切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 163 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2009.02.006

临床研究

年轻乳腺癌患者远处转移潜能的相关因素分析
孟洁1, 张瑾1   
  1. 1.300060 天津,天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺三科教育部乳腺癌防治重点试验室
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-10 出版日期:2009-04-01
  • 基金资助:
    长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(IRT0743)

Analysis of relative factors of distant metastasis in young breast cancer patients

Jie MENG1, Jin ZHANG1   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery,Tianjin Cancer Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300060,China
  • Received:2008-09-10 Published:2009-04-01
引用本文:

孟洁, 张瑾. 年轻乳腺癌患者远处转移潜能的相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2009, 03(02): 163-172.

Jie MENG, Jin ZHANG. Analysis of relative factors of distant metastasis in young breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2009, 03(02): 163-172.

目的

回顾性分析与年轻乳腺癌患者预后有关的临床病理、生物学特征,评估与远处转移潜能相关的因素。

方法

收集本院乳腺科1994 年1 月至1998 年4月确诊的年龄≤35岁的原发性乳腺癌患者191例,其中93例临床资料及随访工作完整,并且93 例中63 例肿瘤蜡块可用于生物学指标的免疫组化染色。手术方式包括保乳手术、改良根治术及经典根治术。所有患者按国际抗癌联盟(UICC)1997 年临床分期标准分期。复习病理切片,包括组织学分类及分级、淋巴管侵犯、淋巴结外软组织受累、广泛性导管内成分和淋巴结受累。免疫组化方法检测雌激素受体、孕激素受体、雄激素受体(AR)、c-erbB-2、ki67及P53蛋白表达。术后依据病理及生物学指标给予辅助放射治疗、化疗和内分泌治疗。将93 例病例按5 年是否转移分为2 组,将预后相关因素分为临床、病理及生物学因素。计量资料采用χ2 检验进行5年转移率趋势分析,转移危险因素分析采用多因素COX 回归模型,检验水准a=0.05。

结果

随访至5 年,术后5 年远处转移26例,转移率为28.0%(26/93)。临床分期III期、行经典根治术治疗者5 年转移率最高(分别为60.7%及43.8%,P<0.01)。淋巴结受累1~3、4~6、>6 枚的远处转移风险是淋巴结阴性的2.04、3.33、14.63 倍,淋巴结外软组织受累的转移风险是未受累的2.41 倍,AR 阳性是阴性的0.15 倍,c-erbB-2(+)、分别是c-erbB2(-)的13.51、10.39、12.20 倍。

结论

年轻的晚期乳腺癌患者预后较差,人为干预手段不能从根本上影响预后,病理指标中淋巴结及结外软组织受累情况、生物学因素中AR 及c-erbB-2 表达情况是预测远处转移风险的较佳因素。

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the relationship between clinicopathological and biological characteristics and the outcome in young females with breast cancer and evaluate the relative factors of distant metastasis.

Methods

The data of 191 cases of≤35-year-old women with primary breast cancer treated from January 1994 to April 1998 in Tianjin Cancer Hospital were retrospectinely analyzed.The follow-up clinical data of 93 of the 191 cases were complete.Sixty-three samples were available for immunohistochemical analyses.The surgical operation included breast-conserving therapy,modified mastectomy and radical mastec-tomy.Clinical staging were consistent with the 1997 UICC TNM classification.The histological specimens were reviewed.The pathological parameters including pathological type,histological grade,lymphatic vessel invasion,fat involvement,extensive intraductal component and lymph node status were determined.Various biological factors including estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),androgen receptor(AR),c-erbB-2,ki67 and p53 were tested with immunohistochemistry.The adjuvant radiation therapy,chemotherapy and hormonal therapy after operation were carried out on the basis of pathological and biological features.The 93 cases were divided into two groups according to metastasis and non-metastasis within 5 years.The prognosis-related factors including clinical factors,pathological and biological factors were evaluated.Chi-square test was used for analysis of 5-years metastasis status;and multivariate analysis was carried out using Cox proportional hazards models to assess the independent effect of the metastasis factors(the test standard a=0.05).

Results

The 5-year follow-up showed that the metastasis rate in the 93 cases was 28.0% (26/93).The Chi-square test results indicated that the patients with clinical stage III undergoing radical mastectomy had the highest metastasis rate(60.7%and 43.8%respectively,P<0.01).Cox-regression results showed that patients with 1-3,4-6 and>6 positive lymph nodes had a higher risk of metastasis than the patients with negative lymph nodes,and RR values were 2.04,3.33 and 14.63 respectively.The metastasis risk of patients with fat involvement was 2.41 times of the patients without fat involvement.The metastasis risk of patients with AR positive was 0.15 times of the patients with AR negative,and the metastasis risk of c-erbB-2(+),and was 13.51,10.39 and 12.20 times of the patients with c-erbB-2(-)respectively.

Conclusions

The young patients with clinical advanced breast cancer have a poor outcome.The therapeutic intervention has no fundamental impact on the outcome of patients.The lymph node and fat involvement status,AR and c-erbB-2 expression are the factors predicting the distant metastasis risk for young patients with breast cancer.

表1 年轻乳腺癌患者的5年转移率趋势分析
表2 年轻乳腺癌患者的远处转移风险COX 模型分析
图1 浸润性导管癌雄激素受体表达(+)(S-P染色×100)
图2 浸润性导管癌的c-erbB-2蛋白表达(+)(S-P染色×100)
图3 浸润性导管癌的c-erbB-2蛋白表达(S-P染色×100)
图4 浸润性导管癌的c-erbB-2蛋白表达(S-P染色×100)
图5 淋巴结受累亚型的远处转移风险
图6 淋巴结外软组织受累的远处转移风险
图7 不同雄激素受体表达的远处转移危险
图8 c-erbB-2过表达的远处转移危险
[1]
付丽,傅西林.乳腺肿瘤病理学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:285-287.
[2]
EI Saghir N S,Seoud M,Khalil M K,et al.Effects of young age at presentation on survival in breast cancer.BMC Cancer,2006,6:194-204.
[3]
Chan A,Pintilie M,Vallis K,et al.Breast cancer in women<or=35 years:review of 1002 cases from a single institution.Ann Oncol,2000,11:1255-1262.
[4]
Maggard M A,O'Connell J B,Lane K E,et al.Do young breast cancer patients have worse outcomes?Surg Res,2003,113:109-113.
[5]
Han W,Kim S W,Park I A,et al.Young age:an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer.BMC Cancer,2004,17:82-90.
[6]
Foo C S,Su D,Chong C K,et al.Breast cancer in young Asian women:study on survival.ANZ J Surg,2005,75:566-572.
[7]
王德延.乳腺癌淋巴结外转移对预后的影响.天津医药肿瘤学附刊,1965,3:146-149.
[8]
王哲海.HER-2过表达对乳腺癌治疗策略的影响.中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2008,2:88-102.
[9]
Curigliano G,Rigo R,Colleoni M,et al.Adjuvant therapy for very young women with breast cancer:response according to biologic and endocrine features.Clin Breast Cancer,2004,5:125-130.
[10]
Rapiti E,Fioretta G,Verkooijen H M,et al.Survival of young and older breast cancer patients in Geneva from 1990 to 2001.Eur J Cancer,2005,41:1446-52.
[11]
Gonzalez Angulo A M,Broglio K,Kau S W,et al.Women age<or=35 years with primary breast carcinoma:disease features at presentation.Cancer,2005,103:2466-2472.
[12]
Guerra I,Algorta J,Díaz de Otazu R,et al.Immunohistochemical prognostic index for breast cancer in young women.Molecular Pathol,2003,56:323-327.
[13]
Dipen M,Lavinia P,Sijan W,et al.HER-2/neu and p53 overexpression as biomarkers of breast carcinoma in women aged 30 years and younger.Cancer,2005,83:900-905.
[14]
Riva C,Dainese E,Caprara G,et al.Immunohistochemical study of androgen receptor in breast carcinoma:evidence of their frequent expression in lobular carcinoma.Virchows Arch,2005,447:695-700.
[15]
Moinfar F,Okcu M,Tsybrovskyy O,et al.Androgen receptors frequently are expressed in breast carcinoma:potential relevance to new therapeutic strategies.Cancer,2003,98:703-711.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
阅读次数
全文


摘要