切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 352 -358. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2021.06.004

论著

乳腺癌术后化疗患者支持性照顾需求、心理弹性及生活质量的相关性
徐芸1, 张海燕1,(), 蒋春燕1, 颜蕴文2   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院日间病房
    2. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张海燕

Correlation among supportive care needs, psychological resilience and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy

Yun Xu1, Haiyan Zhang1,(), Chunyan Jiang1, Yunwen Yan2   

  1. 1. Daycare Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
    2. Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Haiyan Zhang
引用本文:

徐芸, 张海燕, 蒋春燕, 颜蕴文. 乳腺癌术后化疗患者支持性照顾需求、心理弹性及生活质量的相关性[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 352-358.

Yun Xu, Haiyan Zhang, Chunyan Jiang, Yunwen Yan. Correlation among supportive care needs, psychological resilience and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 352-358.

目的

探讨乳腺癌术后化疗患者支持性照顾需求、心理弹性和生活质量三者之间的相关性。

方法

选择2019年7~12月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院日间病房接受术后化疗的140例女性乳腺癌患者为研究对象进行横断面调查。使用中文版支持性照顾需求量表(SCNS-SF34)、中文版心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)、中文版乳腺癌治疗功能评估量表(FACT-B)进行调查,采用t检验或单因素方差分析比较不同临床特征的乳腺癌患者间SCNS-SF34、CD-RISC及FACT-B评分的差异,并采用Pearson相关分析法分析三者之间的相关性,用多元线性回归分析SCNS-SF34和CD-RISC各维度对FACT-B评分的影响。

结果

本次共发放调查问卷140份,回收138份,剔除填写不完整问卷4份,有效问卷共134份,有效率95.7%。134例患者的SCNS-SF34评分为(140.3±11.3)分,CD-RISC评分为(59.6±8.0)分,FACT-B评分为(88.8±13.7)分。不同文化程度、家庭月收入、医保类型、肿瘤临床分期、化疗疗程及手术方式的患者比较,其SCNS-SF34、CD-RISC和FACT-B评分的差异均有统计学意义(SCNS-SF34评分:F=7.161、4.780、7.413、3.505、8.996,t=3.750, P均<0.050;CD-RISC评分:F=6.628、5.059、7.292、4.533、9.105,t=-2.822, P均<0.050;FACT-B评分:F=6.350、5.152、6.771、3.955、8.180,t=-2.373, P均<0.050),并且不同婚姻状况的患者间比较,CD-RISC评分差异也有统计学意义(F=3.144, P=0.046)。SCNS-SF34评分分别与CD-RISC和FACT-B评分呈负相关关系(r=-0.947, -0.918, P均<0.001);CD-RISC评分与FACT-B评分呈正相关关系(r=0.963, P<0.001)。坚韧和自强是患者FACT-B评分的影响因素(B=4.235, 95%CI:3.873~4.596, t=23.157, P<0.001;B=0.417, 95%CI: 0.059~0.775, t=2.304, P=0.023)。

结论

乳腺癌术后化疗患者存在不同的支持性照顾需求,且心理弹性及生活质量评分较低。心理弹性水平低的患者支持性照顾需求更高,坚韧和自强可以预测患者的生活质量。护理人员可以根据患者不同的支持性照顾需求及心理弹性特点选择不同的护理干预方案。

Objective

To explore the correlation among supportive care needs, psychological resilience and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 140 female breast cancer patients who received postoperative chemotherapy in the daycare ward of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from July to December 2019 were selected as subjects for a cross-sectional investigation. The Chinese version of Supportive Care Need Survey (SCNS)-SF34, Chinese version of Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Chinese version of Function Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) were used for evaluation. The t test or one-factor variance analysis was used to compare the SCNS-SF34, CD-RISC and FACT-B scores among breast cancer patients with different clinical characteristics, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation among the scores of three scales. The influence of SCNS-SF34 and CD-RISC dimensions on FACT-B score was analyzed by multiple linear regression.

Results

A total of 140 questionnaires were distributed, 138 were recovered, and 4 incomplete questionnaires were excluded. There were 134 valid questionnaires, with an effective rate of 95.7%. SCNS-SF34 score of 134 patients was 140.3±11.3, CD-RISC score was 59.6±8.0, FACT-B score was 88.8±13.7. There were significant differences in SCNS-SF34, CD-RISC and FACT-B scores among patients with different educational level, family monthly income, medical insurance type, clinical stage of tumor, chemotherapy course and surgical method (SCNS-SF34 score: F=7.161, 4.780, 7.413, 3.505, 8.996, t=3.750, all P<0.050; CD-RISC score: F=6.628, 5.059, 7.292, 4.533, 9.105, t=-2.822, all P<0.050; FACT-B score: F=6.350, 5.152, 6.771, 3.955, 8.180, t=-2.373, all P<0.050), and there was a significant difference in CD-RISC score among patients with different marital status (F=3.144, P=0.046). SCNS-SF34 score was negatively correlated with CD-RISC score and FACT-B score (r=-0.947, -0.918, both P<0.001), and CD-RISC score was positively correlated with FACT-B score (r=0.963, P<0.001). Tenacity and self-reliance were the influencing factors of FACT-B score (B=4.235, 95%CI: 3.873-4.596, t=23.157, P<0.001; B=0.417, 95%CI: 0.059-0.775, t=2.304, P=0.023).

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy have different supportive care needs and low psychological resilience and quality of life scores. Patients with low levels of psychological resilience have a high need for supportive care. Tenacity and self-reliance can predict patients’ quality of life. Nursing staff can give different nursing interventions according to patients’ supportive care needs and psychological resilience.

表1 134例乳腺癌术后化疗患者SCNS-SF34、CD-RISC及FACT-B评分情况(分,±s)
表2 不同临床特征的乳腺癌术后化疗患者SCNS-SF34、CD-RISC及FACT-B评分比较(分,±s)
临床特征 例数 支持性照顾需求 心理弹性 生活质量
SCNS-SF34 检验值 P CD-RISC 检验值 P FACT-B 检验值 P
年龄                    
  18~44岁 31 137.9±11.8 F=1.389 0.253 61.3±8.2 F=1.433 0.242 90.7±14.1 F=0.876 0.419
  45~59岁 75 140.3±11.8 59.5±8.1 89.0±13.6
  ≥60岁 28 142.8±8.9 57.8±7.2 86.0±13.7
居住地                    
  城市 63 139.7±11.0 t=-0.519 0.604 59.9±7.9 t=0.375 0.708 89.1±13.4 t=0.240 0.811
  农村 71 140.8±11.5 59.3±8.1 88.5±14.0
婚姻状况                    
  已婚 124 139.8±11.4 F=1.820 0.166 60.0±7.9a F=3.144 0.046 89.4±13.7a F=2.568 0.081
  未婚 5 142.8±8.0 56.6±6.5 85.0±12.3
  离异 5 149.2±9.2 51.6±5.9 76.0±9.8
子女情况                    
  0~1个 6 142.8±7.2 t=0.569 0.571 57.0±11.3 t=-0.811 0.419 85.3±11.0 t=-0.626 0.532
  ≥2个 128 140.1±11.4 59.1±8.1 88.9±13.8
职业状态                    
  无职 60 139.6±11.4 F=1.251 0.289 59.9±7.8 F=1.497 0.228 88.7±13.7 F=1.907 0.153
  在职 49 139.5±12.1 60.5±8.5 91.0±13.7
  退休 25 143.5±9.1 57.2±7.1 84.5±13.3
文化程度                    
  大学及以上 26 132.2±10.8b F=7.161 <0.001 65.2±6.9b F=6.628 <0.001 97.8±11.9b F=6.350 <0.001
  高中/中专 15 145.5±8.3 56.8±6.1 83.5±9.7
  初中 36 142.9±11.8 57.3±7.8 84.6±13.0
  小学及以下 57 140.9±10.1 59.2±7.9 88.6±14.0
家庭月收入                    
  >4 000元 23 132.8±10.7c F=4.780 0.003 64.9±6.9c F=5.059 0.002 97.7±12.0c F=5.152 0.002
  3 001~4 000元 31 142.8±11.0 57.4±7.4 84.3±12.8
  2 000~3 000元 52 140.7±11.7 59.5±8.3 89.0±13.4
  <2 000元 28 142.8±8.9 57.9±7.2 86.0±13.7
医保类型                    
  省医保 25 131.8±10.8d F=7.413 <0.001 65.4±6.9d F=7.292 <0.001 98.3±11.9d F=6.771 <0.001
  市医保 34 143.2±10.7 57.2±7.1 84.6±12.1
  农村医保 56 140.8±11.0 59.5±8.1 88.8±14.1
  自费 19 144.5±8.3 56.5±6.8 83.6±11.6
肿瘤临床分期                    
  Ⅰ期 12 132.8±9.4e F=3.505 0.033 65.5±5.9e F=4.533 0.012 98.4±9.9e F=3.955 0.021
  Ⅱ期 85 140.3±12.0 59.6±8.2 88.6±13.8
  Ⅲ期 37 142.6±9.1 57.7±7.1 85.9±13.3
手术方式                    
  根治性手术 128 141.0±10.8 t=3.750 <0.001 59.2±7.8 t=-2.822 0.006 88.2±13.6 t=-2.373 0.019
  保留乳房手术 6 124.2±10.3 68.3±5.8 101.5±8.9
化疗疗程                    
  1~2个 94 142.2±10.4f F=8.996 <0.001 58.2±7.8f F=9.105 <0.001 86.6±13.5f F=8.180 <0.001
  3~4个 22 139.8±12.5 59.9±7.9 88.5±13.0
  ≥5个 18 130.6±9.5 66.4±5.5 100.2±9.5
表3 134例乳腺癌术后化疗患者生活质量相关因素的多元线性回归分析结果
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 201868(6):394-424.
[2]
张敏璐,彭鹏,吴春晓,等.2008—2012年中国肿瘤登记地区女性乳腺癌发病和死亡分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志201941(4):315-320.
[3]
蒋蕾,邱岚茜,张丽琴,等.乳腺癌化疗患者症状群调查分析及循证护理对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志201824(17):17-20.
[4]
安云飞,曹仲茹,刘娟,等.乳腺癌化疗患者自我效能、社会支持及应对方式对心理弹性影响的路径分析[J].中华现代护理杂志201824(3):288-292.
[5]
Ream E, Quennell A, Fincham L, et al. Supportive care needs of men living with prostate cancer in England: a survey[J]. Br J Cancer, 200898(12):1903-1909.
[6]
蔡英杰,高冉,史铁英,等.乳腺癌术后患者化疗期支持性照顾需求与生活质量的相关性[J].中国康复理论与实践201723(9):997-1000.
[7]
Sender A, Friedrich M, Leuteritz K, et al. Unmet supportive care needs in young adult cancer patients: associations and changes over time. Results from the AYA-Leipzig study[J]. J Cancer Surviv, 201913(4):611-619.
[8]
Sodergren SC, Wheelwright SJ, Permyakova NV, et al. Supportive care needs of patients following treatment for colorectal cancer: risk factors for unmet needs and the association between unmet needs and health-related quality of life-results from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) study[J]. J Cancer Surviv, 201913(6):899-909.
[9]
Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C. Brief assessment of adult cancer patients’ perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34)[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 200915(4):602-606.
[10]
Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, et al. Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group [J].Cancer, 200088(1):217-225.
[11]
Au A, Lam WW, Kwong A, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-C)[J]. Psychooncology, 201120(12):1292-1300.
[12]
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)[J]. Depress Anxiety, 200318(2):76-82.
[13]
于肖楠,张建新. Connor-Davidson韧性量表(CD-RISC)在中国大陆的应用[C]//第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集.上海:[出版者不详],2005:781.
[14]
Lien K, Zeng L, Nguyen J, et al. FACT-Br for assessment of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for brain metastases: a literature review[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 201111(6):701-708.
[15]
万崇华,张冬梅,汤学良,等.乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)中文版的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志200317(5):298-300.
[16]
马丹丹,刘坤,齐晓伟.2018年全球癌症统计:乳腺癌发病和死亡人数统计[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)201812(6):375.
[17]
陈玮,吴库生.乳腺癌术后患者心理弹性及其影响因素分析[J].中国医药科学20177(20):24-29.
[18]
方琼,吴怡颖,沈莉莉,等.不同化疗阶段乳腺癌患者生活质量及影响因素研究[J].上海护理201919(9):23-28.
[19]
陈玉梅,杨月仙,闫树英,等.乳腺癌化疗患者的症状困扰、心理弹性及生活质量的相关性研究[J].宁夏医学杂志201739(9):813-816.
[20]
Burg MA, Adorno G, Lopez ED, et al. Current unmet needs of cancer survivors: analysis of open-ended responses to the American Cancer Society Study of Cancer Survivors Ⅱ[J]. Cancer, 2015121(4):623-630.
[21]
宋张骏,雷双燕,谢娟.重视癌症患者支持性照顾需求提高患者生存质量[J].中国卫生质量管理201926(1):74-77.
[22]
Lu Q, Dong L, Wu IHC, et al. The impact of an expressive writing intervention on quality of life among Chinese breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. Support Care Cancer, 201927(1):165-173.
[23]
黄昆,刘玉,王蓓,等.个体化认知行为干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者心理弹性的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志201622(1):32-37.
[24]
刘储聪,孙欣,赵丽萍,等.同伴支持对乳腺癌术后化疗病人心理弹性的影响[J].循证护理20195(4):309-313.
[25]
耿俊颖,谷丰.理性认知链接疗法对乳腺癌术后化疗患者心理弹性和生活质量的影响分析[J].国际护理学杂志201736(5):655-657.
[26]
钟梦诗,李晓波,唐楠,等.心理弹性在乳腺癌病人领悟社会支持与生活质量关系中的作用[J].护理研究201933(2):237-240.
[27]
Wu PH, Chen SW, Huang WT, et al. Effects of a psychoeducational intervention in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy[J]. J Nurs Res, 201826(4):266-279.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[12] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[13] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[14] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要