切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2007, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 19 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.978-7-900220-07-3.2007.02.006

临床研究

乳管镜辅助乳管冲洗液薄层液基细胞学检查诊断乳头溢液的研究
张安秦1, 王颀1, 张江宇2, 许娟1, 李文萍1, 陈中扬1, 杨剑敏1, 朱彩霞1, 施军涛1, 翁秀琼1   
  1. 1.510010 广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院乳腺病中心
    2.510010 广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2007-02-26 出版日期:2007-02-25
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金课题(B2004017)

Intraductal aspiration TCT by Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge

An-qin ZHANG, Qi WANG, Jiang-yu ZHANG, Juan Xu, Wenping Li, Zhongyang Chen, Jianmin Yang, Caixia Zhu, Juntao Shi, Xiuqiong Weng   

  • Received:2007-02-26 Published:2007-02-25
引用本文:

张安秦, 王颀, 张江宇, 许娟, 李文萍, 陈中扬, 杨剑敏, 朱彩霞, 施军涛, 翁秀琼. 乳管镜辅助乳管冲洗液薄层液基细胞学检查诊断乳头溢液的研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2007, 01(02): 19-21.

An-qin ZHANG, Qi WANG, Jiang-yu ZHANG, Juan Xu, Wenping Li, Zhongyang Chen, Jianmin Yang, Caixia Zhu, Juntao Shi, Xiuqiong Weng. Intraductal aspiration TCT by Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2007, 01(02): 19-21.

目的

探讨乳管镜(FDS)检查中冲洗液薄层液基细胞学(TCT)检查辅助诊断乳头溢液病因的价值。

方法

对2004年4月至2006年6月间107 例乳头溢液患者进行FDS 和冲洗液TCT 检查,79 例接受手术活检和治疗,将各种检查与病理检查结果进行对照研究。

结果

FDS 下确定30 例乳头溢液患者,乳管内隆起型病变的占77 例,位于三级以下乳管占88.3%。FDS 和TCT 检查总符合率为74.7%和81.0%,病变在二级导管以上FDS 和TCT 检查符合率为86.7%和76.7%,三级以下导管,两种检查符合为67.3%和83.7%;FDS 和TCT 检查诊断多发乳头状瘤符合率、阳性试验似然比(likelihood ratio of a positive test,LR)分别为60.3%、3.67 和84.2%、4.46;FDS 和TCT 检查诊断乳腺癌符合率、LR 分别为66.7%、1.46和100%、6.84。TCT 或FDS 联合后对恶性病变诊断阳性试验似然比(LR)可达25.5。

结论

二级以上乳管病变FDS 检查准确性高,三级以下辅助乳管冲洗液TCT 检查,提高乳头溢液诊断准确性。对于FDS 诊断疑难的病例两者联合有助于提高良恶性病变的鉴别诊断。

Objective

To evaluate the value of intraductal aspiration ThinPrep Cytology Test (TCT) by fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) in the diagosis of nipple discharge.

Methods

FDS,intraductal aspiration TCT by FDS were used to diagnose and examine 107 patients with confused nipple discharge during April 2004 to June 2006; 79 patients were treated operatively. The results of diagnosis and biopsy pathology were studied.

Results

Using FDS 107 patients with nipple discharge were diagnosed. 77 were detected to have intraductal tumor, and 88.3% was below the third branch duct. The over accuracy of FDS and TCT was 74.7% and 81.0%. The accuracy of FDS and TCT was 86.7% and 76.7% over the second branch duct. But the first branch duct and the second branch duct accounted for 67.3% and 83.7%. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 60.3%, 81.4% and 77.8% for intraductal papillomas, and those of TCT were 84.2%,7 4.4% and 83.3% , respectively.And their Likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR) was 3.67 and 4.46, that of FDS for breast cancer was 66.7%,31.6% and 78.3%, and that of TCT was 100%, 68.4% and 90%, respectively. FDS and TCT were used together to diagnose breast cancer , and the sensitivity and specificity were improved to 84.2% and 96.7%. And their LR was 1.46 and 6.84, LR of combined use of the two means to diagnose breast cancer reached 25.5.

Conclusions

FDS is a good method to diagnose nipple discharge of the first branch and the second branch. But for the third branch, combine use of FDS with TCT can improve the accuracy and decrease false-negative rate of nipple discharge. It is helpful in differentiating malgnant from benign discharge.

表1 79 例FDS 诊断与术后病理检查对比
表2 79 例TCT 检查与术后病理检查比较
[1]
张安秦,王颀,陈中扬,等.乳管内乳头状瘤的现代诊治—附89例报告.肿瘤防治杂志,2003,10:740 -742.
[2]
王颀,张安秦,施军涛,等.乳管内视镜诊断乳管内隆起性病变的价值.中国实用外科杂志,2000,20:541 -543.
[3]
王颀.乳管内视镜检查彩色图谱美国. 纽约:国际中华科学技术出版社,2002:9 -13.
[4]
马本忠.诊断细胞病理学. 郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2002:490 -508.
[5]
Yamamoto D, Senzaki H. Detection of chromosomalaneusomy by fluo 2 rescence in situ hybridization for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer,2003,97:690 -694.
[6]
Baitchev G, Gortchev G, Todorova A,et al. Intraductal aspirarion cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surge,2003,88:83.
[7]
Shao Z M,Mai N. Nipple aspiration in diagnosis of breast cancer.Seminars in Surgical Onc,2001,20:175 -180.
[8]
King B L,Crisi G M, Tsai S C,et al. Immunocyto chemicalanalysis of breast cells btained by ductal lavage. Cancer,2002,96:244-249.
[9]
Hutchinson M L, et al. homegeneous sampling accounts for the increase diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol,1994,10:215.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 左志诚, 刘桂谦, 裴广楠, 刘波. 内窥镜辅助下改良Okutsu 法治疗腕管综合征的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 503-506.
[3] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[4] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 石静, 陈龙舟, 于倩, 高峥嵘, 陆澄. 腺体瓣成形术在病理性乳头溢液手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 691-693.
[7] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[12] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[13] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
阅读次数
全文


摘要