切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 340 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2023.06.003

论著

HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响
衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦()   
  1. 266000 青岛市市立医院肿瘤二科
    266003 青岛大学附属医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张彦

Impact of HER-2 low expression on response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in breast cancer patients

Xiaoli Yi, Shasha Hu, Yan Zhang()   

  1. Department of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
    Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2023-02-03 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Zhang
引用本文:

衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.

Xiaoli Yi, Shasha Hu, Yan Zhang. Impact of HER-2 low expression on response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.

目的

探讨HER-2表达状态对乳腺癌新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解(pCR)率以及生存的影响。

方法

根据纳入及排除标准,入组2016年6月1日至2020年12月31日在青岛市市立医院确诊乳腺癌并行新辅助化疗的171例患者进行回顾性研究。根据免疫组织化学(IHC)检测结果,将患者分为HER-2(0)组、HER-2低表达组[IHC染色HER-2(+)或HER-2(2+)且ISH阴性]及HER-2阳性组[IHC染色HER-2(3+)或HER-2(2+)且ISH阳性]。采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法或Fisher-Freeman-Halton检验比较3组患者的临床病理特征和预后指标。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制无瘤生存曲线,用Log-rank检验比较组间生存率。

结果

中位随访时间47个月(范围2~54个月)。HER-2(0)组33例(19.3%,33/171),HER-2低表达95例(55.6%,95/171),HER-2阳性43例(25.1%,43/171)。3组患者的激素受体(HR)状态、MP分级比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.497,P=0.014;H=9.406,P=0.009)。新辅助化疗后,HER-2(0)、HER-2低表达、HER-2阳性组的pCR率分别为6.1%(2/33),7.4%(7/95),20.9%(9/43),3组差异无统计学意义(χ2=5.744,P=0.052)。根据HR状态分层,HR阳性患者中,3组的pCR率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.618,P=0.011),其中HER-2低表达组与HER-2阳性组比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.033);在HR阴性患者中,3组的pCR率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.498,P=0.513)。3组的复发转移率分别为24.2%(8/33),23.2%(22/95),25.6%(11/43),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.097,P=0.953)。HER-2(0)、HER-2低表达、HER-2阳性组的DFS分别为32个月(95%CI:17~57个月)、44个月(95%CI:40~49个月)及58个月(95%CI:56~60个月)。3组的DFS比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.471,P=0.790)。

结论

HER-2低表达不影响乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的pCR率,HER-2低表达与HER-2(0)患者的预后比较也没有明显差异。

Objective

To investigate the effect of HER-2 expression on pathological complete response (pCR) and survival of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 171 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were enrolled for a retrospective study. According to the immunohistochemical (IHC) results, the patients were divided into HER-2 (0) group, HER-2 low expression group [IHC: HER-2 (+ ) or HER-2 (2+ ) with ISH negative] and HER-2 positive group [IHC: HER-2 (3+ ) or HER-2 (2+ ) with ISH positive]. The clinicopathological features and prognostic parameters were compared among three groups using χ2 test, Fisher exact test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the disease-free survival curve, and log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate between groups.

Results

The patients were followed up for median 47 months (range: 2-54 months). There were 33 cases (19.3%, 33/171) in the HER-2 (0) group, 95 cases (55.6%, 95/171) in HER-2 low expression, and 43 cases (25.1%, 43/171) in HER-2 positive group. The hormone receptor (HR) status and MP grade showed no significant difference among three groups (χ2=8.497, P=0.014; H=9.406, P=0.009). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the pCR rates of HER-2 (0), HER-2 low expression and HER-2 positive group were 6.1% (2/33), 7.4% (7/95) and 20.9% (9/43), respectively, indicating no significant difference among three groups (χ2=5.744, P=0.052). According to the stratification of HR status, in HR positive patients, there was a statistically significant difference in pCR rate among three groups (χ2=7.618, P=0.011), and the pCR rate presented a significant difference between HER-2 low expression group and HER-2 positive group (P=0.033). In HR negative patients, there was no significant difference in pCR rate among three groups (χ2=1.498, P=0.513). The recurrence/metastasis rates of the three groups were 24.2% (8/33), 23.2% (22/95), 25.6% (11/43), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.097, P=0.953). The disease-free survival of HER-2 (0), HER-2 low expression and HER-2 positive groups were 32 months (95%CI: 17-57 months), 44 months (95%CI: 40-49 months) and 58 months (95%CI: 56-60 months), respectively. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival among three groups (χ2=0.471, P=0.790).

Conclusion

Low expression of HER-2 cannot affect the pCR rate of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the patients with HER-2 low expression show no significantly different prognosis compared with HER-2 (0) patients.

表1 不同HER-2表达状态乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征比较
临床病理特征 HER-2(0)(33例) HER-2低表达(95例) HER-2阳性(43例) 检验值 P
年龄(岁,M (P25P75)) 52.0(42.0,60.5) 50.0(41.0,58.0) 47.0(39.0,54.0) H=5.157 0.076
绝经状态[例(%)]          
绝经前 17(51.5) 49(51.6) 28(65.1) χ2=2.389 0.303
绝经后 16(48.5) 46(48.4) 15(34.9)
病理类型[例(%)]          
导管癌 27(81.8) 84(88.4) 41(95.3) χ2=5.447 0.232
非导管癌 6(18.2) 11(11.6) 2(4.7)
组织学分级[例(%)]a          
1级 3(9.1) 4(4.2) 1(2.3) H=5.319 0.070
2级 18(54.5) 53(55.8) 13(30.3)
3级 9(27.3) 29(30.5) 17(39.5)
未知 3(9.1) 9(9.5) 12(27.9)
激素受体[例(%)]          
阴性 11(33.3) 21(22.1) 20(46.5) χ2=8.497 0.014
阳性 22(66.7) 74(77.9) 23(53.5)
Ki-67[例(%)]          
≤20% 10(30.3) 30(31.6) 7(16.3) χ2=3.640 0.162
>20% 23(69.7) 65(68.4) 36(83.7)
ypT[例(%)]          
T0 5(15.2) 10(10.5) 9(20.9) H=0.358 0.836
Tis 0 0 5(11.6)
T1 19(57.6) 60(63.2) 14(32.6)
T2 8(24.2) 21(22.1) 10(23.3)
T3 1(3.0) 4(4.2) 5(11.6)
ypN(%)          
N0 12(36.4) 32(33.7) 19(44.2) H=2.328 0.312
N1 7(21.2) 25(26.3) 11(25.6)
N2 10(30.3) 18(18.9) 9(20.9)
N3 4(12.1) 20(21.1) 4(9.3)
MP分级[例(%)]          
1级 3(9.1) 20(21.1) 3(7.0) H=9.406 0.009
2级 6(18.2) 20(21.1) 9(20.9)
3级 15(45.4) 36(37.8) 12(27.9)
4级 6(18.2) 9(9.5) 5(11.6)
5级 3(9.1) 10(10.5) 14(32.6)
化疗方案[例(%)]          
蒽环+紫杉类 29(87.9) 83(87.4) 38(88.4) χ2=0.028 0.986
紫杉类 4(12.1) 12(12.6) 5(11.6)
pCR[例(%)]          
2(6.1) 7(7.4) 9(20.9) χ2=5.744 0.052
31(93.9) 88(92.6) 34(79.1)
复发转移[例(%)]          
8(24.2) 22(23.2) 11(25.6) χ2=0.097 0.953
25(75.8) 73(76.8) 32(74.4)
图1 不同HER-2表达状态乳腺癌患者的无瘤生存曲线比较注:3组比较,χ2=0.471,P=0.790
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE,et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(1):7-33.
[2]
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update[J]. J Clin Oncol201836(20):2105-2122.
[3]
Tarantino P, Hamilton E, Tolaney SM, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape[J]. J Clin Oncol202038(17):1951-1962.
[4]
杨文涛,步宏. 乳腺癌雌、孕激素受体免疫组织化学检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志2015, 44(4):237-239.
[5]
《乳腺癌HER2检测指南(2019版)》编写组.乳腺癌HER2检测指南(2019版)[J].中华病理学杂志2019, 48(3):169-175.
[6]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志2021, 31(10):954-1040.
[7]
刘裔莎,魏兵,杨雯娟,等.美国癌症联合会乳腺癌分期(第七版)简介[J].中华病理学杂志2010, 39(11):787-790.
[8]
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013[J]. Ann Oncol201324(9):2206-2223.
[9]
Marchiò C, Annaratone L, Marques A, et al. Evolving concepts in HER2 evaluation in breast cancer: heterogeneity, HER2-low carcinomas and beyond [J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 202172:123-135.
[10]
Xu Z, Guo D, Jiang Z, et al. Novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates of trastuzumab beyond T-DM1 in breast cancer: trastuzumab deruxtecan(DS-8201a) and (Vic-)trastuzumab duocarmazine (SYD985) [J]. Eur J Med Chem2019183:111682.
[11]
Modi S, Park H, Murthy RK, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study[J]. J Clin Oncol202038(17):1887-1896.
[12]
Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022387(1):9-20.
[13]
Tamura K, Tsurutani J, Takahashi S, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: a dose-expansion, phase 1 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(6):816-826.
[14]
Shao Y, Yu Y, Luo Z,et al. Clinical, pathological complete response, and prognosis characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting-a retrospective analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(13):8035-8036.
[15]
Schettini F, Chic N, Brasó-Maristany F,et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 20217(1):1.
[16]
Eiger D, Agostinetto E, Saúde-Conde R, et al. The exciting new field of HER2-low breast cancer treatment [J]. Cancers (Basel), 202113(5):1015.
[17]
de Moura Leite L, Cesca MG, Tavares MC, et al. HER2-low status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 negative early breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2021190(1):155-163.
[18]
Agostinetto E, Rediti M, Fimereli D, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: molecular characteristics and prognosis[J]. Cancers (Basel)202113(11):2824.
[19]
Denkert C, Seither F, Schneeweiss A,et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials[J]. Lancet Oncol202122(8):1151-1161.
[20]
Fernandez AI, Liu M, Bellizzi A, et al. Examination of low ERBB2 protein expression in breast cancer tissue[J]. JAMA Oncol, 20228(4):1-4.
[21]
Zhang G, Ren C, Li C,et al. Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-,low-,or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status[J]. BMC Med202220(1):142.
[22]
Chen M, Chen W, Liu D, et al. Prognostic values of clinical and molecular features in HER2 low-breast cancer with hormonal receptor overexpression: features of HER2-low breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer202229(5):844-853.
[23]
Almstedt K, Heimes AS, Kappenberg F, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of HER2-low and HER2-zero in node-negative breast cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer2022173:10-19.
[24]
Won HS, Ahn J, Kim Y, et al. Clinical significance of HER2-low expression in early breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society[J]. Breast Cancer Res202224(1):22.
[25]
Alves FR, Gil L, Vasconcelos de Matos L, et al. Impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low status in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer[J]. Cureus202214(2):e22330.
[26]
Reinert T, Sartori GP, Souza AA, et al. Prevalence of HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups and correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with HER2-negative breast[J]. Cancer Res, 2021, 81 (4_Suppl): PS4-22.
[27]
Rossi V, Sarotto I, Maggiorotto F, et al. Moderate immunohistochemical expression of HER-2 (2+) without HER-2 gene amplification is a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer[J]. Oncologist, 201217(11):1418-1425.
[28]
Horisawa N, Adachi Y, Takatsuka D, et al. The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status[J]. Breast Cancer202229:234-241.
[29]
于宏,邱芳,顾玺,等. HER-2低表达的三阴性乳腺癌患者的临床特征和预后分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报2022, 51(8):721-724.
[1] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[2] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[3] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[8] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[9] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[10] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[13] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?