切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 298 -302. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2022.05.006

论著

叙事护理对首次复发乳腺癌患者心理韧性及焦虑的干预效果
陈薇1, 彭昕,1   
  1. 1. 430000 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-02 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 彭昕

Effect of narrative nursing on psychological resilience and anxiety in breast cancer patients with first recurrence

Wei Chen1, Xin Peng,1   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2020-08-02 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xin Peng
引用本文:

陈薇, 彭昕. 叙事护理对首次复发乳腺癌患者心理韧性及焦虑的干预效果[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 298-302.

Wei Chen, Xin Peng. Effect of narrative nursing on psychological resilience and anxiety in breast cancer patients with first recurrence[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 298-302.

目的

探讨叙事护理对首次复发乳腺癌患者心理韧性和焦虑的影响。

方法

采用便利抽样法前瞻性选取2018年1月至2019年1月华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院收治的60例首次复发的乳腺癌患者,分为观察组和对照组各30例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上加用叙事护理。采用简化版心理韧性量表(CD-RISC)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)在干预前后对2组患者进行评估,组间比较和干预前后组内比较,均采用t检验。

结果

(1)干预后,观察组CD-RISC量表3个维度的评分和总分均高于对照组(坚韧:t=-0.386,P=0.701;自强:t=0.168,P=0.867;乐观:t=-2.560,P=0.013;总分:t=7.456,P<0.001)。干预前后观察组3个维度的评分和总分比较,差异有统计学意义(坚韧:t=-3.539, P=0.001;自强:t=-3.667, P=0.001;乐观:t=-8.225, P<0.001;总分:t=-4.357, P<0.001)。对照组仅有乐观评分在干预前后比较差异有统计学意义(t=-3.521,P=0.001)。(2)干预后,观察组的SAS评分低于对照组[(50.63±5.12)分比(58.82±3.16)分,t=7.456, P<0.001]。干预前后观察组和对照组的SAS评分组内比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=12.335、8.606, P均<0.001)。

结论

叙事护理能够显著改善首次复发乳腺癌患者的心理韧性及焦虑情绪。

Objective

To explore the effect of narrative nursing on psychological resilience and anxiety in breast cancer patients with first recurrence.

Methods

A total of 60 breast cancer patients with first recurrence in the Department of Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected for a prospective study using convenience sampling. They were divided into observation group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group adopted conventional nursing and the observation group adopted narrative nursing on the basis of conventional nursing. The simplified version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) were used to evaluate psychological resilience and anxiety of patients in two groups before and after intervention. The scores were compared between groups and the scores of patients in the same group were compared before and after intervention using t test.

Results

(1) After intervention, the scores of three dimensions and total scores of the CD-RISC in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (tenacity: t=-0.386, P=0.701; self-reliance: t=0.168, P=0.867; optimism: t=-2.560, P=0.013; total scores: t=7.456, P<0.001). The scores of three dimensions and total scores of the CD-RISC in observation group presented a significant difference before and after intervention (tenacity: t=-3.539, P=0.001; self-reliance: t=-3.667, P=0.001; optimism: t=-8.225, P<0.001; total score: t=-4.357, P<0.001). In control group, only the score in the dimension of optimism showed a significant difference before and after intervention (t=-3.521, P=0.001). (2) After intervention, the SAS score in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group [50.63±5.12 vs 58.82±3.16, t=7.456, P<0.001]. The SAS scores of observation group and control group showed a significant difference before and after intervention (t=12.335, 8.606, both P<0.001).

Conclusion

Narrative nursing can significantly improve the psychological resilience and relieve the anxiety in breast cancer patients with first recurrence.

表1 2组首次复发乳腺癌患者基线资料比较
表2 2组首次复发乳腺癌患者心理韧性评分比较(分,±s)
表3 2组首次复发乳腺癌患者焦虑自评量表评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I,et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6):394-424.
[2]
于洗河,张景茹,降海蕊,等.中国女性1990—2019年宫颈癌和乳腺癌疾病负担分析[J].中国公共卫生202238(5):534-538.
[3]
张勇,余一朗,单鹏飞,等.乳腺癌患者改良根治术后复发转移的相关危险因素分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(4):418-421.
[4]
梁欣.年轻乳腺癌与年长乳腺癌患者临床资料对比及复发危险因素分析[J].实用癌症杂志202136(10):1696-1699.
[5]
陈安安,江健健,王德斌,等.安徽城市癌症患者肿瘤防治健康素养现状和影响因素[J].泰山医学院学报202142(4):241-245.
[6]
杨梅,李伟萍,王坤.乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估及治疗方案的多学科讨论[J].循证医学201919(2):126-128.
[7]
Pudkasam S, Polman R, Pitcher M, et al. Physical activity and breast cancer survivors: importance of adherence, motivational interviewing and psychological health[J]. Maturitas2018116:66-72.
[8]
Butler LD, Koopman C, Classen C, et al. Traumatic stress, life events, and emotional support in women with metastatic breast cancer: cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms associated with past and current stressors[J]. Health Psychol199918(6):555-560.
[9]
黄辉,刘义兰.叙事护理临床应用的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志201651(2):196-199.
[10]
杨晓霖.美国叙事医学课程对我国医学人文精神回归的启示[J].西北医学教育201119(2):219-221.
[11]
管燕.现代医学模式下叙事医学的价值[J].医学与哲学201233(11):10-11.
[12]
杨艳,姜安丽,叙事护理临床实践的国内外研究现状[J].中国实用护理杂志201733(24):1917-1920.
[13]
Zung WW. A. Self-rating depression scale [J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry196512:63-70.
[14]
Chen Y, Fink P, Wei J,et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Whiteley Index-8 in Chinese outpatients in general hospitals[J]. Front Psychol202112:557 662.
[15]
Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, Charalambous A. Nurses' and patients' perceptions of caring behaviours: quantitative systematic review of comparative studies[J]. J Adv Nurs201167(6):1191-1205.
[16]
Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application[J]. Ann Behav Med200733(3):221-235.
[17]
张鲁敏,顾芬. 叙事护理在健康教育中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报201926(1):28-31.
[18]
薛梅.个体化心理干预对减轻乳腺癌患者术前焦虑的效果观察[J].中华全科医学201412(7):1145-1146.
[19]
姜玲博,张少华,杨俊兰,等.中国晚期乳腺癌诊疗现状的调查研究[J].肿瘤研究与临床201325(7):481-484.
[1] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[2] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[3] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[4] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[8] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[11] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[12] 陈秀梅, 陈思涓, 郑小静. 护理联盟体构建及实践的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 703-708.
[13] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[14] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
[15] 于洁, 金小红, 顾艳楣, 王慧, 葛杨杨, 李燕. 癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症患者疾病体验与需求的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 739-744.
阅读次数
全文
8
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 1 0 0 7

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 7 1
  比例 88% 12%

摘要
567
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 567
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 502 65
  比例 89% 11%