切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 340 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2023.06.003

论著

HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响
衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦()   
  1. 266000 青岛市市立医院肿瘤二科
    266003 青岛大学附属医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张彦

Impact of HER-2 low expression on response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in breast cancer patients

Xiaoli Yi, Shasha Hu, Yan Zhang()   

  1. Department of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
    Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2023-02-03 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Zhang
引用本文:

衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.

Xiaoli Yi, Shasha Hu, Yan Zhang. Impact of HER-2 low expression on response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in breast cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.

目的

探讨HER-2表达状态对乳腺癌新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解(pCR)率以及生存的影响。

方法

根据纳入及排除标准,入组2016年6月1日至2020年12月31日在青岛市市立医院确诊乳腺癌并行新辅助化疗的171例患者进行回顾性研究。根据免疫组织化学(IHC)检测结果,将患者分为HER-2(0)组、HER-2低表达组[IHC染色HER-2(+)或HER-2(2+)且ISH阴性]及HER-2阳性组[IHC染色HER-2(3+)或HER-2(2+)且ISH阳性]。采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法或Fisher-Freeman-Halton检验比较3组患者的临床病理特征和预后指标。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制无瘤生存曲线,用Log-rank检验比较组间生存率。

结果

中位随访时间47个月(范围2~54个月)。HER-2(0)组33例(19.3%,33/171),HER-2低表达95例(55.6%,95/171),HER-2阳性43例(25.1%,43/171)。3组患者的激素受体(HR)状态、MP分级比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.497,P=0.014;H=9.406,P=0.009)。新辅助化疗后,HER-2(0)、HER-2低表达、HER-2阳性组的pCR率分别为6.1%(2/33),7.4%(7/95),20.9%(9/43),3组差异无统计学意义(χ2=5.744,P=0.052)。根据HR状态分层,HR阳性患者中,3组的pCR率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.618,P=0.011),其中HER-2低表达组与HER-2阳性组比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.033);在HR阴性患者中,3组的pCR率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.498,P=0.513)。3组的复发转移率分别为24.2%(8/33),23.2%(22/95),25.6%(11/43),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.097,P=0.953)。HER-2(0)、HER-2低表达、HER-2阳性组的DFS分别为32个月(95%CI:17~57个月)、44个月(95%CI:40~49个月)及58个月(95%CI:56~60个月)。3组的DFS比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.471,P=0.790)。

结论

HER-2低表达不影响乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后的pCR率,HER-2低表达与HER-2(0)患者的预后比较也没有明显差异。

Objective

To investigate the effect of HER-2 expression on pathological complete response (pCR) and survival of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 171 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were enrolled for a retrospective study. According to the immunohistochemical (IHC) results, the patients were divided into HER-2 (0) group, HER-2 low expression group [IHC: HER-2 (+ ) or HER-2 (2+ ) with ISH negative] and HER-2 positive group [IHC: HER-2 (3+ ) or HER-2 (2+ ) with ISH positive]. The clinicopathological features and prognostic parameters were compared among three groups using χ2 test, Fisher exact test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the disease-free survival curve, and log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate between groups.

Results

The patients were followed up for median 47 months (range: 2-54 months). There were 33 cases (19.3%, 33/171) in the HER-2 (0) group, 95 cases (55.6%, 95/171) in HER-2 low expression, and 43 cases (25.1%, 43/171) in HER-2 positive group. The hormone receptor (HR) status and MP grade showed no significant difference among three groups (χ2=8.497, P=0.014; H=9.406, P=0.009). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the pCR rates of HER-2 (0), HER-2 low expression and HER-2 positive group were 6.1% (2/33), 7.4% (7/95) and 20.9% (9/43), respectively, indicating no significant difference among three groups (χ2=5.744, P=0.052). According to the stratification of HR status, in HR positive patients, there was a statistically significant difference in pCR rate among three groups (χ2=7.618, P=0.011), and the pCR rate presented a significant difference between HER-2 low expression group and HER-2 positive group (P=0.033). In HR negative patients, there was no significant difference in pCR rate among three groups (χ2=1.498, P=0.513). The recurrence/metastasis rates of the three groups were 24.2% (8/33), 23.2% (22/95), 25.6% (11/43), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.097, P=0.953). The disease-free survival of HER-2 (0), HER-2 low expression and HER-2 positive groups were 32 months (95%CI: 17-57 months), 44 months (95%CI: 40-49 months) and 58 months (95%CI: 56-60 months), respectively. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival among three groups (χ2=0.471, P=0.790).

Conclusion

Low expression of HER-2 cannot affect the pCR rate of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the patients with HER-2 low expression show no significantly different prognosis compared with HER-2 (0) patients.

表1 不同HER-2表达状态乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征比较
临床病理特征 HER-2(0)(33例) HER-2低表达(95例) HER-2阳性(43例) 检验值 P
年龄(岁,M (P25P75)) 52.0(42.0,60.5) 50.0(41.0,58.0) 47.0(39.0,54.0) H=5.157 0.076
绝经状态[例(%)]          
绝经前 17(51.5) 49(51.6) 28(65.1) χ2=2.389 0.303
绝经后 16(48.5) 46(48.4) 15(34.9)
病理类型[例(%)]          
导管癌 27(81.8) 84(88.4) 41(95.3) χ2=5.447 0.232
非导管癌 6(18.2) 11(11.6) 2(4.7)
组织学分级[例(%)]a          
1级 3(9.1) 4(4.2) 1(2.3) H=5.319 0.070
2级 18(54.5) 53(55.8) 13(30.3)
3级 9(27.3) 29(30.5) 17(39.5)
未知 3(9.1) 9(9.5) 12(27.9)
激素受体[例(%)]          
阴性 11(33.3) 21(22.1) 20(46.5) χ2=8.497 0.014
阳性 22(66.7) 74(77.9) 23(53.5)
Ki-67[例(%)]          
≤20% 10(30.3) 30(31.6) 7(16.3) χ2=3.640 0.162
>20% 23(69.7) 65(68.4) 36(83.7)
ypT[例(%)]          
T0 5(15.2) 10(10.5) 9(20.9) H=0.358 0.836
Tis 0 0 5(11.6)
T1 19(57.6) 60(63.2) 14(32.6)
T2 8(24.2) 21(22.1) 10(23.3)
T3 1(3.0) 4(4.2) 5(11.6)
ypN(%)          
N0 12(36.4) 32(33.7) 19(44.2) H=2.328 0.312
N1 7(21.2) 25(26.3) 11(25.6)
N2 10(30.3) 18(18.9) 9(20.9)
N3 4(12.1) 20(21.1) 4(9.3)
MP分级[例(%)]          
1级 3(9.1) 20(21.1) 3(7.0) H=9.406 0.009
2级 6(18.2) 20(21.1) 9(20.9)
3级 15(45.4) 36(37.8) 12(27.9)
4级 6(18.2) 9(9.5) 5(11.6)
5级 3(9.1) 10(10.5) 14(32.6)
化疗方案[例(%)]          
蒽环+紫杉类 29(87.9) 83(87.4) 38(88.4) χ2=0.028 0.986
紫杉类 4(12.1) 12(12.6) 5(11.6)
pCR[例(%)]          
2(6.1) 7(7.4) 9(20.9) χ2=5.744 0.052
31(93.9) 88(92.6) 34(79.1)
复发转移[例(%)]          
8(24.2) 22(23.2) 11(25.6) χ2=0.097 0.953
25(75.8) 73(76.8) 32(74.4)
图1 不同HER-2表达状态乳腺癌患者的无瘤生存曲线比较注:3组比较,χ2=0.471,P=0.790
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE,et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(1):7-33.
[2]
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update[J]. J Clin Oncol201836(20):2105-2122.
[3]
Tarantino P, Hamilton E, Tolaney SM, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape[J]. J Clin Oncol202038(17):1951-1962.
[4]
杨文涛,步宏. 乳腺癌雌、孕激素受体免疫组织化学检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志2015, 44(4):237-239.
[5]
《乳腺癌HER2检测指南(2019版)》编写组.乳腺癌HER2检测指南(2019版)[J].中华病理学杂志2019, 48(3):169-175.
[6]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志2021, 31(10):954-1040.
[7]
刘裔莎,魏兵,杨雯娟,等.美国癌症联合会乳腺癌分期(第七版)简介[J].中华病理学杂志2010, 39(11):787-790.
[8]
Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013[J]. Ann Oncol201324(9):2206-2223.
[9]
Marchiò C, Annaratone L, Marques A, et al. Evolving concepts in HER2 evaluation in breast cancer: heterogeneity, HER2-low carcinomas and beyond [J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 202172:123-135.
[10]
Xu Z, Guo D, Jiang Z, et al. Novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates of trastuzumab beyond T-DM1 in breast cancer: trastuzumab deruxtecan(DS-8201a) and (Vic-)trastuzumab duocarmazine (SYD985) [J]. Eur J Med Chem2019183:111682.
[11]
Modi S, Park H, Murthy RK, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study[J]. J Clin Oncol202038(17):1887-1896.
[12]
Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022387(1):9-20.
[13]
Tamura K, Tsurutani J, Takahashi S, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: a dose-expansion, phase 1 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(6):816-826.
[14]
Shao Y, Yu Y, Luo Z,et al. Clinical, pathological complete response, and prognosis characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting-a retrospective analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(13):8035-8036.
[15]
Schettini F, Chic N, Brasó-Maristany F,et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 20217(1):1.
[16]
Eiger D, Agostinetto E, Saúde-Conde R, et al. The exciting new field of HER2-low breast cancer treatment [J]. Cancers (Basel), 202113(5):1015.
[17]
de Moura Leite L, Cesca MG, Tavares MC, et al. HER2-low status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 negative early breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2021190(1):155-163.
[18]
Agostinetto E, Rediti M, Fimereli D, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: molecular characteristics and prognosis[J]. Cancers (Basel)202113(11):2824.
[19]
Denkert C, Seither F, Schneeweiss A,et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials[J]. Lancet Oncol202122(8):1151-1161.
[20]
Fernandez AI, Liu M, Bellizzi A, et al. Examination of low ERBB2 protein expression in breast cancer tissue[J]. JAMA Oncol, 20228(4):1-4.
[21]
Zhang G, Ren C, Li C,et al. Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-,low-,or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status[J]. BMC Med202220(1):142.
[22]
Chen M, Chen W, Liu D, et al. Prognostic values of clinical and molecular features in HER2 low-breast cancer with hormonal receptor overexpression: features of HER2-low breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer202229(5):844-853.
[23]
Almstedt K, Heimes AS, Kappenberg F, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of HER2-low and HER2-zero in node-negative breast cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer2022173:10-19.
[24]
Won HS, Ahn J, Kim Y, et al. Clinical significance of HER2-low expression in early breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society[J]. Breast Cancer Res202224(1):22.
[25]
Alves FR, Gil L, Vasconcelos de Matos L, et al. Impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low status in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer[J]. Cureus202214(2):e22330.
[26]
Reinert T, Sartori GP, Souza AA, et al. Prevalence of HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups and correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with HER2-negative breast[J]. Cancer Res, 2021, 81 (4_Suppl): PS4-22.
[27]
Rossi V, Sarotto I, Maggiorotto F, et al. Moderate immunohistochemical expression of HER-2 (2+) without HER-2 gene amplification is a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer[J]. Oncologist, 201217(11):1418-1425.
[28]
Horisawa N, Adachi Y, Takatsuka D, et al. The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status[J]. Breast Cancer202229:234-241.
[29]
于宏,邱芳,顾玺,等. HER-2低表达的三阴性乳腺癌患者的临床特征和预后分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报2022, 51(8):721-724.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[8] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[9] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[10] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[11] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要