的蛋白表达 注:a为sh-NC组,b为sh-MIX23组;MIX23为线粒体基质导入因子23;OGN为骨诱导因子;GAPDH为甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶
图5 MIX23敲低后MDA-MB-231细胞中EGFR/Akt/mTOR信号通路蛋白表达 注:a为sh-NC组,b为sh-MIX23组; MIX23为线粒体基质导入因子23;EGFR为表皮生长因子受体;Akt为蛋白激酶B;mTOR为哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白;GAPDH为甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶
[1]
Xiong XZheng LWDing Y, et al. Breast cancer:pathogenesis and treatments[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther202510(1):49.
[2]
Li YWDai LJWu XR, et al. Molecular characterization and classification of HER2-positive breast cancer inform tailored therapeutic strategies[J]. Cancer Res202484(21):3669-3683.
[3]
Gong YJi PYang YS, et al. Metabolic-pathway-based subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets[J]. Cell Metab202133(1):51-64.
[4]
Liang YZhang HSong X, et al. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer:molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets[J]. Semin Cancer Biol202060:14-27.
[5]
Wu GYXiao MZHao WC, et al. Drug resistance in breast cancer:mechanisms and strategies for management[J]. Drug Resist Updat202583:101288.
[6]
Liu YHe JChen J, et al. Programmed cell death in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett202530(1):111.
[7]
Liu YHu YXue J, et al. Advances in immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Mol Cancer202322(1):145.
[8]
Qiu PYu XZheng F, et al. Advancements in liquid biopsy for breast cancer:molecular biomarkers and clinical applications[J]. Cancer Treat Rev2025139:102979.
[9]
Yao DWang YDong X, et al. Renal-clearable and tumor-retained nanodots overcoming metabolic reprogramming to boost mitochondrial-targeted photodynamic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. J Nanobiotechnology202523(1):195.
[10]
van den Ende NSNguyen AHJager A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer and predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy:a systematic review[J]. Int J Mol Sci202324(3):2969.
[11]
Wang XLi XDong T, et al. Global biomarker trends in triple-negative breast cancer research:a bibliometric analysis[J]. Int J Surg2024110(12):7962-7983.
[12]
Du HXu TYu S, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer therapeutic innovation[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther202510(1):245.
[13]
Delaunay SPascual GFeng B, et al. Mitochondrial RNA modifications shape metabolic plasticity in metastasis[J]. Nature2022607(7919):593-603.
[14]
Minarrieta LAnnis MGAudet-Delage Y, et al. Mitochondrial elongation impairs breast cancer metastasis[J]. Sci Adv202410(45):eadm8212.
[15]
Zöller ELaborenz JKrämer L, et al. The intermembrane space protein Mix23 is a novel stress-induced mitochondrial import factor[J]. J Biol Chem2020295(43):14686-14697.
[16]
Liu XSalokas KTamene F, et al. An AP-MS- and BioID-compatible MAC-tag enables comprehensive mapping of protein interactions and subcellular localizations[J]. Nat Commun20189(1):1188.
[17]
Wu HGeng QShi W, et al. Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis reveals CCDC58 as a carcinogenic factor related to immune infiltration[J]. Apoptosis202429(3-4):536-555.
[18]
Dai WYang JYang W, et al. CCDC58 drives lung adenocarcinoma progression via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway[J]. Front Oncol202515:1619123.
[19]
Liu ZLin XTan T, et al. Identification of CCDC58 as a potential predictive biomarker of immune cell infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Discov Oncol202516(1):448.
[20]
Wang ZLi YYang J, et al. Circ-TRIO promotes TNBC progression by regulating the miR-432-5p/CCDC58 axis[J]. Cell Death Dis202213(9):776.
[21]
Nulali JZhan MZhang K, et al. Osteoglycin:an ECM factor regulating fibrosis and tumorigenesis[J]. Biomolecules202212(11):1674.
[22]
Mohan VDas ASagi I. Emerging roles of ECM remodeling processes in cancer[J]. Semin Cancer Biol202062:192-200.
[23]
Yang MHu HWu S, et al. EIF4A3-regulated circ_0087429 can reverse EMT and inhibit the progression of cervical cancer via miR-5003-3p-dependent upregulation of OGN expression[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res202241(1):165.
[24]
Jiang BXiao SZhang S, et al. The miR-1290/OGN axis in ovarian cancer-associated fibroblasts modulates cancer cell proliferation and invasion[J]. J Ovarian Res202417(1):52.
[25]
Xu TZhang RDong M, et al. Osteoglycin (OGN) inhibits cell proliferation and invasiveness in breast cancer via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway[J]. Onco Targets Ther201912:10639-10650.
[26]
Vyas SZaganjor EHaigis MC. Mitochondria and cancer[J]. Cell2016166(3):555-566.
[27]
Gandhi NDas GM. Metabolic reprogramming in breast cancer and its therapeutic[J]. Cells20198(2):89.
[28]
Takeuchi KSoda MTogashi Y, et al. RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer[J]. Nat Med201218(3):378-381.
[29]
Walker BRMoraes CT. Nuclear-mitochondrial interactions[J]. Biomolecules202212(3):427.
[30]
Pei WBLei ZYXie FQ, et al. A novel photosensitizer berberine derivative B12 induces apoptosis and suppresses HIF-1alpha expression in colorectal cancer cells via mitochondria-to-nucleus sequential-targeting[J]. Acta Pharmacol Sin202647(5):1249-1269.
[31]
Priyanka PPYenugu S. Coiled-coil domain-containing (CCDC) proteins:functional roles in general and male reproductive physiology[J]. Reprod Sci202128(10):2725-2734.
[32]
Sun RGe WZhu Y, et al. Proteomic dynamics of breast cancer cell lines identifies potential therapeutic protein targets[J]. Mol Cell Proteomics202322(8):100602.
[33]
Hu XLi YQLi QG, et al. Osteoglycin (OGN) reverses epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasiveness in colorectal cancer via EGFR/Akt pathway[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res201837(1):41.
[1] 王硕, 郑新宇. 乳腺癌术后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的病理学认知与处理[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 133-137.
[2] 丁彩霞, 曲景辉, 裴英宏, 李静娜, 郑晓瑜, 徐岭植, 李思思. 基于RNA结合蛋白基因表达特征的乳腺癌预后预测模型构建及评价分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 138-147.
[3] 王美衡, 李杰, 陈策实, 许超汉. 乳腺癌串联重复表型的识别及分子功能特征分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 148-155.
[4] 中国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌专家委员会, 中国医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会, 广东省药学会. 乳腺癌内分泌治疗超说明书用药专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 69-81.
[5] 莫遵玉, 赖莉萍, 李水平, 葛肖艳. 基于多种超声参数构建乳腺癌高负荷腋窝淋巴结转移的预测模型[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 82-90.
[6] 肖晓, 张心蓝, 汤怡梅, 吴玉婷, 周云, 韩晓蓉. 切除活检与空芯针穿刺活检在乳腺癌患者保留乳房手术中的对比分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 91-97.
[7] 肖佳, 王寅欢, 苏小君, 章国智, 李丹, 吴丹, 杨英. 乳腺癌患者首次日间化疗出院准备度与医学应对方式的相关性[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 98-103.
[8] 李会霞, 王文东, 杜鹏, 邢文豪, 刘悦琦, 密雪芳, 邓萌, 葛新. 妊娠相关乳腺癌发病机制及诊疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 104-108.
[9] 刘天航, 刘志坤, 张安度. 新辅助化疗乳腺癌患者术后放射治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 109-114.
[10] 冯学乾, 王千丹, 张旭. 乳腺叶状肿瘤的诊疗进展与全程管理策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-119.
[11] 杨莉金, 任丹丹, 朱红梅, 张馨丹, 袁三英. 特级初榨橄榄油对乳腺癌发病风险及预后影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 120-123.
[12] 贾亚南, 尚迎晓, 甄江涛. 乳腺术后皮下高引流量淋巴漏1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 303-304.
[13] 何宇杭, 曹中伟. 中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值与乳腺癌的关联性及预测效能研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 279-283.
[14] 田爱洁, 何晨熙, 孔凡庭. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后乳腺钼靶微钙化术前评估的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 284-288.
[15] 韩丽丽, 范慈勃, 陈纲. PALB2基因胚系突变与中国女性乳腺癌遗传风险及临床特征的关联研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 289-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?