切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 220 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2016.04.006

论著

乳腺象限或大区段切除术中应用侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形的研究
洪士开1, 王圣应1,(), 郑绪才1, 陈公仆1, 刘松1, 高红1, 赵源源1   
  1. 1.230088 合肥,安徽省肿瘤医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-24 出版日期:2016-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王圣应

Mammaplasty with lateral thoracic steato-fascia flap in segmental or quadrant mastectomy

Shikai Hong1, Shengying Wang1,(), Xucai Zheng1, Gongpu Chen1, Song Liu1, Hong Gao1, Yuanyuan Zhao1   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei 230088, China
  • Received:2015-09-24 Published:2016-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Shengying Wang
引用本文:

洪士开, 王圣应, 郑绪才, 陈公仆, 刘松, 高红, 赵源源. 乳腺象限或大区段切除术中应用侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形的研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(04): 220-225.

Shikai Hong, Shengying Wang, Xucai Zheng, Gongpu Chen, Song Liu, Hong Gao, Yuanyuan Zhao. Mammaplasty with lateral thoracic steato-fascia flap in segmental or quadrant mastectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(04): 220-225.

目的

探讨乳腺象限或大区段切除术中应用侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣即刻乳房成形的疗效及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2014 年2 月至2015 年11 月安徽省肿瘤医院乳腺外科收治的96 例行乳腺象限或大区段切除术的乳腺良性疾病患者临床资料,其中43 例术中即刻应用侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣修复乳房外形(乳房成形组),37 例未行侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形(非乳房成形组),16 例行皮下腺体切除术即刻假体植入重建乳房(假体重建组)。 比较3 组患者的手术相关特征、并发症及美容效果。 偏态分布的数据用M(P25 ~P75)表示, 组间比较采用多个独立样本的非参数检验(Kruskal-Wallis 检验),组间多重比较采用Nemenyi 检验。

结果

乳房成形组患者手术时间比假体重建组短[70.0(60.0 ~80.0) min比96.0(90.5 ~101.5) min,χ2=-4.338,P<0.017]。 并且,乳房成形组患者的住院时间与非乳房成形组相似[11.0 (10.0 ~14.0) d 比11.0 (9.5 ~12.0) d,χ2=1.080,P>0.017]。 乳房成形组患者术后住院时间明显比假体重建组短[8.0 (7.0 ~10.0) d 比10.0(8.3 ~11.0) d,χ2=2.644,P<0.017],其引流管留置时间也无明显增加(χ2=3.176,P=0.204)。 术后随访3 ~24 个月(中位随访13 个月),乳房成形组、非乳房成形组、假体重建组各感染5、3、0 例,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.640,P=0.486)。 乳腺成形组患者术后总体满意度评分为9.2(9.0 ~9.5)分,优于非乳房成形组的8.5(7.3 ~8.7)分(χ2=7.388,P<0.017)。

结论

对于需要行乳腺象限或大区段切除术的乳腺良性疾病患者,术中应用侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣修复乳房外形具有技术可行、美容效果好的优点,宜于临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate therapeutic effect and feasibility of immediate mammaplasty with lateral thoracic steato-fascia flap in segmental or quadrant mastectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively studied clinicopathologic data of 96 patients with benign diseases who underwent segmental or quadrant mastectomy in Department of Breast Surgery, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital from February 2014 to November 2015,including 43 patients who received segmental or quadrant mastectomy and immediate mammaplasty with lateral thoracic steato-fascia flap (mammaplasty group) and 37 patients who received segmental or quadrant mastectomy without breast mammaplasty (non-mammaplasty group) and 16 patients had subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis implantation (breast reconstruction group).The clinical characteristics, complications and cosmetic effects were compared among 3 groups. The data with skewed distribution were expressed as M (P25-P75). The multiple independent samples were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Nemenyi test was used for multiple comparisons between groups.

Results

The operation time in mammaplasty group was 70.0 (60.0-80.0) min, less than 96.0 (90.5-101.5) min in breast reconstruction group (χ2=-4.338, P<0.017). The hospitalization stay was not significantly different between mammaplasty group and non-mammaplasty group [11.0 (10.0-14.0) d vs 11.0 (9.5-12.0) d, χ2=1.080,P>0.017]. The postoperative hospitalization stay in breast reconstruction group was 10.0 (8.3-11.0) d,significantly longer than 8.0 (7.0-10.0) d in breast mammaplasty group (χ2 =2.644, P <0.017). The drainage time was not significantly different among three groups (χ2 =3.176,P=0.204). All patients were followed up for 3-24 months (median 13 months). Five patients had infection in mammaplasty group, 3 in non-mammaplasty group, 0 in breast reconstruction group, respectively, indicating no significant difference(χ2=1.640, P=0.486). The overall aesthetic score in mammaplasty group was 9.2(9-9.5), significantly higher than 8.5(7.3-8.7) in non-mammaplasty group (χ2 = 7.388,P <0.017).

Conclusion

For the patients with breast benign diseases requiring segmental or quadrant mastectomy, immediate mammaplasty with lateral thoracic steato-fascia flap is easy to operate and feasible, with good cosmetic effect, which is worthy of clinical application.

图1 侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形术操作步骤
图2 乳腺良性疾病患者行侧胸壁脂肪筋膜组织瓣乳房成形术 注:a、b 图所示术中切取的侧胸壁脂肪筋膜组织瓣
表1 3 组乳腺良性疾病患者临床病理类型比较(例)
表2 3 组乳腺良性疾病患者手术相关特征比较[M(P25P75)]
表3 3 组乳腺良性疾病患者术后乳房外观满意度评分[分,M(P25P75)]
图3 侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形组与非乳房成形组乳腺良性疾病患者术后乳房外形比较 注:a、b 图分别为乳腺良性疾病患者行侧胸壁脂肪筋膜瓣乳房成形术后1 周和3 个月时乳房外形;c、d 图分别为非乳房成形组患者术后1 周和3 个月时乳房外形
[1]
McCarthy CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al.The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life [J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,130(1):218-223.
[2]
Black DM, Hunt KK, Mittendorf EA.Long term outcomes reporting the safety of breast conserving therapy compared to mastectomy: 20-year results of EORTC 10801[J].Gland Surg,2013,2(3):120-123.
[3]
Agrawal A, Sibbering DM, Courtney CA.Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction:a review [J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2013,39(4):320-328.
[4]
Tan BK, Chim H, Ng ZY, et al. Aesthetic design of skin-sparing mastectomy incisions for immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction in asian women [J].Arch Plast Surg,2014,41(4):366-373.
[5]
Erdogmus S, Govsa F.Distal variations of the neurovascular pedicle of the serratus anterior muscle as a flap[J]. Surg Radiol Anat,2005,27(2):100-107.
[6]
Yuen AP, Ng RW. Surgical techniques and results of lateral thoracic cutaneous myocutaneous, and conjoint flaps for head and neck reconstruction[J].Laryngoscope,2007,117(2):288-294.
[7]
乔群,冯锐.自体组织乳房再造手术方式的变迁[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2007,1(5):133-136.
[8]
Chan YW,Ng RW,Yuen AP.Lateral thoracic flap for donor site repair of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2009,62(8):1004-1007.
[9]
韩炳生,李志新,陈洁生,等.乳腺癌皮下根治切除加背阔肌脂肪瓣一期乳房重建的研究[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2011,5(3):360-366.
[10]
McCulley SJ,Schaverien MV,Tan VK,et al. Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2015,68(5):686-691.
[1] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[2] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[3] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[4] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[5] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[6] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[7] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[8] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 石静, 陈龙舟, 于倩, 高峥嵘, 陆澄. 腺体瓣成形术在病理性乳头溢液手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 691-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要