切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 160 -164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2018.03.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

空芯针穿刺活组织检查对乳腺占位性病变诊断的临床价值
谭璇妮1, 陈显春1, 张婷1, 姜军1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学西南医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-26 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 姜军

Clinical value of core-needle biopsy in diagnosis of breast space-occupying lesions

Xuanni Tan1, Xianchun Chen1, Ting Zhang1, Jun Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2017-10-26 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Jun, Email:
引用本文:

谭璇妮, 陈显春, 张婷, 姜军. 空芯针穿刺活组织检查对乳腺占位性病变诊断的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 160-164.

Xuanni Tan, Xianchun Chen, Ting Zhang, Jun Jiang. Clinical value of core-needle biopsy in diagnosis of breast space-occupying lesions[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 160-164.

目的

探讨空芯针穿刺活组织检查(CNB)在乳腺占位性病变诊断中的准确性及其临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年12月陆军军医大学西南医院乳腺外科收治的691例乳腺占位性病变患者的临床资料。全部患者均行术前CNB及手术治疗,对比CNB与术后病理结果。以术后病理诊断结果为金标准,评估CNB的敏感度和特异度,采用Kappa检验分析CNB与术后病理诊断的一致性。采用χ2检验比较CNB对高危病变与DCIS的低估率。

结果

CNB与术后病理诊断的一致率为96.0%(663/691),假阴性率为4.9%(28/571),敏感度为95.1%(543/571),特异度为100%(120/120),阳性预测值为100%(543/543),阴性预测值为81.1%(120/148),约登指数为0.951,两者一致性较高(Kappa=0.871,P<0.001)。CNB对DCIS、高危病变的低估率分别是27.8%(15/54)、45.0%(18/40),两者差异没有统计学意义(χ2=2.992,P=0.084)。691例患者经手术确诊为乳腺叶状肿瘤有17例,而术前CNB诊断为叶状肿瘤有3例。另外,44.4%(16/36)的不典型导管增生患者经术后确诊后为恶性肿瘤。

结论

CNB诊断乳腺占位性病变的准确性较高,但也存在假阴性和组织学低估的情况,必要时需要手术切除活组织检查明确诊断。

Objective

To investigate the accuracy and clinical value of core-needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast space-occupying lesions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 691 patients with breast space-occupying lesions in the Department of Breast Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University from January 2012 to December 2016. All patients underwent preoperative CNB and surgical treatment. The preoperative CNB results were compared with postoperative pathological results. With the postoperative pathological result as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CNB were evaluated. Kappa test was used to analyze the consistency of CNB with postoperative pathology. χ2 test was used to compare the underestimation rates of high-risk lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ by CNB.

Results

The coincidence rate between CNB and postoperative pathological result was 96.0% (663/691), the false negative rate 4.9% (28/571), the sensitivity 95.1%(543/571), the specificity 100%(120/120), the positive predictive value 100%(543/543), the negative predictive value 81.1%(120/148) and the Yoden index 0.951, indicating a high consistency (Kappa=0.871, P<0.001). The underestimation rates of CNB on ductal carcinoma in situ and high-risk lesions were 27.8% (15/54) and 45.0% (18/40), respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (χ2=2.992, P=0.084). In all patients, 17 patients were diagnosed with lobular tumor by surgery, and among them, three patients had the accurate diagnosis by preoperative CNB. Additionally, 44.4% (16/36) of patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia were diagnosed with malignant tumor after surgery.

Conclusions

CNB has a high accuracy in the diagnosis of breast space-occupying lesions, but there are false negative cases and histological underestimates. If necessary, a surgical resection biopsy is recommended for a definitive diagnosis.

表1 691例乳腺占位性病变患者CNB病理结果分布情况
表2 691例乳腺占位性病变患者术后病理结果分布情况
表3 691例乳腺占位性病变患者CNB与术后病理诊断结果比较(例)
[1]
Gurdal SO, Kostanoglu A, Cavdar I, et al. Comparison of intermittent pneumatic compression with manual lymphatic drainage for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Lymphatic Res Biol, 2012, 10(3): 129-135.
[2]
肖坚,陈文新,陈春明. 空芯针穿刺活组织检查在46例乳腺疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 福建医药杂志,2009, 31(5):88-89.
[3]
姜军.现代乳腺外科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:150.
[4]
Brem RF, Mehta AK, Thomas GM. High-risk lesions at minimally invasive breast biopsy: now what[J].Curr Radiol Rep, 2017, 5: 45.
[5]
吴剑,王品,唐艳,等.应用生物阻抗谱检测法快速鉴定乳腺肿物良恶性的技术[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2017,11(4):203-207.
[6]
Boba M, Kotun U, Bobek-Billewicz B, et al. False-negative results of breast core needle biopsies-retrospective analysis of 988 biopsies[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2011, 76(1): 25-29.
[7]
Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, et al. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 242(5): 701-707.
[8]
何亦波. 乳腺癌超声引导下16G空芯针穿刺病理诊断及免疫组化价值的评估[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2017.
[9]
周洁莹. 乳腺病变超声引导下空芯针穿刺活检诊断价值的临床研究[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军医学院,2014.
[10]
Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions[J]. Arch Surg, 2000, 135(6): 700-703
[11]
Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, et al. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? [J]. Am J Surg, 2000, 180(4): 313-315.
[12]
Mendez I, Andreu FJ, Saez E, et al. Ductal carcinomain situ and atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core biopsy[J]. Breast J, 2001, 7(1): 14-18.
[13]
Magnanini RO, Klem DA, Huston BJ, et al. Upgrade rate of core biopsy-determined atypical ductal hyperplasia by open excisional biopsy[J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 182(4): 355-358.
[14]
Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia[J]. Radiology, 1994, 193(1): 91-95.
[15]
O'hea BJ, Tornos C. Mild ductal atypia after large-core needle biopsy of the breast: is surgical excision always necessary? [J]. Surgery, 2000, 128(4): 738-743.
[16]
Renshaw AA. Adequate histologic sampling of breast core needle biopsies [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2001, 125(8): 1055-1057.
[17]
曹淑娟. 超声引导下空芯针活检对乳腺肿块的诊断价值[D]. 济南:山东大学,2010.
[18]
魏建南. 乳腺导管上皮内瘤变的影像鉴别诊断及真空辅助活检的组织学低估研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2012.
[19]
Lee AH, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, et al. Histological features useful in the distinction of phyllodes tumour and fibroadenoma on needle core biopsy of the breast [J]. Histopathology, 2007, 51(3): 336-344.
[20]
王晨辰. 乳腺分叶状肿瘤术前空芯针活检的辅助诊断意义及术后复发风险因素的研究[D]. 上海:复旦大学,2014.
[21]
Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review [J]. Histopathology, 2016, 68(1): 5-21.
[1] 朱洪宇, 曹越, 赵鑫洋, 周毅. 三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.
[2] 李婷婷, 崔翔, 刘静, 吴鑫, 杨汐, 陈莉. 新型脐周按钮式切口在横向腹直肌肌瓣乳房重建中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 347-352.
[3] 李昌金, 顾昊煜, 白辰光, 胡薇. 以腋窝肿块为主要表现的免疫球蛋白G4相关疾病三例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 254-257.
[4] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[5] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[6] 石静, 陈龙舟, 于倩, 高峥嵘, 陆澄. 腺体瓣成形术在病理性乳头溢液手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 691-693.
[7] 唐丹萍, 王萍, 江孟蝶, 杨晓蓉. 自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 582-585.
[8] 刘虹, 王品, 王彬, 任杰超, 张文杰, 吴剑, 刘莹. 经腋窝腔镜辅助保留乳头乳晕皮下腺体切除术+Ⅰ期胸肌前假体乳房重建术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 419-422.
[9] 金从稳, 陈霖霖, 刘浩, 余有声, 陈本鑫. 超声联合细针穿刺定位在乳腺微小病灶切除中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 423-426.
[10] 张茴, 李一, 代美玲. 植入物在乳房重建中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 349-352.
[11] 齐立强. 新辅助化疗后左乳腺癌改良根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 257-257.
[12] 白雪, 陈宏业, 司惠妍, 刘小涵, 张提. 小切口保留乳头的乳房切除(NSM)腋窝淋巴结清扫即刻扩张器置入术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 256-256.
[13] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. 基于决策曲线分析血清E-cad、HIF-1α预测乳腺癌改良根治术治疗预后的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 272-275.
[14] 范拥国, 吕勇刚, 杨晓民, 王虎霞, 陈楠, 贺赛, 侯艳妮, 赵静, 张静远, 韩丕华. 不同方案乳房重建术患者报告结局及并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 262-266.
[15] 肖体先, 刘骞, 宋京海. 乳房外Paget病脾转移一例报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 717-719.
阅读次数
全文


摘要