切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2011.01.012

实验研究

微小RNA206和连接蛋白43在乳腺癌原发灶及腋窝转移淋巴结中的表达变化
明佳1, 范林军1, 钟玲1, 陈庆秋1, 姜军1,()   
  1. 1.400038 重庆,第三军医大学附属西南医院乳腺疾病中心
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-24 出版日期:2011-02-01
  • 通信作者: 姜军
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金(2008BB5102)

Expressions of miR-206 and Cx43 in primary breast tumours and metastatic lymph nodes

Jia MING1, Lin-jun FAN1, Ling ZHONG1, Qing-qiu CHEN1, Jun JIANG1,()   

  1. 1.Breast Disease Center,Southwest Hospital,Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China
  • Received:2011-01-24 Published:2011-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun JIANG
引用本文:

明佳, 范林军, 钟玲, 陈庆秋, 姜军. 微小RNA206和连接蛋白43在乳腺癌原发灶及腋窝转移淋巴结中的表达变化[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2011, 05(01): 38-41.

Jia MING, Lin-jun FAN, Ling ZHONG, Qing-qiu CHEN, Jun JIANG. Expressions of miR-206 and Cx43 in primary breast tumours and metastatic lymph nodes[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2011, 05(01): 38-41.

目的

探讨微小RNA-206(miR-206)和连接蛋白(Cx)43在乳腺癌原发灶(PTs)及腋窝转移淋巴结(MLNs)中的表达变化关系。

方法

收集8例经病理学证实为浸润性导管癌的乳腺癌患者,取手术切除的癌旁正常腺体组织、乳腺癌PTs、配对的正常腋窝淋巴结(NLNs)及MLNs,采用实时定量PCR和Western blotting等实验方法,检测正常腺体组织、乳腺癌PTs、配对的NLNs、MLNs中miR-206和Cx43的mRNA和蛋白表达。各组间均数比较行单因素方差分析和Post hoc检验(SNK/LSD)。

结果

与正常乳腺腺体组织比较,乳腺癌PTs和NLNs中miR-206的mRNA表达明显降低,配对的MLNs中miR-206的mRNA表达较PTs和NLNs进一步降低(P<0.05)。PTs、NLNs和MLNs中Cx43mRNA表达较正常乳腺组织明显降低(P<0.05),而PTs与MLNs中Cx43 mRNA的表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PTs和NLNs中Cx43蛋白表达较正常乳腺组织明显降低(P<0.05);与PTs比较,NLNs中Cx43蛋白表达的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而MLNs中Cx43蛋白的表达明显增加(P<0.05)。

结论

miR-206和Cx43基因的相互作用可能与乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移有关。

Objective

To explore the expression and regulation role of microRNA-206(miR-206)and connexin 43(Cx43)in primary breast tumours(PTs)and metastatic lymph nodes(MLNs).

Methods

Eight patients of pathologically confirmed infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast were enrolled.Pericancer normal tissues,primary breast tumors(PTs),paired normal axillary lymph nodes(NLNs)and paired metastatic lymph nodes(MLNs)were obtained from the resected tumors of the patients.The expressions of mRNA and protein of miR-206 and Cx43 in pericancer normal tissue,PTs,NLNs and MLNs were tested using real-time PCR and Western blot techniques.Comparison between groups was performed using one way analysis of variances and SNK or LSD test.

Results

Compared with the normal breast tissues,the mRNA expression of miR-206 in PTs and NLNs decreased significantly,and it further decreased in MLNs compared with PTs and NLNs(P<0.05).The mRNA expressions of Cx43 was significantly decreased in PTs,NLNs and MLNs compared with the normal(P<0.05),but there was no statistical difference between PTs and MLNs(P>0.05).The protein expression of Cx43 in PTS and NLNs were significantly lower than in the normal(P<0.05).Compared with PTs the protein expression of Cx43 had no statistical difference in NLNs(P>0.05),but significantly increased in MLNs(P<0.05).

Conclusions

The interaction of miR-206 and Cx43 probably play a role in the metastasis of axillary lymph node in breast cancer.

表1 miR-206、Cx43和GAPDH的PCR引物序列
表2 乳腺癌中miR-206与Cx43的mRNA表达
[1]
邵志敏.乳腺癌转移机制的研究及其临床应用[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2009,3(5):475-479.
[2]
Lewis BP,Shih IH,Jones Rhoades MW,et al.Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets[J].Cell,2003,115(7):787-798.
[3]
Zhang H,Li Y,Lai M.The microRNA network and tumor metas-tasis[J].Oncogene,2010,18,29(7):937-948.
[4]
Tavazoie SF,Alarcón C,Oskarsson T,et al.Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis[J].Nature,2008,451(7175):147-152.
[5]
Conklin CM,Bechberger JF,MacFabe D,et al.Genistein and quercetin increase connexin43 and suppress growth of breast cancer cells[J].Carcinogenesis,2007,28(1):93-100.
[6]
Elzarrad MK,Haroon A,Willecke K,Dobrowolski R,Gillespie MN,et al.Connexin-43 up-regulation in micrometastases and tumor vasculature and its role in tumor cell attachment to pulmonary endothelium[J].BMC Med,2008,22(6):20.
[7]
Kanczuga Koda L,Sulkowski S,Lenczewski A,et al.Increased expression of connexins 26 and 43 in lymph node metastases of breast cancer[J].J Clin Pathol,2006,59(4):429-33.
[8]
Inose H,Ochi H,Kimura A,et al.microRNA regulatory mechanism of osteoblast differentiation[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2009,106(49):20794-20799.
[9]
Joseph S,David WR.Molecular Cloning:a laboratory manual[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Beijing Science Publishing Company,2002:1564-1595.
[10]
He L,Hannon GJ.MicroRNAs:small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation[J].Nat Rev Genet,2004,5(7):522-531.
[11]
Hutvagner G.MicroRNAs and cancer:issue summary[J].Oncogene,2006,25:6154-6155.
[12]
Esquela Kerscher A,Slack FJ.Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer[J].Nat Rev Cancer,2006,6(4):259-269.
[13]
Yu Z,Baserga R,Chen L,Wang C,Lisanti MP,Pestell RG.microRNA,cell cycle,and human breast cancer[J].Am J Pathol,2010,176(3):1058-1064.
[14]
Xu X,Francis R,Wei CJ,et al.Connexin 43-mediated modulation of polarized cell movement and the directional migration of cardiac neural crest cells[J].Development,2006,133(18):3629-3639.
[15]
Homkajom B,Sims NR,Muyderman H.Connexin 43 regulates astrocytic migration and proliferation in response to injury[J].Neurosci Lett,2010,486(3):197-201.
[16]
Kanczuga Koda L,Sulkowski S,Tomaszewski J,et al.Connexins 26 and 43 correlate with Bak,but not with Bcl-2 protein in breast cancer[J].Oncol Rep,2005,14(2):325-329.
[17]
Parthasarathi K,Ichimura H,Monma E,et al.Connexin 43 mediates spread of Ca2+dependent proinflammatory responses in lung capillaries[J].J Clin Invest,2006,116(8):2193-2200.
[18]
Goldberg GS,Moreno AP,Lampe PD.Gap junctions between cells expressing connexin43 or 32 show inverse permselectivity to adenosine and ATP[J].J Biol Chem,2002,277(39):36725-36730.
[19]
Oktem G,Bilir A,Ayla S,et al.Role of intercellular communications in breast cancer multicellular tumor spheroids after chemotherapy[J].Oncol Res,2006,16(5):225-233.
[20]
Kanczuga Koda L,Sulkowski S,Lenczewski A,et al.Increased expression of connexins 26 and 43 in lymph node metastases of breast cancer[J].J Clin Pathol,2006,59(4):429-433.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 罗青杉, 梅海涛, 郝家领, 蔡锦锋, 周润楷, 温玉刚. 连接蛋白43通过调控细胞周期抑制结直肠癌的增殖机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 344-349.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要