切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 322 -328. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2010.03.013

实验研究

抑制肿瘤细胞骨保护素表达对乳腺癌细胞致骨转移能力的影响
张帆1, 杨新华1, 唐振宁1, 梁燕1, 唐鹏1, 齐晓伟1, 陈庆秋1, 姜军1,()   
  1. 1.400038重庆,第三军医大学西南医院乳腺疾病中心
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-16 出版日期:2010-06-01
  • 通信作者: 姜军
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(30700814)第三军医大学2006年度中青年科研基金资助项目

Impact of inhibiting osteoprotegerin expression of tumor cell on breast cancer metastasis to bone

Fan ZHANG1, Xin-hua YANG1, Zhen-ning TANG1, Yan LIANG1, Peng TANG1, Xiao-wei QI1, Qing-qiu CHEN1, Jun JIANG,1()   

  1. 1.Breast Disease Center,Southwest Hospital,Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China
  • Received:2009-03-16 Published:2010-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun JIANG
引用本文:

张帆, 杨新华, 唐振宁, 梁燕, 唐鹏, 齐晓伟, 陈庆秋, 姜军. 抑制肿瘤细胞骨保护素表达对乳腺癌细胞致骨转移能力的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2010, 04(03): 322-328.

Fan ZHANG, Xin-hua YANG, Zhen-ning TANG, Yan LIANG, Peng TANG, Xiao-wei QI, Qing-qiu CHEN, Jun JIANG. Impact of inhibiting osteoprotegerin expression of tumor cell on breast cancer metastasis to bone[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2010, 04(03): 322-328.

目的

观察抑制肿瘤细胞骨保护素(osteoprotegerin,OPG)表达对乳腺癌MDA-MB-231细胞株致骨转移的影响。

方法

32只4~6周龄雌性裸鼠被随机分为A、B、C、D 4组,每组8只,A、C 组的每只裸鼠按分组分别以5×105 个MDA-MB-231细胞注射入左心室(A 组)或左胫骨骨髓腔(C组)。B、D 组的每只裸鼠按分组分别以5×105 个MDA-MB-231i细胞(OPG 表达抑制)注射入左心室(B组)或左胫骨骨髓腔(D 组),42 d后行病理检查,比较A、B组骨转移发生率和骨转移灶数量,以及C、D组的骨肿瘤体积。定量资料的比较采用t检验或秩和检验,定性资料比较采用Fisher确切概率检验。

结果

A组有6只发生骨转移,全组共检出不连续性骨转移灶23处;B组有3只发生骨转移,全组共检出不连续性骨转移灶8处。A 组的骨转移发生率和转移灶数量虽高于B 组,但两者差异并无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C 组肿瘤平均体积为(66.29±41.01)mm3,D 组肿瘤平均体积为(23.70±16.14)mm3,C组骨肿瘤体积大于D 组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.02)。

结论

乳腺癌细胞致骨转移能力与其OPG 表达水平密切相关,抑制OPG 表达可以降低乳腺癌细胞致骨转移的能力。

Objective

To investigate the impact of inhibiting osteoprotegerin(OPG)expression in tumor cells on breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 induced bone metastasis.

Methods

Thirty-two female nude mice aged 4-6 weeks were divided randomly into four groups(n=8 in each group).MDA-MB-231 cells(5×105)were injected into the body via the left heart ventricles(group A)and via the left tibia marrow cavities (group C),respectively.MDA-MB-231i cells (5×105)(OPG expression inhibition)were injected into the body via the left heart ventricles(group B)and via the left tibia marrow cavities(group D),respectively.Forty-two days after the injection,all the nude mice were subjected to pathological examination to determine bone metastasis.Student's t-test was used for the comparison of quantitative data,and Fisher's exact test was used for the comparison of qualitative data.

Results

There were 23 bone metastasis lesions detected and six mice with bone metastasis in group A,and 8 bone metastasis lesions detected and three mice with bone metastasis in group B,but with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The bone tumor volume of group C and group D was(66.29±41.01)mm3 and(23.70±16.14)mm3,respectively.The bone tumor volume of group C was larger than that of group D.There was a statistically significant difference in the bone tumor volume between group C and group D (P=0.02).

Conclusions

Breast cancer metastasis to bone is closely correlated with the osteoprotegerin expression level in tumor cells.To inhibit the osteoprotegerin expression can decrease the capability of breast cancer-induced bone metastasis.

表1 C组与D 组的骨转移瘤体积比较
图1 不同部位的骨转移大体形态 a:右髂骨转移;b:左肱骨转移;c:颅骨转移
图2 左胫骨肿瘤
图3 骨转移显微镜下形态(HE染色 ×100)
[1]
Simonet WS,Lacey DL,Dunstan CR,et al.Osteoprotegerin:a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density.Cell,1997,89:309-319.
[2]
Thomas RJ,Guise TA,Yin JJ,et al.Breast cancer cells interact with osteoblasts to support osteoclast formation.Endocrinology,1999,140:4451-4458.
[3]
杨滨,阎华,王欣彦,等.卡培他滨与放射联合对子宫颈腺癌抗肿瘤效果的实验研究.中国医科大学学报,2009,38:751-754.
[4]
Lu X,Kang Y.Organotropism of breast cancer metastasis.J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia,2007,12:153-162.
[5]
Reid P,Holen I.Pathophysiological roles of osteoprotegerin(OPG).Eur J Cell Biol,2009,88:1-17.
[6]
Kozlow W,Guise TA.Breast cancer metastasis to bone:mechanisms of osteolysis and implications for therapy.J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia,2005,10:169-180.
[7]
Holen I,Cross SS,Neville Webbe HL,et al.Osteoprotegerin(OPG)expression by breast cancer cells in vitro and breast tumours in vivo-a role in tumour cell survival?Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,92:207-215.
[8]
Fisher JL,Thomas Mudge RJ,Elliott J,et al.Osteoprotegerin overexpression by breast cancer cells enhances orthotopic and osseous tumor growth and contrasts with that delivered therapeutically.Cancer Res,2006,66:3620-3628.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 胡思平, 熊性宇, 徐航, 杨璐. 衰老相关分泌表型因子在前列腺癌发生发展中的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 425-434.
阅读次数
全文


摘要