切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 151 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2023.03.004

论著

伴人类免疫缺陷病毒感染乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征与预后的相关性研究
吴茜, 邓力, 练士贤, 张华, 江颖, 张宏伟()   
  1. 200083 上海市公共卫生临床中心普外科
    200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-29 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张宏伟

Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HIV-infected breast cancer patients

Qian Wu, Li Deng, Shixian Lian, Hua Zhang, Ying Jiang, Hongwei Zhang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Center, Shanghai 200083, China
    Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2022-07-29 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Zhang
引用本文:

吴茜, 邓力, 练士贤, 张华, 江颖, 张宏伟. 伴人类免疫缺陷病毒感染乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征与预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 151-156.

Qian Wu, Li Deng, Shixian Lian, Hua Zhang, Ying Jiang, Hongwei Zhang. Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HIV-infected breast cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 151-156.

目的

研究人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征、治疗现状及预后情况。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究方法,收集2016年8月至2022年1月于上海市公共卫生临床中心就诊的19例伴HIV感染乳腺癌患者临床资料(HIV组),以2016年11月至2021年5月同医院收治的174例非HIV乳腺癌患者作为研究对照(非HIV组)。通过倾向性评分匹配(PSM)按1∶2匹配后得到38例患者作为对照组。应用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验比较2组患者的DFS和OS。采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行预后的单因素及多因素分析。

结果

19例HIV感染乳腺癌患者中位随访时间为24个月。PSM前相较于HIV组,非HIV组患者激素受体阳性率、Ki-67低表达率、肿瘤分期为0、Ⅰ、Ⅱ期和区域淋巴结无转移率的患者比例均更高(P=0.034、0.048、0.026;χ2=4.499,P=0.034)。PSM后,2组患者的基线资料比较无统计学差异,2组患者DFS和OS比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.295,P=0.004;χ2=12.759,P<0.001)。单因素分析发现激素受体状态与DFS相关(HR=0.115,95%CI:0.013~0.991,P=0.049),HIV感染与DFS及OS均相关(HR=6.101,95%CI:1.510~24.657,P=0.004;HR=17.682,95%CI:2.049~152.565,P<0.001)。多因素分析发现HIV感染与DFS及OS均相关(HR=7.891,95%CI:1.715~36.322,P=0.008;HR=37.796,95%CI:2.338~611.103,P=0.011)。

结论

HIV感染的乳腺癌患者预后较差。

Objective

To study the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of HIV-infected breast cancer patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 19 HIV-infected breast cancer patients (HIV-infected group) in the Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical center from August 2016 to January 2022. Another 174 breast cancer patients who were not infected by HIV (non-HIV-infected group) admitted in the same hospital from November 2016 to May 2021 served as controls. By propensity score matching (PSM) at 1∶2, 38 cases were obtained from non-HIV-infected group. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to develop survival curves, and the Log-rank test was used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between two groups. The Cox proportional risk regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The median follow-up time was 24 months. All patients were treated with standardized HARRT therapy. Before PSM, compared with the HIV-infected group, the non-HIV-infected group showed higher rates of hormonal receptor(HR) positivity, low Ki-67 expression, 0-Ⅱ stage tumor and no metastasis in axillary lymph nodes (P=0.034, 0.048, 0.026; χ2=4.499, P=0.034). After PSM, there was no significant difference in the baseline data between two groups, but the DFS and OS presented a significant difference (χ2=8.295, P=0.004; χ2=12.759, P<0.001). Univariate Cox analysis showed that HR expression was related to DFS (HR=0.115, 95%CI: 0.013-0.991, P=0.049), and HIV infection was related to both DFS and OS (HR=6.101, 95%CI: 1.510-24.657, P=0.004; HR=17.682, 95%CI: 2.049-152.565, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that HIV infection was related to both DFS and OS (HR=7.891, 95%CI: 1.715-36.322, P=0.008; HR=37.796, 95%CI: 2.338-611.103, P=0.011).

Conclusion

HIV-infected breast cancer patients have a poor prognosis.

表1 57例乳腺癌患者预后影响因素的Cox回归分析变量赋值表
表2 HIV感染组和非HIV感染组乳腺癌患者临床病理特征比较
图1 HIV感染和非HIV感染组乳腺癌患者的生存曲线 a图为患者的无瘤生存曲线;b图为患者的总生存曲线注:无复发生存率,χ2=8.295,P=0.004;总生存率,χ2=12.759,P<0.001
表3 57例乳腺癌患者总生存率和无瘤生存率影响因素的单因素分析
表4 57例乳腺癌患者总生存率和无瘤生存率影响因素的多因素分析
[1]
Ceccarelli M, Venanzi RE, Marino MA, et al. Non-AIDS defining cancers: a comprehensive update on diagnosis and management[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 202024(7):3849-3875.
[2]
Arts EJ, Hazuda DJ. HIV-1 antiretroviral drug therapy[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 20122(4):a7161.
[3]
Coghill AE, Shiels MS, Suneja G, et al. Elevated cancer-specific mortality among HIV-infected patients in the United States[J]. J Clin Oncol, 201533(21):2376-2383.
[4]
Patel P, Hanson DL, Sullivan PS, et al. Incidence of types of cancer among HIV~infected persons compared with the general population in the United States, 1992-2003[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2008148(10):728-736.
[5]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin. 202171(3):209-249.
[6]
Jiang Z, Li J, Chen J, et al. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022 [J]. Transl Breast Cancer Res20223: 13.
[7]
覃亚勤,罗凤,黎彦君,等. 艾滋病合并恶性肿瘤住院患者疾病谱分析[J/CD]. 新发传染病电子杂志20227(1):39-42.
[8]
Brandão M, Bruzzone M, Franzoi MA, et al. Impact of HIV infection on baseline characteristics and survival of women with breast cancer[J]. Aids, 202135(4):605-618.
[9]
Bense RD, Sotiriou C, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. Relevance of tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition and functionality for disease outcome in breast cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2017109(1): djw192.
[10]
Cubasch H, Joffe M, Hanisch R, et al. Breast cancer characteristics and HIV among 1,092 women in Soweto, South Africa[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2013140(1):177-186.
[11]
Coghill AE, Han X, Suneja G, et al. Advanced stage at diagnosis and elevated mortality among US patients with cancer infected with HIV in the National Cancer Data Base[J]. Cancer, 2019125(16):2868-2876.
[12]
Robbins HA, Pfeiffer RM, Shiels MS, et al. Excess cancers among HIV-infected people in the United States[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst., 2015107(4):dju503.
[13]
郑莹,吴春晓,张敏璐. 乳腺癌在中国的流行状况和疾病特征[J]. 中国癌症杂志201323(8):561-569.
[14]
Singh SN, Zhu Y, Chumsri S, et al. Outcomes and chemotherapy-related toxicity in HIV-infected patients with breast cancer [J]. Clin Breast Cancer201414(2):e53-e59.
[15]
Vaccher E, Spina M, di Gennaro G, et al. Concomitant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy plus highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-related, no-Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Cancer, 200191(1):155-163.
[16]
Levine AM. Evaluation and management of HIV-infected women[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2002136(3):228-242.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[8] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[9] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[10] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[11] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[12] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要