切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 162 -167. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.03.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪及生活质量与人格的关系
陈庆秋1, 韩容2, 李齐寅2,(), 钟玲1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院乳腺甲状腺外科
    2. 400021 重庆市妇幼保健院心理科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-18 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李齐寅, 钟玲

Correlation of anxiety, depression, quality of life with personality in breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy

Qingqiu Chen1, Rong Han2, Qiyin Li2,(), Ling Zhong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
    2. Department of Psycology, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing 400021, China
引用本文:

陈庆秋, 韩容, 李齐寅, 钟玲. 乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪及生活质量与人格的关系[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 162-167.

Qingqiu Chen, Rong Han, Qiyin Li, Ling Zhong. Correlation of anxiety, depression, quality of life with personality in breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 162-167.

目的

分析乳腺癌改良根治术后女性患者的心理健康状况,探讨其与患者人格的关系。

方法

采用横断面调查研究的方式,纳入2018年9~12月在陆军军医大学第一附属医院乳腺甲状腺外科接受过乳腺癌改良根治术后到门诊或住院部复查的女性患者132例。采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)及汉密尔顿抑郁量表-24(HAMD-24)测定患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪,采用乳腺癌患者生活质量量表(FACT-B)评估患者术后生活质量,用中文版10项目大五人格量表(TIPI-C)评估患者的人格特质。用Spearman相关性分析探讨乳腺癌术后女性患者的HAMA和HAMD-24评分与患者的年龄、术后时间、文化水平的相关性。用Mann-Whitney U检验对比≤50岁组与>50岁组的各个量表评分。生活质量和人格各因素对HAMA、HAMD-24评分的影响采用多重线性回归分析。人格各因素对生活质量的影响也采用多重线性回归分析。

结果

患者年龄为(48±9)岁,最大年龄69岁,最小年龄32岁。术后时间为(5±2)个月,范围1~12个月。132例患者中,130例存在焦虑情绪(HAMA评分≥7分),占98.5%,111例存在抑郁情绪(HAMD-24评分≥7分),占84.1%。焦虑情绪与患者的年龄及术后时间呈负相关(r=-0.244、-0.313,P=0.005, P<0.001)。≤50岁组与>50岁组患者在HAMA评分、FACT-B的附加关注和TIPI-C的开放性方面差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.142、-2.794、-2.286,P均<0.050)。患者术后焦虑情绪的影响因素包括情感状况、生理状况、开放性、神经质性(B=-1.986,95%CI: -3.158~-0.814, t=-3.354, P=0.001; B=-1.765,95%CI: -2.853~-0.678,t=-3.211, P=0.002; B=-0.510,95%CI: -0.796~-0.223, t=3.515, P=0.001;B=-0.425,95%CI: -0.804~-0.046, t=-2.219,P=0.028),而抑郁情绪的影响因素包括情感状况及生理状况(B=-4.123,95%CI: -5.272~-2.974,t=-7.099,P<0.001;B=-2.553,95%CI: -3.762~-1.345,t=-4.179,P<0.001)。在人格因素中,外向性、神经质性及尽责性会影响患者的术后生活质量(B=0.469,95%CI: 0.350~0.589,t=7.752,P<0.001; B=-0.654,95%CI: -0.823~-0.485,t=-7.671,P<0.001; B=0.545,95%CI: 0.364~0.726,t=5.965,P<0.001)。

结论

乳腺癌改良根治术后女性患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的检出率高。人格因素可能对患者术后的情绪状态及生活质量有影响,临床医师可以根据患者不同的人格特点及术后心理状态选择不同的心理干预手段。

Objective

To analyze the mental health of female breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy and explore its relationship with personality.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 132 female patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer and rechecking in clinic or in-patient units of the Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University were enrolled. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) were used to investigate the anxiety and depression of all patients. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) was adopted to evaluate postoperative quality of life and the Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version (TIPI-C) was used to assess the personality of patients. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the HAMA and HAMD-24 scores of female patients after breast cancer surgery and their age, postoperative time and education. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the scores of four scales between patients ≤50 years and patients > 50 years. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to investigate the influence of each factor of life quality and personality on HAMA and HAMD-24 scores. The influence of personality factors on quality of life was also analyzed by multiple linear regression.

Results

The patients were (48 ± 9) years old (range: 32-69 years). The postoperative course was (5±2) months (range: 1-12 months). Among 132 patients, 130 presented anxiety (HAMA score ≥ 7), accounting for 98.5%, and 111 had depression (HAMD-24 score ≥ 7), accounting for 84.1%. Anxiety was negatively correlated with patient age (r=-0.244, P=0.005) and course of disease (r=-0.313, P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the HAMA score, additional attention section of FACT-B and the openness of TIPI-C between patients ≤50 years and patients > 50 years (Z=-3.142、-2.794、-2.286, all P<0.050). The influencing factors of anxiety in breast cancer patients after surgery included emotional well-being (B=-1.986, 95%CI: -3.158--0.814, t=-3.354, P=0.001), physical well-being (B=-1.765, 95%CI: -2.853--0.678, t=-3.211, P=0.002), openness (B=-0.510, 95%CI: -0.769--0.223, t=3.515, P=0.001), neuroticism (B=-0.425, 95%CI: -0.804--0.046, t=-2.219, P=0.028). The influencing factors of depression include emotional well-being (B=-4.123, 95%CI: -5.272--2.974, t=-7.099, P<0.001) and physical well-being (B=-2.553, 95%CI: -3.762--1.345, t=-4.179, P<0.001). Among the factors of personality, extroversion (B=0.469, 95%CI: 0.350-0.589, t=7.752, P<0.001), neuroticism (B=-0.654, 95%CI: -0.823--0.485, t=-7.671, P<0.001) and conscientiousness (B=0.545, 95%CI: 0.364-0.726, t=5.965, P<0.001) affected the quality of life after surgery.

Conclusions

The female breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy show a high detection rate of anxiety and depression. Personality traits may have an impact on their postoperative emotional state and quality of life. Clinicians can give psychological intervention according to the patients’ personality and postoperative mental state.

表1 132例乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的HAMA及HAMD-24评分
表2 不同年龄乳腺癌患者术后HAMA、HAMD-24、FACT-B及TIPI-C评分比较[分,M(P25P75)]
表3 不同年龄乳腺癌患者术后FACT-B各部分得分比较[分,M(P25P75)]
表4 不同年龄乳腺癌患者术后TIPI-C各因子得分比较[分,M(P25P75)]
表5 132例乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的生活质量和人格各因素与HAMA评分的多元线性回归分析结果
表6 132例乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的生活质量和人格各因素与HAMD-24评分的多元线性回归分析结果
表7 132例乳腺癌改良根治术后患者的人格因素与生活质量评分的多元线性回归分析结果
[1]
郑荣寿,孙可欣,张思维,等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志,2019, 41(1): 19-28.
[2]
张敏璐,黄哲宙,郑莹. 中国2008年女性乳腺癌发病、死亡和患病情况的估计及预测[J].中华流行病学杂志,2012,33(10): 1049-1051.
[3]
杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,等. 中国乳腺癌发病死亡趋势的估计与预测[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6): 438-440.
[4]
岂怀华,张景华,姚三巧,等. 女性人格特征对其乳腺癌发病的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(31): 3573-3576.
[5]
Coyne JC, Tennen H. Positive psychology in cancer care: bad science, exaggerated claims, and unproven medicine[J]. Ann Behav Med, 2010,39(1): 16-26.
[6]
陈显春,陈庆秋,谭璇妮,等. 团体心理治疗对乳腺癌改良根治术后患者病耻感的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(24): 2486-2489.
[7]
Lemogne C, Turinici M, Panjo H, et al. Personality and breast cancer screening in women of the GAZEL cohort study[J]. Cancer Med, 2018,7(2): 515-524.
[8]
Jagielski CH, Tucker DC, Dalton SO, et al. Personality as a predictor of well-being in a randomized trial of a mindfulness-based stress reduction of Danish women with breast cancer[J]. J Psychosoc Oncol, 2020, 38(1): 4-19.
[9]
旺向东,王希林,马宏. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M]. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999: 88-94.
[10]
Brown GW, Harris T. Social origins of depression: a reply[J]. Psychol Med, 1978,8(4): 577-588.
[11]
万崇华,张冬梅,汤学良,等. 乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)中文版的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(5): 298-300.
[12]
万崇华,张冬梅,汤学良,等. 乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表FACT-B中文版介绍[J].中国肿瘤,2002,11(6): 10-12.
[13]
李金德. 中国版10项目大五人格量表(TIPI-C)的信效度检验[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2013,21(11): 1688-1692.
[14]
李璐璐,张蒙悦,赵雯倩,等. 中文版10项目大五人格量表在乳腺癌病人中应用的信效度分析[J].护理研究,2019,33(6): 970-973.
[15]
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011,61(2): 69-90.
[16]
Morgan S, Cooper B, Paul S, et al. Association of personality profiles with depressive, anxiety, and cancer-related symptoms in patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2017,117: 130-138.
[17]
van Dijk SD, Hanssen D, Naarding P, et al. Big Five personality traits and medically unexplained symptoms in later life[J]. Eur Psychiatry, 2016,38: 23-30.
[18]
Würtzen H, Dalton SO, Christensen J, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on somatic symptoms, distress, mindfulness and spiritual wellbeing in women with breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Oncol, 2015,54(5): 712-719.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 刘佩, 黄晓洁, 郑曼玉, 金作林, 高洁. 人格特征对青少年矫治过程中依从性的影响[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 412-415.
[10] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要