切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 129 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.03.001

所属专题: 文献

专家论坛

第41届美国圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会重要研究进展解析
张毅1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学西南医院乳腺甲状腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-05 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张毅

Research advancement in the 41st San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Yi Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2019-03-05 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yi, Email:
引用本文:

张毅. 第41届美国圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会重要研究进展解析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 129-136.

Yi Zhang. Research advancement in the 41st San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 129-136.

第41届美国圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会于2018年12月4~8日在美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥如期召开。笔者选取本次大会公布的乳腺癌外科手术治疗、化疗、靶向治疗、免疫治疗及内分泌治疗领域重要的研究数据分别进行解读和分享,以期为临床医师治疗和研究乳腺癌提供思路和参考。EORTC AMAROS研究10年随访数据提示,对于前哨淋巴结活组织检查阳性的原发性乳腺癌患者,采用腋窝放射治疗替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术是安全可行的。3期GEICAM/CIBOMA研究结果显示,早期三阴性乳腺癌患者完成手术和标准化疗后使用卡培他滨辅助治疗,并未显著改善生存。哈佛大学Meta分析结果提示,行新辅助化疗后达到pCR的患者,术后可豁免常规辅助化疗,不影响生存获益。中国邵志敏教授主持的多中心PEONY研究结果显示,在早期或局部晚期的HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗中,帕妥珠单克隆抗体+曲妥珠单克隆抗体+多西他赛双靶向治疗组术后总体pCR率显著高于曲妥珠单克隆抗体+多西他赛单靶向治疗组。KATHERINE研究表明,曲妥珠单克隆抗体-美坦新偶联物对早期HER-2阳性乳腺癌辅助治疗具有重要价值。IMpassion 130研究中,有关免疫学生物标志物亚组疗效评估的探索性分析显示,免疫细胞程序性死亡配体-1阳性表达者接受阿替利珠单克隆抗体联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗后显著获益。PALLET研究结果显示,对绝经后早期的ER阳性、HER-2阴性乳腺癌患者使用新辅助内分泌治疗,来曲唑联合细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂可显著提高Ki67抑制率,但未提高患者的临床缓解率。AERAS研究10年数据显示,阿那曲唑辅助内分泌治疗延长至10年组患者显著获益。EBCTCG Meta分析显示,延长内分泌治疗可显著降低绝经后的激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤复发风险。TAM-01研究结果提示,对于乳腺导管内廇变患者而言,低剂量他莫昔芬可能更具减毒、增效的优势。临床医师应积极推动新型药物的临床研究和生物预测标志物的探索性分析,充分发挥国内的优势,积极学习先进技术和理念,在临床治疗中使乳腺癌患者最大限度获益。

The 41st San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium was held in San Antonio, Texas, USA on December 4-8, 2018. In this article, we reviewed the key advancement in breast cancer surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and endocrine therapy reported in this symposium, in order to provide references for clinicians in the treatment and research of breast cancer. The 10-year follow-up data of the EORTC AMAROS study suggested that axillary radiotherapy was a safe and feasible alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes confirmed by sentinel lymph node biopsy. The result of the phase 3 GEICAM/CIBOMA study showed that in early triple negative breast cancer patients, capecitabine administration after surgery and standard chemotherapy did not significantly improve the patients’ survival. The meta-analysis conducted by researchers in Harvard University suggested that the patients who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be exempted from conventional adjuvant chemotherapy, with no obvious effect on patients’ survival. The multi-center PEONY study conducted by Professor Shao Zhimin in China showed that for neoadjuvant therapy of early or locally advanced HER-2 positive breast cancer patients in Asia, the overall postoperative pCR rate of double-target group (pertuzumab monoclonal antibody + trastuzumab monoclonal antibody + docetaxel) was significantly higher than that of single-target group (trastuzumab monoclonal antibody + docetaxel). The KATHERINE study showed that the trastuzumab monoclonal antibody combined with maitansine conjugate was feasible in the adjuvant treatment of HER-2 positive early breast cancer. An exploratory analysis to evaluate the efficacy of immuno-biomarker subgroups in the IMpassion 130 study showed that the patients with programmed death ligand 1 positive in immunocytes significantly benefited from the treatment of atezolizumab monoclonal antibody + albumin paclitaxel. The PALLET study showed that in postmenopausal early breast cancer patients with ER positive and HER-2 negative, the neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of letrozole combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased the inhibition rate of Ki67, but did not improve the clinical response rate. The 10-year clinical data of the AERAS study showed that the patients significantly benefited from the adjuvant endocrine therapy if the use of anastrozole was extended to 10 years. The meta-analysis of EBCTCG showed that prolonged endocrine therapy significantly reduced the overall risk of recurrence in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. The TAM-01 study suggested that low-dose administration of tamoxifen could reduce the toxicity and improve the efficacy in patients with breast intraductal neoplasms. The clinicians should actively promote the clinical research of new drugs and the exploratory analysis of predictive biomarkers, take the advantages of domestic researches and learn advanced techniques and concepts overseas in order to benefit most of breast cancer patients.

[1]
Dominici LS, Hu J, King TA, et al. Local therapy and quality of life outcomes in young women with breast cancer[EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[2]
Song CG, Lin YX, Zhang J, et al. Impact of surgery on survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer: A population-based study from the SEER database [EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[3]
Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010,11(10):927-933.
[4]
Donker M, van Tienhoven G,Straver ME,et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2014,15(12):1303-1310.
[5]
Rutgers EJ, Donker M, Poncet C, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer patients: 10 year follow up results of the EORTC AMAROS trial (EORTC 10981/22023)[EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[6]
Qi X, Yuan L, Zhang Y,et al. Comparison of sentinel lymph node detection performances using methylene blue in conjunction with indocyanine green or radioisotope in breast cancer patients: A prospective single-center cohort study[EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[7]
Joensuu H,Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL,Huovinen R, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine in combination with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide for early breast cancer: The randomized clinical FinXX trial[J]. JAMA Oncol,2017,3(6):793-800.
[8]
Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy[J]. N Eng J Med,2017,376(22):2147-2159.
[9]
Cameron D, Morden JP, Canney P, et al. Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2017,18(7):929-945.
[10]
Mathew A,Brufsky A. TACT2: improving treatment tolerability in early breast cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol,2017,18(7):843-845.
[11]
Martn M, Barrios CH, Torrecillas L, et al. Efficacy results from CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 study: A randomized phase Ⅲ trial assessing adjuvant capecitabine after standard chemotherapy for patients with early triple negative breast cancer[EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[12]
Gradishar WJ,Tjulandin S,Davidson N,et al. Phase Ⅲ trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol,2005,23(31):7794-7803.
[13]
Guan ZZ, Li QL, Feng F,et al. Superior efficacy of a cremophor-free albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with solvent-based paclitaxel in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol,2009,5: 165-174.
[14]
Gradishar WJ, Krasnojon D, Cheporov S,et al. Significantly longer progression-free survival with nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(22):3611-3619.
[15]
NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南(中国版)专家组.NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南(中国版) [EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[16]
Untch M,Jackisch C,Schneeweiss A,et al. Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2016,17(3):345-356.
[17]
Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27 000 patients [EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[18]
Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel+carboplatin vs nab-paclitaxel+gemcitabine in triple-negative breast cancer: randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN trial results[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2018,110(6):628-637.
[19]
Morante Z, Ruiz R, De la Cruz-Ku G, et al. Impact of the delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the outcomes of triple negative breast cancer [EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[20]
Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH,et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER-2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2012,13(1):25-32.
[21]
von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E,et al. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2017,377(2):122-131.
[22]
Shao Z, Pang D, Yang H, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting:Efficacy and safety analysis of a randomized phase Ⅲ study in Asian patients (PEONY) [EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[23]
李健斌,江泽飞. 乳腺癌从"新辅助治疗"到"术前治疗"的理念和实践[J]. 临床外科杂志,2016,24(1):14-17.
[24]
von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS,et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER-2-positive breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2019,380(7):617-628.
[25]
Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B,et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial [J]. Lancet Oncol,2017,18(12):1688-1700.
[26]
叶青,江泽飞.三阴性乳腺癌精准治疗的机遇[J].中国肿瘤临床,2016,43(24): 1074-1077.
[27]
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS,et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2018,379(22):2108-2121.
[28]
Schmid P. ESMO 2018 presidential symposium-IMpassion130: atezolizumab+nab-paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. ESMO Open,2018,3(6):e000453.
[29]
Kok M, Winer E, Loi S. Passion for Immune checkpoint blockade in triple negative breast cancer? Comment on the IMpassion130 study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2019,30(1):13-16.
[30]
Emens LA, Loi S, Rugo HS,et al. IMpassion130: Efficacy in immune biomarker subgroups from the global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ⅲ study of atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel in patients with treatment-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer[EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[31]
王晓迪,江泽飞.再议乳腺癌治疗10项热点问题[J].中国癌症杂志,2017,27(10):822-828.
[32]
Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I,et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol,2016,17(4):425-439.
[33]
Johnston S, Puhalla S, Wheatley D, et al. Randomized phase Ⅱ study evaluating palbociclib in addition to letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: PALLET trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2019,37(3):178-189.
[34]
Ohtani S, Iijima K, Higaki K, et al. A prospective randomized multi-center open-label phase Ⅲ trial of extending aromatase-inhibitor adjuvant therapy to 10 years-Results from 1697 postmenopausal women in the N-SAS BC 05 trial: Arimidex extended adjuvant randomized study (AERAS)[EB/OL].[2019-01-01].

URL    
[35]
Gray R, Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of prolonging adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy beyond five years on recurrence and cause-specific mortality: An EBCTCG meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials including 24 912 women[EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[36]
Lemieux J, Brundage MD, Parulekar WR, et al. Quality of life from Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA. 17R: a randomized trial of extending adjuvant letrozole to 10 years[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(6):563-571.
[37]
Mamounas EP, Bandos H, Lembersky BC, et al. Abstract S1-05: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (tx) with letrozole (L) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor (+) breast cancer (BC) who have completed previous adjuvant tx with an aromatase inhibitor (AI): Results from NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 [EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[38]
Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Hellemond IEG, Peer PGM,et al. Extended adjuvant aromatase inhibition after sequential endocrine therapy (DATA): a randomised, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2017,18(11):1502-1511.
[39]
Blok EJ, van de Velde CJH, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg EM, et al. Abstract S1-04: Optimal duration of extended letrozole treatment after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy; results of the randomized phase Ⅲ IDEAL trial (BOOG 2006-05) [EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[40]
DeCensi A, Puntoni M, Guerrieri Gonzaga A, et al. A randomized placebo controlled phase Ⅲ trial of low dose tamoxifen for the prevention of recurrence in women with operated hormone sensitive breast ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ[EB/OL]. [2019-01-01].

URL    
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 王昌前, 林婷婷, 宁雨露, 王颖杰, 谭文勇. 光免疫治疗在肿瘤领域的临床应用新进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 575-583.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?