切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 199 -203. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2022.04.001

专家论坛

Immunotherapeutic approach on triple negative breast cancer: recent progress and predictors of response
Louis Wing-­Cheong Chow1,(), Erich Ferdiansyah Lie2   
  1. 1. UNIMED Medical Institute, Hong Kong, China;Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong, China
    2. UNIMED Medical Institute, Hong Kong, China
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-10 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: Louis Wing--Cheong Chow

Immunotherapeutic approach on triple negative breast cancer: recent progress and predictors of response

Louis Wing-­Cheong Chow1(), Erich Ferdiansyah Lie2   

  • Received:2022-02-10 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Louis Wing--Cheong Chow
引用本文:

Louis Wing-­Cheong Chow, Erich Ferdiansyah Lie. Immunotherapeutic approach on triple negative breast cancer: recent progress and predictors of response[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 199-203.

Louis Wing-­Cheong Chow, Erich Ferdiansyah Lie. Immunotherapeutic approach on triple negative breast cancer: recent progress and predictors of response[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 199-203.

Clinical trials utilizing the immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly the IMpassion and KEYNOTE trials, have made it possible to understand how the immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used to treat patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patient stratification based on simply PD-L1 positivity has now been shown to be insufficient and inaccurate as a predictor of response to the immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the role of the tumor microenvironment has become more apparent. This article serves as a brief overview of the latest progress on the clinical trials as well as the potential predictors of response to immune checkpoint blockade.

Table 1 Selected clinical trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating TNBC
[1]
Bayraktar S, Batoo S, Okuno S, et al. Immunotherapy in breast cancer[J]. J Carcinog201918:2.
[2]
Zhang J, Tian Q, Zhang M, et al. Immune-related biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer202128(4):792-805.
[3]
Zhao J, Huang J. Breast cancer immunology and immunotherapy: targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death protein ligand-1[J]. Chin Med J (Engl)2020133(7):853-862.
[4]
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med2018379(22):2108-2121.
[5]
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. IMpassion130: updated overall survival (OS) from a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + nab-paclitaxel (nP) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [J]. J Clin Oncol201937(15_suppl):1003.
[6]
Emens LA, Adams S, Barrios CH, et al. LBA16 IMpassion130: Final OS analysis from the pivotal phase III study of atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel vs placebo + nab-paclitaxel in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol202031:S1148.
[7]
Miles D, Gligorov J, André F, et al. Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol202132(8):994-1004.
[8]
Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial[J]. Lancet2020396(10 265):1817-1828.
[9]
Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. LBA16 KEYNOTE-355: Final results from a randomized, double-blind phase III study of first-line pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy for metastatic TNBC[J]. Ann Oncol202132:S1289-1290.
[10]
Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med2020382(9):810-821.
[11]
Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(6):556-567.
[12]
Li C, Shao Z, Wang Z, et al. Combination of famitinib with camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with immunomodulatory advanced triple-negative breast cancer (FUTURE-C-PLUS): A prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study[J]. J Clin Oncol202139(15_suppl):1007.
[13]
Cortes J, Rugo HS, Cescon DW, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022387(3):217-226.
[14]
Loi S, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gombos A, et al. Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced, HER2-positive breast cancer (PANACEA): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b-2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol201920(3):371-382.
[15]
Emens LA, Esteva FJ, Beresford M, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine plus atezolizumab versus trastuzumab emtansine plus placebo in previously treated, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (KATE2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial[J]. Lancet Oncol202021(10):1283-1295.
[16]
Andersson A, Bergenstråhle J, Asp M, et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography[J]. Commun Biol20203(1):565.
[17]
Bianchini G, Wang X, Danenberg E, et al. Single-cell spatial analysis by imaging mass cytometry and immunotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the NeoTRIPaPDL1 trial[J]. Cancer Res, 2022, 82(4_Supplement): GS1-00.
[18]
Dugo M, Huang C, Egle D, et al. Predictive value of RT-qPCR 27-gene IO score and comparison with RNA-Seq IO score in the NeoTRIPaPDL1 trial[J]. Cancer Res, 2022, 82 (4_Supplement): PD10-06.
[19]
Nielsen TJ, Ring BZ, Seitz RS, et al. A novel immuno-oncology algorithm measuring tumor microenvironment to predict response to immunotherapies[J]. Heliyon20217(3):e06438.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要