Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05): 292-297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2022.05.005

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of imaging methods for architectural distortion of the breast

Jiaqi Ma1, Xiufen Liang1,(), Bin Yan1, Ying Deng1, Qiang Dai1, Jing Ma1, Jin Liu1, Quan Yuan2, Hao Cheng2, Jiang Zhu3, Jianrong Lu4   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi’An 710061, China
    2. Department of Ultrasonography, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi’An 710061, China
    3. Department of Mastopathy, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi’An 710061, China
    4. Department of Pathology, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi’An 710061, China
  • Received:2020-03-02 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-11-10
  • Contact: Xiufen Liang

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the diagnosis of architectural distortion (AD) lesions.

Methods

The imaging data of 112 female patients with 126 AD lesions detected by DBT and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in the Department of Radiology, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital between August 2018 and October 2019 were collected for a retrospective study. χ2 test was used to compare the detection rate of AD between FFDM and DBT. According to the ultrasound BI-RADS grading, the lesions were divided into two groups: ultrasound-related group(BI-RADS 4A and above) and unrelated group(BI-RADS 1-3). The pathological results and the proportion of malignant lesions were compared between two groups by χ2 test.

Results

Totally 80 AD lesions were detected by FFDM and 126 by DBT. The detection rate of AD by DBT was significantly higher than that by FFDM [100%(126/126) vs 63.5%(80/126), χ2=56.272, P<0.001]. Among the 126 AD lesions, 45 were malignant lesions, 40 were benign lesions and 41 were high-risk lesions. There was a significant difference in the pathological results between ultrasound-related group (82 lesions) and unrelated group (44 lesions) (χ2=20.502, P<0.001). The proportion of malignant lesions was 48.8% (40/82) in ultrasound-related group, 11.4% (5/44) in unrelated group, indicating a significant difference (χ2=17.461, P<0.001). Among the 46 AD lesions only detected by DBT, the pathological results presented a significant difference between ultrasound-related group (21 lesions) and unrelated group (25 lesions) (χ2=7.672, P=0.022), while there was no significant difference in the proportion of malignant lesions between two groups [33.3% (7/21) vs 12.0% (3/25), χ2=3.053, P=0.081].

Conclusions

The detection rate of AD by DBT was significantly higher than that by FFDM.The AD lesion of BI-RADS 4A and above on ultrasonography shows a higher probability of malignancy.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Mammography, Ultrasonography

京ICP 备07035254号-13
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-10-51322630 E-mail: jcbd@medmail.com.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd