切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 98 -106. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.02.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

来那替尼治疗乳腺癌引起肝毒性和胃肠道不良反应风险的Meta分析
邓茜1, 李柏群1,(), 黄道秋1, 方伟1, 胡彦君1   
  1. 1. 404000 万州,重庆三峡中心医院药学部
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-04 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李柏群

Risk of hepatic toxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events in breast cancer patients treated with neratinib: a meta-analysis

Qian Deng1, Boqun Li1,(), Daoqiu Huang1, Wei Fang1, Yanjun Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital, Wanzhou 404000, China
  • Received:2018-05-04 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Boqun Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Boqun, Email:
引用本文:

邓茜, 李柏群, 黄道秋, 方伟, 胡彦君. 来那替尼治疗乳腺癌引起肝毒性和胃肠道不良反应风险的Meta分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 98-106.

Qian Deng, Boqun Li, Daoqiu Huang, Wei Fang, Yanjun Hu. Risk of hepatic toxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events in breast cancer patients treated with neratinib: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 98-106.

目的

研究来那替尼治疗乳腺癌引起肝毒性和胃肠道不良反应风险。

方法

检索Cochrane、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、维普及万方等相关数据库,检索时间为从建库以来至2018年3月1日,收集关于来那替尼治疗乳腺癌且描述了肝毒性[丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)或天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)升高]和胃肠道不良反应(包括腹泻、呕吐或恶心)等不良事件的随机对照临床研究。不良反应按严重程度分为1~5级,其中所有级别包括1~5级;严重级别包括3级及以上。由2名研究人员独立完成文献筛选、数据提取,运用Cochrane手册推荐的风险评价工具对文献质量进行评价。采用相对危险度(relative risk, RR)和95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI)作为效应量;采用Q检验分析数据的异质性,并根据异质性结果选择固定效应模型或随机效应模型。

结果

本研究共纳入4项RCT研究,共3 745例患者。其中2项研究为来那替尼单用,另外2项研究为来那替尼联用紫杉醇。来那替尼组的所有级别ALT与AST升高发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(ALT:RR=1.37,95%CI:0.50~3.76,P=0.54; AST: RR=1.19,95%CI:0.36~3.92,P=0.78),但严重级别的ALT升高发生率来那替尼组高于对照组(RR=3.63,95%CI:1.58~8.36,P<0.01),来那替尼组的严重级别AST升高发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(RR=2.08,95%CI:0.80~5.43,P=0.13)。关于胃肠道不良反应,所有级别与严重级别的腹泻发生率在来那替尼组均高于对照组(所有级别:RR=2.06,95%CI:1.38~3.08,P<0.01;严重级别:RR=8.77, 95%CI:2.91~26.40,P<0.01);所有级别与严重级别的呕吐发生率在来那替尼组均高于对照组(所有级别:RR=2.13,95%CI:1.43~3.18, P<0.01;严重级别:RR=6.22,95%CI:3.16~12.27, P<0.01)。所有级别和严重级别的恶心发生率,来那替尼组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(所有级别:RR=1.28, 95%CI:0.81~2.04,P=0.29;严重级别:RR=3.10, 95%CI: 0.87~11.00,P=0.08)。

结论

来那替尼用于治疗乳腺癌后,严重级别的ALT升高、腹泻和呕吐的发生率增加,AST升高和恶心的发生率没有明显变化,因此,需要密切监测患者的肝功能和胃肠道功能。

Objective

To investigate the risk of hepatic toxicity and gastrointestinal events in breast cancer patients treated with neratinib.

Methods

The Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials in breast cancer patients treated with neratinib from the earliest data available to March 1, 2018. The enrolled studies described hepatic toxicity such as elevated alanine aminotransferase(ALT) or elevated aspartate aminotransferase(AST) or gastrointestinal events induding diarrhea, vomiting and nausea. All adverse events were divided into 5 grades(1-5). The adverse events at all levels included all 5 grades and high-level adverse events refered to the events at grade 3 and above. Two researchers independently completed literature retrieval and data extraction, and evaluated the quality of the included studies using the recommended bias tools of the Cochrane handbook. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect quantities and Q test was used to analyze the heterogeneity of the data. A fixed effect model or a random effect model was chosen according to the results of the heterogeneity.

Results

Four studies were included, among which neratinib monotherapy was used in two studies and neratinib combined with paclitaxel in other two studies. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of ALT and AST increase at all levels between neratinib group and control group (ALT: RR=1.37, 95%CI: 0.50-3.76, P=0.54; AST: RR=1.19, 95%CI: 0.36-3.92, P=0.78). The incidence of high-level elevation of ALT was significantly higher in neratinib group than in control group (RR=3.63, 95%CI: 1.58-8.36, P<0.01), while no significant difference was found in the incidence of high-level elevation of AST (RR=2.08, 95%CI: 0.80-5.43, P=0.13). As to gastrointestinal events, the incidences of nausea at all levels and high level were significantly higher in neratinib group than in control group(at all levels: RR=2.06, 95%CI: 1.38-3.08, P<0.01; high-level: RR=8.77, 95%CI: 2.91-26.40, P<0.01); the incidences of vomiting at all levels and high level were significantly higher in neratinib group than in control group(at all levels: RR=2.13, 95%CI: 1.43-3.18, P<0.01; high-level: RR=6.22, 95%CI: 3.16-12.27, P<0.01). The incidence of nausea at all levels and high level presented no significant difference between neratinib group and control group (at all levels: RR=1.28, 95%CI: 0.81-2.04, P=0.29; high-level: RR=3.10, 95%CI: 0.87-11.00, P=0.08).

Conclusions

The application of neratinib in breast cancer patients will increase the incidences of high-level ALT increase, diarrhea and vomiting, but no significant changes are observed in AST increase and nausea. Therefore, the liver function and gastrointestinal function should be closely monitored if neratinib is used against breast cancer.

图1 来那替尼治疗乳腺癌引起胃肠道不良反应和肝毒性相关研究的筛选流程图
表1 纳入4篇文献的基本情况
表2 Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对4篇纳入文献的质量评价结果
图2 乳腺癌患者与来那替尼治疗相关的所有级别(a)和严重级别(b)丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高发生率的森林图及异质性分析
图3 乳腺癌患者与来那替尼治疗相关的所有级别(a)和严重级别(b)天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶升高的不良反应发生率的森林图及异质性分析
图4 乳腺癌患者与来那替尼治疗相关的所有级别(a)和严重级别(b)腹泻发生率的森林图及异质性分析
图5 乳腺癌患者与来那替尼治疗相关的所有级别(a)和严重级别(b)恶心不良反应的发生率的森林图及异质性分析
图6 乳腺癌患者与来那替尼治疗相关的所有级别(a)和严重级别(b)呕吐发生率的森林图及异质性分析
[1]
Zuo TT, Zheng RS, Zeng HM, et al. Female breast cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2013[J].Thorac Cancer, 2017, 8(3):214-218.
[2]
Jelovac D, Wolff AC. The adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer[J].Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2012, 13(2):230-239.
[3]
Hyman DM, Piha-Paul SA, Won H, et al. HER kinase inhibition in patients with HER2-and HER3-mutant cancers[J].Nature, 2018, 554(7691):189-194.
[4]
Echavarria I, Lopez-Tarruella S, Marquez-Rodas I, et al. Neratinib for the treatment of HER2-positive early stage breast cancer[J].Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2017, 17(8):669-679.
[5]
National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v.4.0 (CTCAE) [EB/OL].[2018-05-01].

URL    
[6]
Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions[EB/OL]. [2018-05-01].

URL    
[7]
Park JW, Liu MC, Yee D, et al. Adaptive randomization of neratinib in early breast cancer[J].N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(1):11-22.
[8]
Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B, et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(12):1688-1700.
[9]
Martin M, Bonneterre J, Geyer CE Jr, et al. A phase two randomised trial of neratinib monotherapy versus lapatinib plus capecitabine combination therapy in patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49(18):3763-3772.
[10]
Awada A, Colomer R, Inoue K, et al. Neratinib plus pclitaxel vs trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in previously untreated metastatic ERBB2-positive breast cancer: the NEfERT-T randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Oncol, 2016, 2(12):1557-1564.
[11]
Abdel-Rahman O, Ahmed H, ElHalawani H. Risk of elevated transaminases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib: a meta-analysis [J]. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2016, 10(2):223-234.
[12]
Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H. Risk of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury in patients with solid tumors treated with ramucirumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2015, 14(10):1495-1506.
[13]
Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H, Fouad M. Risk of elevated transaminases in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2015, 14(10):1507-1518.
[14]
Deeks ED. Neratinib: first global approval[J].Drugs, 2017, 77(15):1695-1704.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[3] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[4] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[5] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[6] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[7] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[8] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[9] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[10] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[11] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[12] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[13] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[14] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[15] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
阅读次数
全文


摘要