切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2007, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2007.01.006

临床研究

乳腺癌术后引流液细胞学检查的临床价值
王毅本1, 盛桦1, 曾小兵1, 吴驰1   
  1. 1.201900 上海宝山中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2006-08-09 出版日期:2007-01-25

Examination of exfoliative cytology of draining liquid in patients with breast tumor

Yiben Wang1, Hua Sheng1, Xiaobing Zeng1, Chi Wu1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Baoshan Central Hospital, Shanghai 201900, China
  • Received:2006-08-09 Published:2007-01-25
引用本文:

王毅本, 盛桦, 曾小兵, 吴驰. 乳腺癌术后引流液细胞学检查的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2007, 01(01): 19-21.

Yiben Wang, Hua Sheng, Xiaobing Zeng, Chi Wu. Examination of exfoliative cytology of draining liquid in patients with breast tumor[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2007, 01(01): 19-21.

目的

探讨乳腺癌手术创面脱落癌细胞的相关因素及防范对策。

方法

对174 例乳腺癌术后的腋下和肿瘤附近创面引流液作脱落细胞涂片检查,将结果与相关因素作对比分析。

结果

本组脱落癌细胞阳性者42例,占24% 。 T1和T2差异有统计学意义( P =0.008,χ2 =6.960),T2和T3~4差异有统计学意义(P=0.000,χ2=26.372)。 Ⅰ期和Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期比较差异有统计学意义(P =0.000,χ2=33.187),Ⅱ期和Ⅲ、Ⅳ期比较差异有统计学意义(P =0.000,χ2 =18.200),Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期比较差异无统计学意义(P =0.471,χ2=0.520)。 有淋巴结转移和无淋巴结转移比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.000,χ2=18.748);非浸润和浸润比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.004,χ2=8.121);根治和改良根治比较差异无统计学意义(P =0.059,χ2 =3.563);腋下引流和胸创面比较差异有统计学意义(P =0.004,χ2=8.116)。

结论

脱落癌细胞阳性率与肿瘤大小、病期早晚、组织学类型和有无淋巴结转移有关,提高手术操作质量可降低脱落癌细胞阳性率。

Objective

To study the relative factors about exfoliative cytology of operative wound and to provide theory for reducing exfoliative tumor cell in the operation.

Methods

Examination of drained liquid of the axilla and the wound around tumor was done in 174 patients with breast tumor.The relative action amony exfoliated cells, size,clinical classification of tumor and lymphmetastasis of axilla was analyzed.

Results

In 174 patients,exfoliated tumor cells were found in 42 patients (24% ).There was significant difference(P=0.008,χ2=6.960) between T1 and T2.There was significant difference(P =0.000, χ2=26.372)between T2 and T3-4.There was significant difference(P=0.000, χ2=33.187) between Ⅰand Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ stage.There was significant difference( P =0.000, χ2=18.200) between Ⅱand Ⅲ,Ⅳstage.There wasnt significant difference (P =0.471, χ2 =0.520) between Ⅲ and Ⅳ stage.There was significant difference(P=0.000, χ2=18.748) between patients with of without lymphmetastasis.There was significant difference(P =0.004, χ2=8.121) between infiltrative carcinoma and noninfiltrative carcinoma.There wasnt significant difference (P =0.059, χ2 =3.563) between operation of Patey and Halsted.There was significant difference(P =0.004, χ2 =8.116) between wound of axilla and operation.

Conclusions

Exfoliated tumor cells is related to size,stage,type and lymphmetastasis of tumor.It is necessary to improve operation for reducing positive rate of exfoliative tumor cells.

[1]
马榕,王建丽,孙靖中,等.乳腺癌手术创面脱落癌细胞的临床研究[J].中华外科杂志,1998,36(4) :237 - 238.
[2]
黎国屏,黎玮.乳腺癌[M]//黎国屏,王松鹤.实用临床乳腺病学.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:182 - 216.
[3]
刘广余,杨春明.乳癌手术[M]//朱维继,吴汝舟.实用外科手术学.第2 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:226 -236.
[4]
Dahlstrom K K, Andersson D A, Andersen M, etal.Wide local excision of recurrent breast cancer in the thoracic wall[J].Cancer,1993,72(3):774-777.
[5]
宋万新,李明虎,李煜,等.乳腺癌术后胸壁复发23例临床及病理分析[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2002,9(5) :523 - 533.
[6]
崔殿龙,万幼峰,崔宾宾.73 例乳腺癌术后胸壁复发因素及预后分析[J].四川肿瘤防治,2004,17(3) :140 -141,149.
[7]
沈镇宙.乳腺恶性肿瘤[M]//石美鑫,熊汝成,李鸿儒,等.实用外科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1997:509 - 518.
[8]
何建苗,蒲永东,曹志宇.乳腺癌创面游离癌细胞检查和术中温热低渗浸泡化疗的临床研究[J].临床外科杂志,2002,10(6):343-344.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[3] 杨柳, 宋振川, 王新乐. 乳腺癌改良根治术联合背阔肌复位的临床疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 269-273.
[4] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[5] 宋佳, 汪波, 孙凯律, 商江峰, 吴旦平, 肇毅. 吲哚菁绿荧光显影联合亚甲蓝染色在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 498-501.
[6] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[7] 唐丹萍, 王萍, 江孟蝶, 杨晓蓉. 自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 582-585.
[8] 黄程鑫, 陈莉, 刘伊楚, 王水良, 赖晓凤. OPA1 在乳腺癌组织的表达特征及在ER阳性乳腺癌细胞中的生物学功能研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 275-284.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[11] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[12] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[13] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[14] 张梦婷, 穷拉姆, 色珍, 李逸群, 德庆旺姆. 西藏地区藏族乳腺癌新辅助化疗的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-446.
[15] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 基于自动乳腺超声的列线图模型早期预测HER-2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要