2010 , Vol. 04 >Issue 02: 168 - 176
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2010.02.011
乳腺癌术后抑郁症患者综合心理干预价值的研究
Copy editor: 罗承丽
收稿日期: 2009-09-21
网络出版日期: 2024-12-06
版权
Study on psychological intervention of postoperative depression for breast cancer patients
Received date: 2009-09-21
Online published: 2024-12-06
Copyright
目的
探讨综合的心理干预措施对乳腺癌术后抑郁症患者的价值。
方法
采用前瞻性病例对照单盲试验研究方法,将术后病理确诊为乳腺癌、符合《中国精神障碍诊断与分类标准第3版》中抑郁症诊断标准、初始(诊断抑郁症后第1次评价)汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HA MD,24项版本)得分≥20并最终进入统计分析的87例女性患者分成对照组和干预组。两组病例治疗方法相同,基本情况差异无统计学意义。对照组41例实施常规治疗和护理,干预组46例在此基础上进行由心理咨询师参与的综合心理干预。采用HA MD 抑郁量表和乳腺癌患者生活质量量表(FACT-B)分别于初始、第4周末和第6个月末对两组患者进行抑郁状况和生活质量评价,并根据患者完成化疗和放射治疗的脱漏率评价其遵医行为。采用重复测量的方差分析、计数资料χ2 检验、两独立样本t检验及配对t 检验进行统计分析。
结果
两组患者HA MD 评分差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);干预组第6个月末FACT-B总分和各领域得分与初始及对照组第6个月末比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000);两组间术后辅助化疗和放射治疗的脱漏率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.121 P=0.042,χ2=4.586 P=0.032)。
结论
综合心理干预能够明显改善患者的心理健康状况,增强患者治疗的依从性,提高其生活质量,非常适合乳腺癌患者各种治疗相对集中的早期。
张爱琴 , 曾宪红 , 杨孙虎 , 杨仲俊 . 乳腺癌术后抑郁症患者综合心理干预价值的研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2010 , 04(02) : 168 -176 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2010.02.011
Objective
To investigate the effect of co mprehensive psychological inter vention on depression of patients after mastecto my.
Methods
A pr ospective casecontr ol single blind st udy was perf or med.Eighty seven fe male patients,who were postoperatively pat hol ogically confir med as breast cancer,met the diagnostic criteria of CCMD-3(Chinese Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Mental disorders 3rd version),had the initial HAMD(Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression,24 item version)score≥20,and eventuall y enr olled into statistical analysis,were divided into t he psychol ogical inter vention gr oup(n=46)and t he contr ol gr oup(n=41).Both groups were treated with sa me met hods,wit h no statistical diff erence in basic conditions bet ween the t wo groups.The control group received conventional treat ment and nursing care,and t he psychol ogical inter vention gr oup conventional treat ment and nursing care pl us co mprehensive psychol ogical inter vention.We used HA MD and t he Functional Assess ment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Breast(FACT-B)to assess t he depression degree and quality of life f or t hese patients bef ore t he inter vention and at t he end of the 4th week and the 6th month after the intervention.The co mpliance behaviors of patients were eval uated accor ding to t he dr opout rates of che mot herapy and radiot herapy.Repeated measures analysis of variance,chi-square test,t wo-sa mple t test and paired t test were used f or statistical analysis.
Results
There was a significant difference in HA MD score bet ween t he t wo groups(P=0.000).There was a statistical difference in the total score of FACT-B at the end of the 6th month and other items'scores co mpared with before the intervention in theintervention group,and co mpared wit h t hose at the 6t h mont h in t he contr ol gr oup(P=0.000).The co mparison of t he dropout rates of postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy showed a statistical difference bet ween the t wo groups(χ2=4.121 P=0.042,χ2=4.586 P=0.032).
Conclusion
Co mprehensive psychological inter vention can significantly i mpr ove t he patient's mental healt h,treat ment co mpliance behavior and quality of life,so it is ver y suitable f or breast cancer patients after mastecto my.
Key words: Breast neoplasms; Depression; Mental inter vention; Mental health; Life quality
表1 两组患者的一般情况比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 受教育程度(例) | 临床分期(例) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
文盲 | 小学 | 初中 | 高中/中专 | 大专以上 | Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | |||
对照组 | 41 | 44±8 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 11 |
干预组a | 46 | 42±9 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 29 | 13 |
组别 | 婚姻状况(例) | KPS评分(例) | 家庭人均收入(例) | |||||||
在婚 | 离异/未婚/丧偶 | 50分 | 60分 | 70分 | 80分 | 90分 | <2000元 | >2000元 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 23 | 18 | |
干预组a | 37 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 26 | 20 |
表2 两组患者初始、第4周末和第6个月末HAMD评分比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 初始 | 第4周末 | 第6个月末 |
---|---|---|---|---|
干预组a | 46 | 32.78±4.90 | 26.57±5.27 | 16.22±4.98b |
对照组 | 41 | 31.83±5.24 | 30.63±6.31 | 28.78±5.96 |
表3 两组患者术后辅助化疗的脱漏率比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 脱漏[例(%)] | 未脱漏[例(%)] | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组 | 41 | 5(12.20) | 36(87.80) | 4.121 | 0.042 |
对照组 | 39 | 12(30.77) | 27(69.23) |
表4 两组患者术后放射治疗的脱漏率比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 脱漏[例(%)] | 未脱漏[例(%)] | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组 | 40 | 5(12.50) | 35(87.50) | 4.586 | 0.032 |
对照组 | 33 | 11(33.33) | 22(66.67) |
表5 初始时两组患者的FACT-B评分比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 量表总分 | 社会家庭状况 | 生理状况 | 情感状况 | 功能状况 | 附加关注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组 | 46 | 74.78±6.20 | 18.48±2.88 | 13.78±3.26 | 14.63±3.22 | 12.41±2.59 | 15.52±3.56 |
对照组 | 41 | 75.07±6.79 | 17.78±3.02 | 14.68±2.46 | 14.22±2.53 | 13.27±2.06 | 15.12±2.68 |
t值 | -0.208 | 1.102 | -1.440 | 0.657 | -1.691 | 0.586 | |
P值a | 0.835 | 0.273 | 0.154 | 0.513 | 0.094 | 0.559 |
表6 第6个月末时两组患者的FACT-B评分比较 |
组别 | 例数 | 量表总分 | 社会家庭状况 | 生理状况 | 情感状况 | 功能状况 | 附加关注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组 | 46 | 110.59±5.34 | 23.63±1.42 | 22.63±2.18 | 20.32±2.66 | 19.33±2.98 | 24.89±1.99 |
对照组 | 41 | 82.64±7.07 | 18.15±1.98 | 16.68±2.13 | 15.26±3.11 | 14.44±3.11 | 18.12±2.68 |
t值 | 20.935 | 14.953 | 12.836 | 8.041 | 7.472 | 13.478 | |
P值a | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表7 干预组患者初始与第6个月末时FACT-B评分比较 |
时间 | 量表总分 | 社会家庭状况 | 生理状况 | 情感状况 | 功能状况 | 附加关注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始 | 74.78±6.20 | 18.48±2.88 | 13.78±3.26 | 14.63±3.22 | 12.41±2.59 | 15.52±3.56 |
第6个月末 | 110.59±5.34 | 23.63±1.42 | 22.63±2.18 | 20.32±2.66 | 19.33±2.98 | 24.89±1.99 |
t值 | -25.669 | -11.663 | -17.292 | -9.340 | -11.847 | -14.935 |
P值a | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表8 对照组患者初始与第6个月末时FACT-B评分比较 |
时间 | 量表总分 | 社会家庭状况 | 生理状况 | 情感状况 | 功能状况 | 附加关注 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始 | 75.07±6.79 | 17.78±3.02 | 14.68±2.46 | 14.22±2.53 | 13.27±2.06 | 15.12±2.68 |
第6个月末 | 82.64±7.07 | 18.15±1.98 | 16.68±2.13 | 15.26±3.11 | 14.44±3.11 | 18.12±2.68 |
t值 | -5.162 | -0.685 | -3.827 | -2.369 | -1.843 | 5.027 |
P值a | 0.000 | 0.497 | 0.000 | 0.023 | 0.073 | 0.000 |
[1] |
Fann JR,Tho mas Rich A M,Katon WJ,et al.Major depression after breast cancer:a review of epide miol ogy and treat ment.Gen Hosp Paychiatr y,2008,30:112-126.
|
[2] |
汤艳清,李艳苓,谢光荣,等.氟西汀对乳癌患者抑郁症状的疗效研究.中国行为医学科学杂志,2004,13:399-400.
|
[3] |
张继东,舒志荣.恶性肿瘤患者抑郁症及影响因素的调查.青岛大学医学院学报,2006,42:347-349.
|
[4] |
邹建军,郑莹,古青,等.影响癌症病人抑郁状况的因素研究.肿瘤,2005,25:186-191.
|
[5] |
童亚芳.护士对癌症患者抑郁症的认识.国外医学·护理学分册,2000,19:35-36.
|
[6] |
Ber nhar d H,Geor g K,Martin K,et al.Quality of life in breast cancer patients:not enough attention for long-ter m survivors.Psychoso matics,2001,42:117-123.
|
[7] |
陈彦方,胡珍玉.抑郁问题与抑郁障碍综合干预程序.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009:19.
|
[8] |
Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al.The f unctional assess meng of cancer t herapy scale:develop ment and validation of t he general measure.J Clin Oncol,1993,11:570-579.
|
[9] |
万崇华,张冬梅,汤学良,等.乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表FACT-B 中文版介绍.中国肿瘤,2002,11:318-320.
|
[10] |
郭念锋.心理咨询师/二级.北京:民族出版社,2005:174-178.
|
[11] |
王丕琳,张铁,智迎辉.乳腺癌治疗过程中的心理问题及干预策略研究.肿瘤防治杂志,2005,12:1691-1694.
|
[12] |
贾文亮,周朝霞,孙凤新,等.家庭支持系统对抑郁症生活质量影响的研究.中国实用医药,2009,4:231-232.
|
[13] |
何雪娟,杨署光.乳腺癌手术后抑郁症综合治疗分析.承德医学院学报,2006,23:313-314.
|
[14] |
唐旭,赵斌,谢杰荣.青年乳腺癌患者术后性生活质量变化及其影响因素调查.神经疾病与精神卫生,2006,6:185-187.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |