切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 152 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2024.03.004

论著

三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症
朱洪宇1, 曹越1, 赵鑫洋1, 周毅1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-01 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 周毅

Three-hole total endoscopy for treatment of moderate to severe gynecomastia

Hongyu Zhu1, Yue Cao1, Xinyang Zhao1, Yi Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2023-11-01 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi Zhou
引用本文:

朱洪宇, 曹越, 赵鑫洋, 周毅. 三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.

Hongyu Zhu, Yue Cao, Xinyang Zhao, Yi Zhou. Three-hole total endoscopy for treatment of moderate to severe gynecomastia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.

目的

比较三孔全腔镜下皮下腺体切除术对中重度男性乳房发育症(GYN)的治疗效果。

方法

按照纳入及排除标准,纳入2022年6月至2023年6月就诊于哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院乳腺外科的全部GYN患者103例。其中,40例行开放手术(开放组),63例行三孔全腔镜手术。为减少误差,采用随机数字表法从63例行三孔全腔镜手术的患者中抽取40例作为腔镜组进行分析。术后6个月时测评患者满意度。采用独立样本t检验比较2组的手术相关指标、患者满意度和术后腺体指标。

结果

腔镜组切口长度明显低于开放组(t=-3.538,P<0.001),2组BMI、手术时间、出血量及引流管放置时间差异均无统计学意义(t=0.943、-1.425、0.102、0.116,P均>0.050)。腔镜组患者满意度、医师满意度、第三方满意度、总体满意度、加权满意度腔镜组均高于开放组(t=4.065、3.141、3.953、4.405、4.400,P均<0.050)。在术后并发症方面,腔镜组有1例早期出现部分乳头乳晕表皮缺血,开放组4例;腔镜组有1例术后手术区域感觉麻木,开放组3例;2组各有1例出现术后积液;腔镜组有2例术后局部皮下气肿。2组发育腺体半径、手术切除半径、术前凸度、术后凸度比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.813、0.822、0.121、0.153, P均>0.050)。

结论

三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度GYN安全、有效、美观,患者满意度较高,是一种可行的外科治疗方式。

Objective

To compare the therapeutic effect of three-port total laparoscopic subcutaneous gland resection in the treatment of moderate to severe gynecomastia (GYN).

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we enrolled a total of 103 GYN patients in the Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from June 2022 to June 2023, including 40 patients who underwent open surgery (open surgery group) and 63 patients who underwent three-port total endoscopic surgery. In order to reduce the bias, 40 patients were selected from 63 patients receiving three-port total endoscopic surgery using random number table as endoscopic surgery group. Patient satisfaction was assessed 6 months after surgery. The independent-sample t test was used to compare surgery-related parameters, patient satisfaction and postoperative gland-related parameters between two groups.

Results

The incision length in endoscopic surgery group was significantly lower than that in open surgery group (t=-3.538, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in BMI, operation time, blood loss and drainage duration between two groups (t=0.943, -1.425, 0.102, 0.116, all P>0.050). The patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, third-party satisfaction, overall satisfaction and weighted satisfaction in endoscopic surgery group were significantly higher than those in open surgery group (t=4.065, 3.141, 3.953, 4.405, 4.400, all P<0.050). In terms of postoperative complications, nipple-areolar epidermal ischemia occurred in one case of endoscopic surgery group and 4 cases of open surgery group; numbness in surgical area was observed in one case of endoscopic surgery group and 3 cases of open surgery group; postoperative effusion occurred in one patient of each group; 2 cases had localized subcutaneous emphysemain in endoscopic surgery group. There were no significant differences in preoperative gland radius, radius of surgical resection, preoperative convexity and postoperative convexity between two groups (t=0.813, 0.822, 0.121, 0.153, all P>0.050).

Conclusion

Three-port total endoscopic surgery is a feasible surgical treatment for moderate to severe GYN, with the advantages of safety, effectiveness, good aesthetic effect and high patient satisfaction.

图1 三孔全腔镜手术前切口标记注:腋中线与乳头水平交点为10 mm切口处(观察孔),距此处上下3~4 cm为5 mm切口处
图2 三孔全腔镜手术术中操作图注:于腋中线乳头水平处沿皮肤纹理方向取1个10 mm切口,用于放置30°镜头作为观察孔(居中的戳卡),于此切口上下两侧3~4 cm处取2个5 mm切口,用于放置腔镜电钩或腔镜钳作为操作孔(两侧的戳卡)
图3 三孔全腔镜手术后6个月顺皮纹切口外观
表1 两组男性乳房发育症患者的临床指标对比
表2 两组男性乳房发育症患者的术后满意度对比
表3 两组男性乳房发育症患者的腺体相关指标对比
图4 接受三孔全腔镜手术的男性乳房发育症患者的乳房外观注:a、b、c图分别为三孔全腔镜手术患者术前、术后1周、术后6个月的外观对比
[1]
Rahmani S, Turton P, Shaaban A, et al. Overview of gynecomastia in the modern era and the Leeds Gynaecomastia Investigation algorithm[J]. Breast J, 2011, 17(3):246- 255.
[2]
Kanakis GA, Nordkap L, Bang AK, et al. EAA clinical practice guidelines-gynecomastia evaluation and management[J]. Andrology20197(6):778-793.
[3]
Sollie M. Management of gynecomastia-changes in psychological aspects after surgery-a systematic review[J]. Gland Surg20187(Suppl 1):S70-S76.
[4]
Varlet F, Esposito C, Scalabre A,et al. Pediatric endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (pesma) with liposuction in adolescents with gynecomastia[J]. Surg Endosc202337(1):766-773.
[5]
Wang Y, Wang J, Liu L,et al. Comparison of curative effects between mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection (MAMIR) and traditional open surgery for gynecomastia in Chinese patients: a prospective clinical study[J]. Breast J201925(6):1084-1089.
[6]
Tripathy S, Likhyani A, Sharma R, et al. Prospective analysis and comparison of periareolar excision (delivery) technique and pullthroughtechnique for the treatment of gynecomastia[J]. AestheticPlast Surg, 202044(3):653-661.
[7]
Shang F, Zhao Z, Li Z, Liu B. The combination of endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction (Liu and Shang’s 2-hole 7-step method) as the treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Surgery2023174(2):159-165.
[8]
Wyrick DL, Roberts M, Young ZT,et al. Changing practices: the addition of a novel surgical approach to gynecomastia[J]. Am J Surg, 2018216(3):547-550.
[9]
Yao Y, Yang Y, Liu J, et al. Vacuum-assisted minimally invasive surgery-an innovative method for the operative treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Surgery2019166(5):934-939.
[10]
Fricke A, Lehner GM, Stark GB, et al. Long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg201741(3):491-498.
[11]
陈达丰,周松,金娥,等.三种术式治疗男性乳房发育症临床对比分析[J].医学理论与实践201629(22):3043-3044+3047.
[12]
Jian C, Wu L, Lin L, et al. Single-port endoscopic mastectomy via the lateral chest approach for the treatment of grade II gynecomastia[J]. Medicine (Baltimore)2020, 99(22):e20100.
[13]
吕晨光,郭一君,何淼,等.免溶脂技术经腋窝腔镜手术治疗男性乳房发育症效果研究[J].创伤与急危重病医学202210(5):385-386.
[14]
杨婷,欧阳杰,梁卓虹,等.腋窝入路单孔腔镜法治疗男性乳房发育症的临床报告[J].临床普外科电子杂志202210(3):51-54.
[15]
Holzmer SW, Lewis PG, Landau MJ, et al. Surgical management of gynecomastia: a comprehensive review of the literature[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2020, 8(10):e3161
[1] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[2] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[3] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[4] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[5] 张蕾, 彭超, 周应芳. 直肠阴道隔子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 257-261.
[6] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[7] 李干斌, 侯睿, 郭雅萍, 张潇, 邱小原, 牛备战, 林国乐. 改良经辅助切口回肠造口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 271-276.
[8] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中国专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 193-198.
[9] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[10] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[11] 孙鹏, 陈瑛罡. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门取标本的腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 347-352.
[12] 曹文钰, 郭鹏, 李锦平. 微创手术及非手术方式治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 304-309.
[13] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[14] 吕东, 朱盛, 胡秋平, 徐如祥. 腹腔镜下直肠癌手术并发颅内静脉窦血栓一例报道[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 250-253.
[15] 王嘉巍, 张广健, 杜昊楠, 余宸傲, 张佳. 混合现实技术在肺结节手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 254-259.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?