Management mode of nursing responsibility group of medical aid team in Hubei province during the COVID-19 pandemic

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.06.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the efficacy of the management mode of nursing responsibility group in medical aid team in the treatment of COVID-19 patients in Hubei province.

Methods

For this prospective study, 48 COVID-19 patients in the 7th unit of Taikang Tongji (Wuhan) Hospital from February 19 to March 3, 2020 were enrolled as the experimental group, and another 48 COVID-19 patients from another unit (randomly extracted from other 18 units) served as the control group. Totally 100 nurses worked for two groups (50 for each group). The nursing function management mode was employed in the control group. The experimental group initially adopted the nursing function management mode and changed to the management mode of nursing responsibility group one week later. The nursing satisfaction questionnaire of patients and job satisfaction questionnaire of nurses were delivered to the patients and nurses in two groups respectively at the initial time of the study (W₀) and 2 weeks after the implementation of nursing responsibility group in the experimental group (W₂). Then the scores of the two groups before and after the implementation were compared. The scores between two groups were compared by the t test of two independent samples, and paired t test was used for comparison within the group.

Results

(1) Patient satisfaction: the satisfaction score of patients in the experimental group at W₂ was significantly higher than that at W₀ (97.1±2.0 vs 92.0±2.6, t=-10.719, P<0.001]; the satisfaction score of patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group at W₂ (97.1±2.0 vs 91.3±1.0, t=-17.750, P<0.001). (2) The job satisfaction of nurses: in the experimental group, the satisfaction score of nurses at W₂ was significantly higher than that at W₀[(72.8±1.4 vs 67.6±1.5, t=-14.591, P<0.001], and the satisfaction score of nurses in the experimental group nurses at W₂ was significantly higher than that in the control group (72.8±1.4 vs 66.4±1.7, t=-17.127, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The management mode of nursing responsibility group in medical aid team can effectively improve patient satisfaction with nursing and job satisfaction of nurses, and promote the nursing quality in special medical tasks.

Key words: Nursing care, Nurses, Organization and administration, COVID-19

Xiaoqing Wu, Dandan Lin, Lei Liu. Management mode of nursing responsibility group of medical aid team in Hubei province during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 349-355.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhrxbzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.06.005

https://zhrxbzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V14/I06/349

Figures/Tables 8

References 16

[1]	武汉市卫生健康委员会．武汉市卫生健康委关于当前我市肺炎疫情的情况通报[EB/OL]. (2019-12-31)[2020-01-30]． URL
[2]	疾病预防控制局. 新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎纳入法定传染病管理[EB/OL]. [2020-01-30]. URL
[3]	郑秋霞，杨峰桃，陈婧婧，等．以组为单位的全程责任制护理模式在重症监护室的实施与效果[J]．解放军护理杂志，2016，33(17): 63-65.
[4]	国家卫生健康委办公厅，国家中医药管理局办公室．关于印发新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎诊疗方案(试行第五版)的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-02-04)[2020-09-04]． URL
[5]	Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB，et al. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRI ME-MD：the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire[J]. JAMA, 1999，282(18): 1737-1744.
[6]	Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW，et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder：the GAD-7[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(10): 1092-1097.
[7]	彭雪，彭渝，肖利，等. 援鄂医疗队阶梯递进式护理排班模式探索与实践[J]．解放军护理杂志，2020，37(2): 10-12.
[8]	刘翔宇，谌永毅，周钰娟，等．住院患者护理服务满意度评价指标体系的构建[J]．中华护理杂志，2015，50(1): 18-21.
[9]	亓莱滨. 李克特量表的统计学分析与模糊综合评判[J]. 山东科学，2006，19(2): 18-23.
[10]	Lu H, While AE, Barriball KL. Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud，2005，42(2): 211-227.
[11]	陆虹．用因子分析测量"护士工作满意度量表"的结构效度[J]．护士进修杂志，2007，22(11): 975-977.
[12]	孙青娟，任海连，陈佳．小组联合干预在糖尿病病人延续护理中的应用[J]. 护理研究，2020，34(5): 916-918.
[13]	樊建楠，田岳凤，焦锐．小组式教学在护理学专业临床课程教学改革中的实践探索[J]．护理研究，2018，32(6): 959-960.
[14]	周静，肖娜．危重症专职护理小组干预提高COPD呼吸衰竭患者序贯机械通气治疗效果[J]．护理学杂志，2017，32(13): 9-11.
[15]	曹岚，王湘，李君，等．营养支持护理专科小组的临床实践效果[J]. 护理学杂志，2016，31(7): 82-84.
[16]	王露，刘丽萍．责任制整体护理的研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 解放军护理杂志，2015，32(23): 32-34.

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	性别[例(%)]		病情[例(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	男	女	重症	轻症
对照组患者	48	42.5±5.5	24(50.0)	24(50.0)	5(10.4)	43(89.6)
研究组患者	48	42.5±5.4	23(47.9)	25(52.1)	6(12.5)	42(87.5)
检验值		t＝-0.027	χ²＝0.042		χ²＝0.103
P值		0.978	0.838		0.749

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	性别[例(%)]		病情[例(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	男	女	重症	轻症
对照组患者	48	42.5±5.5	24(50.0)	24(50.0)	5(10.4)	43(89.6)
研究组患者	48	42.5±5.4	23(47.9)	25(52.1)	6(12.5)	42(87.5)
检验值		t＝-0.027	χ²＝0.042		χ²＝0.103
P值		0.978	0.838		0.749

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	工作年限[例(%)]			职称[例(%)]			学科[例(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	≤5年	>5年且<10年	≥10年	初级	中级	高级	感染相关学科	非感染相关学科
对照组护士	35	31.8±4.0	6(17.1)	25(71.4)	4(11.4)	13(37.1)	20(57.1)	2(5.7)	11(31.4)	24(68.6)
研究组护士	35	33.6±4.5	7(20.0)	24(68.6)	4(11.4)	12(34.2)	22(62.9)	1(2.9)	13(37.1)	22(62.9)
检验值		t＝1.775	Z＝-0.226			Z＝-0.075			χ²＝0.254
P值		0.084	0.821			0.940			0.615

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	工作年限[例(%)]			职称[例(%)]			学科[例(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	≤5年	>5年且<10年	≥10年	初级	中级	高级	感染相关学科	非感染相关学科
对照组护士	35	31.8±4.0	6(17.1)	25(71.4)	4(11.4)	13(37.1)	20(57.1)	2(5.7)	11(31.4)	24(68.6)
研究组护士	35	33.6±4.5	7(20.0)	24(68.6)	4(11.4)	12(34.2)	22(62.9)	1(2.9)	13(37.1)	22(62.9)
检验值		t＝1.775	Z＝-0.226			Z＝-0.075			χ²＝0.254
P值		0.084	0.821			0.940			0.615

组别	例数	W₀	W₂
对照组患者	48	91.4±1.1	91.3±1.1
研究组患者	48	92.0±2.6	97.1±2.0^a
t值		-1.639	-17.750
P值		0.105	<0.001

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export