切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 79 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2018.02.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

乳腺、卵巢双原发癌9例临床分析
胡铭阳1, 张小波2, 林子晶1, 王宁1, 周鸿1, 明佳1,()   
  1. 1. 400010 重庆医科大学附属第二医院三腺外科
    2. 621000 四川省绵阳市中心医院全科医学科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-04 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 明佳
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市渝中区科技计划项目(20160104); 重庆市卫生计生委医学科研项目(2016BDXM012)

Clinical analysis of nine patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer

Mingyang Hu1, Xiaobo Zhang2, Zijin Lin1, Ning Wang1, Hong Zhou1, Jia Ming1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast, Thyroid and Pancreas Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
    2. Department of General Medicine, Central Hospital of Mianyang, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-09-04 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jia Ming
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ming Jia, Email:
引用本文:

胡铭阳, 张小波, 林子晶, 王宁, 周鸿, 明佳. 乳腺、卵巢双原发癌9例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 79-83.

Mingyang Hu, Xiaobo Zhang, Zijin Lin, Ning Wang, Hong Zhou, Jia Ming. Clinical analysis of nine patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 79-83.

目的

总结乳腺、卵巢癌双原发癌患者的临床病理特征,并讨论其可能原因及防治策略。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月间重庆医科大学附属第二医院及四川省绵阳市中心医院收治的9例乳腺、卵巢双原发癌患者的临床资料。随访时间为24~312个月,中位随访时间为120个月。

结果

9例患者中,6例首发乳腺癌,2例首发卵巢癌,1例为同时性乳腺、卵巢双原发癌。2例患者进行了BRCA基因检测,1例患者存在BRCA1基因突变。9例患者乳腺首发临床症状均为乳房包块;卵巢首发症状中6例为腹胀,2例为阴道异常流血,1例为卵巢肿物。有乳腺标本免疫组织化学检测结果的5例患者中,ER均阴性表达,其中4例为三阴性乳腺癌。9例患者均进行了乳腺癌根治术,并全部接受了化疗,有3例患者术后进行了放射治疗,1例患者术后接受了他莫昔芬内分泌治疗,无患者接受抗HER-2治疗。9例患者中除1例患者拒绝卵巢手术外,其余8例患者均进行了卵巢癌全面分期手术,9例患者均接受了静脉化疗,3例患者接受了腹腔灌注化疗,无患者接受放射治疗。9例患者的中位发病年龄为46岁(36~51岁),中位发病间隔时间为93个月(0~300个月),确诊第二癌后的中位无进展生存时间为19个月(7~22个月)。7例患者发生卵巢癌复发转移,随访期间3例患者死亡。6例无家族史者发生两癌的中位间隔时间为122个月,3例有家族史者发生两癌的中位间隔时间为21个月;3例患者发生首发癌时年龄<45岁,其发生第二原发癌的中位间隔时间为258个月,6例患者发生首发癌时年龄≥45岁,其发生第二原发癌的中位间隔时间为36个月。

结论

乳腺、卵巢双原发癌患者的首发起病年龄较小,诊断卵巢癌时多已出现明显临床症状,有家族史的患者两癌的间隔时间明显缩短。患者的治疗以手术和化疗为主。

Objective

To summarize the clinicopathological features of nine patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer, and explore the possible causes and prevention and treatment measures.

Methods

The clinical records of nine patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and the Central Hospital of Mianyang from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were followed up for 24-312 months, median 120 months.

Results

Among these patients, six patients firstly had breast cancer, two patients firstly had ovarian cancer and one patient had synchronal breast and ovarian cancer. Two patients received the detection of BRCA genes, including one with BRCA1 gene mutation. The first clinical symptom of the breast was mass in nine cases. The first clinical symptom of the ovary was abdominal distension in six cases, unusual vaginal bleeding in two cases and the mass in one case. Five patients with immunohistochemical results were ER negative, including four patients with triple-negative breast cancer. All patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer and chemotherapy, three patients received postoperative radiotherapy, one patient had endocrine therapy of tamoxifen after surgery and none received anti-HER-2 therapy. Except one patient who refused ovarian surgery, the other eight patients underwent the staging surgery of ovarian cancer. All patients received intravenous chemotherapy, three patients received intraperitoneal infusion chemotherapy and none received radiotherapy. The median age of onset in nine patients was 46 years old(range: 36-51 years). The median interval of the two cancers was 93 months(range: 0-300 months) and the median progression-free survival after the diagnosis of the second cancer was 19 months(range: 7-22 months). Seven patients had the recurrence or metastasis of ovarian cancer, and three patients died in the follow-up. The median interval of the two cancers in six patients without family breast/ovarian cancer history was 122 months while three patients with family history had a median interval of 21 months. Three patients who were diagnosed with the first cancer at the age<45 years had a median interval of 258 months between the onsets of two cancers; six patients who were diagnosed with the first cancer at the age≥45 years had a median interval of 36 months.

Conclusion

Patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer have a young age of onset. Most patients have obvious clinical symptoms and advanced stage when they are diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The patients with family history tend to have a short median interval between the onsets of two cancers. These patients are mainly treated by surgery and chemotherapy.

表1 9例原发性乳腺癌合并原发性卵巢癌患者的临床病理特征
[1]
Fan L, Strasser WK, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): 279-289.
[2]
Sundar S, Neal RD, Kehoe S. Diagnosis of ovarian cancer[J]. BMJ, 2015, 351: h4443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4443.
[3]
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M].7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010: 347-376.
[4]
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wi C. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours[M].7th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2009: 317-339.
[5]
Prat J, FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 124(1): 1-5.
[6]
Kurian AW. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations across race and ethnicity: distribution and clinical implications[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 22(1): 72-78.
[7]
Dana MD, Cecelia AB. Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome: a primer for obstetricians/gynecologists[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2013, 40(3): 475-512.
[8]
Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2013, 105(11): 812-822.
[9]
Tavera-Tapia A, Pérez-Cabornero L, Macías JA, et al. Almost 2% of Spanish breast cancer families are associated to germline pathogenic mutations in the ATM gene[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 161(3): 597-604.
[10]
Kluska A, Balabas A, Piatkowska M, et al. PALB2 mutations in BRCA1/2-mutation negative breast and ovarian cancer patients from Poland[J].BMC Med Genomics, 2017, 10(1): 14-20.
[11]
Bergfeldt K, Rydh B, Granath F, et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in breast cancer patients with a family history of breast or ovarin cancer: a population based cohort study[J].Lancet, 2002, 360(9337): 891-894.
[12]
Einbeigi Z, Enerbäck C, Wallgren A, et al. BRCA1 gene mutations may explain more than 80% of excess number of ovarian cancer cases after breast cancer-a population based study from the Western Sweden health care region[J]. Acta Oncol, 2010, 49(3): 361-367.
[13]
Zhang D, Li N, Xi Y, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of ovarian cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2017, 130: 43-52.
[14]
Neuhouser ML, Aragaki AK, Prentice RL, et al. Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: a secondary analysis of the women's health initiative randomized clinical trials[J].JAMA Oncol, 2015, 1(5): 611-621.
[15]
Huang T, Poole EM, Okereke OI, et al. Depression and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: Results from two large prospective cohort studies[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 139(3): 481-486.
[16]
Paredes AC, Pereira MG. Spirituality, distress and posttraumatic growth in breast cancer patients [EB/OL]. [2017-09-01].

URL    
[17]
Skates SJ, Greene MH, Buys SS, et al. Early detection of ovarian cancer using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm with frequent CA125 testingin women at increased familial risk-combined results from two screening trials[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23(14): 3628-3637.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 卢菊, 赵胜, 范建华, 高艳多. 探讨IOTA、GI-RADS及O-RADS在附件肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 484-490.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?