切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 329 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2013.05.004

论著

平消胶囊对实验性大鼠乳腺癌的预防作用及机制
韩晓蓉1, 杨剑敏1, 罗懿忠1, 韩旎1, 黎剑君1, 王颀1,()   
  1. 1.510000 广州,广东省妇幼保健院乳腺科
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-20 出版日期:2013-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王颀
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药局科研基金(20122176)

Chemopreventive effect of Pingxiao capsule on breast cancer in rats and its mechanism

Xiao-rong HAN1, Jian-min YANG1, Yi-zhong LUO1, Ni HAN1, Jian-jun LI1, Qi WANG1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Diseases, Guangdong Maternal and Children Hospital,Guangzhou 510000,China
  • Received:2013-09-20 Published:2013-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Qi WANG
引用本文:

韩晓蓉, 杨剑敏, 罗懿忠, 韩旎, 黎剑君, 王颀. 平消胶囊对实验性大鼠乳腺癌的预防作用及机制[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2013, 07(05): 329-333.

Xiao-rong HAN, Jian-min YANG, Yi-zhong LUO, Ni HAN, Jian-jun LI, Qi WANG. Chemopreventive effect of Pingxiao capsule on breast cancer in rats and its mechanism[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2013, 07(05): 329-333.

目的

探讨中成药平消胶囊对实验性大鼠乳腺癌的预防作用及其机制。

方法

将60 只21 d 龄雌性SD 大鼠随机分为3 组:A 组(空白对照组)20 只,腹腔注射甲基亚硝脲,饮清水;B 组(平消胶囊组)20 只,腹腔注射甲基亚硝脲后饮用平消胶囊混悬液;C 组(他莫昔芬组)20 只,腹腔注射甲基亚硝脲后饮用他莫昔芬水。观察各组大鼠肿瘤生长情况, 记录肿瘤数量及体积;在鼠龄98 d 时, 取各组大鼠乳腺肿瘤组织行常规HE 染色病理学检查,应用免疫组织化学SP 法检测各组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的表达并行微血管密度(MVD)计数。采用χ2 检验及单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。

结果

A、B、C 组大鼠乳腺IDC 的发生率分别为100%(20/20)、60.0%(12/20)和50.0%(10/20),3 组间比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.33,P=0.001);B 组IDC 的发生率比A 组低(P<0.017),但与C 组相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.40,P>0.017)。A、B、C 组乳腺肿瘤的体积分别为(1042±102)、(398±42)、(520±33) mm3,3 组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=4.99,P=0.010);B 组肿瘤体积明显小于A 组(P=0.009),但与C 组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.120)。A、B、C 组乳腺IDC 组织VEFG 阳性表达率分别为83.3%(115/138)、42.6%(29/68)和75.3%(58/77)(χ2=37.71,P=0.000),B 组的VEGF 阳性表达率明显低于A 组和C 组(χ2=35.84、16.07,P 均<0.017)。A、B、C 组IDC 的MVD计数依次为(68.2±8.6)、(29.6±1.2)和(59.1±7.1)个(F=4.31,P=0.015),B 组IDC 的MVD 计数明显少于A 组和C 组(P 均=0.000)。

结论

平消胶囊对实验性大鼠乳腺癌的发生有明显的抑制作用, 其抑制乳腺癌的发生可能是通过抑制肿瘤血管生成实现的。平消胶囊对大鼠乳腺癌的发生有一定的化学预防作用。

Objective

To investigate the chemopreventive effect of Pingxiao capsule on breast cancer in rats and its mechanism.

Methods

A total of 60 21-day-old female SD rats were randomly divided into three groups,20 rats in each group.All rats were intraperitoneally injected with methylnitrosourea.After that, water was provided to rats in group A (negative control group), water mixed with Pingxiao capsules in group B(Pingxiao capsule group), water solved with tamoxifen in Group C (tamoxifen group).The number and volume of the tumors developed in rats of each group were recorded.All rats were sacrificed at age of 98 days,and then the breast cancer tissue was sampled for HE staining and pathological detection.VEGF expression and microvessel density (MVD) in rat breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were determined by SP immunohistochemistry.χ2 test and one-way analysis of variance were conducted for data analysis.

Results

The occurrence of IDC was 100%(20/20)in group A, 60.0%(12/20) in group B and 50.0%(10/20) in group C, respectively, which presented a statisticaly significant difference among the three groups(χ2 =13.33,P=0.001).The occurrence of IDC in group B was lower than that in group A(P<0.017), but there was no statistical difference between group B and group C (χ2=0.40,P>0.017).The volume of tumors was (1042±102) mm3 in group A,(398±42) mm3 in group B and (520±33) mm3 in group C,respectively,which showed a statistical difference among the three groups (F=4.99,P=0.010).The average volume of tumors in group B was less than that in group A(P=0.009), but there was no statistical difference between group B and group C(P=0.120).The positive rate of VEGF in IDC tissue was 83.3% in group A,42.6% in group B and 75.3%in group C, respectively (χ2=37.71,P=0.000 ).The positive rate of VEGF in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (χ2=35.84,P<0.017)and group C (χ2=16.07,P<0.017).MVD of IDC was 68.2±8.6 in group A,29.6±1.2 in group B and 59.1±7.1 in group C, respectively (F=4.31,P=0.015 ).MVD in group B was lower than that in group A and group C (all P=0.000).

Conclusions

Pingxiao capsules can inhibit the development of breast cancer in rats, which may be due to its anti-angiogenesis effect.So Pingxiao capsules have chemopreventive effects on breast cancer in rats.

表1 各组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌的观察指标比较
图1 大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌病理表现(HE ×100)
表2 各组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌组织中VEFG 阳性表达率的比较
图2 大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌组织VEGF 的免疫组织化学染色结果(SP ×100) 大鼠肿瘤血管内皮生长因素(VEGF)阳性表达,胞质中可见棕黄色颗粒,阳性肿瘤细胞占肿瘤细胞的比例>10%
图3 平消胶囊组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌组织CD34 的免疫组织化学染色结果(SP ×100) 用大鼠肿瘤组织CD34 表达标记微血管密度
图4 对照组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌组织CD34 的免疫组织化学染色结果(SP ×100) 用大鼠肿瘤组织CD34 表达标记微血管密度
图5 他莫昔芬组大鼠乳腺浸润性导管癌组织CD34 的免疫组织化学染色结果(SP ×100) 用大鼠肿瘤组织CD34 表达标记微血管密度
[1]
Reimers L, Crew KD.Tamoxifen vs raloxifene vs exemestane for chemoprevention [J].Curr Breast Cancer Rep,2012,4(3):207-215.
[2]
Den Hollander P, Savage MI, Brown PH.Targeted therapy for breast cancer prevention[J].Front Oncol,2013,3:250.
[3]
刘健,刘韬,谢佐福,等.平消胶囊抗肿瘤分子的生物学机制[J].福建医科大学学报,2006,40(4):368-372.
[4]
Kubatka P, Stollárová N, ^Skarda J,et al.Preventive effects of fluvastatin in rat mammary carcinogenesis[J].Eur J Cancer Prev,2013,22(4):352-357.
[5]
Russo J, Russo IH.Atlas and histologic classification of tumors of the rat mammary gland [J].J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia,2000,5(2):187-200.
[6]
韩晓蓉,郜红艺,吴坤河,等.三阴性乳腺癌中血管内皮生长因子C 的表达及其意义[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2010,4(6):671-675.
[7]
Bˇadescu A, Georgescu CV, Vere CC, et al.Correlations between Her2 oncoprotein, VEGF expression, MVD and clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer[J].Rom J Morphol Embryol,2012,53(4):997-1005.
[8]
Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al.Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2005,97(22):1652-1662.
[9]
Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, et al.Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer-96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-1 trial[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2007,99(4):272-282.
[10]
Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S, et al.A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early stage breast cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2003,349(19):1793-1802.
[11]
Roberts N,Kloos B,Cassella M,et al.Inhibition of VEGFR-3 activation with the antagonistic antibody more potently suppresses lymph node and distant metastases than inactivation of VEGFR-2[J].Cancer Res,2006,66(5):2650-2657.
[12]
杨剑敏,王颀,李文萍.Suramin 对实验性大鼠乳腺癌化学预防作用的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2011,18(7):494-497.
[13]
朱庆贵.平消胶囊抗肺癌的分子生物学机制[J].南方医科大学学报,2008,28(11):2069-2071.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要