切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2007, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (03) : 24 -27. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2007.03.008

临床研究

晚期乳腺癌术前区域性动脉灌注化疗后微血管密度及微淋巴管密度的变化
马小军1,2,(), 蒲永东1, 何建苗1, 赵秀坤2   
  1. 1.100091 北京,解放军总医院第二附属医院普外科
    2.100097 北京,空军指挥学院医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-12 出版日期:2007-06-01
  • 通信作者: 马小军

Effect of preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemo-therapy on MVD and LMVD in advanced breast cancer

Xiao-jun MA,1(), Yong-dong PU1, Jian-miao HE1, Xiu-kun ZHAO1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery,Second Affiliated Hospital,General Hospital of PLA,Beijing 100091,China
  • Received:2007-03-12 Published:2007-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiao-jun MA
引用本文:

马小军, 蒲永东, 何建苗, 赵秀坤. 晚期乳腺癌术前区域性动脉灌注化疗后微血管密度及微淋巴管密度的变化[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2007, 01(03): 24-27.

Xiao-jun MA, Yong-dong PU, Jian-miao HE, Xiu-kun ZHAO. Effect of preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemo-therapy on MVD and LMVD in advanced breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2007, 01(03): 24-27.

目的

探讨术前区域动脉灌注化疗及全身静脉化疗对晚期乳腺癌微血管密度(MVD)、微淋巴管密度(MLVD)的影响。

方法

将76例晚期乳腺癌患者随机分为2组,术前动脉灌注化疗组35例,术前全身静脉化疗组41例,选其中25例化疗前的乳腺癌患者作对照组。采用免疫组化SP法,用CD34、VEGFR3抗体对3组乳腺癌组织标本进行MVD、MLVD检测。

结果

术前动脉灌注化疗组的MVD为36.05±13.64,全身静脉化疗组为49.92±12.90,对照组为60.38±13.54,各组间比较(P﹤0.01);术前动脉灌注化疗组的MLVD为6.62±3.70,全身静脉化疗组为9.96±4.57,对照组为11.30±5.32,动脉灌注化疗组与对照组比较显著下降(P﹤0.01),与静脉化疗组比较差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),静脉化疗组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。

结论

术前区域性动脉灌注化疗比全身静脉化疗更能有效降低肿瘤组织及其周边组织内MVD和MLVD,从而抑制肿瘤细胞生长,减少肿瘤转移的机会。

Objective

To investigate the different effect between preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy and preoperative intra-venous infusion chemotherapy on microvessel density(MVD)and lymphatic microvessel density(LMVD)in advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Seventy-six breast cancer patients were divided into 2 groups:the preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy group(PIAC group,35 cases),and the preoperative intra-venous infusion chemotherapy group(PIVC group,41 cases);and another 25 breast cancer patients without preoperative chemotherapy were as the control group.Using SP immunostaining method,MVD and LMVD of the samples of breast cancer in the 3 groups were detected with CD34 and VEGFR3.

Results

MVD was 36.05±13.64 in the PIAC group,49.92±12.90 in the PIVC group and 11.30±5.32 in the control group;there was a significant diffe rence in comparison of the 3 groups(P﹤0.01).MLVD was 6.62±3.70 in the PIAC group,9.96±4.57 in the PIVC group and 11.30±5.32 in the control group,it was remarkably decreased in the PIAC group compared with the control group,there was a significant difference between the two groups(P﹤0.01),the difference between the PIAC group and the PIVC group was statistically significant(P﹤0.05)while the difference between the PIVC group and the control group was not statistically significant(P﹥0.05).

Conclusion

PIAC can more effectively reduce MVD and MLVD than PIVC,thus restraining the growth of cancer cells and reducing cancer metastasis.

表1 两组病例临床一般资料对比
表2 两组患者术前化疗后临床疗效对比
表3 两组患者化疗并发症对比
表4 动脉灌注化疗对乳腺癌MVD、MLVD的影响
[1]
Kitagawa K,yamakado K,Nakatsuka A,et al.Properative transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer(stage Ⅲb)for down-staging and increase of resectability.Eur J Radiol,2002,43:31-36.
[2]
徐工学,李志霞,陈佛来,等.术前区域性动脉灌注化疗对大肠癌细胞凋亡之相关基因的影响.中华外科杂志,2001,39:436-439.
[3]
Fiorentini G,tsetis D,Bernardeschi P,et al.First-line intra-arterial chemotherapy(IAC)with epirubicin and mitoxantrone in locally advanced breast cancer.Anticancer Res,2003,23:4339.
[4]
甘长清,苏新良,杨光伦,等.经尺动脉介入化疗治疗局部晚期乳腺癌27例临床分析.重庆医学,2005,34:407-408.
[5]
何建苗,蒲永东,曹志宇,等.晚期乳腺癌术前局部灌注化疗的疗效观察.中国普通外科杂志,2003,12:329-331.
[6]
Witte D,Thomoas A,Ali N,et al.Expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3(VEGFR-3)and its ligand VEGF-C in human colorectal adenocarcinoma.Anticancer Res,2002,22:1463-1466.
[7]
Shushanov S,Bronetein M,Adelaide J,et al.VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 expression in human thyriod pathyrologies.Int J Cancer,2000,86:47-52.
[8]
陈珊,金伟,闵平,等.血管内皮生长因子家族及其受体与肿瘤血管生成研究进展.生命科学,2004,16:19-23.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[3] 杨柳, 宋振川, 王新乐. 乳腺癌改良根治术联合背阔肌复位的临床疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 269-273.
[4] 汤宏涛, 何坤. 中晚期肝细胞癌介入治疗的进展及前景[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 305-308.
[5] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[6] 宋佳, 汪波, 孙凯律, 商江峰, 吴旦平, 肇毅. 吲哚菁绿荧光显影联合亚甲蓝染色在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 498-501.
[7] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[8] 唐丹萍, 王萍, 江孟蝶, 杨晓蓉. 自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 582-585.
[9] 黄程鑫, 陈莉, 刘伊楚, 王水良, 赖晓凤. OPA1 在乳腺癌组织的表达特征及在ER阳性乳腺癌细胞中的生物学功能研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 275-284.
[10] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[11] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[12] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 张梦婷, 穷拉姆, 色珍, 李逸群, 德庆旺姆. 西藏地区藏族乳腺癌新辅助化疗的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-446.
[15] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 基于自动乳腺超声的列线图模型早期预测HER-2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要