切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -22. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

转录因子叉头框C1在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其与患者预后的关系
沈松杰1, 任新瑜2, 徐雅莉1, 周易冬1, 孙强1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院乳腺外科
    2. 100730 中国医学科学院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-27 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 孙强
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7172168); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(3332018020)

Expression and prognostic value of transcription factor forkhead box C1 in triple negative breast cancer

Songjie Shen1, Xinyu Ren2, Yali Xu1, Yidong Zhou1, Qiang Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2019-09-27 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Qiang, Email:
引用本文:

沈松杰, 任新瑜, 徐雅莉, 周易冬, 孙强. 转录因子叉头框C1在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其与患者预后的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 18-22.

Songjie Shen, Xinyu Ren, Yali Xu, Yidong Zhou, Qiang Sun. Expression and prognostic value of transcription factor forkhead box C1 in triple negative breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 18-22.

目的

探讨转录因子叉头框C1(FOXC1)在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中的表达及其与患者预后的关系。

方法

回顾性分析2002年3月至2012年3月在中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院进行乳腺癌改良根治术或保留乳房手术的TNBC患者临床资料。患者随访截止日期为2019年3月1日。选择符合纳入、排除标准且有复发、转移或随访10年以上无复发、转移的患者,提取乳腺癌原发灶组织RNA进行分析。排除标本不足或RNA提取质控不达标的患者后,最终有59例(27例无复发、转移,32例复发、转移)标本通过定量反转录聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)检测FOXC1表达量。患者临床特征的分析采用χ2检验或非参数检验(Mann-Witney U检验);复发、转移组与无复发、转移组患者年龄及FOXC1表达量(ΔCT值)的比较采用t检验;多因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型;患者生存率的比较采用log-rank检验。

结果

复发、转移组与无复发、转移组患者比较,年龄、肿瘤大小、组织学分级、P53、Ki67表达和脉管癌栓的差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.226,P=0.165;χ2=1.923,P=0.165;Z=-1.694,P=0.090;χ2=0.336,P=0.562;P=1.000;P=1.000),但复发、转移组患者腋窝淋巴结转移的比例更高[75.0% (24/32)比40.7% (11/27),χ2=7.123,P=0.008]。复发、转移组FOXC1表达量是无复发、转移组的2.7倍,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(ΔCT值:4.064±1.392比5.510±1.581,t=3.737,P<0.001)。多因素分析提示,FOXC1高表达是TNBC患者无复发生存(RFS)的独立危险因素(HR=2.531,95%CI:1.211~5.290,P=0.014),而临床上常用的病理指标,仅淋巴结转移与RFS相关(HR=2.453,95%CI:1.093~5.504,P=0.030)。FOXC1高表达的TNBC患者,其RFS和OS都更差(RFS:χ2=8.419,P=0.004;OS:χ2=4.644,P=0.031)。

结论

FOXC1高表达患者出现复发、转移的风险显著增加,可以作为TNBC预后细分的有用指标。

Objective

To investigate the expression of the transcription factor forkhead box C1 (FOXC1) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its prognostic value.

Methods

TNBC patients who received modified radical mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2002 and March 2012 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The last follow-up date was March 1, 2019. Archived specimens of primary breast cancer were collected for RNA extraction from those who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were recurrence-free for more than 10 years, and those who had an early recurrence or metastasis. RNA extraction was successful in specimens of 59 patients (27 without recurrence or metastasis, and 32 with recurrence or metastasis), excluding those with insufficient specimens or failure in quality control of RNA extraction. The FOXC1 mRNA expression of the specimens was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The χ2 test or nonparametric test (Mann-Witney U test) was used in the comparison of enumeration data and the t test was used in the comparison of age and FOXC1 expression level (ΔCT value) between the recurrent and the non-recurrent groups. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. The survival rate was compared by the log-rank test.

Results

There was no significant difference in age, tumor size, histological grade, P53 status, Ki67 expression and peritumoral vascular invasion between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups (t=-0.226, P=0.165; χ2=1.923, P=0.165; Z=-1.694, P=0.090; χ2=0.336, P=0.562; P=1.000; P=1.000). However, the rate of lymph node metastasis was higher in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group[75.0% (24/32) vs 40.7% (11/27), χ2=7.123, P=0.008]. The expression level of FOXC1 in the recurrent group was 2.7 times as high as that in the non-recurrent group (ΔCT value: 4.064±1.392 vs 5.510±1.581, t=3.737, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that high FOXC1 expression was an independent risk factor of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in TNBC patients (HR=2.531, 95%CI: 1.211-5.290, P=0.014). The traditional pathological factors, except lymph node status (HR=2.453, 95%CI: 1.093-5.504, P=0.030), did not reach significant difference to predict recurrence and metastasis. The patients with high expression of FOXC1 had worse RFS and OS (RFS: χ2=8.419, P=0.004; OS: χ2=4.644, P=0.031).

Conclusion

Patients with high expression of FOXC1 are at increased risk of recurrence and metastasis, so FOXC1 can be used as a candidate prognostic marker for TNBC patients.

表1 乳腺癌患者无复发生存影响因素的Cox比例风险回归模型变量赋值表
表2 59例乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征(例)
表3 采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析乳腺癌患者无复发生存的相关因素(n=59)
图1 FOXC1低表达组与高表达组三阴性乳腺癌患者的生存曲线 a图为2组患者间无复发生存曲线比较;b图为2组患者间总生存曲线比较
[1]
Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast cancer treatment: a review [J]. JAMA, 2019,321(3):288-300.
[2]
Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: Challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2016,13(11):674-690.
[3]
沈松杰,孙强,周易冬,等. 三阴性乳腺癌预后相关因素分析 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2013,51(11):1000-1004.
[4]
Shen S, Sun Q, Liang Z, et al. A prognostic model of triple-negative breast cancer based on mir-27b-3p and node status [J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(6):e100664.
[5]
Park YH, Lee SJ, Cho EY, et al. Clinical relevance of tnm staging system according to breast cancer subtypes [J]. Ann Oncol, 2011,22(7):1554-1560.
[6]
Gilding LN, Somervaille TCP. The diverse consequences of FOXC1 deregulation in cancer [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2019,11(2):184.
[7]
Han B, Bhowmick N, Qu Y, et al. Foxc1: An emerging marker and therapeutic target for cancer [J]. Oncogene, 2017,36(28):3957-3963.
[8]
Han B, Zhou B, Qu Y, et al. Foxc1-induced non-canonical WNT5A-MMP7 signaling regulates invasiveness in triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Oncogene, 2018,37(10):1399-1408.
[9]
Elian FA, Yan E, Walter MA. Foxc1, the new player in the cancer sandbox [J]. Oncotarget, 2018,9(8):8165-8178.
[10]
Pan H, Peng Z, Lin J, et al. Forkhead box C1 boosts triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through activating the transcription of chemokine receptor-4 [J]. Cancer Sci, 2018,109(12):3794-3804.
[11]
Wang J, Ray PS, Sim MS, et al. Foxc1 regulates the functions of human basal-like breast cancer cells by activating nf-kappab signaling [J]. Oncogene, 2012,31(45):4798-4802.
[12]
Chung S, Jin Y, Han B, et al. Identification of egf-nf-kappab-foxc1 signaling axis in basal-like breast cancer [J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2017,15(1):22.
[13]
Yu-Rice Y, Jin Y, Han B, et al. Foxc1 is involved in ERα silencing by counteracting GATA3 binding and is implicated in endocrine resistance [J]. Oncogene, 2016,35(41):5400-5411.
[14]
Wang J, Xu Y, Li L, et al. Foxc1 is associated with estrogen receptor alpha and affects sensitivity of tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer [J]. Cancer Med, 2017,6(1):275-287.
[15]
Hirukawa A, Smith HW, Zuo D, et al. Targeting EZH2 reactivates a breast cancer subtype-specific anti-metastatic transcriptional program [J]. Nat Commun, 2018,9(1):2547.
[16]
Jensen TW, Ray T, Wang J, et al. Diagnosis of basal-like breast cancer using a foxc1-based assay [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2015,107(8):djv148.
[17]
Zon G, Barker MA, Kaur P, et al. Formamide as a denaturant for bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA: Bisulfite sequencing of the GSTPi and RARbeta2 genes of 43 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate cancer specimens [J]. Anal Biochem, 2009,392(2):117-125.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[9] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[10] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[11] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[12] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要