切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 292 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma. j. issn.1674-0807.2012.03.009

论著

乳腺癌改良根治术保留肋间臂神经
王雷1, 彭泉1, 赵成功1,()   
  1. 1.230032 合肥,中国人民解放军第105医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-08 出版日期:2012-06-01
  • 通信作者: 赵成功

Reserving intercostobrachial nerve in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer

Lei WANG1, Quan PENG1, Cheng-gong ZHAO1,()   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, the 105th Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Hefei 230032, China
  • Received:2011-10-08 Published:2012-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Cheng-gong ZHAO
引用本文:

王雷, 彭泉, 赵成功. 乳腺癌改良根治术保留肋间臂神经[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2012, 06(03): 292-297.

Lei WANG, Quan PENG, Cheng-gong ZHAO. Reserving intercostobrachial nerve in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2012, 06(03): 292-297.

目的

探讨保留保留肋间臂神经(intercostobrachial nerve,ICBN)在乳腺癌改良根治术中的可行性和临床价值。

方法

总结分析2007 年1 月至2010 年1 月本科施行乳腺癌改良根治术126 例Ⅰ~ⅢA 期乳腺癌患者。 手术常规保留ICBN,若患者出现患侧腋下淋巴结肿大、黏连、固定或ICBN 受肿瘤黏连、侵犯则不保留ICBN。126 例中,成功保留ICBN 93 例(保留ICBN 组),未能保留者33 例(未保留ICBN 组)。术后随访1 ~12 个月。 比较两组患者术后不同时间患侧胸壁和上臂内侧疼痛麻木等感觉异常的发生情况(卡方检验)和淋巴结切除情况(t 检验)。

结果

术后随访率100%。保留ICBN 组平均手术时间为(125±12) min,未保留ICBN 组为( 115±11)min。 保留ICBN 组淋巴结切除数目是(19±3)枚,未保留ICBN 组是(17±2)枚,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.050)。 比较术后1、3、12 个月两组患者ICBN 支配区感觉异常情况显示,保留ICBN 组的ICBN 支配区感觉异常情况明显低于未保留ICBN 组(P<0.050)。 随访期内两组患者均未发现局部肿瘤复发或远处转移。

结论

乳腺癌患者行乳腺癌改良根治术保留ICBN 明显降低了术后患侧胸壁和上臂内侧疼痛麻木等感觉异常的发生,合理的解剖途径不会延长太多手术时间,也不会增加胸壁和腋窝的复发风险。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value and feasibility of reserving intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) during modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.

Methods

From January 2007 to January 2010, a total of 126 cases with Ⅰ-ⅢA stage breast carcinoma were treated using modified radical mastectomy in our department and their data were analyzed. The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) was successfully reserved in 93 patients (the reserving ICBN group), and 33 patients could not reserve ICBN (the nonreserving ICBN group) because of lymphadenectasis, lymph node synechia and immobilization, and ICBN attached or invaded by tumour. The follow-up duration was 1-12 months. Comparison of dysaesthetic in chest wall and upper arm of affected side at different time (Chi-square test) and lymph node resection (t test) between the two groups was done.

Results

All patients were followed up. The mean time of operation was (125±12) min in the reserving ICBN group and (115±11) min in the non-reserving ICBN group. Lymph nodes resected was 19±3 in the reserving ICBN group and 17±2 in the non-reserving ICBN group, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.050). The incidences of dysaesthetic in chest wall and upper arm of affected side at one, three and 12 months after operation were all much lower in the reserving ICBN group than in the non-reserving ICBN group (P<0.050). During the follow-up no local recurrence or distant metastasis was found in both groups.

Conclusion

Modified radical mastectomy with reserving intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer can significantly decrease the incidence of dysaesthesia on the chest wall and upper arm of breast cancer patients after operation. The operation time can not be prolonged much and recurrent risk can not be increased using rational dissection approach.

图1 乳腺癌改良根治术中肋间臂神经的显露
表1 保留肋间臂神经(ICBN)组与未保留ICBN 组淋巴结切除数目的比较
表2 保留肋间臂神经(ICBN)组与未保留ICBN 组术后不同时间患侧上臂及胸壁感觉异常发生率的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Assa J. The intercostobrachial nerve in radical mastectomy [J]. J Surg Oncol,1974,6(2):123-126.
[2]
van Dam MS,Hennipman A,de Kruif JT,et a1.Complications following axillary dissection for breast carcinoma [J].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd,1993,137(46):2395-2398.
[3]
史小丹,徐卫国.乳腺癌改良根治术中保留肋间臂神经和胸前神经的研究进展[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2010,4(1):42-48.
[4]
Nadkarni MS, Raina S, Badwe RA. Medial pectoral pedicle: a critical landmark in axillary dissection[J]. ANZ J Surg,2006,76(7):652-654.
[5]
Loukas M, Grabska J, Tubbs RS,et al. An unusual union of the intercostobrachial nerve and the medial pectoral nerve[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz),2007,66(4):356-359.
[6]
陈伟财,何劲松,王敏,等.保留肋间臂神经在乳腺癌改良根治术中的临床意义[J].山西医科大学学报,2011,42(3):260-262.
[7]
江维,齐立强,张印春,等.保留肋间臂神经在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的临床价值[J].临床外科杂志,2011,19(7):458-459.
[8]
莫春联,卢永刚.乳腺癌改良根治术中保留肋间臂神经39 例[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2011,14(8):648-649.
[9]
Kasai T, Yamamoto N. Medial brachial cutaneous nerves and the intercostobrachial nerves [J]. Kaibogaku Zasshi,1966,41(1):29-42.
[10]
威廉斯. 格氏解剖学[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.1999:1270-1275.
[11]
印国兵,吴诚义.肋间臂神经与肋间臂神经综合征[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(5):298-300.
[12]
吴诚义,姚榛祥,吴凯南,等.乳腺癌腋清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的方法和意义[J].外科理论与实践,2001,6(4):210-212.
[13]
Langer I, Kocher T, Guller U, et al. Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection: a prospective analysis of 52 patients [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,90(1):85-91.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要