切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 282 -286. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2016.05.006

论著

乳腺超声BI-RADS 4A 级病变良恶性的回顾性分析
陈匆聪1, 徐雷1, 祝兰华1, 杨旭1,(), 邵国安1, 刘强1   
  1. 1.830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第五附属医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-09 出版日期:2016-10-01
  • 通信作者: 杨旭

Retrospective study on benign or malignant BI-RADS 4A breast lesions

Congcong Chen1, Lei Xu1, Lanhua Zhu1, Xu Yang1,(), Guoan Shao1, Qiang Liu1   

  1. 1.Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2016-06-09 Published:2016-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xu Yang
引用本文:

陈匆聪, 徐雷, 祝兰华, 杨旭, 邵国安, 刘强. 乳腺超声BI-RADS 4A 级病变良恶性的回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(05): 282-286.

Congcong Chen, Lei Xu, Lanhua Zhu, Xu Yang, Guoan Shao, Qiang Liu. Retrospective study on benign or malignant BI-RADS 4A breast lesions[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(05): 282-286.

目的

寻找超声BI-RADS 4A 级乳腺病变良恶性鉴别的证据,从而探讨部分BI-RADS 4A级乳腺病变患者选择随访的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2015 年1 月至2016 年4 月在新疆医科大学第五附属医院经乳腺超声诊断为BI-RADS 4A 级病变且完成手术治疗的63 例患者的超声图像特征及其相关临床资料。 其中,经病理证实的良性病变有48 例(良性病变组),恶性病变有15 例(恶性病变组)。分析患者的年龄、初潮年龄、流产史、病变部位、是否为多发病灶,超声图中病变的直径、边界、形态和内部血流,以及X 线检查结果与病变良恶性的关系。 先采用χ2 检验和Fisher 确切概率法分析患者乳腺病变性质与临床病理特征的关系(单因素分析),然后,采用逐步Logistic 回归方法进行多因素分析。

结果

单因素分析显示,在恶性病变组中,病变位于外上、外下、内上及内下象限者分别占11/15、4/15、0/15 和0/15,而在良性病变组中,病变位于外上、外下、内上及内下象限者分别占22.9%(11/48)、39.6%(19/48)、27.1% (13/48)和10.4% (5/48),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2 =13.111,P=0.003),其中外上象限病变为恶性的可能性大于内上象限病变(P<0.008)。 并且,在恶性病变组中,超声显示病变直径≥2.0 cm、边界不清、内部存在血流,以及X 线检查提示可疑恶性者分别占9/15、14/15、10/15 和6/15,明显高于良性病变组的14.6%(7/48)、14.6%(7/48)、16.7%(8/48)和12.5%(6/48)(χ2=10.160、31.894、11.657、3.964,P 均<0.050)。 逐步Logistic 回归分析显示,相对于直径<2.0 cm、边界清晰、内部无血流的BI-RADS 4A 级病变而言,超声显示病变直径≥2.0 cm、边界不清、内部存在血流是超声BI-RADS 4A 级乳腺恶性病变的证据(OR=22.162,95%CI:2.083 ~235.756,P=0.010;OR=121.694,95%CI:8.670 ~1708.145,P<0.001;OR=17.400,95%CI:1.779 ~170.218,P=0.014)。

结论

对于乳腺超声提示病变直径<2.0 cm、边界清晰、内部无血流的BI-RADS 4A 级患者,可以进行密切随访、观察,不必立即行穿刺活组织检查或手术。

Objective

To search the evidences to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions,and evaluate the feasibility of follow-up in some BI-RADS 4A patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the ultrasound characteristics and related clinical data of 63 patients who were diagnosed with BI-RADS 4A breast lesions by ultrasound and underwent surgery in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University from January 2015 to April 2016. In these 63 patients, there were 48 patients with benign lesions (benign group) and 15 with malignant lesions (malignant group) confirmed by pathological diagnosis. Patients' age,age at menarche, abortion history, location of lesion, multiple lesions, diameter, margin, shape, internal blood flow of lesions in ultrasonography and X-ray characteristics were analyzed to evaluate their relationship with malignancy of breast lesions. χ2 test and Fisher exact test were firstly used to analyze the relationship of lesion malignancy with clinicopathological characteristics for univariate analysis, and then stepwise Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that the lesions in upper outer quadrant, lower outer quadrant, upper inner quadrant and lower inner quadrant accounted for 11/15,4/15,0/15 and 0/15 in malignant group,22.9%(11/48),39.6%(19/48), 27.1%(13/48) and 10.4%(5/48)in benign group, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=13.111,P=0.003).The possibility of malignant lesions in upper outer quadrant was significantly higher than that in upper inner quadrant (P<0.008). In malignant group, the proportion of malignant lesions in the patients with lesion diameter ≥2 cm, obscure boundary, blood flow within the lesions and malignancy indicated by X-ray was 9/15, 14/15, 10/15 and 6/15 respectively, significantly higher than 14.6% (7/48), 14.6% (7/48),16.7%(8/48)and 12.5%(6/48) in benign group (χ2=10.160, 31.894, 11.657, 3.964,all P<0.050).Stepwise Logistic regression analysis showed that compared with BI-RADS 4A breast lesions with the lesion diameter <2.0 cm, clear margin and no blood flow inside, lesion diameter ≥2 cm, obscure margin and blood flow within the lesions in ultrasonography were the definite evidences of malignant BI-RADS 4A breast lesions(OR=22.162,95%CI:2.083-235.756,P=0.010;OR=121.694,95%CI:8.670-1708.145,P<0.001;OR=17.400,95%CI:1.779-170.218,P=0.014).

Conclusion

The patients with BI-RADS 4A breast lesions with the diameter <2.0 cm, clear margin and no blood flow inside in ultrasonography should be monitored and followed up carefully, instead of immediate biopsy or surgery.

表1 逐步Logistic 回归分析变量赋值表
表2 63 例患者乳腺病变性质与临床病理特征的关系(例)
图1 乳腺BI-RADS 4A 级恶性病变超声图
表3 63 例超声BI-RADS 4A 级乳腺病变恶性特征的逐步Logistic 回归分析
[1]
黄哲宙, 陈万青, 吴春晓,等. 中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况——全国32 个肿瘤登记点2003-2007 年资料分析报告[J]. 肿瘤,2012,32(6):435-439.
[2]
American College of Radiology. ACR breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS), breast imaging reporting Altas[M]. 4th ed.Reston:American College of Radiology ,2003.
[3]
Cho MJ, Yang JH, Yu YB, et al. Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res,2016,90(4):194-200.
[4]
Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China[J].Lancet Oncol,2014,15(7): e279-289.
[5]
Benndorf M, Wu Y, Burnside ES. A history of breast cancer and older age allow risk stratification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 ratings in the diagnostic setting[J]. Clin Imaging,2016,40(2):200-204.
[6]
邵志敏,沈镇宙,徐兵河.乳腺肿瘤学[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社,2013.
[7]
Leng X, Huang G, Yao L, et al. Role of multi-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis of level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions and Logistic regression model[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(9):15 889-15 899.
[8]
Taskin F, Koseoglu K, Ozbas S, et al. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2012, 40(5):261-265.
[9]
陈琮瑛, 王文韬, 余蓉,等. 乳腺小肿块的超声BI-RADS 分析研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2014,23(11):957-961.
[10]
郑雅兰, 郑媛媛, 宋会明, 等. 超声征象在诊断BI-RADS 4 级乳腺病变的临床价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2014,25(2):124-126.
[11]
Chaiwerawattana A, Thanasitthichai S, Boonlikit S, et al. Clinical outcome of breast cancer BI-RADS 4 lesions during 2003-2008 in the National Cancer Institute Thailand[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2012,13(8):4063-4066.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[3] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[4] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[5] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[12] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[13] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
阅读次数
全文


摘要