切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 159 -164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.03.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

纤维乳管镜和乳腺超声在伴有乳头溢液的乳管内占位性病变中的诊断价值
刘洪1, 罗凤1, 邢雷1,()   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-27 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 邢雷

Diagnosis of intraductal space-occupying lesions with nipple discharge: mammary ductoscopy versus breast ultrasonography

Hong Liu1, Feng Luo1, Lei Xing1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2019-03-27 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Lei Xing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xing Lei, Email:
引用本文:

刘洪, 罗凤, 邢雷. 纤维乳管镜和乳腺超声在伴有乳头溢液的乳管内占位性病变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 159-164.

Hong Liu, Feng Luo, Lei Xing. Diagnosis of intraductal space-occupying lesions with nipple discharge: mammary ductoscopy versus breast ultrasonography[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 159-164.

目的

探讨纤维乳管镜与乳腺超声在伴有乳头溢液的乳管内占位性病变中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科2017年1月至2018年2月收治的133例乳头溢液患者临床资料,分析纤维乳管镜与乳腺超声检查在乳头溢液患者乳管内占位性病变诊断中的应用情况。采用配对χ2检验比较2种检查间乳管内占位性病变检出率的差异,以及纤维乳管镜与乳腺超声诊断乳管内乳头状瘤敏感度的差异,并用Fisher确切概率法比较亚组间乳管内占位性病变为恶性肿瘤的概率。

结果

133例患者中,有63例患者行溢液乳管腺段切除术,4例行乳腺结节微创旋切术,穿刺或包块切除术明确为恶性肿瘤后行根治术各1例,53例患者未行手术,11例患者失访。65例常规手术患者(非微创旋切术)术后病理结果:乳腺恶性肿瘤4例,乳管内乳头状瘤57例,乳腺增生4例。纤维乳管镜检查对乳管内占位性病变的检出率为57.1% (76/133),高于乳腺超声检查的24.8% (33/133)(χ2=31.339,P<0.001),且纤维乳管镜诊断乳管内乳头状瘤的敏感度优于乳腺超声检查[93.0%(53/57)比42.1%(24/57),χ2=33.652,P<0.001)。纤维乳管镜提示乳管内占位性病变的患者中,乳管内占位性病变出血或合并乳房包块者与未出血且无乳房包块者相比,发生恶性肿瘤的概率更高[3/13比2.3%(1/44),P=0.034]。

结论

纤维乳管镜对乳管内占位性病变的诊断具有优势,可以作为乳头溢液患者的常规检查。对于乳管内占位性病变合并乳房包块或者瘤体出血的患者,应行手术切除以明确诊断。

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of mammary ductoscopy and breast ultrasonography in intraductal space-occupying lesions with nipple discharge.

Methods

The clinical data of 133 patients with nipple discharge in the Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2017 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The application of mammary ductoscopy and breast ultrasonography was analyzed for the diagnosis of intraductal space-occupying lesions in nipple discharge patients. Paired χ2 test was used to compare the detection rates of intraductal space-occupying lesions between two methods and analyze the sensitivity of mammary ductoscopy and breast ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intraductal papilloma. Fisher exact probability test were used to compare the malignancy rate of intraductal space-occupying lesions between two groups.

Results

In 133 patients, 63 patients underwent duct excision, 4 minimal invasive surgery of breast nodes, 2 radical mastectomy after the malignancy was confirmed (one case by core-needle biopsy and the other by lumpectomy). Fifty-three patients underwent no surgery and 11 patients were lost to follow-up. In 65 patients receiving conventional surgery, postoperative pathology revealed malignant breast tumor in 4 patients, intraductal papilloma in 57 and breast hyperplasia in 4. The detection rate of intraductal space-occupying lesions by mammary ductoscopy was 57.1% (76/133), significantly higher in 24.8% (33/133) by breast ultrasonography (χ2=31.339, P<0.001). The sensitivity of mammary ductoscopy was significantly higher than that of breast ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intraductal papilloma [93.0%(53/57) vs 42.1%(24/57), χ2=33.652, P<0.001). Among the patients with intraductal space-occupying lesions indicated by mammary ductoscopy, the patients with breast mass or bleeding of space-occupying lesions had a significantly higher incidence of malignancy compared with the patients without breast mass or bleeding [3/13 vs 2.3% (1/44), P=0.034].

Conclusions

Mammary ductoscopy is superior in the diagnosis of intraductal space-occupying lesions and can be used as a routine examination for patients with nipple discharge. For patients with intraductal space-occupying lesions associated with breast mass or tumor hemorrhage, surgical resection should be performed to confirm the diagnosis.

图1 乳头溢液患者行纤维乳管镜检查 a图所示乳管内占位性病变;b图所示乳管炎
图2 乳头溢液患者的超声影像 a图所示乳管内异常回声;b图所示异常回声似与乳管相通;c图所示乳管扩张伴内透声差;d图所示乳管扩张但内透声好;e图所示腺体内异常回声;f图所示正常乳腺超声图
表1 不同类型乳头溢液患者行纤维乳管镜及乳腺超声检查结果(例)
表2 4例乳腺癌患者的一般情况
表3 纤维乳管镜与乳腺超声检查对乳管内占位性病变的检出率比较(例)
表4 61例乳腺良性病变患者的纤维乳管镜与术后病理诊断结果(例)
表5 61例乳腺良性病变患者的乳腺超声与术后病理诊断结果(例)
表6 57例术后病理诊断为乳管内乳头状瘤患者的乳腺超声与纤维乳管镜检查结果(例)
[1]
Onstad M, Stuckey A. Benign breast disorders [J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2013,40(3):459-473.
[2]
Alcock C, Layer GT. Predicting occult malignancy in nipple discharge[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2010,80(9):646-649.
[3]
Lesetedi C, Rayne S, Kruger D, et al. Indicators of breast cancer in patients undergoing microdochectomy for a pathological nipple discharge in a middle-income country[J]. J Surg Res, 2017,220:336-340.
[4]
Yang X, Li H, Gou J, et al. The role of breast ductoscopy in evaluation of nipple discharge: a Chinese experience of 419 patients[J]. Breast J, 2014,20(4):388-393.
[5]
Yilmaz R, Bender Ö,Çelik Yabul F, et al. Diagnosis of nipple discharge: value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in comparison with ductoscopy[J]. Balkan Med J, 2017,34(2):119-126.
[6]
Kan WM, Chen C, Kwong A. Implications of nipple discharge in Hong Kong Chinese women[J]. Hong Kong Med J, 2018,24(1):18-24.
[7]
Foulkes RE, Heard G, Boyce T, et al. Duct excision is still necessary to rule out breast cancer in patients presenting with spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge[J]. Int J Breast Cancer, 2011,2011:495 315.
[8]
马宏民,龙天柱,姚育芝,等. 乳管镜定位及超声引导下真空辅助空芯针活组织检查治疗乳管内病灶[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018,12(5):290-293.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[9] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[10] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[11] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[12] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[13] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[14] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[15] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
阅读次数
全文


摘要