切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2009, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -162. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2009.02.005

临床研究

超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值
林清萍1, 欧阳秋芳1, 赵红佳1, 吴辛颖2, 高尤亮3   
  1. 1.350003 福州,福建中医学院附属第二人民医院超声科
    2.350003 福州,福建中医学院附属第二人民医院乳腺外科
    3.350003 福州,福建中医学院附属第二人民医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-16 出版日期:2009-04-01

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma

Qing-ping LIN1, Qiu-fang OUYANG1, Hong-jia ZHAO1, Xin-ying WU1, You-liang GAO1   

  1. 1.Department of Ultrasonography,Second Affiliated People's Hospital,Fujian Traditional Chinese Medcine,Fuzhou 350003,China
  • Received:2009-01-16 Published:2009-04-01
引用本文:

林清萍, 欧阳秋芳, 赵红佳, 吴辛颖, 高尤亮. 超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2009, 03(02): 154-162.

Qing-ping LIN, Qiu-fang OUYANG, Hong-jia ZHAO, Xin-ying WU, You-liang GAO. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2009, 03(02): 154-162.

目的

探讨超声造影对诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的应用价值。

方法

对141例浸润型乳腺癌患者行乳腺病灶及腋窝淋巴结常规超声检查后,再对腋窝淋巴结进行超声造影,先用目测法观察淋巴结超声造影增强模式,再用QontraXt软件分析超声造影时间-强度曲线参数。根据超声造影灌注特点,将腋窝淋巴结分为淋巴结转移组(有转移组)和无淋巴结转移组(无转移组),并与病理检查结果相比较。增强模式之间的对比采用χ2 检验,造影参数用单因素方差分析。

结果

淋巴结有转移组灌注模式表现为不均匀增强型或无增强,淋巴结无转移组表现为均匀型增强,两组灌注模式之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。两组造影剂到达时间、达峰时间、峰值强度之间的差异无统计学意义(P 值分别为0.129、0.094、0.140)。淋巴结实质内高灌注区与低灌注区的差值(SImax-SImin)有转移组大于无转移组(P=0.000)。以SImax- SImin 值大于28 为最佳临界点,鉴别的灵敏度为93.3%,特异度为80.8%。

结论

超声造影对鉴别乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移有一定的临床价值。

Objective

To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS)in detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma.

Methods

The breasts and axillae of 141 patients with breast carcinoma were examined with Ultrasound scans,followed by ultrasonography and CEUS of axillary lymph nodes.The perfusion patterns were assessed by direct visualization method.QontraXt software was subsequently used to determine the wash-in and wash-out parameters of each node.The axillary lymph nodes were divided into metastatic and nonmetastatic groups according to the perfusion features and were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis.The correlation of CEUS patterns with histopathology was analyzed by chi-square test.One-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences in perfusion parameters among the nodes.

Results

Homogeneous enhancement patterns were more frequently associated with non-metastasis of nodes,while heterogeneous enhancement patterns or avascular patterns were mostly suggestive of metastasis of nodes,with statistical difference between the two groups.No statistically significant difference was found in the arrival time,time to peak intensity,and peak signal intensity between the two groups(P=0.129,0.094,and 0.140,respectively).The difference between the maximum signal intensity and minimum signal intensity(SImax- SImin)were more obvious in metastatic nodes than in nonmetastatic ones(P=0.000).And histopathologic diagnosis could be predicted with a sensitivity of 93.3%and a specificity of 80.8%by the standardized value of SImax-SImin above 28.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography play a role in clinically discriminating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer.

图1 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移组、无转移组灰阶超声造影增强模式 a:淋巴结转移组超声造影表现为不均匀型增强,箭头示灌注缺损区;b:淋巴结无转移组超声造影显示实质内均匀型增强。
表1 良恶性淋巴结的增强模式
表2 淋巴结转移组、无转移组超声造影到达时间、达峰时间、峰值强度及SImax-SImin的比较
表3 超声造影诊断结果与病理检查结果比较
图2 腋窝淋巴结转移者的淋巴结常规超声、病理、造影参数成像图及时间强度曲线 a:常规超声显示淋巴结呈圆形,皮质、髓质内血供丰富;b:病理检查显示癌细胞密集,淋巴细胞增生明显,箭头示癌巢形成(HE染色 ×40);c:超声造影灌注图中低灌注区的感兴趣区;d:超声造影灌注图中高灌注区的感兴趣区;e:低灌注区的时间-强度曲线分析;f:高灌注区的时间-强度曲线分析。
图3 无腋窝淋巴结转移者的淋巴结常规超声、病理、造影参数成像图及时间强度曲线 a:常规超声检查显示淋巴结呈长椭圆形,淋巴门区探及血流信号;b:病理检查显示淋巴小结分布尚均匀,淋巴滤泡增生、生发中心扩大(HE染色 ×40);c:超声造影灌注图中低灌注区的感兴趣区;d:超声造影灌注图中高灌注区的感兴趣区;e:低灌注区的时间-强度曲线分析;f:高灌注区的时间-强度曲线分析。
图4 SImax-SImin 诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
Moritz J D,Ludwig A,Oestmann J W.Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,174:1279-1284.
[2]
Greene F L,Page D L,Fleming I D,et al,AJCC Cancer Sta-ging Manual.6th ed.New York:Springer-Verlag.2002.
[3]
洪玉蓉,刘学明,张闻,等.超声造影在浅表淋巴结疾病鉴别诊断中的应用研究.中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15:849-852.
[4]
胡崇珠,方志沂.中国乳腺癌普查开展现状.中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2007,1:177-179.
[5]
Keller M W,Segal SS,Kaul S,et al.The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation:a basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography.Circ Res,1989,65:458-467.
[6]
赵红佳,董宝玮,许荣,等.超声造影定量分析在乳腺肿瘤诊断中的应用价值.中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2008,2:634-640.
[7]
GalièM,D'Onofrio M,Montani M,et al.Tumor vessel compression hinders perfusion of ultrasonographic contrast agents.Neoplasia,2005,7:528-536.
[8]
Less J R,Skalak T C,Sevick E M,et al.Microvascular architecture in a mammary carcinoma:branching patterns and vessel dimension.Cancer Res,1991,51:265-273.
[9]
Rubaltelli L,Corradin S,Dorigo A,et al.Automated quantitative evaluation of lymph node perfusion on contrastenhanced sonography.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2007,188:977-983.
[10]
Zenk J,Bozzato A,Hornung J,et al.Neck lymph nodes:prediction by computer-assisted contrast medium analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol,2007,33:246-253.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[7] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[8] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[9] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[10] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[11] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[12] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[13] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 王曦娅, 尹弘青, 丁伟, 徐滨, 于海源, 马东升, 邵军. 桥本背景下甲状腺乳头状癌多参数分析预测大容量淋巴结转移[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 548-554.
阅读次数
全文


摘要