切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 206 -210. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2025.04.003

论著

腔镜辅助乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建的临床应用
李毅力, 向科, 庄雨陈, 任嘉辉, 高寒()   
  1. 401147 重庆,重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院乳腺科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-10 出版日期:2025-08-01
  • 通信作者: 高寒

Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients

Yili Li, Ke Xiang, Yuchen Zhuang, Jiahui Ren, Han Gao()   

  1. Department of Breast Diseases, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Received:2024-10-10 Published:2025-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Han Gao
引用本文:

李毅力, 向科, 庄雨陈, 任嘉辉, 高寒. 腔镜辅助乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 206-210.

Yili Li, Ke Xiang, Yuchen Zhuang, Jiahui Ren, Han Gao. Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 206-210.

目的

探讨早期乳腺癌腔镜辅助保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术(NSM)及Ⅰ期乳房重建的临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2020年6月至2024年6月在重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院行NSM及Ⅰ期乳房重建术的38例早期乳腺癌患者临床资料,根据手术方式分为腔镜组(25例)和开放组(13例)。2组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较采用独立样本t检验,住院时间、乳房外观满意度评分(术前和术后)比较采用非参数Mann-Whitney 检验,患者术前和术后满意度的组内比较采用配对秩和检验。

结果

腔镜组手术时间长于开放组,差异有统计学意义[(165.84±16.30) min 比(99.69±12.35) min,t=12.813,P<0.001];2组患者术中出血量及术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.456,P=0.154;Z=-0.135,P=0.199)。2组患者术前乳房外观满意度比较差异无统计学意义[48.00(39.00,55.50) 比53.00(44.00,58.00),Z=-0.856,P=0.392)],腔镜组术后乳房外观满意度高于开放组[42.00(40.00,45.50)比38.00(33.00,43.00),Z=-2.501,P=0.012]。2组患者手术后乳房外观满意度均优于手术前,差异均具有统计学意义(Z=-2.432、-2.906,P=0.015、0.004)。

结论

腔镜辅助下早期乳腺癌NSM及Ⅰ期乳房重建美观、安全、可操作性高,术后患者满意度高,可以推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application and outcomes of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate reconstruction in early breast cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 38 patients with early breast cancer who underwent surgery in the Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2020 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the type of surgery,patients were divided into the endoscopic surgery group (n=25) and the open surgery group (n=13). Operation time,intraoperative blood loss were compared between two groups using independent sample t test; hospital stay,preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction with breast appearance were compared between two groups using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test,and pre- and postoperative patient satisfaction within-group was compared by paired rank-sum test.

Results

Operation time was significantly longer in the endoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group [(165.84±16.30) min vs (99.69±12.35) min,t=12.813,P<0.001]. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay showed no statistically significant difference(t=1.456,P=0.154;Z=-0.135,P=0.199). The patient satisfaction with breast appearance showed no significant differences between two groups before operation[48.00(39.00,55.50) vs 53.00(44.00,58.00),Z=-0.856,P=0.392)],while postoperative satisfaction was significantly higher in the endoscopic surgery group [42.00(40.00,45.50) vs 38.00(33.00,43.00),Z=-2.501,P=0.012]. The patient satisfaction with breast appearance after surgery was significantly better than that before surgery (Z=-2.432,-2.906,P=0.015,0.004).

Conclusion

The endoscope-assisted NSM and immediate reconstruction in early breast cancer has the advantages of good aesthetic effect,safety and operability,and high postoperative patient satisfaction worthy of clinical application.

图1 腔镜辅助乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建切口和术前腺体体表标记
图2 腔镜辅助乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建手术中非补片假体置入
表1 乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建手术2组患者基本资料比较(
表2 乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建2组患者手术前后乳房外观满意度比较[分,M(P25P75 )]
图3 双侧乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕切除术及Ⅰ期乳房重建手术患者术前和术后乳房外观对比图 a、b、c图分别为术前、术后1周拔出引流管后和术后1个月
[1]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[2]
Rossi CMingozzi MCurcio A,et al. Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy[J]. Gland Surg20154(6):528-540.
[3]
Tsangaris EKlassen AFKaur MN,et al. Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction[J].Ann Surg Oncol202128(12):7842-7853.
[4]
Chen WZheng RBaade PD,et al. Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin201666(2):115-132.
[5]
Ratti FSerenari MZanello M,et al. Appraisal of disease-specific benefits of minimally invasiveness in surgery of breast cancer liver metastases[J]. Surg Oncol2019120(7):1169-1176.
[6]
Chen YXu JHong S,et al. A challenging surgical technique: single-port endoscopic-assisted radical mastectomy in retrograde way and immediate reconstruction using prosthesis implantation[J].Transl Cancer Res202413(2):752-761.
[7]
姜军. 乳腺疾病腔镜手术技术操作指南(2008 版)[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)20093(1):53-57.
[8]
姜军,屈翔,唐鹏. 乳腺癌腔镜治疗专家共识与操作指导意见(2019 版)[J].中华外科杂志202058(4):257-260.
[9]
Yao CCLiu CXian J. Comparison of single-pore non-liposuction near-infrared laparoscopy with conventional open surgery for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center,small-sample retrospective study[J].World J Surg Oncol202321(1):66.
[10]
DeLong MRTandon VJFarajzadeh M,et al. Systematic review of the impact of acellular dermal matrix on aesthetics and patient satisfaction in tissue expander-to-implant breast reconstructions[J].Plast Reconstr Surg2019144(6):967e-974e.
[11]
Vardanian AJClayton JLRoostaeian J,et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix[J].Plast Reconstr Surg2011128(5):403e-410e.
[12]
Whisker LBarber MEgbeare D,et al. Biological and synthetic mesh assisted breast reconstruction procedures: Joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic,Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons[J].Eur J Surg Oncol202147(11):2807-2813.
[13]
Hallberg HRafnsdottir SSelvaggi G,et al. Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Plast Surg Hand Surg201852(3):130-114.
[14]
炜怡林,洁陈,秋雯谭. 乳房胸肌前假体重建的复兴:理论依据及研究现状[J].中国修复重建外科杂志202337(2): 233-239.
[15]
DeLong MRTandon VJBertrand AA,et al. Review of outcomes in prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction with and without surgical mesh assistance[J].Plast Reconstr Surg2021147(2):305-315.
[16]
Potter SConroy EJCutress RI,et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre,prospective cohort study[J].Lancet Oncol201920(2):254-266.
[17]
Kwon JByon JHKo BK,et al. Clinical progression following acellular dermal matrix use for volume replacement after breast-conserving surgery[J].BMC Surg202525(1):91.
[18]
高强. 假体植入乳房再造手术后各种并发症的发病时间窗及影响因素分析[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志202319(5):464.
[1] 孙丕绛, 崔上, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路联合门静脉切除重建扩大清扫胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 487-487.
[2] 陈华, 孙备. 我国胰头癌腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 483-486.
[3] 李金洁, 颜迪, 高德山. 改良桥式导管内引流在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 488-491.
[4] 李福荣, 王晔飞, 白治渊, 王海霖, 贺志强, 牛福勇. 两种胰肠吻合方法在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 492-495.
[5] 王小军, 蔡瑜, 安艳新, 刘斌, 冯永安. 完全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 509-512.
[6] 贾宇浩, 吕坤昱, 刘志强, 李保中. 不同入路腹腔镜辅助下根治性远端胃切除术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 513-516.
[7] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[8] 孔宪诚, 沙粒, 杜磊, 刘岗. 以卫式线引导的保留邓氏筋膜全直肠系膜切除术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 523-526.
[9] 袁德玺, 徐海霞, 华秀丽, 申青. 适形保肛术对低位直肠癌患者术后肛门功能的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 527-530.
[10] 肖燕玲, 杜升兰, 杨春梅, 许政文, 王玫. 正中切口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术预防性回肠造口中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 539-542.
[11] 洪菁, 高义, 廖桂兰, 陈晓蔚, 菅志远, 周娟娟, 黄志琼, 韦宇, 邓艳婷. 腹腔镜保留回盲部的右半结肠癌根治术在结肠肝曲和横结肠肿瘤中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 547-550.
[12] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[13] 吴金柱, 王锐, 朱国栋, 蔡卫华. 吲哚菁绿荧光导航腹腔镜肝右前叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 802-802.
[14] 蒋林哲. 腹腔镜胆囊切除+超细胆道镜经胆囊颈管胆道探查术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 803-803.
[15] 平文俊, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 804-804.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?