切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 236 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma. j. issn.1674-0807.2015.04.003

论著

乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的临床意义
王立兵1,(), 冯亮1, 何静1, 刘博1, 田会萍1   
  1. 1.050011 河北省石家庄市第一医院腺体外科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-28 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王立兵

Clinical significance of preserving intercostobrachial nerve in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients

Libing Wang1,(), Liang Feng1, Jing He1, Bo Liu1, Huiping Tian1   

  1. 1.Department of Glandular Surgery,First Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
  • Received:2014-11-28 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Libing Wang
引用本文:

王立兵, 冯亮, 何静, 刘博, 田会萍. 乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015, 09(04): 236-241.

Libing Wang, Liang Feng, Jing He, Bo Liu, Huiping Tian. Clinical significance of preserving intercostobrachial nerve in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2015, 09(04): 236-241.

目的

探讨乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)中保留肋间臂神经(ICBN)的临床意义。

方法

前瞻性研究2011年1月至2013年6月石家庄市第一医院收治的228 例乳腺癌患者的临床资料。 其中,乳腺癌ALND 中保留ICBN 的患者有90 例(ICBN 保留组),切除ICBN 的患者有138 例(ICBN 切除组)。 并对两组患者术后1、6、12 个月时上臂内侧及腋窝皮肤的感觉进行观察。 两组患者间感觉异常发生率和上肢水肿发生率的比较采用χ2 检验,淋巴结检出数目的比较采用t 检验。

结果

术后1、6、12 个月时,ICBN 保留组患者感觉异常的发生率分别为42.2%(38/90)、43.3%(39/90)和33.3%(30/90),明显低于ICBN 切除组的84.1% (116/138)、81.2% (112/138)和80.4% (111/138)(χ2=43.491、34.847、51.214,P 均<0.001)。 术后1 个月时,ICBN 保留组患者的主观感觉异常发生率明显低于ICBN 切除组[27.8%(25/90)比46.4%(64/138),χ2=7.918,P=0.005];而在术后6 个月和12 个月时,两组患者的主观感觉异常发生率相似[13.3%(12/90)比21.0%(29/138),χ2 =2.179,P=0.140;8.9%(8/90)比15.2%(21/138),χ2=1.965,P= 0.161]。 术后1、6、12 个月时,ICBN 保留组患者的客观感觉异常发生率均明显低于ICBN 切除组[35.6%(32/90)比76.8%(106/138),41.1%(37/90) 比76.8%(106/138),31.1% (28/90)比76.8%(106/138),χ2=38.807、29.693、46.953, P 均<0.001)。 并且,ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组患者间淋巴结的检出数目相似[(19±4)枚比(18±3)枚,t=1.848,P=0.066],术后上肢水肿的发生率也相似[术后1 个月:11.1%(10/90)比15.2%(21/138),χ2=0.782,P=0.377;术后6 个月:15.6% (14/90)比15.9%(22/138),χ2 =0.006,P=0.938;术后12 个月:16.7%(15/90)比15.9%(22/138),χ2=0.021,P=0.885]。 中位随访14 个月(12 ~41 个月)时,两组患者均未出现局部复发及死亡病例。

结论

乳腺癌ALND 中保留ICBN 在术后早期可以明显降低感觉异常的发生率,在一定程度上提高了患者的生存质量。 并且,手术6 个月以后,保留ICBN 者的客观感觉异常得到明显改善,而主观感觉异常的改善并不明显。

Objective

To investigate the clinical significance of preserving intercostobrachial nerve(ICBN) in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 228 cases of breast cancer in the First Hospital of Shijiazhuang City from 2011 January to 2013 June were prospectively analyzed. ICBN was preserved in 90 cases (ICBN preservation group) and was resected in the other 138 cases (ICBN dissection group) in ALND. The skin sensation inside the affected upper arm and at axillary fossa was recorded at 1,6 and 12 months after surgery. The rates of skin paresthesia and edema of the upper extremity between two groups were compared using χ2 test, the number of detected axillary nodes using t test.

Results

At 1,6 and 12 months after surgery,the incidence of skin paresthesia in ICBN preservation group was 42.2%(38/90),43.3%(39/90)and 33.3%(30/90)respectively, which was significantly lower than that in ICBN dissection group [84.1%(116/138),81.2%(112/138),80.4%(111/138);χ2 =43.491,34.847,51.214;all P<0.001]. The incidence of subjective paresthesia in ICBN preservation group was significantly lower than that in ICBN dissection group at one month after surgery [27.8%(25/90) vs 46.4%(64/138),χ2=7.918,P=0.005].There was no significant difference in the incidence of subjective paresthesia between the two groups at 6 and 12 months after surgery (13.3%(12/90) vs 21.0%(29/138),χ2=2.179,P=0.140;8.9%(8/90) vs 15.2%(21/138),χ2 =1.965,P= 0.161). The incidence of objective paresthesia in ICBN preservation group was significantly lower than that in ICBN dissection group at 1,6 and 12 months after surgery[35.6%(32/90) vs 76.8%(106/138),41.1%(37/90) vs 76.8%(106/138),31.1% (28/90) vs 76.8%(106/138);χ2=38.807,29.693,46.953,all P<0.001]. No significant difference was found in the numbers of detected axillary nodes [(19±4) vs (18±3),t=1.848,P=0.066] and in the incidences of the upper extremity edema between ICBN preservation group and ICBN dissection group [one month after surgery:11.1%(10/90) vs 15.2%(21/138),χ2=0.782,P=0.377;6 months after surgery:15.6% (14/90)vs 15.9%(22/138),χ2=0.006,P=0.938;12 months after surgery:16.7%(15/90) vs 15.9%(22/138),χ2=0.021,P=0.885].No case of local recurrence or death was observed in both groups in the follow-up of 12-41 months (median 14 months).

Conclusions

Preserving the intercostobrachial nerve in ALND can decrease the incidence of the skin paresthesia significantly at early stage after surgery and improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients to some extent. However, at postoperative 6 months, the patients with ICBN preservation show a significant improvement in objective paresthesia, but not in subjective paresthesia.

表1 ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组乳腺癌患者的一般资料
图1 乳腺癌患者的单干型肋间臂神经(箭头所示)
图2 乳腺癌患者的单干分支型肋间臂神经(箭头所示)
图3 乳腺癌患者的Ⅱ干型肋间臂神经(箭头所示)
图4 乳腺癌患者的肋间臂神经(细箭头所示)和第三肋间神经(粗箭头所示)
表2 ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组乳腺癌患者术后上臂内侧及腋窝皮肤的感觉情况
表3 ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组乳腺癌患者术后上臂内侧及腋窝皮肤主观感觉异常的情况
表4 ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组乳腺癌患者术后上臂内侧及腋窝皮肤客观感觉异常的情况
表5 ICBN 保留组与ICBN 切除组乳腺癌患者术后上肢水肿情况
[1]
吴诚义,姚榛祥,吴凯南,等. 乳腺癌腋清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的方法和意义[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2001,6(4):210-212.
[2]
郑桓,石畅,张世伟, 等. 乳腺癌腋淋巴结清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的组织学观察[J]. 中华医学杂志,2014,94(46):3646-3648.
[3]
Freeman SR,Washington SJ, Pritchard T, et al. Long term results of a randomised prospective study of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2003,29(3):213-215.
[4]
McCrrady D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline [J].Can J Surg,2005,48(3):185-194.
[5]
Granek I,Ashikari R,Foley KM. The postmastectomy pain syndrome: clinical and anatomical correlates[J]. Proc ASCO,1984,3 (1):122.
[6]
Temple WT, Ketcham AS.Preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve during axillary dissection for breast cancer[J]. Am J Surg,1985,150(5):585-588.
[7]
Vecht CJ,van de Brand HJ,Wajer OJ. Post-axillary dissection pain in breast cancer due to a lesion of the intercostobrachial nerve[J].Pain,1989,38(2):171-176.
[8]
Abdullah TI,Iddon J,Barr L,et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve during axillary node clearance for breast cancer[J]. Br J Surg,1998,85(10):1443-1445.
[9]
Maycock LA, Dillon P, Dixon JM. Morbidity related to intercostobrachial nerve damage following axillary surgery for breast cancer[J]. Breast,1998,7(4):209-212.
[10]
Taira N, Shimozuma K, Ohsumi S, et al. Impact of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve during axillary dissection on sensory change and health-related quality of life 2 years after breast cancer surgery[J]. Breast Cancer,2014,21(2):183-190.
[11]
王雷, 何俊峰, 彭泉,等. 保留功能神经在乳腺癌根治术中的意义[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志,2011,5(6):400-402.
[12]
陆萍, 施亚周. 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术保留肋间臂神经的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2014,18(11):52-54.
[13]
吴骥, 顾书成, 郑向欣,等. 保留肋间臂神经和胸前神经在乳腺癌改良根治腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志,2014,22(9):656-658.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[11] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要