切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 356 -361. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留乳房手术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效分析
丁锦辉1,(), 丁贺义1, 罗超英1, 刘军乐1, 胡杨刚1, 付大鹏1   
  1. 1. 834000 新疆克拉玛依市中心医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-20 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 丁锦辉

Efficacy of breast-conserving surgery combined with endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for early breast cancer

Jinghui Ding1,(), Heyi Ding1, Chaoying Luo1, Junle Liu1, Yanggang Hu1, Dapeng Fu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay 834000, China
  • Received:2017-07-20 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinghui Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Jinghui, Email:
引用本文:

丁锦辉, 丁贺义, 罗超英, 刘军乐, 胡杨刚, 付大鹏. 保留乳房手术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 356-361.

Jinghui Ding, Heyi Ding, Chaoying Luo, Junle Liu, Yanggang Hu, Dapeng Fu. Efficacy of breast-conserving surgery combined with endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for early breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 356-361.

目的

探讨保留乳房手术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术(简称腔镜保乳术)治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效。

方法

纳入2009年7月至2011年7月在新疆克拉玛依市中心医院普通外科就诊的60例早期乳腺癌患者进行前瞻性分析。根据患者意愿分配入腔镜保乳术组(16例),传统保留乳房手术组(20例),改良根治术组(24例)。采用χ2检验和Fisher确切概率法比较术后1年、3年、5年时3组患者在患肢活动功能障碍、患肢淋巴水肿、切口瘢痕、患肢疼痛、患肢感觉异常、局部复发、远处转移、病死率及乳房美容效果等方面的差异。

结果

腔镜保乳术组5年局部复发率和病死率均为1/16,传统保留乳房手术组(简称保乳术组)5年局部复发率和病死率均为5.0%(1/20),改良根治术组5年局部复发率和病死率均为4.2%(1/24),3组的5年局部复发率及病死率差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。术后1年3组患者切口瘢痕形成率分别为0、60.0%(12/20)、100%(24/24)( χ2=40.000,P<0.001),患肢感觉异常发生率分别为1/16、30.0%(6/20)、50.0%(12/24) (χ2=8.530,P=0.014),组间差异均有统计学意义。术后3年时3组患者患肢活动功能障碍的发生率分别为0、0、29.2%(7/24)(P=0.002),切口瘢痕的发生率分别为0、50.0%(10/20)、91.7%(22/24)(χ2=32.545,P<0.001),患肢感觉异常的发生率分别为0、10.0%(2/20)、33.3%(8/24) (P=0.011),差异均有统计学意义。术后5年时3组患者患肢活动功能障碍发生率分别为0、0、25.0%(6/24) (P=0.007),切口瘢痕的发生率分别为0、45.0%(9/20)、83.3%(20/24)(χ2=27.609,P<0.001),患肢感觉异常的发生率分别为0、10.0%(2/20)、33.3%(8/24) (P=0.011),差异均有统计学意义。在术后1年、3年和5年时,腔镜保乳术组的切口瘢痕形成少于保乳术组(P<0.001、0.001、0.002)和改良根治术组(P均<0.001),其余并发症发生率与保乳术组差异无统计学意义,但是在患肢感觉异常方面明显优于改良根治术组(P=0.005、0.013、0.013)。3组患者在术后1年、3年和5年的并发症发生率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=32.237、31.917、16.481,P均<0.001),腔镜保乳术组在术后1年和3年时明显少于保乳术组(Bonferroni校正P=0.001、0.009)。术后5年腔镜保乳术组与保乳术组在乳房美容效果方面差异无统计学意义(P =0.715)。

结论

保留乳房手术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术不增加乳腺癌患者的复发、转移率,同时具有手术创伤小、并发症少和瘢痕不明显等优势。

Objective

To explore efficacy of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (EALND) in the treatment of early breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 60 patients with early breast cancer in the Department of General Surgery, Karamay Central Hospital from July 2009 to July 2011 were enrolled for a prospective study. The patients were divided into three groups according to their wishes: BCS+ EALND group (16 cases), BCS group (20 cases) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) group (24 cases). χ2 test and the Fisher exact test was used to compare the dysfunction, lymphedema, pain and paresthesia of limbs, incision scar, local recurrence, distant metastasis, mortality and cosmetic effect across three groups at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.

Results

The local recurrence rate and mortality were 1/16 and 1/16 in BCS+ EALND group, 5.0%(1/20) and 5.0%(1/20)in BCS group, 4.2%(1/24) and 4.2%(1/24) in MRM group. No significant difference was found in the local recurrence rate and mortality across three groups (P=1.000). At one year after surgery, the incidence of incision scar in three groups was 0, 60.0%(12/20) and 100%(24/24)( χ2=40.000, P<0.001), and incidence of limb paresthesia was 1/16, 30.0%(6/20) and 50.0%(12/24)(χ2=8.530, P=0.014), and the difference was statistically significant across three groups. At 3 years after surgery, the incidence of movement dysfunction was 0, 0, 29.2%(7/24)(P=0.002), the incidence of incision scar was 0, 50.0%(10/20), 91.7%(22/24)(χ2=32.545, P<0.001), the incidence of limb paresthesia was 0, 10.0%(2/20), 33.3%(8/24) (P=0.011), and the difference was statistically significant across three groups. At 5 years after surgery, the incidence of movement dysfunction was 0, 0, 25.0%(6/24) (P=0.007), the incidence of incision scar was 0, 45.0%(9/20), 83.3%(20/24)( χ2=27.609, P<0.001), the incidence of limb paresthesia was 0, 10.0%(2/20), 33.3%(8/24) (P=0.011), and the difference was statistically significant across three groups. At 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery, the occurrence of incision scar in BCS+ EALND group was significantly lower than that in BCS group (P<0.001, 0.001, 0.002) or MRM group (both P<0.001); the incidence of other complications in BCS+ EALND group was similar to that in BCS group while the occurrence of limb paresthesia in BCS+ EALND group was significantly lower than that in MRM group (P=0.005, 0.013, 0.013). There was significant difference in the complication rate across three groups at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery (χ2=32.237, 31.917, 16.481, all P<0.001); the complication rate in BCS+ EALND group was significantly lower than that in BCS group at 1 and 3 years after surgery (Bonferroni correction: P=0.001, 0.009). There was no significant difference in cosmetic effect between BCS+ ELAND group and BCS group (P =0.715).

Conclusion

BCA combined with EALND has the advantages of less surgical trauma, fewer complications and less visible incision scar, without increasing the rate of recurrence and metastasis.

表1 3组早期乳腺癌患者的一般资料比较(例)
表2 3组早期乳腺癌患者在术后1年、3年、5年时并发症和随访结果比较(例)
表3 3组早期乳腺癌患者在术后1年、3年、5年时并发症发生率比较(例)
图1 腔镜保乳术组患者术后乳房外观 a图为术后2周患侧乳房正面观;b图为术后2周患侧乳房侧面观;c图为术后1年双侧乳房正面观;d图为术后1年双侧乳房侧面观
表4 2组保留乳房手术患者的乳房美容效果比较(例)
[1]
DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2013[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64(1):52-62.
[2]
陈万青,郑荣寿.中国女性乳腺癌发病死亡和生存状况[J].中国肿瘤临床,2015,42(13):668-674.
[3]
Langer I, Kocher T, Guller U, et al. Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection: a prospective analysis of 52 patients[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005, 90(1):85-91.
[4]
Left DR, Vashisht R, Yongue G, et al.Endoscopic breast surgery:where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery?[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2011,125(3):607-625.
[5]
邵志敏,李俊杰.2015版《中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范》:外科部分解读[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2016,10(1):1-5.
[6]
张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民等.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11): 680-684.
[7]
Plecha D, Bai S, Patterson H, et al. Improving the accuracy of axillary lymph node surgery in breast cancer with ultrasound guided wire localization of biopsy proven metastatic lymph nodes[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(13):4241-4246.
[8]
朱江,康骅,海涛等. 腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫与传统腋窝淋巴结清扫对保乳手术美容效果影响的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):498-502.
[9]
王立兵,冯亮,何静,等. 乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的临床意义 [J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2015,9(4):236-241.
[10]
石畅,徐卫国. 乳腺癌手术中保留肋间臂神经的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2014,8(1):52-54.
[11]
贺青卿,柴吉鑫.乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴结水肿的诊断和治疗现状[J].国际外科学杂志,2011,38(3):214-216.
[12]
Luo CY, Guo WB, Yang J, et al. Comparison of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer :long-term results from a randomized, multicenter trial[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2012,87(12):1153-1161.
[13]
张延勇.乳腔镜辅助下乳腺癌腋窝淋巴清扫与传统开放手术临床效果的比较分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,36(21):3190-3191.
[14]
Brun JL, Beueannee G, Rousseau E, et al. Does axillary liposuction modify histologic study of excised lymph nodes? [J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris),1997,26(5):503-506.
[15]
刘军,魏树新,鲁明.乳腔镜辅助乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术25例临床分析[J].中国医学创新,2011,20(20):25-26.
[16]
Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Factors affecting sentinel lymph node identification rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance)[J]. Ann Surg,2015 ,261(3):547-552.
[17]
Yan X, Jia M, Yan Z, et al. Mammotome-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery: a novel technique for early-stage breast cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2014,12:99.
[18]
丁波泥,钱立元,赵于军等. 腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术与传统开放手术治疗乳腺癌的Meta分析[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(7):782-789.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要