切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 253 -256. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2022.04.011

综述

乳腺磁共振成像背景实质强化的研究进展
黄舒婷1,(), 江肖松1, 谭昱1, 吴华艺1, 江魁明1   
  1. 1. 511400 广州,广东省妇幼保健院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-24 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 黄舒婷

Background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging

Shuting Huang1(), Xiaosong Jiang1, Yu Tan1   

  • Received:2020-05-24 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuting Huang
引用本文:

黄舒婷, 江肖松, 谭昱, 吴华艺, 江魁明. 乳腺磁共振成像背景实质强化的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 253-256.

Shuting Huang, Xiaosong Jiang, Yu Tan. Background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 253-256.

随着影像诊断技术的不断发展,磁共振成像(MRI)因具有较高的敏感度和特异度而被越来越多地应用于乳腺病变的定性和定量诊断。乳腺MRI中的背景实质强化(BPE)是正常纤维腺体组织的增强,与乳腺癌的发生和发展关系密切。乳腺MRI诊断医师应了解BPE的影响因素并掌握BPE的典型与不典型表现,结合临床病史及其他相关检查判读BPE可能的生物学行为,为临床预防、诊治乳腺癌提供有价值的前瞻性信息。目前,BPE在乳腺癌风险预测、肿瘤分型、术前肿瘤分期、术后切缘评估和新辅助治疗疗效评估等方面的研究越来越受关注。由于BPE显示出了成为"影像生物标志物"的潜力,若能将BPE的影像学特征充分挖掘和利用,将大大提升乳腺癌MRI的早期诊断效能。本文就BPE的影响因素、表现模式、临床生物学行为等研究现状进行综述。

[1]
沈艳,郭筱兰. 早期乳腺癌的影像学筛查现状与进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 114-116.
[2]
陈君,王小飞,张蕾,等. 钼靶、超声和MRI对乳腺肿块诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 实用放射学杂志2016, 32(4): 531-535.
[3]
Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, et al. BI-RADS fifth edition: A summary of changes[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging201798(3):179-190.
[4]
King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, et al. Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI[J]. Eur Radiol201222(12):2641-2647.
[5]
Telegrafo M, Rella L, Stabile Ianora AA,et al. Effect of background parenchymal enhancement on breast cancer detection with magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging201697(3):315-320.
[6]
DeMartini WB, Liu F, Peacock S, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2012198(4):W373-380.
[7]
Preibsch H, Wanner L, Bahrs SD, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response[J]. Eur Radiol201626(6):1590-1596.
[8]
Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice[J]. Radiology2007244(2):356-378.
[9]
Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation[J]. Radiographics201434(1):234-247.
[10]
Kang SS, Ko EY, Han BK, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: influence of menstrual cycle and breast composition[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging201439(3):526-534.
[11]
Taron J, Fleischer S, Preibsch H,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement in pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a hindrance to diagnosis?[J]. Eur Radiol201929(3):1187-1193.
[12]
Kim YJ, Kim SH, Choi BG,et al. Impact of radiotherapy on background parenchymal enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev201415(7):2939-2943.
[13]
King V, Kaplan J, Pike MC, et. Impact of tamoxifen on amount of fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement, and cysts on breast magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Breast J201218(6):527-534.
[14]
King V, Goldfarb SB, Brooks JD, et al. Effect of aromatase inhibitors on background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue at breast MR imaging[J]. Radiology2012264(3):670-678.
[15]
Price ER, Brooks JD, Watson EJ, et al. The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue[J]. Eur Radiol201424(1):162-168.
[16]
Zeng L, Lo G, Moshonov H, et al. Breast background parenchymal enhancement on screening magnetic resonance imaging in women who received chest radiotherapy for childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma[J]. Acad Radiol201623(2):168-175.
[17]
Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C,et al. A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition[J]. Radiographics201636(3):623-639.
[18]
Hegenscheid K, Schmidt CO, Seipel R, et al. Normal breast parenchyma: contrast enhancement kinetics at dynamic MR mammography--influence of anthropometric measures and menopausal status[J]. Radiology2013266(1):72-80.
[19]
Ha R, Mema E, Guo X,et al. Three-dimensional auantitative validation of breast magnetic resonance imaging background parenchymal enhancement assessments[J]. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol201645(5):297-303.
[20]
Lam DL, Hippe DS, Kitsch AE, et al. Assessment of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging background parenchymal enhancement parameters to improve determination of individual breast cancer risk[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 201943(1):85-92.
[21]
Tagliafico A, Bignotti B, Tagliafico G,et al. Quantitative evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI. A feasibility study with a semi-automatic and automatic software compared to observer-based scores[J]. Br J Radiol201588(1056):20 150 417.
[22]
Amano Y, Woo J, Amano M, et al. MRI texture analysis of background parenchymal enhancement of the breast[J]. Biomed Res Int20172017:4 845 909.
[23]
Ha R, Chang P, Mema E, et al. Fully automated convolutional neural network method for quantification of breast MRI fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement[J]. J Digit Imaging201932(1):141-147.
[24]
Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2011196(1):218-224.
[25]
Tomida T, Urikura A, Uematsu T, et al. Contrast enhancement in breast cancer and background mammary-gland tissue during the super-early phase of dynamic breast magnetic resonance tmaging[J]. Acad Radiol201724(11):1380-1386.
[26]
Horvat JV, Durando M, Milans S, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis[J]. Eur Radiol201828(6):2516-2524.
[27]
Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, et al. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2009193(6):1716-1722.
[28]
Plaza MJ, Morris EA, Thakur SB. Diffusion tensor imaging in the normal breast: influences of fibroglandular tissue composition and background parenchymal enhancement[J]. Clin Imaging201640(3):506-511.
[29]
Telegrafo M, Rella L, Stabile Ianora AA, et al. Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) correlates with the risk of breast cancer[J]. Magn Reson Imaging201634(2):173-176.
[30]
Grimm LJ, Saha A, Ghate SV, et al. Relationship between background parenchymal enhancement on high-risk screening MRI and future breast cancer risk[J]. Acad Radiol201926(1):69-75.
[31]
Mema E, Mango VL, Guo X, et al. Does breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement indicate metabolic activity? Qualitative and 3D quantitative computer imaging analysis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging201847(3):753-759.
[32]
Kohara S, Ishigaki S, Satake H,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement in preoperative breast MRI[J]. Nagoya J Med Sci201577(3):373-382.
[33]
Baek JE, Kim SH, Lee AW. Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRIs of breast cancer patients: impact on tumor size estimation[J]. Eur J Radiol201483(8):1356-1362.
[34]
Park SY, Kang DK, Kim TH. Does background parenchymal enhancement on MRI affect the rate of positive resection margin in breast cancer patients?[J]. Br J Radiol201588(1046):20 140 638.
[35]
Kim MY, Cho N, Koo HR, et al. Predicting local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment: parenchymal signal enhancement ratio (SER) around the tumor on preoperative MRI[J]. Acta Radiol201354(7):731-738.
[36]
Preibsch H, Richter V, Bahrs SD, et al. Repeated surgeries in invasive lobular breast cancer with preoperative MRI: Role of additional carcinoma in situ and background parenchymal enhancement[J]. Eur J Radiol201790:181-187.
[37]
Chen JH, Yu H, Lin M,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral normal breast of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy measured by DCE-MRI[J]. Magn Reson Imaging201331(9):1465-1471.
[38]
Chen JH, Yu HJ, Hsu C,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral normal nreast: Association with tumor response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Transl Oncol20158(3):204-209.
[39]
You C, Gu Y, Peng W, et al. Decreased background parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral breast after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor response in HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. Acta Radiol201859(7):806-812.
[40]
Hilal T, Covington M, Kosiorek HE, et al. Breast MRI phenotype and background parenchymal enhancement may predict tumor response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy[J]. Breast J, 201824(6):1010-1014.
[41]
Leithner D, Baltzer PA, Magometschnigg HF, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast parenchymal uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Correlation with age, background parenchymal enhancement, and amount of fibroglandular tissue on MRI[J]. J Nucl Med201657(10):1518-1522.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要