切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 54 -57. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.01.009

所属专题: 文献

综述

脱细胞异体真皮基质在乳腺癌术后即刻乳房假体重建中的研究进展
何天慧1, 冯锐2,(), 李玉璟2, 张海丽2, 虞睿琪2, 杨金昊2, 蒋冰梅2   
  1. 1. 300070 天津医科大学基础医学院临床医学五年制2班
    2. 300100 天津市中心妇产科医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-19 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 冯锐

Acellular allogeneic dermal matrix in breast implant reconstruction immediately after breast cancer surgery

Tianhui He1, Rui Feng2(), Yujing Li2   

  • Received:2017-02-19 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Rui Feng
引用本文:

何天慧, 冯锐, 李玉璟, 张海丽, 虞睿琪, 杨金昊, 蒋冰梅. 脱细胞异体真皮基质在乳腺癌术后即刻乳房假体重建中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 54-57.

Tianhui He, Rui Feng, Yujing Li. Acellular allogeneic dermal matrix in breast implant reconstruction immediately after breast cancer surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 54-57.

脱细胞异体真皮基质辅助的即刻乳房假体植入重建术,目前在欧美国家得到了广泛的应用。脱细胞异体真皮基质具有再生能力,能给植入的乳房假体提供额外的组织支持,所以从外科手术学和美容学的角度改善了术后效果。笔者就脱细胞真皮基质的种类、应用历史、术后并发症、价格及其与脂肪干细胞的联合应用等几个方面进行综述。

表1 常见的ADM产品[13]
[1]
American Society of Plastic Surgeons.2014 plastic surgery statics report [EB/OL].[2015-07-02].

URL    
[2]
Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, et al. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm)[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2011,127(2):514-524.
[3]
Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ganor O, et al. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg,2015,39(3):359-368.
[4]
Park GY, Yoon ES, Cho HE, et al. Acellular dermal matrix as a core strut for projection in nipple reconstruction: approaches for three different methods of breast reconstruction[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2016,43(5):424-429.
[5]
Nilsen TJ, Dasgupta A, Huang YC, et al. Do processing methods make a difference in cellular dermal matrix properties?[J]. Aesthet Surg J,2016,36(suppl 2):S7-S22.
[6]
Downs RK, Hedges K. An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016,4(7):e821.
[7]
Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Discussion: Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 130(5 Suppl 2):54S-56S.
[8]
Leong M, Basu CB, Hicks MJ. Further evidence that human acellular dmatrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction[J]. Aesthet Surg J,2015,35(1):40-47.
[9]
Livesey SA, Herndon DN, Hollyoak MA, et al. Transplanted acellular allograft dermal matrix: Potential as a template for the reconstruction of viable dermis[J]. Transplantation, 1995,60(1):1-9.
[10]
Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns [J]. Burns, 1995,21(4):243-248.
[11]
Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns [J]. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1996, 17(2):124-136.
[12]
Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using Allograft Dermis [J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2001, 21(1):81-84.
[13]
Lyons DA, Mendenhall SD, Neumeister MW, et al. Aseptic versus sterile acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction: an updated review[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016, 4(7):e823.
[14]
Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2017,18(2):251-258.
[15]
扈杰杰,栾杰. 异体脱细胞真皮在假体乳房再造中的应用[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志,2015,26(4):217-219.
[16]
Breuing KH, Warren SM.Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings[J].Ann Plast Surg,2005,55(3):232-239.
[17]
Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN,et al.Acellular dermis assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage:A head-to-head comparison of outcomes[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2009,124(6):1735-1740.
[18]
Serra-Renom JM, Fontdevila J, Monner J,et al.Mammary reconstruction using tissue expander and partial detachment of the pectoralis major muscle to expand the lower breast quadrants[J].Ann Plast Surg,2004,53(4):317-321.
[19]
Spear SL, Penetiere CV.Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured,integrated valve tissue expanders and breast implants[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2004,113(7):2098-2103.
[20]
North WD, Kubajak CS, St Martin B, et al. Dermal autograft using donor breast as alternative to acellular dermal matrices in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparative review[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2017, 78(Suppl 5):S282-S285.
[21]
Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, et al. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2015,41(1):113-119.
[22]
Avraham T, Weichman KE, Wilson S, et al. Postoperative expansion is not a primary cause of infection in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders[J]. Breast J, 2015,21(5):501-507.
[23]
Schnarrs RH, Carman CM, Tobin C, et al. Complication rates with human acellular dermal matrices: Retrospective review of 211 consecutive breast reconstructions[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016,4(11):e1118.
[24]
Keifer OP Jr, Page EK, Hart A, et al. A complication analysis of 2 acellular dermal matrices in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016,4(7):e800.
[25]
Zenn MR, Salzberg CA. A direct comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use(RTU) and DermACELL in immediate breast implant reconstruction[J]. Eplasty, 2016,16:e23.
[26]
Rose JF, Zafar SN, Ellsworth Iv WA. Does acellular dermal matrix thickness affect complication rate in tissue expander based breast reconstruction?[J]. Plast Surg Int,2016,2016:2867097.
[27]
Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction[J].Ann Plast Surg,2010,64(5):674-678.
[28]
Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S,et al. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(4):1146-1152.
[29]
Lee KT, Mun GH. Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2016,23(2):600-610.
[30]
Lee KT, Mun GH. A meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of diverse acellular dermal matrices for implant-based breast reconstruction[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2017,79(1):115-123.
[31]
Ooi ASH, Song DH. Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions[J]. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press),2016,8:161-172.
[32]
Nahabedian MY. Prosthetic breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices: Achieving predictability and reproducibility[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016,4(5):e698.
[33]
Klein GM, Nasser AE, Phillips BT, et al. Is sterile better than aseptic? Comparing the microbiology of acellular dermal matrices[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016, 4(6):e761.
[34]
Colwell AS. Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction [J]. Gland Surg, 2015, 4(2):111-115.
[35]
Ye K, Traianedes K, Choong PF, et al. Chondrogenesis of human infrapatellar Fat Pad stem cells on acellular dermal matrix[J]. Front Surg, 2016,3:3.
[36]
Jin US, Hong KY, Hwang YI. Effect of adipose-derived stem cells on acellular dermal matrix engraftment in a rabbit model of breast reconstruction[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2017,70(6):806-813.
[37]
Nahabedian MY. Implant-based breast reconstruction: strategies to achieve optimal outcomes and minimize complications[J]. J Surg Oncol,2016,113(8):895-905.
[38]
Bengtson B. Acellular dermal matrices in secondary aesthetic breast surgery: indications, techniques, and outcomes[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2012, 130(5 suppl 2):142S-156S.
[39]
Jansen LA, Macadam SA. The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part Ⅱ. A cost analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 127(6):2245-2254.
[40]
Kolker AR, Piccolo PP. Extended submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction with pectoralis-serratus sling and acellular dermal matrix[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2017,37(4):485-491.
[41]
Parisi D, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, et al. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without the use of an acellular dermal matrix is cost effective and oncologically safe[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017,140(6):820e-821e.
[42]
Qureshi AA, Broderick K, Funk S, et al. Direct hospital cost of outcome pathways in implant-based reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2016,4(8):e831.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 刘佳璇, 徐兵河. 中国乳腺癌临床研究年度进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 259-265.
[13] 韩李念, 王君. 放射性皮肤损伤治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 533-537.
[14] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[15] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要