切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2008, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (05) : 6 -9. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2008.05.002

临床研究

乳晕下注射示踪剂行前哨淋巴结活检的可行性
尹军1,2, 唐军1,(), 王曦1, 谢泽明1, 连臻强1, 谢小明1, 杨名添1   
  1. 1.510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心乳腺科华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室
    2.421001 湖南衡阳,衡阳市中心医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2008-06-25 出版日期:2008-10-01
  • 通信作者: 唐军

Feasibility of subareolar injection technique for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy

Jun YIN, Jun TANG(), Xi WANG, Zeming Xie, Zhenqiang Lian, Xiaoming Xie, Mingtian Yang   

  • Received:2008-06-25 Published:2008-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun TANG
引用本文:

尹军, 唐军, 王曦, 谢泽明, 连臻强, 谢小明, 杨名添. 乳晕下注射示踪剂行前哨淋巴结活检的可行性[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2008, 02(05): 6-9.

Jun YIN, Jun TANG, Xi WANG, Zeming Xie, Zhenqiang Lian, Xiaoming Xie, Mingtian Yang. Feasibility of subareolar injection technique for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2008, 02(05): 6-9.

目的

探讨乳晕下联合注射核素和美蓝行前哨淋巴结活检的可行性。

方法

选择2004 年10 月至2007 年2 月早期乳腺癌患者195 例,将患者抽签随机分为两组:一组将示踪剂注射在肿瘤周围(肿瘤周围组);另一组将示踪剂注射在乳晕下(乳晕下组)。 对所有患者均先行前哨淋巴结活检,再行腋窝淋巴结清扫。 将所有的前哨淋巴结和非前哨淋巴结均进行常规切片和HE 染色检查,对常规病理检查阴性的前哨淋巴结行多层切片和免疫组化检查。

结果

全组195 例,肿瘤周围组98 例,乳晕下组97 例。 肿瘤周围组与乳晕下组前哨淋巴结活检成功率分别为92.9%和97.9%(P =0.17)。 经常规病理检查或多层切片加免疫组化检查后,肿瘤周围组有25 例SLN 阳性,乳晕下组29 例SLN 阳性。 经腋窝淋巴结清扫后,肿瘤周围组有2 例SLN 为假阴性,假阴性率为7.4%(2/27),乳晕下组有3 例假阴性,假阴性率为9.4%(3/32),两组间差异无统计学意义。 肿瘤周围组和乳晕下组对腋窝淋巴结预测的准确度分别为97.8%和96.8%,灵敏度分别为92.6%和90.6%,差异均无统计学意义。

结论

乳晕下注射两种示踪剂行前哨淋巴结活检与肿瘤周围注射相比具有同样预测腋窝淋巴结状况的准确性,同时能避免肿瘤周围注射存在的缺点,是较佳的注射途径。

Objective

To compare the results of SLNB by peritumoral and subareolar injection routes and to explore the feasibility of subareolar injection route for breast cancer SLNB.

Methods

From Oct. 2004 to Feb. 2007,195 patients with early stage breast cancer were divived randomly into two groups. In one group(the PT group), peritumoral injection of 99mTc sulfur colloid and methylene blue was performed; in the other group(the SA group), subareolar injection of the same tracers was performed. In all patients, complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed. All SLNs and non-SLNs were subjected separately to routine pathological examnation. The SLNs of tumor-negative were paraffin embedded, sectioned and stained with immunohistochemical stain.

Results

In the 195 patients, peritumoral injection was performed in 98 patients and subareolar injection in 97 patients . Routine pathological and immunohistochemical examinations showed positive SLN in 25 cases in the PT group and in 29 cases in the SA group. The success rate of identifying SLN was 92.9% in the PT group and 97.9% in the SA group (P =0.17). The false negative rate was 7.4%(2/27) in the PT group and 9.4%(3/32) in the SA group (P =1). The overall accuracy of detecting SLN was 97.8% and 96.8% (P =1), and the sensitivity was 92.6% and 90.6% in the PT group and the SA group separately (P=1.000).

Conclusions

Subareolar injection of tracers has the same accuracy of detecting axillary lymph node status as peritumoral injection route, and avoids demerits from peritumoral injection.Subareolar injection route is an optimal way of administrating tracers for SLN mapping and biopsy in breast cancer.

表1 两组患者临床资料比较
表2 两组前哨淋巴结活检结果比较
[1]
Krag D N,Weaver D L,Alex J C,et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol,1993,2:335 -339.
[2]
Giuliano A E, Kirgan D M, Guenther J M, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg,1994,220:391 -398.
[3]
Motomura K, Komoike Y, Hasegawa Y, et al. Intradermal radioisotope injection is superior to subdermal injection for the identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol,2003,82:91 -96.
[4]
Van Rijk M C, Tanis P J, Nieweg O E, et al. Sentinel node biopsy and concomitant probe-guided tumor excision of nonpalpable breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14:627 -632.
[5]
Bauer T W, Spitz F R, Callans L S. Subareolar and peritumoral injection identify similar sentinel nodes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol,2002,9:169 -176.
[6]
Gray R J, Pockaj B A. A concordance study of subareolar and subdermal injections for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Am J Surg,2004,188:423 -425.
[7]
D'Eredita'G, Giardina C, Ingravallo G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in multiple breast cancer using subareolar injection of the tracer. Breast,2007,16:316 -322.
[8]
Zavagno G, Rubello D, Franchini Z, et al. Axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: a single lymphatic pathway drains the entire mammary gland. Eur J Surg Oncol,2005,31:479 -484.
[9]
凌立君,赵佳,王水,等.核素法前哨淋巴通道的研究. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2007,1:16 -18.
[10]
McMasters K M, Wong S L, Martin R C 2nd, et al. Dermal injection of radioactive colloid is superior to peritumoral injection for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: results of a multiinstitutional study. Ann Surg,2001,233:676 -687.
[11]
Motomura K, Egawa C, Komoike Y, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: technical aspects and controversies.Breast Cancer,2007,14:25 -30.
[12]
Chagpar A, Martin RC 3rd, Chao C, et al. Validation of subareolar and periareolar injection techniques for breast sentinel lymph node biopsy.Arch Surg,2004,139:614 -618.
[13]
Kern K A. Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid. J Am Coll Surg,2002,195:467 -475.
[14]
D'Eredita G, Giardina C, Guerrieri A M, A further vlidation of subareolar injection technique for breast sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13:701 -707.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
阅读次数
全文


摘要