切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 16 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.01.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建中肿瘤学安全性的Meta分析
刘欢欢1, 林珣珣2, 许澍洽2, 许扬滨2,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,孙逸仙纪念医院整形外科
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院整形外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-30 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 许扬滨

Oncological safety of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a meta-analysis

Huanhuan Liu1, Xunxun Lin2, Shuqia Xu2, Yangbin Xu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Department of Plastic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2018-10-30 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yangbin Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Yangbin, Email:
引用本文:

刘欢欢, 林珣珣, 许澍洽, 许扬滨. 自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建中肿瘤学安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 16-23.

Huanhuan Liu, Xunxun Lin, Shuqia Xu, Yangbin Xu. Oncological safety of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 16-23.

目的

评价乳腺癌术后乳房重建患者行自体脂肪移植的肿瘤学安全性。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、中国知网、万方及维普数据库,收集截止至2018年5月所有已发表的队列研究,由2位评价员独立完成文献筛选和数据提取,并运用改良纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)系统评价文献质量。采用比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)为效应量,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。

结果

最终纳入符合标准的文献13篇,总样本量8 466例患者,其中乳房重建过程应用脂肪移植者(AFG组)1 963例,未应用脂肪移植者(NFG组)6 503例。NOS评价结果显示,所有纳入文献质量均较高(评分为6~9分)。Meta分析显示:AFG组总复发病例数为88例(4.5%,88/1 963),NFG组总复发病例数为455例(7.0%,455/6 503),AFG组乳腺癌复发率明显低于NFG组(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.57~0.95,P=0.02);脂肪移植对乳腺癌的局部复发率、区域复发率及远处复发率均无显著影响(OR=1.06,95%CI:0.60~1.88,P=0.84;OR=0.89,95%CI:0.32~2.48,P=0.83;OR=0.36,95%CI:0.10~1.28,P=0.11)。亚组分析显示:在DCIS或浸润性癌患者中,脂肪移植对乳腺癌复发率无显著影响(OR=1.16,95%CI:0.05~26.91,P=0.93;OR=0.68,95%CI:0.40~1.16,P=0.16);在行保留乳房术或乳房全切手术的患者中,脂肪移植对乳腺癌复发率亦无显著影响(OR=0.36,95%CI:0.08~1.66,P=0.19;OR=0.64,95%CI:0.33~1.26,P=0.19)。

结论

基于1965年1月至2018年5月相关临床队列研究的综合分析,自体脂肪移植是安全的,且其乳腺癌复发风险较低。

Objective

To investigate the oncological safety of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases were searched for all published relevant cohort studies up to May 2018. According to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), the literature screening, data extraction and systematic evaluation were performed by two reviewers independently. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software, with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as the effect size.

Results

Thirteen studies were included, with a sample size of 8 466 patients including 1 963 patients in autologous fat grafting group (AFG group) and 6 503 patients in non-fat grafting group (NFG group). The NOS scores were 6 to 9, indicating high methodological quality. The meta-analysis showed that 455 patients (7.0%, 455/6 503) in NFG group had recurrence, while 88 patients (4.5%, 88/1 963) in AFG group had recurrence, indicating that the recurrence rate of AFG group was significantly lower than that of NFG group (OR=0.73, 95%CI: 0.57-0.95, P=0.02). Fat grafting had no significant effect on the local recurrence rate, regional recurrence rate and distant recurrence rate (OR=1.06, 95%CI: 0.60-1.88, P=0.84; OR=0.89, 95%CI: 0.32-2.48, P=0.83; OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.28, P=0.11). Subgroup analysis showed that fat grafting had no significant effect on the recurrence rate of breast cancer in patients with carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma (OR=1.16, 95%CI: 0.05-26.91, P=0.93; OR=0.68, 95%CI: 0.40-1.16, P=0.16). The fat grafting still had no significant effect on the recurrence rate of breast cancer in the patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy (OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.08-1.66, P=0.19; OR=0.64, 95%CI: 0.33-1.26, P=0.19).

Conclusion

Based on our meta-analysis of the cohort studies from January 1965 to May 2018, autologous fat grafting is feasible, with low risk of recurrence.

表1 Meta分析的文献纳入标准
表2 纳入文献的质量评价
表3 纳入文献的基本特征
图1 文献筛选流程图
图2 自体脂肪移植(AFG)组与非自体脂肪移植(NFG)组乳腺癌患者术后复发的森林图及异质性检验结果
图3 13篇文献发表偏倚检验结果 a图所示13篇文献发表偏倚漏斗图;b图所示Egger回归图(t=0.25,P=0.80,95%CI: -1.04~1.31,包含0);c图所示Begg漏斗图(Z<0.01时,P>0.05);d图所示剪补法校正后的漏斗图(与剪补法校正前一致)
图4 自体脂肪移植(AFG)组与非自体脂肪移植(NFG)组乳腺癌患者复发类型分层分析的森林图及异质性检验结果 a图所示,采用固定效应模型分析AFG组与NFG组患者局部复发和区域复发的差异;b图所示,采用随机效应模型分析AFG组与NFG组患者远处复发的差异
图5 按乳腺癌患者疾病特征分类的分层分析森林图及异质性检验结果 a图所示,采用随机效应模型分析导管原位癌亚组中,自体脂肪移植(AFG)组与非自体脂肪移植(NFG)组患者复发率的差异;b图所示,采用固定效应模型分析浸润性癌以及保留乳房、全乳切除亚组中,AFG组与NFG组患者复发率的差异
[1]
Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting[J]. Aesther Surg J,1998,18(5):386-388.
[2]
Spear SL. Fat for breast: where are we? [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2008,122(3):983-984.
[3]
Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, et al. Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the american society of plastic surgeons [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2013, 132(1):35-46.
[4]
Karnoub AE, Dash AB, Vo AP, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis [J]. Nature,2007,449(7162):557-563.
[5]
Millet E, Haik J, Ofir E, et al. The impact of autologous fat grafting on breast cancer: an experimental model using magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2016, 18(5):283-285.
[6]
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement [J]. PLoS Med, 2009, 6(7):e1000097.
[7]
李雪迎.Meta分析研究设计中的PICOS原则[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(11):611.
[8]
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9):603-605.
[9]
Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials[J]. BMJ, 2011, 343:d4002.
[10]
Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Association of fat grafting with patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(10):944-950.
[11]
Cohen O, Lam G, Karp N, et al. Determining the oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting as a reconstructive modality: an institutional review of breast cancer recurrence rates and surgical outcomes [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2017, 140(3):382e-392e.
[12]
Khan LR, Raine CR, Dixon JM. Immediate lipofilling in breast conserving surgery [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017,43(8):1402-1408.
[13]
Kronowitz S, Mandujano C, Liu J, et al. Lipofilling of the breast does not increase the risk of recurrence of breast cancer: a matched controlled study [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2016, 137(2):385-393.
[14]
Masia J, Bordoni D, Pons G, et al. Oncological safety of breast cancer patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction and lipofilling [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2015,41(5):612-616.
[15]
Mestak O, Hromadkova V, Fajfrova M, et al. Evaluation of oncological safety of fat grafting after breast-conserving therapy: a prospective study [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(3):776-781.
[16]
Myckatyn TM, Wagner IJ, Mehrara BJ, et al. Cancer risk after fat transfer: a multicenter case-cohort study [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2017, 139(1):11-18.
[17]
Petit JY, Botteri E, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk after lipofilling in breast cancer patients [J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(3):582-588.
[18]
Petit JY, Rietjens M, Botteri E, et al. Evaluation of fat grafting safety in patients with intra epithelial neoplasia: a matched-cohort study [J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(6):1479-1484.
[19]
Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Kim JY, et al. Long-term outcomes following fat grafting in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a comparative analysis [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2012, 130(5):984-990.
[20]
Fertsch S, Hagouan M, Munder B, et al. Increased risk of recurrence associated with certain risk factors in breast cancer patients after DIEP-flap reconstruction and lipofilling-a matched cohort study with 200 patients [J]. Gland Surg, 2017, 6(4):315-323.
[21]
Stumpf CC, Biazus JV, Zucatto F, et al. Immediate reconstruction with autologous fat grafting: influence in breast cancerregional recurrence [J]. Rev Col Bras Cir,2017,44(2):179-186.
[22]
Weichman KE, Broer PN, Tanna N, et al. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2013, 71(1):24-30.
[23]
Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Dowlut N, et al. Use of autologous fat grafting in reconstruction following mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: an updated systematic review protocol [J]. Int J Surg Prot, 2017, 5(1):22-26.
[24]
Charvet HJ, Orbay H, Wong MS, et al. The oncologic safety of breast fat grafting and contradictions between basic science and clinical studies[J].Ann Plas Surg, 75(4):471-479.
[25]
Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy [J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2007, 7(11):834-846.
[26]
Gale KL, Rakha EA, Ball G, et al. A case-controlled study of the oncologic safety of fat grafting [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 2015, 135(5):1263-1275.
[27]
林燕,孙强. 乳腺癌的风险评估与预防[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2):101-104.
[28]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(1):7-30.
[29]
Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases [J]. Plast Recomstr Surg, 1983, 72(5):591-597.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[15] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
阅读次数
全文


摘要