切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -137. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.03.002

论著

循环肿瘤DNA 预测激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗耐药的临床分析
易宗毕1, 马飞1,(), 远丽芳2, 李春晓3, 管彦芳4, 管秀雯1, 黎立喜1, 王佳玉1, 徐兵河1   
  1. 1.100021 北京,国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院肿瘤内科
    2.100122 北京,桓兴肿瘤医院肿瘤内科
    3.100021 北京,国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院分子肿瘤学国家重点实验室
    4.100096 北京,北京吉因加医学检验所
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-26 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 马飞
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科学技术委员会专项课题(D161100000816004)

Circulating tumor DNA predicting resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer

Zongbi Yi1, Fei Ma1,(), Lifang Yuan2, Chunxiao Li3, Yanfang Guan4, Xiuwen Guan1, Lixi Li1, Jiayu Wang1, Binghe Xu1   

  1. 1.Department of Medical Oncology
    2.Department of Medical Oncology,Huanxing Cancer Hospital,Beijing 100122, China
    3.National Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,China
    4.Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing 100096, China
  • Received:2016-10-26 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Fei Ma
引用本文:

易宗毕, 马飞, 远丽芳, 李春晓, 管彦芳, 管秀雯, 黎立喜, 王佳玉, 徐兵河. 循环肿瘤DNA 预测激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗耐药的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 132-137.

Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Lifang Yuan, Chunxiao Li, Yanfang Guan, Xiuwen Guan, Lixi Li, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu. Circulating tumor DNA predicting resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(03): 132-137.

目的

探讨多基因联合检测预测激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗耐药的临床应用价值。

方法

采用回顾性病例分析方法,收集2015 年1 月至2016 年8 月中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院收治的30 例激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的临床资料。 于患者治疗前采集其外周血10 ml,利用目标区域捕获测序技术检测循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)突变情况。 根据患者是否存在耐药相关基因(TP53、PIK3CA、mTOR、ERBB2、ESR1、FGFR1)突变,将其分为基因突变组和非基因突变组。 分析内分泌治疗耐药与基因突变的关系。 采用Kaplan-Meier 法绘制2 组患者的无进展生存(PFS)曲线,用Log-rank 检验比较两者之间的差异。 并用χ2 检验比较基因突变组与非基因突变组患者发生原发耐药的差异。

结果

在30 例患者中,基因突变组与非基因突变组患者分别有20 例和10 例。 随访1 ~19 个月,中位随访时间为3 个月,2 组患者中位PFS 分别为3 个月和5 个月,并且,基因突变组患者6 个月PFS 率明显低于非基因突变组(10%比50%,χ2=8.328,P=0.004)。 20 例基因突变组患者中,原发耐药者18 例,继发耐药者2 例,而10 例非基因突变组患者中原发耐药者5 例,继发耐药者5 例;基因突变组原发耐药者比非基因突变组多(χ2=5.963,P=0.026)。

结论

联合检测多个耐药相关基因的ctDNA,能够预测晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗耐药。

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of serial gene-panel circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA) sequencing in predicting resistance to endocrine therapy of hormone receptor (HR) positive advanced breast cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 30 patients with HR positive advanced breast cancer in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from January 2015 to August 2016. Blood sample of 10 ml was collected from these patients before endocrine therapy. ctDNA mutation was assayed by gene-panel target-capture next-generation sequencing. Based on the existence of drug resistance-related gene mutation (TP53, PIK3CA, mTOR,ERBB2, ESR1 and FGFR1), all samples were further subdivided into two groups: mutant group and nonmutant group. The relationship between resistance to endocrine therapy and gene mutation was analyzed.Survival curves of progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison of these estimates was performed using log-rank test. χ2 test was used to compare the primary drug resistance rates between mutant group and non-mutant group.

Results

In all 30 patients, there were 20 patients in mutant group and 10 patients in non-mutant group respectively. The median follow-up was 3 months (range 1-19 months). The median PFS was 3.0 months in the mutant group and 5.0 months in nonmutant group respectively. The 6-month PFS in mutant group was significantly lower than that in non-mutant group (10% vs 50%, χ2 =8.328, P=0.004). In mutant group (20 patients), 18 patients had primary resistance to endocrine therapy and 2 patients had secondary resistance. In non-mutant group (10 patients),5 patients had primary resistance to endocrine therapy and 5 patients had secondary resistance. The primary resistance rate in mutant group was significantly higher than that in non-mutant group (χ2 = 5.963, P =0.026).

Conclusion

The combined detection of ctDNA in multiple drug resistance-related genes can predict the resistance to endocrine therapy in HR positive advanced breast cancer patients.

表1 30 例激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者基本信息
编号 发病年龄(岁) HER-2 Ki67(%) 转移器官(个) 是否手术 既往内分泌治疗(次) 既往化疗(次) 既往靶向治疗(次) DFS(月) 药物 PFS(月)
P1 52 阳性 5 3 2 3 1 14 托瑞米芬 7
P2 47 阴性 0 4 2 4 3 44 阿那曲唑 2
P3 31 阴性 5 3 2 5 3 9 托瑞米芬 3
P4 41 阳性 20 3 3 5 3 19 来曲唑 12
P5a 58 阳性 40 3 3 4 4 来曲唑 2
P6 46 阴性 40 4 1 2 0 39 来曲唑 4
P7 45 阴性 20 4 1 3 1 50 来曲唑 1
P8 46 阴性 10 3 2 6 0 29 托瑞米芬 18
P9 44 阳性 25 1 1 1 0 64 来曲唑 19
P10 34 阳性 2 3 1 2 1 23 来曲唑 5
P11 34 阳性 30 2 1 1 0 50 依西美坦 3
P12 24 阳性 30 2 2 7 1 29 来曲唑 8
P13 26 阳性 5 4 1 6 6 8 氟维司群 5
P14a 55 阳性 18 2 1 0 1 来曲唑 3
P15 32 阳性 25 3 2 4 3 62 托瑞米芬 2
P16a 47 阳性 35 3 2 2 0 来曲唑 1
P17 46 阴性 25 4 2 4 0 49 来曲唑 1
P18a 68 阳性 35 2 0 2 1 依西美坦 2
P19a 34 阴性 60 4 1 2 0 托瑞米芬 3
P20 55 阴性 25 2 1 0 0 74 氟维斯群 5
P21a 68 阴性 10 3 3 1 0 阿那曲唑 3
P22 39 阴性 50 2 1 0 1 57 来曲唑 4
P23 42 阴性 30 1 2 2 0 83 托瑞米芬 4
P24 47 阴性 50 2 2 6 1 13 托瑞米芬 1
P25 64 阴性 NA 2 2 NA NA 21 托瑞米芬 11
P26a 42 阴性 25 4 1 0 0 托瑞米芬 3
P27 48 阴性 30 4 1 0 1 31 来曲唑 2
P28 30 阳性 70 3 1 0 2 21 依西美坦 7
P29 45 阴性 50 3 2 NA 0 37 托瑞米芬 2
P30 51 阴性 NA 4 2 NA 1 132 托瑞米芬 5
表2 基因突变组与非基因突变组乳腺癌患者临床特征对比(例)
图1 基因突变组与非基因突变组乳腺癌患者无进展生存曲线比较 注:基因突变组(n=20)与非基因突变组(n=10)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2=8.328,P=0.004
图2 各基因突变型与野生型乳腺癌患者间无进展生存曲线比较 注:a 图所示,TP53 基因突变型(n=10)与野生型(n=20)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2=6.277,P=0.012;b 图所示,mTOR 基因突变型(n=3)与野生型(n=27)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2=6.891,P=0.009;c 图所示,ERBB2 基因突变型(n=6)与野生型(n=24)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2=0.221,P=0.639;d 图所示,ESR1 基因突变型(n=6)与野生型(n=24)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2 =1.494,P=0.222;e 图所示,FGFR1 基因突变型(n=4)与野生型(n=26)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2 =1.863,P=0.172;f 图所示,PIK3CA 基因突变型(n=10)与野生型(n=20)乳腺癌患者相比,χ2=1.845,P=0.174
[1]
Robinson DR, Wu YM, Vats P, et al. Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer [J]. Nat Genet,2013,45(12):1446-1451.
[2]
Toy W,Shen Y,Won H,et al. ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer[J]. Nat Genet,2013,45(12):1439-1445.
[3]
Diaz LA Jr, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA[J]. J Clin Oncol,2014,32(6):579-586.
[4]
Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients[J]. Nat Rev Cancer,2011,11(6):426-437.
[5]
Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer [J].Nature,2012,486(7404):532-536.
[6]
Ma F, Zhu W, Guan Y, et al. ctDNA dynamics: a novel indicator to track resistance in metastatic breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 therapy [J]. Oncotarget,2016,7(40):66 020-66 031.
[7]
Jeselsohn R, Buchwalter G, De Angelis C, et al. ESR1 mutations—a mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2015,12(10):573-583.
[8]
Turner N, Pearson A, Sharpe R, et al. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer[J]. Cancer Res,2010,70(5):2085-2094.
[9]
Ma CX, Reinert T, Chmielewska I, et al. Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance [J]. Nat Rev Cancer,2015,15(5):261-275.
[10]
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J].Eur J Cancer,2009,45(2):228-247.
[11]
徐兵河,江泽飞,胡夕春. 中国晚期乳腺癌临床诊疗专家共识2016[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(22):1719-1727.
[12]
Fang CH, Chang YJ, Chung WC, et al. Subset selection of high-depth next generation sequencing reads for de novo genome assembly using MapReduce framework[J]. BMC Genomics,2015,16 Suppl 12:S9.
[13]
Schneeberger K. Using next-generation sequencing to isolate mutant genes from forward genetic screens[J]. Nat Rev Genet,2014,15(10):662-676.
[14]
Chabon JJ, Simmons AD, Lovejoy AF, et al. Circulating tumour DNA profiling reveals heterogeneity of EGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms in lung cancer patients[J]. Nat Commun,2016,7:13 513.
[15]
Dancey J. mTOR signaling and drug development in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2010,4(7):209-219.
[16]
Zilli M, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, et al. Molecular mechanisms of endocrine resistance and their implication in the therapy of breast cancer[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta,2009,1795(1):62-81.
[17]
Niu J, Andres G, Kramer K, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients[J]. Onco Targets Ther,2015,8:3323-3328.
[18]
Schiavon G, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, et al. Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer [J]. Sci Transl Med,2015,7(313):313ra182.
[19]
廖宁. 超越过去的认知——2016 乳腺癌内分泌精准治疗[J]. 循证医学,2016,16 (3):136-142.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 笪东祝, 林凯, 王小蕊, 王开银, 王敏, 王玮, 李瑾, 刘俊. 低促甲状腺激素水平结节性甲状腺肿的发生发展与促甲状腺激素受体基因D727E 多态性的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 443-446.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要