切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 120 -123. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.02.012

所属专题: 文献

综述

MammaPrint的研究进展
闫帅1, 陶维阳1,(), 张国强1   
  1. 1. 150081 哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-09 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陶维阳
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省自然科学基金面上项目(H2016052)

Research progress of MammaPrint assay

Shuai Yan1, Weiyang Tao1(), Guoqiang Zhang1   

  • Received:2018-11-09 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Weiyang Tao
引用本文:

闫帅, 陶维阳, 张国强. MammaPrint的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 120-123.

Shuai Yan, Weiyang Tao, Guoqiang Zhang. Research progress of MammaPrint assay[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 120-123.

乳腺癌是高度异质性疾病,即使临床分期及病理分级相同的患者,对治疗的反应和预后可能会大不相同。可能有相当比例的早期乳腺癌患者在没有明显获益的情况下,接受了不必要的辅助治疗。应用高通量基因测序分析技术,通过对特定"靶基因群"表达水平的检测,来提供更准确的预后信息,为选择治疗方案提供参考,是肿瘤精准治疗的重要研究方向。目前,已经研发出多个乳腺癌基因检测系统。其中,较有影响力、潜在价值较高且获美国FDA批准的2个多基因检测系统分别是Oncotype DX基因检测系统和MammaPrint基因检测系统。笔者详细地介绍了MammaPrint基因检测系统的开发、回顾性验证及大型前瞻性临床试验MINDACT研究,并对该系统的成本效益进行了分析。

[1]
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012[J]. Int J Cancer, 2015,136(5):E359-E386.
[2]
Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen international expert consensus conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017,28(8):1700-1712.
[3]
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Peto R, Davies C, et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2012,379(9814):432-444.
[4]
Mook S, Van’t Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ, et al. Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial[J]. Cancer Genomics Proteomics, 2007,4(3):147-155.
[5]
Kwa M, Makris A, Esteva FJ. Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017,14(10):595-610.
[6]
Audeh W, Blumencranz L, Kling H, et al. Prospective validation of a genomic assay in breast cancer: the 70-gene MammaPrint assay and the MINDACT trial[J]. Acta Med Acad, 2019,48(1):18-34.
[7]
Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, et al. 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016,375(8):717-729.
[8]
van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer[J]. Nature, 2002,415(6871):530-536.
[9]
Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L, et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006,98(17):1183-1192.
[10]
Drukker CA, van Tinteren H, Schmidt MK, et al. Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014,143(3):587-592.
[11]
Esserman LJ, Yau C, Thompson CK, et al. Use of molecular tools to identify patients with indolent breast cancers with ultralow risk over 2 decades[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2017,3(11):1503-1510.
[12]
Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2008,10(4):R65-R65.
[13]
Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, et al. Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER)[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2007,8(12):1079-1087.
[14]
Drukker CA, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retèl VP, et al. A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013,133(4):929-936.
[15]
Brandão M, Pondé N, Piccart-Gebhart M. Mammaprint™:a comprehensive review[J]. Future Oncol, 2019,15(2):207-224.
[16]
Straver ME, Glas AM, Hannemann J, et al. The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010,119(3):551-558.
[17]
Rugo HS, Olopade OI, DeMichele A, et al. Adaptive randomization of veliparib-carboplatin treatment in breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016,375(1):23-34.
[18]
Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Nap M, et al. Clinical use of biomarkers in breast cancer: updated guidelines from the European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017,04(75):284-298.
[19]
Krop I, Ismaila N, Andre F, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice guideline focused update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017,35(24):2838-2847.
[20]
Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017,67(4):290-303.
[21]
Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006,355(6):560-569.
[22]
Bartlett JM, Bayani J, Marshall A, et al. Comparing breast cancer multiparameter tests in the OPTIMA prelim trial: no test is more equal than the others[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016,108(9): djw050.
[23]
Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F, et al. Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer[J]. BMC Genomics,2008,9:394.
[24]
Sestak I, Buus R, Cuzick J, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6 prognostic signatures for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018,4(4):545-553.
[25]
Blok EJ, Bastiaannet E, van den Hout WB, et al. Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2018,62(1):74-90.
[26]
Kuijer A, van Bommel AC, Drukker CA, et al. Using a gene expression signature when controversy exists regarding the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment reduces the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study[J]. Genet Med, 2016,18(7):720-726.
[27]
Wuerstlein R, Kates R, Gluz O, et al. Strong impact of MammaPrint and BluePrint on treatment decisions in luminal early breast cancer: results of the WSG-PRIMe study[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2019,175(2):389-399.
[28]
Retèl VP, Joore MA, Drukker CA, et al. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of genomic profiling in breast cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49(18):3773-3779.
[29]
Yang M, Rajan S, Issa AM. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model[J]. Cancer, 2012,118(20):5163-5170.
[30]
Chen E, Tong KB, Malin JL. Cost-effectiveness of 70-gene MammaPrint signature in node-negative breast cancer[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2010,16(12):e333-e342.
[31]
Seguí MÁ,Crespo C, Cortés J, et al. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2014,14(6):889-899.
[32]
Bonastre J, Marguet S, Lueza B, et al. Cost effectiveness of molecular profiling for adjuvant decision making in patients with node-negative breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014,32(31):3513-3519.
[33]
Retèl VP, Linn SC, van Harten WH. Molecular profiling is rather likely to be cost effective[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015,33(14):1626-1627.
[34]
Gauchan D, Ramaekers R, Copur SM. Cost-effectiveness of molecular profiling for early breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015,33(14):1627.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[3] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[8] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[9] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[10] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[11] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 王飞飞, 王光林, 孟泽松, 李保坤, 曹龙飞, 张娟, 周超熙, 丁源一, 王贵英. 敲低IMPDH1对结肠癌SW480、HT29细胞生物功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 884-890.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要