切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 167 -174. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2022.03.006

论著

人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达变化与疗效的关系
周丹1, 陈佩贤1, 李巍1, 杨树青1, 张昆1, 何添成1, 叶国麟1,(), 吴爱国2   
  1. 1. 528100 佛山市第一人民医院乳腺外科
    2. 510282 广州南方医科大学珠江医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-10 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 叶国麟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金资助项目(A2019329)

Correlation between Ki-67 expression change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients

Dan Zhou1, Peixian Chen1, Wei Li1, Shuqing Yang1, Kun Zhang1, Tiancheng He1, Guolin Ye1,(), Aiguo Wu2   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528100, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
  • Received:2020-09-10 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Guolin Ye
引用本文:

周丹, 陈佩贤, 李巍, 杨树青, 张昆, 何添成, 叶国麟, 吴爱国. 人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达变化与疗效的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 167-174.

Dan Zhou, Peixian Chen, Wei Li, Shuqing Yang, Kun Zhang, Tiancheng He, Guolin Ye, Aiguo Wu. Correlation between Ki-67 expression change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 167-174.

目的

探讨HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗前、后Ki-67的表达变化与预后的关系。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年12月佛山市第一人民医院收治的85例乳腺癌患者的临床资料,术前均经空芯针吸穿刺活组织检查证实为HER-2阳性乳腺浸润性导管癌,之后接受新辅助化疗。采用χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法分析新辅助化疗前Ki-67表达与临床病理特征及新辅助化疗疗效之间的关系。采用χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法比较接受TcbH(多西他赛+卡铂+曲妥珠单克隆抗体)和AC-TH(表柔比星+环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛+曲妥珠单克隆抗体)2种方案的乳腺癌患者临床疗效和病理疗效的差异。根据新辅助化疗后激素受体(HR)状态,分成HR阴性组与HR阳性组,用χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法比较2组临床特征的差异。采用χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法分析新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达变化与患者疗效的相关性,采用Kaplan-Meier法描绘生存曲线并进行生存分析,用Log-rank法进行无复发生存(RFS)的组间比较,并根据HR状态进行亚组分析。(5)采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析复发的影响因素。

结果

新辅助化疗前Ki-67低表达患者22例,高表达患者63例。新辅助化疗前Ki-67低表达与高表达患者在年龄、月经状态、组织学分级、淋巴结转移状态、ER表达、PR表达、病理疗效及肿瘤大小和临床疗效方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.000、0.296、0.186、0.276、0.010、0.021、1.401, P均>0.050;P=0.646、0.569)。接受TcbH和AC-TH方案的患者临床疗效和病理疗效比较,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.154; χ2=0.232,P=0.630)。新辅助化疗后,HR阴性51例,HR阳性34例。2组患者的手术方式、Miller-Payne分级、是否接受放射治疗、复发转移情况、Ki-67状态改变以及新辅助化疗方案比较,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.157;χ2=2.215、3.266、0.095、0.516、0.297,P均>0.050)。新辅助化疗后,21例Ki-67表达升高或无变化,64例Ki-67表达降低。Ki-67降低者的临床疗效及病理疗效均优于Ki-67升高或无变化者(P=0.003; χ2=8.729,P=0.003)。亚组分析结果显示,在51例HR阴性患者中,Ki-67降低者病理疗效优于Ki-67升高或无变化者(χ2=11.141,P=0.001),但临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.071);而在34例HR阳性患者中,Ki-67降低者临床疗效优于Ki-67升高或无变化者(P=0.037),但病理疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.672)。生存分析显示:新辅助化疗后Ki-67降低组RFS率明显高于Ki-67升高或无变化组(χ2=26.275,P<0.001);在HR阴性及HR阳性患者中,新辅助化疗后Ki-67降低组RFS率均高于Ki-67升高或无变化组(χ2=11.302、22.127,P均<0.001)。Cox风险比例回归模型分析显示,组织学分级3级、淋巴结转移是患者复发的独立危险因素(HR=2.764、3.550,95%CI:1.104~6.919、1.026~12.281,P=0.030、0.045),新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达降低是独立保护因素(HR=0.197,95%CI:0.087~0.475,P<0.001)。

结论

新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达变化与临床疗效及病理疗效之间存在相关性,可能是HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者RFS的独立影响因素。

Objective

To investigate the correlation between Ki-67 expression change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the prognosis of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 85 HER-2-positive breast cancer patients in the First People’s Hospital of Foshan from January 2014 to December 2017. All patients were diagnosed with HER-2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast by preoperative core-needle aspiration biopsy, and then received NAC. The relationship of Ki-67 expression before NAC with clinicopathological characteristics and the efficacy of NAC was analyzed by χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. The clinical and pathological efficacy of NAC in breast cancer patients receiving different regimens (TcbH group: docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab; AC-TH group: epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel + trastuzumab) was compared by χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. According to hormonal receptor (HR) status after NAC, the patients were divided into HR-negative group and HR-positive group, and the clinical parameters between two groups were compared by χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. The correlation between the expression changes of Ki-67 after NAC and the efficacy was analyzed by χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test, the survival curve was drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank method was used to compared RFS between groups. The subgroup analysis was performed according to the HR status. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of recurrence.

Results

Before NAC, 22 patients had low expression of Ki-67 and 63 had high expression. There was no significant difference in age, menstrual status, histological grade, lymph node metastasis, ER status, PR status, pathological efficacy, tumor size and clinical efficacy between patients with low Ki-67 expression and patients with high Ki-67 expression (χ2=0.000, 0.296, 0.186, 0.276, 0.010, 0.021, 1.401, all P>0.050; P=0.646, 0.569). There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy and pathological efficacy between patients receiving TcbH and patients receiving AC-TH (P=0.154; χ2=0.232, P=0.630). After NAC, HR was negative in 51 cases and positive in 34 cases. There was no significant difference in surgical methods, Miller-Payne grade, radiotherapy, recurrence/metastasis, Ki-67 change and NAC regimen between HR-positive and HR-negative patients (P=0.157; χ2=2.215, 3.266, 0.095, 0.516, 0.297, all P>0.050). After NAC, the expression of Ki-67 was increased or unchanged in 21 cases, and decreased in 64 cases. The clinical efficacy and pathological efficacy of patients with decreased Ki-67 were significantly better than those of patients with increased or unchanged Ki-67 (P=0.003; χ2=8.729, P=0.003). The results of subgroup analysis showed that among 51 HR-negative patients, the pathological efficacy of patients with decreased Ki-67 was significantly better than that of patients with increased or unchanged Ki-67 (χ2=11.141, P=0.001), but clinical efficacy presented no significant difference (P=0.071); among 34 HR-positive patients, the clinical efficacy of patients with decreased Ki-67 was significantly better than that of patients with increased or unchanged Ki-67 (P=0.037), but there was no difference in pathological efficacy (P=0.672). Survival analysis showed that the RFS of patients with decreased Ki-67 after NAC was significantly higher than that of patients with increased or unchanged Ki-67 (χ2=26.275, P<0.001); in HR-negative and HR-positive subgroups, the RFS of patients with decreased Ki-67 after NAC was significantly higher than that of patients with increased or unchanged Ki-67 (χ2=11.302, 22.127, both P<0.001). The Cox hazard proportional regression model analysis showed that histological grade 3 and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence (HR=2.764, 3.550, 95%CI: 1.104-6.919, 1.026-12.281, P=0.030, 0.045). The decreased Ki-67 expression after NAC was an independent protective factor for recurrence (HR=0.197, 95%CI: 0.087-0.475, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The change of Ki-67 expression is correlated with clinical and pathological efficacy of NAC, and it may be considered as an independent factor affecting RFS of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients.

表1 85例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后复发影响因素的变量赋值表
表2 85例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗前Ki-67表达与临床病理特征及新辅助化疗疗效之间的关系(例)
表3 HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者接受TcbH和AC-TH方案治疗后的疗效比较(例)
表4 新辅助化疗后不同HR状态的乳腺癌患者临床特征比较(例)
表5 新辅助化疗后不同Ki-67表达变化的乳腺癌患者疗效比较(例)
表6 激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者中不同Ki-67表达变化者的疗效比较(例)
表7 激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者中不同Ki-67表达变化者的疗效比较(例)
图1 新辅助化疗后不同Ki-67表达变化的乳腺癌患者无复发生存曲线比较 注:χ2=26.275,P<0.001
图2 激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者中不同Ki-67表达变化者的无复发生存曲线比较 注:χ2=11.302,P=0.001
图3 激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者中不同Ki-67表达变化者的无复发生存曲线比较 注:χ2=22.127,P<0.001
表8 85例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后复发的单因素分析[例(%)]
表9 85例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后复发的多因素分析
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin201868(6):394-424.
[2]
郑荣寿,孙可欣,张思维,等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志201941(1):19-28.
[3]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2017年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志201727(9):695-759.
[4]
中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)乳腺癌诊疗指南(2018.V1)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:20-22.
[5]
Waks AGWiner EP. Breast cancer treatment:a review[J]. JAMA2019321(3):288-300.
[6]
Mayer ELGropper ABHarris L,et al. Long-term follow-up after preoperative trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-overexpressing breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer201515(1):24-30.
[7]
Jackisch CHegg RStroyakovskiy D,et al. HannaH phase III randomised study:Association of total pathological complete response with event-free survival in HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant trastuzumab after 2 years of treatment-free follow-up[J]. Eur J Cancer201662:62-75.
[8]
中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家组. 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2019年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志201929(5):390-400.
[9]
Gianni LEiermann WSemiglazov V,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone,in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial):a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort[J]. Lancet2010375(9712):377-384.
[10]
Gianni LPienkowski TIm YH,et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced,inflammatory,or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere):a multicentre,open-label,phase 2 randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol201617(6):791-800.
[11]
Mazouni CPeintinger FWan-Kau S,et al. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome[J]. J Clin Oncol200725(19):2650-2655.
[12]
von Minckwitz GUntch MBlohmer JU,et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes[J]. J Clin Oncol201230(15):1796-1804.
[13]
Chen XHe CHan D,et al. The predictive value of Ki-67 before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Future Oncol201713(9):843-857.
[14]
Yoshioka THosoda MYamamoto M,et al. Prognostic significance of pathologic complete response and Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer201522(2):185-191.
[15]
Goldhirsch AWood WCCoates AS,et al. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer:highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011[J]. Ann Oncol201122(8):1736-1747.
[16]
刘梅,张敏,只向成. 术后补充化疗对完整周期新辅助化疗后未获pCR的ⅡA~ⅢB期乳腺癌患者预后的影响[J].天津医药201947(4):409-413.
[17]
桑蝶,王佳玉,徐兵河,等. Ki67指数预测Luminal型HER2-乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的临床价值[J]. 癌症进展201614(3):251-252,255.
[18]
肖荣耀,陈伟克,吴林峰. 新辅助化疗后Ki-67表达改变对乳腺癌预后的影响及与分子分型的关联性研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科201823(6):1182-1184.
[19]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2017年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志201727(9):695-759.
[20]
Eisenhauer EATherasse PBogaerts J,et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline (version1.1) [J]. Eur J Cancer200945(2):228-247.
[21]
Nekljudova VLoibl Svon Minckwitz G,et al. Trial-level prediction of long-term outcome based on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC)[J]. Contemp Clin Trials201871:194-198.
[22]
Hammond MEHayes DFDowsett M,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol201028(16):2784-2795.
[23]
Giuliano AE, Edge SB, Hortobagyi GN. Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(7):1783-1785.
[24]
Avci NDeligonul ATolunay S,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced changes in immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor,progesterone receptor,HER2,and Ki-67 in patients with breast cancer[J]. J BUON201520(1):45-49.
[25]
Houssami NMacaskill Pvon Minckwitz G,et al. Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Eur J Cancer201248(18):3342-3354.
[26]
Cortazar PZhang LUntch M,et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer:the CTNeo BC pooled analysis[J]. Lancet2014384(9938):164-172
[27]
Kilickap SKaya YYucel B,et al. Higher Ki67 expression is associates with unfavorable prognostic factors and shorter survival in breast cancer[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev201415(3):1381-1385.
[28]
梁晨露,王晨,俞星飞,等. 三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后Ki67表达变化与患者生存的关系[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)201913(3):145-149.
[29]
刘艳,张霄蓓,余峰,等. 新辅助化疗前后Ki-67的表达改变在预测不同分子分型乳腺癌化疗疗效中的作用[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志201436(9):671-676.
[30]
Wang RXChen SJin X,et al. Value of Ki-67 expression in triple-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin[J]. Sci Rep20166:30091.
[31]
Jones RLSalter JA’Hem R,et a1. The prognostic significance of Ki-67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat2009116(1):53-68.
[32]
Lee JIm YHLee SH,et al. Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol200861(4):569-577.
[33]
Li LHan DWang X,et al. Prognostic values of Ki-67 in neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Future Oncol201713(11):1021-1034.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[13] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[14] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[15] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
阅读次数
全文


摘要