Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05): 287-291. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.05.007

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Ultrasound-guided venous access port implantation via axillary vein

Ju Qiu1, Jiazhen Sun1, Feng Luo1, Hongyuan Li1, Ming Cai1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2017-03-13 Online:2017-10-01 Published:2024-11-30
  • Contact: Ming Cai

Abstract:

Objective

To discuss the technical skill and clinical safety of ultrasound-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) via axillary vein.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 40 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy via TIVAP (research group) in Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September to December 2016. Fifteen patients were implanted with TIVAP via left axillary vein, and the other 25 were implanted with TIVAP via right axillary vein. Another 50 patients who received TIVAP via internal jugular vein served as control group. The successful rate, proportion of the patients with ≤2 punctures,operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between 2 groups. t test was used to compare the operation time, and Fisher exact probability method was used to compare the rate.

Results

The implantation of TIVAP via axillary vein or internal jugular vein were performed successfully in all cases,with the successful rate of 100% (40/40, 50/50). The operative time in research group was significantly longer than that in control group [(26±4) min vs (22±3) min, t=-5.410, P<0.001]. However, the proportion of the patients with ≤2 punctures, incidence of pneumothorax and incidence of arterial injury showed no significant difference between 2 groups [research group vs control group: 97.5% (39/40) vs 96.0% (48/50), P=1.000; 0(0/40) vs 2.0% (1/50), P=1.000; 0(0/40) vs 4.0% (2/50), P=0.501]. There were no significant differences in thrombosis rate and infection rate between 2 groups [research group vs control group:2.5% (1/40) vs 0(0/50), P=0.444; 2.5% (1/40) vs 2.0% (1/50), P=1.000].

Conclusion

TIVAP implantation via axillary vein approach is a safe and effective technique with relatively low complication rate.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Punctures, Catheters, indwelling, Catheterization, central venous, Axillary vein, Ultrasonography, Totally implantable venous access ports

京ICP 备07035254号-13
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-10-51322630 E-mail: jcbd@medmail.com.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd